Abstract
Jordan’s position regarding Jerusalem changed over time with the aim to maintain Hashemite legitimacy while coping with many internal and regional challenges, namely, Israel, Palestinian, and Arab neighbours. Jordan’s policy emanates mainly from the quest of the Hashemite monarchs for legitimacy as rulers of Jordan in light of political challenges from the Palestinians of both banks of the Jordan River, from the Israelis and other competing Arab states. The custodianship over the third Islamic holy site—Al-Haram al-Sharif—serves the Hashemite Jordan as a religious symbol of legitimacy, underlining some 700 years of Hashemite leadership of Mecca as servants of the holy shrines of Islam to be complemented with a special attachment to the Nobel Sanctuary in Jerusalem.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Katz, Jordanian Jerusalem, p. 100 and note 44 on p. 175; on the Hashemites’ attachment to Jerusalem see also Abdullah, I. a.-H. (1979).
- 2.
Azaryahu and Reiter.
- 3.
Abduallah, Al-Takmila, p. 88.
- 4.
Gelber, Israeli-Jordanian Dialogue 1948–1953, p. 12.
- 5.
Musa, Ayam la tunsa, p. 347.
- 6.
Reiter, Jerusalem and Its Role in Islamic Solidarity, p. 135.
- 7.
The Guardian, 21 July 1951.
- 8.
Katz, p. 113.
- 9.
Har-Zvi, From Abdullah to Abdullah, p. 83.
- 10.
Later on, Israeli scholars used it to belittle the status of Jerusalem for the Muslims. Reiter, Jerusalem and Its Role In Islamic Solidarity, p. 69.
- 11.
Halabi, Baladiyyat al-Quds al-Arabiyya.
- 12.
Har-Zvi, p. 100.
- 13.
Ibid., p. 95.
- 14.
Katz, p. 148.
- 15.
Ibid. p. 284.
- 16.
Dumper, The Politics of Jerusalem, p. 168.
- 17.
Dumper, Jerusalem Unbound, p. 76.
- 18.
The Jordan Times, 6 August 1988; Reiter, Islamic Institutions, p. 50.
- 19.
Merhav and Giladi, p. 189.
- 20.
Dumper, Jerusalem Unbound, p. 133.
- 21.
Klein, Jerusalem: The Contested City, p. 173.
- 22.
Har-Zvi, p. 254; David, Changes in Jordan’s Positions.
- 23.
David.
- 24.
Har-Zvi, p. 289.
- 25.
David.
- 26.
Reiter, Contested Holy Places in Israel-Palestine, p. 70.
- 27.
David.
- 28.
- 29.
- 30.
- 31.
Reiter, The Eroding Status Quo, p. 29.
- 32.
Al-Rai, 25 September 2014.
- 33.
Al-Rai, 25 September 2014.
- 34.
Reiter, The Eroding Status Quo, p. 141.
References
Abdullah, I. a.-H. (1979). Al-Takmila min Muzakirrat Hadrat Sahib al-Jalalah al-Hashimiyya al-Malik Abdallah ibn al-Husayn. Amman: Umar al-Madani.
Azaryahu, M., & Reiter, Y. (2015). The (geo)politics of interment: An inquiry into the burial of Muhammad Ali in Jerusalem, 1931. Israel Studies, 20(1 Spring), 31–56.
David, A. (2008, February 2). Changes in Jordan’s positions regarding Jerusalem in the last decade. Tel Aviv: ECF. [Hebrew].
Dumper, M. (1997). The politics of Jerusalem since 1967. New York: Columbia University Press.
Dumper, M. (2014). Jerusalem unbound: Geography, history & the future of the Holy City. New York: Columbia University Press.
Gelber, Y. (2004). Israeli-Jordanian dialogue 1948–1953 – Cooperation, conspiracy or collusion? Brighton: Sussex University Press.
Halabi, U. (1993). Baladiyyat al-Quds al-Arabiyya, Al-Quds: PASSIA. [Arabic].
Har-Zvi, S. (2014). From Abdullah to Abdullah: Jordan’s policy on Jerusalem – The regional and national contexts. Dissertation submitted for a Ph.D. degree at Tel Aviv University. [Hebrew].
Katz, K. (2005). Jordanian Jerusalem: Holy places and national spaces. Gainesville: University Press of Florida.
Klein, M. (2001). Jerusalem: The contested city. London: Hurst.
Merhav, R., & Giladi, R. M. (2002). The role of the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan in a future permanent status settlement in Jerusalem. In M. J. Breger & O. Ahimeir (Eds.), Jerusalem, a city and its future (pp. 175–202). Syracuse: Syracuse University Press.
Musa, Suleiman (1982). Ayam la tunsa: Al-Urdun fi Harb 1948. Amman. [Arabic].
Reiter, Y. (1997). Islamic institutions in Jerusalem: Palestinian Muslim administration under Jordanian and Israeli rule. The Hague/London/Boston: Kluwer Law International.
Reiter, Y. (2008). Jerusalem and its role in Islamic solidarity. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Reiter, Y. (2017). The eroding status quo: Power struggles on the Temple mount. Jerusalem: The Jerusalem Institute for Policy Research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Reiter, Y. (2019). Jerusalem: Hashemite Quest for Legitimacy. In: Kumaraswamy, P.R. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9166-8_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9166-8_18
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-9165-1
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-9166-8
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)