Skip to main content

Crimmigration in Border Security? Sorting Crossing through Biometric Identification at Australia’s International Airports

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Crimmigration in Australia
  • 1457 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter, we re-visit crimmigration by examining practices of identification at Australia’s international airports under the aegis of border security. Our purpose here is to open a critical dialogue with some key claims of crimmigration scholars. Introducing insights from cognate fields of critical security studies and international political sociology, and by paying attention to the government’s own theorisation of border security, we argue that border security is a proximate cause of more recent societal effects that can be observed as crimmigration. However, when we examine emergent practices of identification focused on crossing at Australia’s international airports, what we discover is better described as function creep. This opens a space to pose broader questions about crimmigration’s overall usefulness as a guiding theoretical concept for critical theoretical inquiries around immigration and criminal law, especially in an age whose dangers, we contend, may be better understood as surveillance capitalism and the erosion of the normative order associated with liberal democracy. Practices of identification at international airports undertaken for the purpose of border security, we speculate, may be indicative of a move from a liberal society of law and crime to one of surveillance and security aligned with global capitalism.

The authors wish to thank Harley Williamson for her excellent research assitance, and QUT Law for financing Harley’s contribution. We also thank Peter Billings for his editorial assistance, and the anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments on previous versions of this chapter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    ACOSS 2018; Streeck 2014.

  2. 2.

    The purpose of this paper is not to contribute to longstanding debates between the Copenhagen and Paris School. However, Bigo’s description of securitization in this context is serviceable here. Bigo’s account holds that wider definitions produce novel fields dominated by ‘professionals of unease’, who integrate the “threats and various misgivings under the designation of problems concerning state, borders, cities, democracy, and citizenship as if they were the consequences of immigration”(79), transforming “structural difficulties and transformations into elements permitting specific groups to be blamed, even before they have done anything, simply by categorizing them, anticipating profiles of risk from previous trends, and projecting them by generalization upon the potential behaviour of each individual pertaining to the risk category” (Bigo 2002, p. 81).

  3. 3.

    GAMSA 2013; Pezzullo 2013.

  4. 4.

    Pezzullo 2013, 2017.

  5. 5.

    Jones 2017; Nevins 2010.

  6. 6.

    Chambers 2017; McNevin 2008.

  7. 7.

    Michael Pezzullo is the Secretary of the Department of Home Affairs within the Australian Government. He has been responsible for issues relating to maritime security, law enforcement strategies, border intelligence, and national security in Australia over approximately the past decade. See https://www.homeaffairs.gov.au/about-us/who-we-are/our-senior-staff/michael-pezzullo

  8. 8.

    Pezzullo 2013, 2017.

  9. 9.

    Bigo 2001; Salter 2013.

  10. 10.

    See Balibar 2003, p. 92.

  11. 11.

    See Nevins 2010.

  12. 12.

    Jones 2017.

  13. 13.

    Chambers 2015; Pezzullo 2013, 2017.

  14. 14.

    Australian Bureau of Statistics 2018.

  15. 15.

    Streeck 2014, pp. 35–6.

  16. 16.

    Stumpf 2006.

  17. 17.

    Hernández 2014.

  18. 18.

    Although see Doty and Wheatley 2013, p. 435.

  19. 19.

    Aas 2011; Hernandez 2014.

  20. 20.

    Bigo 2002; de Goede 2012.

  21. 21.

    Stanley 2018.

  22. 22.

    See, especially, Pickering 2001; Saxton 2003.

  23. 23.

    Mares 2016; Chambers 2017, pp. 219–247.

  24. 24.

    Harding 2012.

  25. 25.

    Tilly 1985; Young 2003.

  26. 26.

    Stepick 1982.

  27. 27.

    Ratner 1998.

  28. 28.

    See Simon 1998.

  29. 29.

    Kwon 2012.

  30. 30.

    Zilberg 2011.

  31. 31.

    Stanley 2018, p. 521, emphasis added.

  32. 32.

    Ibid.

  33. 33.

    See also Butler’s use of “petty sovereigns” in her interpretation of Agamben in Butler 2006, p. 56.

  34. 34.

    Mr. Dutton, a white, male, right wing Conservative Christian, ex Queensland policeman and multi-millionaire property baron with significant interests in a childcare franchise, has been a vocal crusader in the post-Trump revivification of culture wars.

  35. 35.

    Button 2018.

  36. 36.

    Where the previous minister, Scott Morrison, declared his ministry to be about ‘keeping them out’, Mr. Dutton has sought to ensure his legacy is about ‘kicking them out’. The interesting development is that the non-citizen other has been transposed from asylum seekers trying to get ‘in’, to people who have already been ‘in’ for some time, but deserve to be kicked out. The commonality of both populations is that they serve as a way of staging a conversation about who, rightly, is deserving of the sovereign’s protection (Tilly 1985; Young 2003). We return to reflect upon this point in the conclusion.

  37. 37.

    SBS News 2016; Karp 2018.

  38. 38.

    Department of Home Affairs 2014; Chambers 2017, pp. 3–7.

  39. 39.

    Pezzullo 2014, 2017.

  40. 40.

    Bigo 2001, pp. 91–116.

  41. 41.

    Border security policy has strong bipartisan support in Australia: since the 2013 federal election, when the Coalition’s ‘stop the boats’ slogan contributed to its victory, Labor (the other major party) has scrupulously avoided being wedged on national security. On our interpretation, this has made border security a kind of critical national infrastructure, giving Pezzullo an enormous agency since 2013 to implement his ideas.

  42. 42.

    Pezzullo 2017.

  43. 43.

    Sassen 2006, p. 1.

  44. 44.

    Pezzullo 2014, 2017.

  45. 45.

    See Nevins 2010.

  46. 46.

    These points include: the shift away from family reunion and toward skilled migration (from the late 1970s), political economic and institutional neoliberalisation (from the early 1980s), economic globalisation as the new normal (clearly visible by the late 1990s), a deterrence-led approach to irregular migration (from 1996), the militarisation of Customs and border-enforcing role for the Navy (from 2000), and the amalgamation of Customs, Immigration, and a number of espionage, military, investigative, policing and enforcement roles and functions, first into the Australian Border Force (2015), and then into Home Affairs (2017).

  47. 47.

    Collier 2009; Sassen 2006; Salter 2013.

  48. 48.

    With notable exceptions such as naval and commercial sailors, cruise passengers, and round-the-world yachtspeople.

  49. 49.

    Stevens 2006.

  50. 50.

    Chambers 2015, 2017.

  51. 51.

    Button 2018.

  52. 52.

    To be clear, we are emphatically not suggesting that the Commonwealth is actually capable of what it promises, or that it does work as intended. The key point is that this utopian frame or ideal type (a paradigm, or Weberian gedankenbild) has guided action, orders transformation, and shows the ‘ideal state’ of the system according to Pezzullo’s designs. On the empirical failure here, see, Rizvi 2019.

  53. 53.

    Salter 2006.

  54. 54.

    Adey 2004, 2007.

  55. 55.

    Salter 2007. And see Marmo Ch. 9.

  56. 56.

    Sheller 2010.

  57. 57.

    Adey 2007.

  58. 58.

    Sparke 2006.

  59. 59.

    All non-citizens must have a visa to enter; many visas are extremely expensive. This is a significant source of revenue offsetting the cost of enacting security measures.

  60. 60.

    These are systems-theoretical assumptions, clearly laid out by John Urry. See Urry 2004, p.27.

  61. 61.

    See Pezzullo 2017.

  62. 62.

    Sheller 2010.

  63. 63.

    Sparke 2006.

  64. 64.

    Shachar 2009.

  65. 65.

    To be clear, we’re not asserting an unreconstructed ‘final instance’ economic determinist Marxism, but see Mezzadra and Neilson 2013; Streeck 2016.

  66. 66.

    Sparke 2006.

  67. 67.

    Lyon 2003, 2006, 2007.

  68. 68.

    Chambers 2017, pp. 187–191, 215–216.

  69. 69.

    Stanley 2018.

  70. 70.

    Sparke 2006.

  71. 71.

    Salter 2004; Zureik and Hindle 2004; Mann and Smith 2017.

  72. 72.

    Wilson 2007; Mann and Smith 2017; Smith et al. 2018.

  73. 73.

    Wheeler 2005.

  74. 74.

    Ibid. p. 73.

  75. 75.

    Marx 2006; Dahl and Sætnan 2009; Tzanou 2010.

  76. 76.

    Fox 2001, p. 261.

  77. 77.

    Tilly 1985; Young 2003.

  78. 78.

    Stumpf 2006, pp. 396–418.

  79. 79.

    ‘Creep’ implies a level of volitional action or intentionality, ‘drift’ need not: I leave it to others to decide which is more appropriate.

  80. 80.

    Migration Legislation Amendment (Identification and Authentication) Act 2004 (Cth).

  81. 81.

    Neilson 2015; Mann and Smith 2017.

  82. 82.

    Wilson 2006, 2007.

  83. 83.

    Could one sensibly speak of cr-emigration in such cases?

  84. 84.

    Malet 2015.

  85. 85.

    See Kapferer and Morris 2003 for one perceptive analysis of this cluster of issues and its co-creative contexts in the mid 1990s.

  86. 86.

    See, further, Chapter eight by Ananian-Welsh.

  87. 87.

    Parliamentary Joint Committee on Intelligence and Security 2014; Neilson 2015.

  88. 88.

    Neilson 2015.

  89. 89.

    Ericson and Haggerty 2006; Haggerty and Ericson 2003.

  90. 90.

    Stumpf 2006.

  91. 91.

    Home Affairs was established on December 20th, 2017. This followed the establishment of Border Force, on July 1st, 2015, which followed the transformation of the Department of Immigration and Citizenship into the Department of Immigration and Border Protection, in 2013.

  92. 92.

    Although we have qualms as regards to the concept of consent in border control contexts more generally, particularly where entry or refusal is predicated on the provision of personal information or computerised devices or social media accounts.

  93. 93.

    See, Cover 1986; Tilly 1985; Young 2003.

  94. 94.

    The provisions include: “when a non-citizen applies for a visa (ss 40 and 46); at Australia’s borders when a person (either a citizen or a non-citizen) is arriving (s 166), travelling from port to port on an overseas vessel (s 170) or departing the country (s 175); where an officer reasonably suspects a person is a non-citizen and requires them to present certain evidence of being a lawful non-citizen (s 188); and where a non-citizen is detained as their visa is liable to cancellation under certain provisions in the Migration Act (s 192)” (Nielsen 2015).

  95. 95.

    Butler 2006, p. 56.

  96. 96.

    Triple M 2017.

  97. 97.

    Lauder (2015).

  98. 98.

    Galloway, Mann and Goldenfien (2018).

  99. 99.

    Mann and Smith 2017.

  100. 100.

    Garvie et al. 2016.

  101. 101.

    Sparke 2006.

  102. 102.

    Staff Writers 2015.

  103. 103.

    Reilly 2015.

  104. 104.

    Wilson 2006.

  105. 105.

    Haggerty and Ericson 2003.

  106. 106.

    Ibid.

  107. 107.

    Amoore 2011.

  108. 108.

    Hu 2017.

  109. 109.

    Aas 2004.

  110. 110.

    Noble 2018.

  111. 111.

    Garvie et al. 2016; Ferguson 2017.

  112. 112.

    Anderson 2016; Hogg and Brown 2018.

  113. 113.

    Gajjala and Birzescu 2011; Jin 2015; Thatcher et al. 2016; Mann and Daly 2018.

  114. 114.

    Connell 2007; Kukutai and Taylor 2016; Lovett 2016; Pool 2016; Yap and Yu 2016; Mann and Daly 2018.

  115. 115.

    Triple M 2017.

  116. 116.

    Stanley 2018.

  117. 117.

    Pezzullo 2014, 2017.

  118. 118.

    Young 2003.

  119. 119.

    Brown 2015.

  120. 120.

    Zuboff 2015, 2019.

  121. 121.

    Garland 2001.

  122. 122.

    Scheuerman 2000.

  123. 123.

    Brown et al. 2018.

References

Legislation

  • Australian Passports Act 2005 (Cth)

    Google Scholar 

  • Counter-Terrorism Legislation Amendment (Foreign Fighters) Act 2014 (Cth)

    Google Scholar 

  • Migration Act 1958 (Cth)

    Google Scholar 

  • Migration Amendment (Strengthening Biometrics Integrity) Act 2015 (Cth)

    Google Scholar 

  • Migration Legislation Amendment (Identification and Authentication) Act 2004 (Cth)

    Google Scholar 

Secondary Sources

  • Aas K F (2004) From narrative to database: technological change and penal culture. Punishment & Society 6(4):379–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aas K F (2011) Crimmigrant bodies and bona fide travelers: Surveillance, citizenship and global governance. Theoretical Criminology 15(3):331–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adey P (2004) Surveillance at the airport: surveilling mobility/mobilising surveillance. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 36(8):1365–1380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adey P (2007) May I have your attention: airport geographies of spectatorship, position, and (im)mobility. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 25(3):515–536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amoore L (2011) Data derivatives: on the emergence of a security risk calculus for our times. Theory, Culture and Society 28(6):24–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson C (2016) Transnational histories of penal transportation: punishment, labour and governance in the British imperial world, 1788–1939. Australian Historical Studies 47(3):381–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics (2018) 3401.0 – Overseas arrivals and departures, Australia, Dec 2018. Available via Australian Bureau of Statistics. http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/products/961B6B53B87C130ACA2574030010BD05. Accessed 1 March 2019

  • Australian Council of Social Service (2018) Inequality in Australia 2018. Australian Council of Social Service and University of New South Wales. https://www.acoss.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/Inequality-in-Australia-2018.pdf. Accessed 1 March 2019

  • Balibar E (2003) We, the people of Europe? Reflections on transnational citizenship. Princeton University Press, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Bigo D (2001) The möbius ribbon of internal and external security(ies). In: Albert A (ed) Identities, borders, orders: rethinking international relations theory. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, p 91–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Bigo D (2002) Security and immigration: toward a critique of the governmentality of unease. Alternatives 27:63–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown W (2015) Undoing the demos: Neoliberalism’s stealth revolution. MIT Press, Boston

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brown W, Gordon P, Pensky M (2018) Authoritarianism: three inquiries in critical theor., University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Butler J (2006) Precarious life: powers of mourning and violence. Verso, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Button J (2018) The minister, Pezzullo and the demise of immigration. Available via The Monthly.https://www.themonthly.com.au/issue/2018/february/1517403600/james-button/dutton-s-dark-victory. Accessed 1 March 2019

  • Chambers P (2015) The embrace of border security: maritime jurisdiction, national sovereignty, and the geopolitics of operation sovereign borders. Geopolitics 20(2):404–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers P (2017) Border security: shores of politics, horizons of justice. Routledge, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Collier SJ (2009) Topologies of power: Foucault’s analysis of political government beyond governmentality. Theory, Culture and Society 26(6):78–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cover R (1986) Violence and the word. Yale Law Journal 95:12601–1629

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahl J, Sætnan A (2009) It all happened so slowly – on controlling function creep in forensic DNA databases. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice 37(3):83–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Goede M (2012) Speculative Security: The Politics of Pursuing Terrorist Monies. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Department of Home Affairs (2014) Blueprint for Integration. Commonwealth of Australia. Available via Canberra Times. http://images.canberratimes.com.au/file/2014/10/30/5934807/ImmigrationBlueprintForIntegration.pdf. Accessed 1 March 2019

  • Doty R, Wheatley E (2013) Private detention and the immigration industrial complex. International Political Sociology 7(4):426–443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ericson RV, Haggerty KD (eds) (2006) The new politics of surveillance and visibility. University of Toronto Press, Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson S (2017) The rise of big data policing: surveillance, race, and the future of law enforcement. NYU Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Finnane M, Kaladelfos A (2019) Australia’s long history of immigration, policing and the criminal law. In Billings P (ed) Crimmigration in Australia. Law Politics and Society. Springer. Chap. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox R (2001) Someone to watch over us: back to the panopticon? Criminal Justice 1(3):251–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gajjala R, Birzescu A (2011) Digital imperialism through online social/financial networks. Economic and Political Weekly 46(13):95–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Galloway A, Mann M, Goldenfien J (2018) Review of the identity-mating services bill 2018 and the Australian passports amendment (identity-matching services) bill 2018, Parliamentary Joint Committee on Intelligence and Security. Canberra, ACT. Available via: https://eprints.qut.edu.au/116911/. Accessed 10 April 2019

  • GAMSA (2013) Guide to Australian Maritime Security Arrangements. Australian Government, Canberra. Available via Department of Home Affairs. http://www.bpc.gov.au/webdata/resources/files/gamsa_2013_web.pdf. Accessed 1 March 2019

  • Garland D (2001) The culture of control: Crime and social order in contemporary society. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Garvie C, Bedoya AM, Frankle J (2016) The perpetual line-up: unregulated police face recognition in America. In: Georgetown Law Centre on Privacy and Technology. Available via Perpetual Line-Up. https://www.perpetuallineup.org/. Accessed 1 March 2019

  • Gerard A (this volume). What’s in a theory? reflecting on crimmigration, border control and penal power in Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Haggerty KD, Ericson RV (2003) The surveillant assemblage. The British Journal of Sociology 51(4):605–622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harding J (2012) Border vigils: keeping migrants out of the rich world. Verso, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hernández CC (2014) The life of crimmigration law. Denver University Law Review 92:697–700

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogg R, Brown D (2018) Rethinking penal modernism from the global south: the case of convict transportation to Australia. In: Carrington R (ed) The Palgrave handbook of criminology and the global south. Palgrave Macmillan, London, p 751–774

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hu M (2017) Crimmigration-counterterrorism. University of Wisconsin Law Review 5:955–1002

    Google Scholar 

  • Jin DY (2015) Digital platforms, imperialism and political culture. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones R (2017) Violent borders: refugees and the right to move. Verso, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapferer B, Morris B (2003 The Australian society of the state egalitarian ideologies and new directions in exclusionary practice. Social Analysis: The International Journal of Social and Cultural Practice 47(3):80–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Karp P (2018) Australia considers fast-track visas for white South African farmers. 14 March 2018. Available via The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2018/mar/14/dutton-considers-fast-track-visas-for-white-south-african-farmers. Accessed 8 April 2019

  • Kukutai T, Taylor J (2016) Data sovereignty for indigenous peoples: current practice and future needs. In: Kukutai T, Taylor (eds) Indigenous data sovereignty: towards an agenda. ANU Press, Canberra, p 1–23

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kwon SA (2012) Deporting Cambodian refugees: youth activism, state reform, and imperial statecraft. Positions 20(3):737–762

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lauder S (2015) The capability: Government’s national facial recognition plan raises privacy concerns. 17 December 2015. Available via ABC News. http://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-12-17/governments-facial-recognition-system-sparks-privacy-concerns/7035980. Accessed 1 March 2019

  • Lovett R (2016) Aboriginal and Torres Strait islander community wellbeing: identified needs for statistical capacity. In Kukutai T, Taylor J (eds) Indigenous data sovereignty: towards an agenda. ANU Press, Canberra, p 213–232

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyon D (2006) Airport screening, surveillance, and social sorting: Canadian responses to 9/11 in context. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice 48(3):397–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyon D (2007) Surveillance, security and social sorting: emerging research priorities. International criminal justice review 17(3):161–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyon D (ed) (2003) Surveillance as social sorting: privacy, risk, and digital discrimination. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Malet D (2015) Foreign fighter mobilisation and persistence in a global context. Terrorism and Political Violence 27(3):454–473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mann M, Daly A (2018) (Big) data and the north-in-south: informational imperialism and digital colonialism in Australia. Special issue on big data from the south: beyond data universalism. Television and New Media. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476418806091

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mann M, Smith M (2017). Automated facial recognition technology: recent developments and approaches to oversight. University of New South Wales Law Journal 40:121–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mares P (2016) Not quite Australian: How temporary migration is changing the nation. Text Publishing, Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx GT (2006) Ethics for the new surveillance. The Information Society 14(3):171–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNevin A (2008) The liberal paradox and the politics of asylum in Australia. Australian Journal of Political Science 42(4):611–630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mezzadra S, Neilson B (2013) Border as method, or: the multiplication of labor. Duke University Press, Durham

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Neilson M (2015) Migration Amendment (Strengthening Biometrics Integrity) Bill 2015, Bills Digest No. 111 2014–2015. Available via Parliament of Australia. https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/bd/bd1415a/15bd111#_Toc421264769. Accessed 1 March 2019

  • Nevins J (2010) Operation gatekeeper and beyond: the war on illegals and the remaking of the US–Mexico boundary. Routledge, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Noble SU (2018) Algorithms of oppression: how search engines reinforce racism. NYU Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Parliamentary Joint Committee on Intelligence and Security (2014) Inquiry into the Counter-Terrorism Legislation Amendment (Foreign Fighters) Bill 2014. Available via Parliament of Australia. https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Joint/Intelligence_and_Security/Counter-Terrorism_Legislation_Amendment_Foreign_Fighters_Bill_2014. Accessed 1 March 2019

  • Pezzullo M (2014) Sovereignty in an age of global interdependency: the role of borders. Department of Immigration and Border Protection; Australian Strategic Policy Institute. Available via Parlinfo. https://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/search/display/display.w3p;query=Id:%22library/jrnart/3707339%22. Accessed 10 April 2019

  • Pezzullo M (2013) CEO speech to university of canberra national security secture series: new thinking about borders, 30 August 2013. Available via Australian Border Force News Room. https://newsroom.abf.gov.au/releases/ceo-speech-to-university-of-canberra-national-security-lecture-series Accessed 2 July 2019

    Google Scholar 

  • Pezzullo M (2017) Secretary’s remarks to the trans-tasman business circle [Press Release]. 13 October 2018. Available via Department of Home Affairs. https://www.homeaffairs.gov.au/about/news-media/speeches-and-messages/2017/secretary-remarks-to-the-trans-tasman-business-circle. Accessed 10 April 2019

  • Pickering S (2001) Common sense and original deviancy: news discourses and asylum seekers in Australia. Journal of Refugee Studies 14(2):169–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pool I (2016) Colonialism’s and postcolonialism’s fellow traveller: the collection, use and misuse of data on indigenous people. In Kukutai T, Taylor J (eds) Indigenous data sovereignty: towards an agenda. ANU Press, Canberra p 57–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Ratner M (1998) How we closed the guantanamo HIV camp: the intersection of politics and litigation. Harvard Human Rights Journal 11:187–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Reilly C (2015) Fly the skies with a cloud passport: government proposes digital trial. 30 October 2016. Available via CNet.https://www.cnet.com/au/news/government-proposes-cloud-passport-trial-for-document-free-travel/. Accessed 1 March 2019

  • Rizvi A (2019) Worst ever immigration minister: asylum seekers jet in under Dutton’s nose. 9 March 2019. Available via The Age. https://www.theage.com.au/national/worst-ever-immigration-minister-asylum-seekers-jet-in-under-dutton-s-nose-20190302-p511d8.html. Accessed 8 April 2019

  • Salter MB (2004) Passports, mobility, and security: how smart can the border be? International Studies Perspectives 5(1):71–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salter MB (2006) The global visa regime and the political technologies of the international self: borders, bodies, biopolitics. Alternatives 31(2):167–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salter MB (2007) Governmentalities of an airport: heterotopia and confession. International Political Sociology 1(1):49–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salter MB (2013) To make move and let stop: mobility and the assemblage of circulation. Mobilities 8(1):7–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sassen S (2006) Territory, authority, rights from medieval to global assemblages. Princeton University Press, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Saxton A (2003) I certainly don’t want people like that here: the discursive construction of asylum seekers. Media International Australia 109(1):109–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SBS News (2016) Political correctness gone mad: Dutton furious over Christmas carol change. 15 December 2016. https://www.sbs.com.au/news/political-correctness-gone-mad-dutton-furious-over-christmas-carol-change. Accessed 1 March 2019

  • Scheuerman WE (2000) The twilight of legality? Globalisation and American democracy. Global Society 14(1):53–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon J (1998) Refugees in a carceral age: the rebirth of immigration prisons in the United States. Public Culture 10(3):577–607

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shachar A (2009) The birthright lottery: citizenship and global inequality. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sheller M (2010) Air mobilities on the US–Caribbean border: open skies and closed gates. The Communication Review 13(4):269–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith M, Mann M, Urbas G (2018) Biometrics, crime and security. Routledge, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sparke M (2006) A neoliberal nexus: economy, security and the biopolitics of citizenship on the border. Political Geography 25(2):151–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Staff Writers (2015) Australia considering passport-less travel. 29 October 2015. Available via IT News. https://www.itnews.com.au/news/australia-considering-passport-less-travel-411218. Accessed 1 March 2019

  • Stepick A (1982) Haitian boat people: a study in the conflicting forces shaping US immigration policy. Law and Contemporary Problems 45(2):63–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanley E (2018) Expanding crimmigration: The detention and deportation of New Zealanders from Australia. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology 51(4):519–536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens DM (2006) To disrupt, deter and deny: Sealing australia’s maritime borders. In: Elleman BA, Paine SCM (eds) Naval blockades and seapower: strategies and counter-strategies, 1805–2005. Routledge, London p 225–236

    Google Scholar 

  • Streeck W (2014) How will capitalism end? New Left Review 87:35–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Streeck W (2016) How will capitalism end? essays on a failing system. Verso, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Stumpf J (2006) The crimmigration crisis: immigrants, crime, and sovereign power. American University Law Review 56(2):367–420

    Google Scholar 

  • Thatcher J, O’Sullivan D, Mahmoudi D (2016) Data colonialism through accumulation by dispossession: new metaphors for daily data. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 34(6):990–1006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilly C (1985) War making and state making as organized crime. In: Evans P, Rueschemeyer D, Skocpol T (eds) Bringing the state back in. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 161–191

    Google Scholar 

  • Triple M (2017) Peter Dutton explains the situation around Shane Martin’s visa. 6 December 2017. Available via The Hot Breakfast. https://www.triplem.com.au/story/peter-dutton-explains-the-situation-around-shane-martins-visa-72047. Accessed 1 March 2019

  • Tzanou M (2010) The EU as an emerging surveillance society: The function creep case study and challenges to privacy and data protection. Vienna Online Journal on International Constitutional Law 4(3):407–427

    Google Scholar 

  • Urry J (2004) The system of automobility, Theory, Culture and Society 21(4–5):25–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler J (2005) An Independent Review of Airport Security and Policing for the Government of Australia (The Wheeler Report), Commonwealth of Australia. Available via Australian Government. https://apo.org.au/sites/default/files/resource-files/2005/10/apo-nid1917-1156721.pdf. Accessed 1 March 2019

  • Wilson D (2006) Biometrics, borders and the ideal suspect. In: Pickering S, Weber L (eds) Borders, mobility and technologies of control. Springer, Amsterdam, p 87–109

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson D (2007) Australian biometrics and global surveillance. International Criminal Justice Review 17(3):207–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yap M, Yu E (2016) Data sovereignty for the Yawuru in Western Australia. In Kukutai T, and Taylor J (eds) Indigenous data sovereignty: Towards an Agenda. ANU Press, Canberra, p 233–252

    Google Scholar 

  • Young IM (2003) The logic of masculinist protection: reflections on the current security state. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 29(1):1–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zilberg E (2011) Space of detention: the making of a transnational gang crisis between Los Angeles and San Salvador. Duke University Press, Durham

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Zuboff S (2015) Big other: surveillance capitalism and the prospects of an information civilization. Journal of Information Technology 30(1):75–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuboff S (2019) The age of surveillance capitalism: the fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. Public Affairs, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Zureik E, Hindle K (2004) Governance, security and technology: the case of biometrics. Studies in Political Economy 73(1):113–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zureik E, Salter MB (eds) (2005) global surveillance and policing: borders, security, identity, portland, Willan, Portland

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Chambers .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Chambers, P., Mann, M. (2019). Crimmigration in Border Security? Sorting Crossing through Biometric Identification at Australia’s International Airports. In: Billings, P. (eds) Crimmigration in Australia. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9093-7_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9093-7_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-9092-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-9093-7

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics