Abstract
The widespread environmental degradation caused by human activities has resulted in the advent of a new era: the Anthropocene. In responding to this dramatic change, the system of rules regulating human behaviors should be reshaped. In the process of self-reflection on its ecological crisis, China has developed the idea of a transition to an “ecological civilization”. Therefore, environmental law in China will play a crucial role in this process which requires a thorough re-examination and transformation of existing law and institutions. This chapter is comprised of three sections. First, the strategy of “ecological civilization” initiated by the Chinese government and its relevance to the Anthropocene are discussed. The concept of the Anthropocene and ecological civilization both require adjustment in humans’ attitudes towards nature and human interactions with nature. Next, the chapter examines the three main challenges to the transformations of environmental law in China in moving towards “ecological civilization”. The interactions between the rules of supra-national, national and local levels constitutes the first challenge. It is argued that efforts should be made both in ways of “top-down” and “bottom-up”. The second challenge is the coordination of the administrative and the party accountability mechanism in terms of implementation. Thirdly, fragmented rules on the legal standing for environmental litigation require systematization in order to enhance the access to environmental justice. The concluding section broadens the discussion to encourage legal scholars to adopt inter-disciplinary and trans-disciplinary methods to reposition the role of environmental law in China in a comprehensive and integrated way.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Administrative Litigation Act (2017) http://en.pkulaw.cn/Display.aspx?LookType=1&Lib=law&Cgid=297379&Id=23601&SearchKeyword=&SearchCKeyword=&paycode=
Bergmann M et al (2012) Methods for transdisciplinary research. Campus Verlag, Frankfurl, New York, p 41
Civil Procedure Act (2012) http://en.pkulaw.cn/display.aspx?cgid=297379&lib=law
Crutzen PJ, Stoermer EF (2000) The Anthropocene. Glob Chang Newslett 41:17–18
Environment Protection Act (2014) http://www.law-lib.com/law/law_view.asp?id=6229
Gare A (2017) From sustainable development to ecological civilization: winning the war for survival. Cosm Hist: J Nat Soc Philos 3:130–153
Glocalization (2013) Encyclopedia Britannic. https://www.britannica.com/topic/glocalization
Government implements river chief system across the country (2018). China Daily. http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/a/201807/17/WS5b4d9664a310796df4df6f21.html
Hamilton C (2015) Getting the Anthropocene so wrong. Anthropocene Rev 1:1–6
Липицкий BC (1984) Пyти фopмиpoвaния экoлoгичecкoй кyльтypы личнocти в ycлoвияx зpeлoгo coциaлизмa. Teopия нayчнoгo кoммyнизмa 12:43 (Lipitsky BC (1984) The way of the formation of ecological culture under the conditions of socialism. Theory Sci Commun 12:43)
Jahn T et al (2012) Transdisciplinarity: between mainstreaming and marginalization. Ecol Econ 79:1–10
Jiang CY (2008) Towards ecological civilization. Guangming Daily. http://theory.people.com.cn/GB/40557/179596/179599/10784102.html
Kajikawa Y (2018) Research core and framework of sustainability science. Sustain Sci 3:215–239
Kim R, Bosselmann K (2015) Operationalizing sustainable development: ecological integrity as a grundnorm of international law. Rev Eur Comp & Int Environ Law 24:194–208
Lewis SL, Maslin MA (2015) Defining the Anthropocene. Nature 519:171–180
Lidskog R, Waterton C (2016) Anthropocene—a cautious welcome from environmental sociology? Environ Sociol 2(4):395–406
Lin YT (1948) The Wisdom of Lao tse. Modem Library, New York
Liu HL (2018) Think of the river chief system legislation. Present Day Law Sci 16:15–23
Malm A, Hornborg A (2014) The geology of mankind? A critique of the Anthropocene narrative. Anthropocene Rev. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/
Oldfield F et al (2014) The Anthropocene review: its significance, implications and the rationale for a new transdisciplinary journal. The Anthropocene Rev 1(1):3–7
Pohl C et al (2017) Ten reflective steps for rendering research societally relevant. Ecol Perspect Sci Soc 9:43–51
Report to the 18th National Congress of the Communist Party of China (2012). http://www.china.org.cn/china/18th_cpc_congress/2012-11/16/content_27137540_8.htm
Report to the 19th National Congress of the Communist Party of China (2017). http://news.xinhuanet.com/politics/19cpcnc/2017-10/27/c_1121867529.htm
Robertson R (1995) Glocalization: time-space and homogeneity-heterogeneity. In: Featherstone M et al (eds) Global modernities. Sage, London, pp 25–44
Stern RE (2014) The political logic of China’s new environmental courts. China J 72:53–74
Taylor P (2013) The global perspective: convergence of International and municipal law. In: Bosselmann K et al (eds) Environmental law for a sustainable society, 2nd edn. New Zealand Centre for Environmental Law, Auckland, pp 143–166
The Supreme People’s Court of China (2017) White paper on environment and natural resource adjudication (2016–2017). http://www.court.gov.cn/zixun-xiangqing-50682.html
Wang SY (2001) Ecological law in Russia. Wuhan University Press, Wuhan
Ye QJ (1984) Eco-agriculture: the future of agriculture in China. Chongqing Publishing, Chongqing
Zhou D (2018) A feasible way to improve the environmental legislative quality in China: reasonable allocation of legislative issues between the central and local authorities. Local Legis 4:90–103
Zhu M (2017) On the development and promotion of river governor system. Environ Prot 45:58–61
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Zhou, D. (2019). Moving Towards “Ecological Civilization” in the Anthropocene: The Future of Environmental Law in China. In: Lim, M. (eds) Charting Environmental Law Futures in the Anthropocene. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9065-4_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9065-4_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-9064-7
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-9065-4
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)