Rational Choice and Revealed Preference: Theoretical Representation of Preference Relations Leading to the Best Choice

  • Kazuhisa TakemuraEmail author


Traditional economics has relied on the assumption of “rational homo economicus.”


Rational choice Best option Revealed preference Indifference curve Marginal substitution rate 


  1. Feldman, M. A., & Serrano, R. (2005). Welfare Economics and social choice theory. New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
  2. Krantz, D. H., Luce, R. D., Suppes, P., & Tversky, A. (1971). Foundations of measurement, Vol. 1: Additive and polynomial representations. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  3. Nakamura, K. (1992). On the nature of intransitivity in human preferential judgments. In V. Novak, J. Ramik, M. Mares, M. Cherny, & J. Nekola (Eds.), Fuzzy approach to reasoning and decision making (pp. 147–162). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Scott, D., & Suppes, P. (1958). Foundational aspects of theories of measurement. The Journal of Symbolic Logic, 23, 113–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Sen, K. A. (1970). Collective choice and social welfare. London, UK: Oliver and Boyd.Google Scholar
  6. Takemura, K. (2007). Ambiguous comparative judgment: Fuzzy set model and data analysis. Japanese Psychological Research, 49, 148–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Takemura, K. (2012). Ambiguity and social judgment: fuzzy set model and data analysis. In E. P. Dadios (Ed.), Fuzzy logic-algorithms, techniques and implementations (pp. 1–22). Shinjuku City, Japan: IntechOpen Access Publisher.Google Scholar
  8. Tversky, A. (1969). Intransitivity of preferences. Psychological Review, 76, 31–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyWaseda UniversityTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations