Advertisement

Rational Choice and Revealed Preference: Theoretical Representation of Preference Relations Leading to the Best Choice

  • Kazuhisa TakemuraEmail author
Chapter
  • 355 Downloads

Abstract

Traditional economics has relied on the assumption of “rational homo economicus.”

Keywords

Rational choice Best option Revealed preference Indifference curve Marginal substitution rate 

References

  1. Feldman, M. A., & Serrano, R. (2005). Welfare Economics and social choice theory. New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
  2. Krantz, D. H., Luce, R. D., Suppes, P., & Tversky, A. (1971). Foundations of measurement, Vol. 1: Additive and polynomial representations. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  3. Nakamura, K. (1992). On the nature of intransitivity in human preferential judgments. In V. Novak, J. Ramik, M. Mares, M. Cherny, & J. Nekola (Eds.), Fuzzy approach to reasoning and decision making (pp. 147–162). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Scott, D., & Suppes, P. (1958). Foundational aspects of theories of measurement. The Journal of Symbolic Logic, 23, 113–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Sen, K. A. (1970). Collective choice and social welfare. London, UK: Oliver and Boyd.Google Scholar
  6. Takemura, K. (2007). Ambiguous comparative judgment: Fuzzy set model and data analysis. Japanese Psychological Research, 49, 148–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Takemura, K. (2012). Ambiguity and social judgment: fuzzy set model and data analysis. In E. P. Dadios (Ed.), Fuzzy logic-algorithms, techniques and implementations (pp. 1–22). Shinjuku City, Japan: IntechOpen Access Publisher.Google Scholar
  8. Tversky, A. (1969). Intransitivity of preferences. Psychological Review, 76, 31–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyWaseda UniversityTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations