Skip to main content

How Do You Catch Drug Smugglers in the Open Sea?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Narcosubmarines
  • 182 Accesses

Abstract

As the seas have been increasingly used by drug smugglers, the Colombian Navy has played a central role in the interdiction of illicit drug flows. The author provides evidence of the many spaces in which the technologies and practices for interdiction are shaped. Long-term plans are an attempt to crystalise the role of the Navy as an able agency in the War on Drugs, there, visions and images of the enemy are entangled. During a Maritime Interdiction Operation (MIO), the Navy personnel deploy diverse forms of knowledge. The patrol boat is key, and its qualities and characteristics are constantly reviewed and adjusted by the Navy personal in the field according to the perception of the enemy capabilities. Intelligence is crucial for the Navy actions, and helps to reduce uncertainty. The author argues that Ignorance Studies are useful to understand the paradoxical results of the Navy actions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The participation of the US military in interdiction operations was sanctioned in 1989 by the National Defence Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1989. To know more about the militarisation of the WoD in Latin America, see McDermott (2018).

  2. 2.

    The certification is a unilateral decision of the US Government, specifically the executive branch. As a matter of internal policies, the US Government established a series of legal mechanisms through administrative and congressional procedures that require the President to annually provide his/her judgment on the efforts of different countries regarding issues affecting the security of the United States, such as nuclear security, terrorism, and narcotrafficking.

  3. 3.

    The US Navy, in its Naval Operational Concepts, establishes two different concepts for Maritime Interdiction Operations: ‘Maritime Interception Operations: monitor, query, and board merchant vessels to enforce sanctions against other nations such as those embodied in United Nations Security Council Resolutions and prevent the transport of restricted goods.’ Moreover, interception operations are carried out by LEAs, mainly the Coast Guard Unit (U.S. NAVY, 2010). According to the NATO, a Maritime Interdiction Operation ‘encompasses seaborne enforcement measures to intercept the movement of certain types of designated items into or out of a nation or specific area’ (NATO, 2005).

  4. 4.

    COMANDO ARMADA, Disposición 016/ 06 de COARC, Normas de Procedimiento Operacional.

  5. 5.

    Development Plan for the Coast Guard of the National Navy.

  6. 6.

    The company in charge of building the Colombian version of the Dolphin was Eduardo Londoño e Hijos Sucesores S. A. (Eduardoño S.A.), based in Medellin with offices in Bogota, Buenaventura, and Cartagena. This company mostly built small boats in polyester and GFRP (Glass-Fiber Reinforced Plastic) between 4 m and 13 m long to be used in transport, fisheries, and sports activities, until it was commissioned by the Navy to construct the Dolphin.

  7. 7.

    Maritime infantry and the Antinarcotics Police also used the Dolphins and equipped them with 1×12.7 mm or 2×7.62 mm automatic guns.

  8. 8.

    Each boat cost 40 million pesos in 1997, compared to 80 million pesos for a similar model off the shelf.

  9. 9.

    The design and building process took five months, with a month of trials and adjustments.

  10. 10.

    As noted in Chap. 3, smugglers also used a vast array of artisanal vessels, built in makeshift shipyards.

  11. 11.

    In Spanish, Corporación de Ciencia y Tecnología para el Desarrollo de la Industrial Naval, Marítima y Fluvial.

  12. 12.

    Together with a reliance type boat discarded by the US Coast Guard, where it was on service from 1968 to 2001. It was renamed Valle del Cauca and refitted to perform patrol duties in the Pacific Ocean.

References

  • Armada República de Colombia. (2003). Plan Estratégico Naval 2003–2006. Bogotá, DC: Armada República de Colombia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armada República de Colombia. (2005). La Aviacion Naval y el Cuerpo de Guardacostas. A La Mar, 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armada República de Colombia. (2007). Plan Estrategico Naval, 2007–2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armada República de Colombia. (2011). Plan Estratégico Naval 2011–2014. Bogotá, DC: Armada República de Colombia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armada República de Colombia. (2015). Navy’s Strategy to Fight Transnational Crimes. Naval Forces, International Forum for Maritime Power, XXXVI(SPECIAL ISSUE 2015), 29–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bright, D. A., & Delaney, J. J. (2013). Evolution of a Drug Trafficking Network: Mapping Changes in Network Structure and Function Across Time. Global Crime, 14(2–3), 238–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Decker, S. H., & Townsend Chapman, M. (2008). Drug Smugglers on Drug Smuggling Lessons from the Inside. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Echeverry, J. C. (2004). Colombia and the war on drugs: How short is the short run? Bogotá, Colombia: CEDE, Universidad de los Andes.

    Google Scholar 

  • El Tiempo. (1994, September). Parte del Atlántico, a Merced de los Narcos. El Tiempo. Retrieved from http://www.eltiempo.com/archivo/documento/MAM-202862

  • Franklin, J. (2009). Así son los submarinos hechizos que transportan hasta 10.000 kilos de cocaína. Bogotá, Colombia: Don Juan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gootenberg, P. (2005). Talking Like a State: Drugs, Borders, and the Language of Control. In W. van Schendel & A. Itty (Eds.), Illicit Flows and Criminal Things States, Borders, and the Other Side of Globalization (pp. 101–127). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gootenberg, P. (2009). Talking About the Flow: Drugs, Borders, and the Discourse of Drug Control. Cultural Critique, 71(1), 13–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gross, M., & McGoey, L. (2015). Routledge International Handbook of Ignorance Studies. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guerrero Castro, J. (2017). Maritime Interdiction in the War on Drugs in Colombia: Practices, Technologies and Technological Innovation. Edinburgh, UK: The University of Edinburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, L. K., & Jackson, P. (2010). On Uncertainty and the Limits of Intelligence. In L. K. Johnson (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of National Security Intelligence (pp. 452–471). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kawell, J. (2001, May 1). Closing the Latin American air-bridge: A disturbing history. Foreign Policy in Focus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenney, M. (2003). Intelligence Games: Comparing the Intelligence Capabilities of Law Enforcement Agencies and Drug Trafficking Enterprises. International Journal of Intelligence and CounterIntelligence, 16(2), 212–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenney, M. (2007). The Architecture of Drug Trafficking: Network Forms of Organisation in the Colombian Cocaine Trade. Global Crime, 8(3), 233–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Law, J. (2003). Ordering and Obduracy. Lancaster, UK: Centre for Science Studies, Lancaster University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, C. (2012). Desperate Mobilities: Logistics, Security and the Extra-Logistical Knowledge of ‘Appropriation’. Geopolitics, 17(2), 355–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Másmela, C. C., & Tickner, A. B. (2017). Desecuritizing the ‘War on Drugs’. In M. A. G. Suarez, R. D. Villa, & B. Weiffen (Eds.), Power Dynamics and Regional Security in Latin America (pp. 295–318). London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • McDermott, J. (2018). Militarisation of the Drug War in Latin America: A Policy Cycle Set to Continue? In T. Reitano, S. Jesperson, & L. Bird Ruiz-Benitez de Lugo (Eds.), Militarised Responses to Transnational Organised Crime: The War on Crime (pp. 259–277). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • McLay, J. M. (2015). Joint Interagency Task Forces; the Right Model to Combat Transnational Organised Crime? Newport, RI: Naval War College (U.S.), Joint Military Operations Department.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mejía, D., & Restrepo, P. (2008). The War on Illegal Drug Production and Trafficking: An Economic Evaluation of Plan Colombia (p. 60). Bogotá, DC: Universidad de Los Andes; CEDE-Centro de Estudios sobre Desarrollo Económico.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministerio de Defensa. (2008). Un año para la historia República de Colombia Ministerio de Defensa Nacional Informe anual Ministerio de Defensa | Julio 2007–Julio 2008. Bogotá, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moloeznik, M. P. (2003). The Military Dimension of the War on Drugs in Mexico and Colombia. Crime, Law and Social Change, 40(1), 107–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munsing, E., & Lamb, C. J. (2011). Joint Interagency Task Force-South: The Best Known, Least Understood Interagency Success. Washington, DC: Institute for National Strategic Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • NATO. (2005). Allied Maritime Interdiction Operations. Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • Proctor, R. N. (2008). Agnotology a missing term to describe the cultural production of ignorance (and its study). In R. N. Proctor & L. Schiebinger (Eds.), Agnotology the making and unmaking of ignorance (pp. 1–36). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rappert, B. (2015). Sensing Absence: How to See What Isn’t There in the Study of Science and Security. In B. Rappert & B. Balmer (Eds.), Absence in Science, Security and Policy: From Research Agendas to Global Strategy (pp. 3–33). London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rappert, B., & Balmer, B. (2015). Ignorance Is Strength? Intelligence, Security and National Secrets. In M. Gross & L. McGoey (Eds.), Routledge International Handbook of Ignorance Studies (pp. 328–337). London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Räsänen, M., & Nyce, J. M. (2013). The Raw Is Cooked: Data in Intelligence Practice. Science, Technology & Human Values, 38(5), 655–677.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reitano, T., De Lugo, L. B. R.-B., & Jesperson, S. (2018). Militarised Responses to Transnational Organised Crime: The War on Crime. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rochlin, J. (2011). Plan Colombia and the Revolution in Military Affairs: The Demise of the FARC. Review of International Studies, 37(02), 715–740.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, K. (1949). Strategic intelligence for American world policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. O. (2011). Maritime Interdiction in Sri Lanka’s Counterinsurgency. Small Wars & Insurgencies, 22(3), 448–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spinardi, G. (2014). Technical Controversy and Ballistic Missile Defence: Disputing Epistemic Authority in the Development of Hit-to-Kill Technology. Science as Culture, 23(1), 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. NAVY. (2010). Naval Operations Concept 2010, Implementing the Maritime Strategy. Washington, DC: USM Corps, USC Guard - 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Government Accountability Office. (2008). PLAN COLOMBIA Drug Reduction Goals Were Not Fully Met, but Security Has Improved; U.S. Agencies Need More Detailed Plans for Reducing Assistance. Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Puyvelde, D. (2016). Fusing Drug Enforcement: A Study of the El Paso Intelligence Center. Intelligence and National Security, 31(6), 888–902.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vellinga, M. (2004). The Political Economy of the Drug Industry: Its Structure and Functioning. In M. Vellinga (Ed.), The Political Economy of the Drug Industry, Latin America and the International System (pp. 3–24). Gainesville, FL: University Press of Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, K. M., Balmer, B., Weiss Evans, S., Kroener, I., Matsumoto, M., & Brian, R. (2016). The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies. In U. Felt, R. Fouché, C. A. Miller, & L. Smith-Doerr (Eds.), The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies (pp. 973–1002). Cambridge, MA/London: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webinfomil. (2003). Lancha de Interdiccion Tipo Orca. Retrieved April 14, 2014, from http://www.webinfomil.com/2011/06/lancha-interceptora-tipo-orca.html

  • Zaitch, D. (2004). Post-Fordist Cocaine, Labor and Business Relations Among Colombian Dealers. In M. Vellinga (Ed.), The Political Economy of the Drug Industry, Latin America and the International System (pp. 148–174). Gainesville, FL: University Press of Florida.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Guerrero C., J. (2020). How Do You Catch Drug Smugglers in the Open Sea?. In: Narcosubmarines. Palgrave Pivot, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9023-4_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9023-4_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Pivot, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-9022-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-9023-4

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics