Skip to main content

Architecture-Centric Dependability Analysis for I&C Safety Systems in NPP: A Case Study

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Reliability, Safety and Hazard Assessment for Risk-Based Technologies

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering ((LNME))

Abstract

System architecture plays a major role in achieving the safety, availability and reliability requirements of the system. Any violation of these requirements detected at a later stage of the system development life cycle may call for architectural modification, which can be expensive in terms of both cost and time. This paper presents a case study of architecture-centric dependability analysis based on rigorous model checking techniques. A large computer-based safety system of a PWR is considered for this study. This work demonstrates that architectural dependability analysis is feasible for large computer based system (CBS) and it increases the level of confidence in meeting the system dependability requirements at the early stage of development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. IEEE Standard criteria for safety systems for nuclear power generating stations. IEEE Std-603 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  2. IEEE Standard criteria for programmable digital devices in safety systems of nuclear power generating stations. IEEE Std 7-4.3.2-2016 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  3. AERB Safety guide: Safety systems for pressurized heavy water reactors, AERB/NPP-PHWR/SG/D-10, (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  4. AERB Safety guide: Computer based systems of pressurized heavy water reactors, AERB/NPP-PHWR/SG/D-25, (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  5. P. Feiler, Open source AADL tool environment (OSATE), in AADL Workshop, Paris (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  6. M. Huth, M. Ryan, Logic in Computer Science: Modelling and Reasoning about Systems (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2004)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. E. Clarke, O. Grumberg, S. Jha, Y. Lu, H. Veith, Progress on the State Explosion Problem in Model Checking (Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2001), pp. 176–194

    Google Scholar 

  8. IAEA Nuclear Energy Series: Dependability Assessment of Software for Safety Instrumentation and Control Systems at Nuclear Power Plants. IAEA Nuclear Energy Series NP-T-3.27, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  9. M. Kwiatkowska, G. Norman, D. Parker, PRISM 4.0: Verification of probabilistic real-time systems, in Proceeding of 23rd International Conference on Computer Aided Verification (CAV’11), vol. 6806 of LNCS (Springer, 2011), pp. 585–591

    Google Scholar 

  10. L. Meshkat, J.B. Dugan, J.D. Andrews, Dependability analysis of systems with on-demand and active failure modes, using dynamic fault trees. IEEE Trans. Reliab. 51(2), 240–251 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. SAE Architecture Analysis and Design Language (AADL) Annex Volume 1: Annex a: Graphical AADL notation. Annex C: AADL MetaModel and Interchange Formats, Annex D: Language Compliance and Application Program Interface Annex E: Error Model Annex, AS5506/1 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  12. P. Hokstad, K. Corneliussen, Loss of safety assessment and the IEC 61508 standard. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 83, 111–120 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. M. Kumar, A.K. Verma, A. Srividya, Modeling demand rate and imperfect proof-test and analysis of their effect on system safety. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 93, 1720–1729 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. A. Kabra, G. Karmakar, M. Kumar, P. Marathe, Sensitivity analysis of safety system architectures, in Proceeding of International Conference on Industrial Instrumentation and Control (ICIC), India (2015), pp. 846–851

    Google Scholar 

  15. BARC Design basis report: Engineered Safety Feature Actuation System of Indian Pressurized Water Reactor, BARC/E&IG/IPWR/DBR/ESFAS/Rev0 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  16. AERB Safety Code: Design of light water based Nuclear Power Plants, AERB/NPP-LWR/SC/D (2015)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Authors wish to thank Mr. Y. S. Mayya,  formar Head, Reactor Control Division & Group Director, E&IG for his kind support and encouragement when this work was carried out. Authors also wish to thank Mr. Debashis Das, Director, E&IG, BARC for his continual encouragement.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amol Wakankar .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Wakankar, A., Kabra, A., Bhattacharjee, A.K., Karmakar, G. (2020). Architecture-Centric Dependability Analysis for I&C Safety Systems in NPP: A Case Study. In: Varde, P., Prakash, R., Vinod, G. (eds) Reliability, Safety and Hazard Assessment for Risk-Based Technologies. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9008-1_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9008-1_25

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-9007-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-9008-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics