Abstract
We conducted an experimental study on 144 participants to evaluate how naïve people evaluate different kinds of interruptions. We manipulated the point in which interruption occurs (early, late and no interruption) and the type of interruption (change subject, disagreement, clarification and agreement) on pre-built, acted and audio-recorded dialogues. Then, participants evaluated how much each interruption was effective, unpleasant and influential. The main results show that (a) with some exceptions, early and late interruptions were evaluated as more influential and unpleasant than control, and early interruption more unpleasant than late interruption; (b) change subject was more unpleasant and less effective than disagreement, and disagreement than clarification but only in not interruptive turn-taking while there was no difference between clarification and disagreement for effectiveness and unpleasantness; (c) the point was more important than type in determining the evaluation of interruption; (d) the perception of a turn-taking as an interruption was correlated with unpleasantness and only partially with influence; (e) all over the study, the effectiveness went in the opposite direction with respect to our hypothesis. Results are interpreted at the light of the literature on the effects of interruption and of politeness theory applied to interruption.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Type*sex of interruptee (F(3, 139) = 3.51, p < 0.05, η2 = 0.07) and type*sex of interrupter (F(3, 139) = 2.92, p < 0.05, η2 = 0.06) were also significant.
- 2.
Type*sex of interrupter (F(3, 139) = 5.71, p = 0.001, η2 = 0.11) was also significant.
- 3.
Type*sex of interrupter (F(3, 139) = 2.85, p < 0.05, η2 = 0.05) was also significant.
References
Brown, P., Levinson, S.C.: Universals in language usage: politeness phenomena. In: Goody, E.N. (ed.) Questions and Politeness: Strategies in Social Interaction, pp. 56–311. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1978)
Brown, P., Levinson, S.C.: Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1987)
Chambliss, C.A., Feeny, N.: Effects of sex of subject, sex of interrupter, and topic of conversation on the perceptions of interruptions. Percept. Mot. Skills 75, 1235–1241 (1992)
Coon, C.A., Schwanenflugel, P.J.: Evaluation of interruption behavior by naïve encoders. Discourse Processes 22, 1–24 (1996)
Crown, C.L., Cummins, D.A.: Objective versus perceived vocal interruptions in the dialogues of unacquainted pairs, friends, and couples. J. Lang. Soc. Psychol. 17, 372–389 (1998)
De Ruiter, J.P., Mitterer, H., Enfield, N.J.: Projecting the end of a speaker’s turn: a cognitive cornerstone of conversation. Language 82, 515–535 (2006)
Eshghi, A., Howes, C., Gregoromichelaki, E., Hough, J., Purver, M.: Feedback in conversation as incremental semantic update. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Computational Semantics (IWCS 2015). Association for Computational Linguisitics, pp. 261–271 (2015)
Farley, S.D.: Attaining status at the expense of likeability: pilfering power through conversational interruption. J. Nonverbal Behav. 32, 241–260 (2008)
Gnisci, A., Bull, P., Graziano, E., Ciancia, M.R., Errico, D.: Un sistema di codifica delle interruzioni per l’intervista politica italiana. Psicologia Sociale 1, 107–128 (2011)
Gnisci, A., Graziano, E., Sergi, I., Pace, A.: Which criteria do naïve people use for identifying and evaluating different kinds of interruption? J. Pragmat. 138, 119–130 (2018)
Gnisci, A., Sergi, I., De Luca, E., Errico, V.: Does frequency of interruptions amplify the effect of various types of interruptions? Experimental evidence. J. Nonverbal Behav. 36, 39–57 (2012)
Goffman, E.: On face-work: an analysis of ritual elements in social interaction. Psychiatry 18, 213–231 (1955)
Goldberg, J.A.: Interrupting the discourse on interruptions: an analysis in terms of relationally neutral, power- and rapport-oriented acts. J. Pragmat. 14, 883–903 (1990)
Graziano, E., Gnisci, A.: The partiality in Italian political interviews: stereotype or reality? In: Esposito, A., Esposito, A.M., Martone, R., Müller, V.C., Scarpetta, G. (eds.) Analysis of Verbal and Nonverbal Communication and Enactment: The Processing Issues, pp. 363–375. Springer, Berlin (2011)
Graziano, E., Gnisci, A., Pace, A.: Gli effetti delle interruzioni nella conversazione diadica: Una rassegna degli studi sperimentali. Giornale Italiano di Psicologia 41, 747–772 (2014)
Hawkins, K.: Interruptions in task-oriented conversations: effects of violations of expectations by males and females. Women’s Stud. Commun. 11, 1–20 (1988)
Hawkins, K.: Some consequences of deep interruption in task-oriented communication. J. Lang. Soc. Psychol. 10, 185–203 (1991)
Holtgraves, T.: Politeness. In: Robinson, W.P., Giles, H. (eds.) The New Handbook of Language and Social Psychology, pp. 341–355. Wiley, New York (2001)
Kempson, R., Gargett, A., Gregoromichelaki, E.: Clarification requests: An incremental account. In: Proceedings of the 11th Workshop on the Semantics and Pragmatics of Dialogue (DECALOG), pp. 62–75 (2007)
LaFrance, M.: Gender and interruptions: individual infraction or violation of the social order? Psychol. Women Q. 16, 497–512 (1992)
Makri-Tsilipakou, M.: Interruption revisited: affiliative vs. disaffiliative intervention. J. Pragmat. 21, 401–426 (1994)
Murata, K.: Intrusive or cooperative? A cross-cultural study of interruption. J. Pragmat. 21, 385–400 (1994)
Orcutt, J.D., Mennella, D.L.: Gender and perception of interruption as intrusive talk: an experimental analysis and reply to criticism. Symbolic Interact. 18, 59–72 (1995)
Robinson, L.F., Reis, H.T.: The effects of interruption, gender, and status on interpersonal perceptions. J. Nonverbal Behav. 13, 141–153 (1989)
Roger, D., Bull, P., Smith, S.: The development of a comprehensive system for classifying interruptions. J. Lang. Soc. Psychol. 7, 27–34 (1988)
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E.A., Jefferson, G.: A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language 50, 696–735 (1974)
West, C., Zimmerman, D.H.: Small insults: a study of interruptions in cross-sex conversations between unacquainted persons. In: Thorne, B., Kramarae, C., Henley, N. (eds.) Language, Gender, and Society, pp. 102–117. Newbury, Rowley (1983)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sergi, I., Gnisci, A., Senese, V.P., Di Gennaro, A. (2020). An Experiment on How Naïve People Evaluate Interruptions as Effective, Unpleasant and Influential. In: Esposito, A., Faundez-Zanuy, M., Morabito, F., Pasero, E. (eds) Neural Approaches to Dynamics of Signal Exchanges. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol 151. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8950-4_33
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8950-4_33
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-8949-8
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-8950-4
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)