Skip to main content

Plant Cognition: Ability to Perceive ‘Touch’ and ‘Sound’

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

Plants’ sessile life-style has enabled them to develop enormous sensitivity towards their dynamic, tactile and clamorous surroundings. Consequently, besides a range of different stimuli, plants can even perceive subtle stimuli, like ‘touch’ and unanticipatedly ‘sound’. Importantly, touch sensitivity in plants is not just limited to sensitive plant and carnivorous species, which respond through eye-catchy movements; instead every plant and living plant cell senses and responds to mechanostimulation, whether intrinsic or extrinsic in nature. For instance, plant roots are extremely touch-sensitive, and upon encountering a barrier in soil, they are able to effectively redirect their growth to transcend it. Similarly, tendrils in climbing plants exhibit extreme sensitivity towards touch, which enable them to sense and grab a support in close vicinity. Unlike touch sensitivity, which was recognized long ago by Robert Hooke and Darwin, plants’ sensitivity towards sound has started gaining attention only recently. The past decade has seen major advances in this area of plant biology; many breakthrough discoveries were made that revealed the, otherwise debatable, ecological significance of sound perception in plants’ life. It has come to light that plants not just sense but also distinguish relevant sound among a mixture of irrelevant sound frequencies; plants distinguish buzz produced by a true pollinator among pollen thieves in the sophisticated process of buzz pollination. Similarly, plants distinguish sound typical of a herbivore for elicitation of defence response. Interestingly, plant roots can sense sound of flowing water in order to direct their growth towards the water source. Given the similarity in the physical properties of touch and sound stimuli, many recently discovered signaling events and molecular players in touch and sound perception are noted to be common. However, in view of the contrasting responses tailored according to the stimuli, plants appear to distinguish well among the two in an ecologically meaningful manner.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Appel HM, Cocroft RB (2014) Plants respond to leaf vibrations caused by insect herbivore chewing. Oecologia 175:1257–1266

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey NW, Fowler-Finn KD, Rebar D, Rodriguez RL (2013) Green symphonies or wind in the willows? Testing acoustic communication in plants. Behav Ecol 24:797–798

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basu D, Haswell ES (2017) Plant mechanosensitive ion channels: an ocean of possibilities. Curr Opin Plant Biol 40:43–48

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Braam J (2005) In touch: plant responses to mechanical stimuli. New Phytol 165:373–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braam J, Davis RW (1990) Rain-, wind-, and touch-induced expression of calmodulin and calmodulin-related genes in Arabidopsis. Cell 60:357–364

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chehab EW, Eich E, Braam J (2009) Thigmomorphogenesis: a complex plant response to mechano-stimulation. J Exp Bot 60:43–56

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Choi B, Ghosh R, Gururani MA, Shanmugam G, Jeon J, Kim J, Park SC, Jeong MJ, Han KH, Bae DW, Bae H (2017) Positive regulatory role of sound vibration treatment in Arabidopsis thaliana against Botrytis cinerea infection. Sci Rep 7:2527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darwin CR (1875) Insectivorous plants. John Murray, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • De Luca PA, Vallejo-Marin M (2013) What’s the ‘buzz’ about? The ecology and evolutionary significance of buzz-pollination. Curr Opin Plant Biol 16:429–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furuichi T, Iida H, Sokabe M, Tatsumi H (2012) Expression of Arabidopsis MCA1 enhanced mechanosensitive channel activity in the Xenopus laevis oocyte plasma membrane. Plant Signal Behav 7:1022–1026

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gagliano M (2013a) The flowering of plant bioacoustics: how and why. Behav Ecol 24:800–801

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gagliano M (2013b) Green symphonies: a call for studies on acoustic communication in plants. Behav Ecol 24:789–796

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gagliano M, Mancuso S, Robert D (2012a) Towards understanding plant bioacoustics. Trends Plant Sci 17:323–325

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gagliano M, Renton M, Duvdevani N, Timmins M, Mancuso S (2012b) Out of sight but not out of mind: alternative means of communication in plants. PLoS One 7:e37382

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gagliano M, Grimonprez M, Depczynski M, Renton M (2017) Tuned in: plant roots use sound to locate water. Oecologia 184:151–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh R, Mishra RC, Choi B, Kwon YS, Bae DW, Park SC, Jeong MJ, Bae H (2016) Exposure to sound vibrations lead to transcriptomic, proteomic and hormonal changes in Arabidopsis. Sci Rep 6:33370

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton ES, Schlegel AM, Haswell ES (2015a) United in diversity: mechanosensitive ion channels in plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol 66:113–137

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton ES, Jensen GS, Maksaev G, Katims A, Sherp AM, Haswell ES (2015b) Mechanosensitive channel MSL8 regulates osmotic forces during pollen hydration and germination. Science 350:438–441

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hassanien RHE, Hou TZ, Li YF, Li BM (2014) Advances in effects of sound waves on plants. J Integr Agric 13:335–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haswell ES, Meyerowitz EM (2006) MscS-like proteins control plastid size and shape in Arabidopsis thaliana. Curr Biol 16:1–11

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe MJ (1973) Thigmomorphogenesis: the response of plant growth and development to mechanical stimulation: with special reference to Bryonia dioica. Planta 114:143–157

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jeong MJ, Shim CK, Lee JO, Kwon HB, Kim YH, Lee SK, Byun MO, Park SC (2008) Plant gene responses to frequency-specific sound signals. Mol Breed 21:217–226

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jeong MJ, Cho JI, Park SH, Kim KH, Lee SK, Kwon TR, Park SC, Siddiqui ZS (2014) Sound frequencies induce drought tolerance in rice plant. Pak J Bot 46:2015–2020

    Google Scholar 

  • Jung J, Kim SK, Kim JY, Jeong MJ, Ryu CM (2018) Beyond chemical triggers: evidence for sound-evokedphysiological reactions in plants. Front Plant Sci 9:25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu S, Jiao J, Lu TJ, Xu F, Pickard BG, Genin GM (2017) Arabidopsis leaf trichomes as acoustic antennae. Biophys J 113:2068–2076

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lopez-Ribera I, Vicient CM (2017) Drought tolerance induced by sound in Arabidopsis plants. Plant Signal Behav 12:e1368938

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mishra RC, Ghosh R, Bae H (2016) Plant acoustics: in the search of a sound mechanism for sound signaling in plants. J Exp Bot 67:4483–4494

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Monshausen GB, Haswell ES (2013) A force of nature: molecular mechanisms of mechanoperception in plants. J Exp Bot 64:4663–4680

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Monshausen GB, Bibikova TN, Weisenseel MH, Gilroy S (2009) Ca2+ regulates reactive oxygen species production and pH during mechanosensing in Arabidopsis roots. Plant Cell 21:2341–2356

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Retallack DL (1973) The sound of music and plants. DeVorss, Santa Monica

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigo-Moreno A, Bazihizina N, Azzarello E, Masi E, Tran D, Bouteau F, Baluska F, Mancuso S (2017) Root phonotropism: early signalling events following sound perception in Arabidopsis roots. Plant Sci 264:9–15

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schöner MG, Caroline RS, Ralph ST, Ulmar G, Sébastien JP, Liaw LJ, Gerald K (2015) Bats are acoustically attracted to mutualistic carnivorous plants. Curr Biol 25(14):1911–1916

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoner MG, Simon R, Schoner CR (2016) Acoustic communication in plant-animal interactions. Curr Opin Plant Biol 32:88–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon R, Holderied MW, Koch CU, von Helversen O (2011) Floral acoustics: conspicuous echoes of a dish-shaped leaf attract bat pollinators. Science 333:631–633

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tompkins P, Birds C (1973) The secret life of plants. Harper & Row, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang K, Yang Z, Qing D, Ren F, Liu S, Zheng Q, Liu J, Zhang W, Dai C, Wu M, Chehab EW, Braam J, Li N (2018) Quantitative and functional posttranslational modification proteomics reveals that TREPH1 plays a role in plant touch-delayed bolting. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 115:E10265–E10274

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou LH, Liu SB, Wang PF, Lu TJ, Xu F, Genin GM, Pickard BG (2017) The Arabidopsis trichome is an active mechanosensory switch. Plant Cell Environ 40:611–621

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (NRF-2017R1D1A1B03030357).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hanhong Bae .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Mishra, R.C., Bae, H. (2019). Plant Cognition: Ability to Perceive ‘Touch’ and ‘Sound’. In: Sopory, S. (eds) Sensory Biology of Plants. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8922-1_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics