Skip to main content

Subjectively and Objectively Measured Hazard Perception Ability of Young Chinese Drivers

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Man–Machine–Environment System Engineering (MMESE 2019)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering ((LNEE,volume 576))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1097 Accesses

Abstract

The present study examined the characteristics of subjectively and objectively measured hazard perception ability of violation-free and violation-involved drivers and the consistency between self-assessments and their response time. Forty-seven young Chinese novice drivers finished a video-based hazard perception task and a self-reported hazard perception questionnaire. Results showed that violation-free drivers responded to the hazards faster than violation-involved drivers. Violation-free drivers also had lower self-assessment score than violation-involved drivers. Importantly, drivers’ self-assessment score correlated positively with the number of traffic violations from the last year. No significant correlations were found between drivers’ response time to the hazards with their self-assessments or the number of traffic violations. The findings suggested that young drivers’ self-assessments did not correspond to their response time, which might partially contribute to their violation involvement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Wetton MA, Horswill MS, Hatherly C et al (2010) The development and validation of two complementary measures of drivers’ hazard perception ability. Accid Anal Prev 42(4):1232–1239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Horswill MS, Hill A, Wetton M (2015) Can a video-based hazard perception test used for driver licensing predict crash involvement? Accid Anal Prev 82:213–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Pelz DC, Krupat E (1974) Caution profile and driving record of undergraduate males. Accid Anal Prev 6(1):45–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ābele L, Haustein S, Møller M et al (2018) Consistency between subjectively and objectively measured hazard perception skills among young male drivers. Accid Anal Prev 118:214–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Horswill MS, Waylen AE, Tofield MI (2004) Drivers’ ratings of different components of their own driving skill: a greater illusion of superiority for skills that relate to accident involvement. J Appl Soc Psychol 34(1):177–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Martinussen LM, Møller M, Prato CG (2017) Accuracy of young male drivers’ self-assessments of driving skill. Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav 46:228–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sümer N, Ünal AB, Birdal A et al (2007) Comparison of self-reported and computer-based hazard perception skills among novice and experienced drivers. In: Proceedings of the fourth international driving symposium on human factors in driver assessment, training and vehicle design

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cheng AS, Ng TC, Lee HC (2011) A comparison of the hazard perception ability of accident-involved and accident-free motorcycle riders. Accid Anal Prev 43(4):1464–1471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. White MJ, Cunningham LC, Titchener K (2011) Young drivers’ optimism bias for accident risk and driving skill: accountability and insight experience manipulations. Accid Anal Prev 43(4):1309–1315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Sun L, Li S, Chang R (2019) Development and validity of Chinese hazard perception test. Lect Notes Electr Eng 527:257–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sun L, Dou G (2019) Computer-based hazard perception study in Chinese environmental effects of driving experience and age. Ekoloji 28(107):4311–4317

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sun L, Chang R, Li S (2018) Effects of driving experience and hazard type on young drivers’ hazard perception. Lect Notes Electr Eng 456:11–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Deery HA (1999) Hazard and risk perception among young novice drivers. J Saf Res 30(4):225–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ventsislavova P, Gugliotta A, Peña-Suarez E et al (2016) What happens when drivers face hazards on the road? Accid Anal Prev 91:43–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ma Y, Sun L (2018) Reliability and validity of self-assessment of driving skills scale in Chinese drivers. Adv Psychol 8(6):848–854

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Compliance with Ethical Standards

The study was approved by the Logistics Department for Civilian Ethics Committee of Liaoning Normal University.

All subjects who participated in the experiment were provided with and signed an informed consent form.

All relevant ethical safeguards have been met with regard to subject protection.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Long Sun .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Hua, L., Sun, L., Ma, Y. (2020). Subjectively and Objectively Measured Hazard Perception Ability of Young Chinese Drivers. In: Long, S., Dhillon, B. (eds) Man–Machine–Environment System Engineering . MMESE 2019. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 576. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8779-1_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics