Skip to main content

Influence of Curvature Ratio on Perforation of 2024 Aluminium by Conical Impactor

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Structural Integrity Assessment

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering ((LNME))

  • 1377 Accesses

Abstract

The impact resistance of 2024 aluminium alloy target plate of varying curvature ratio has been studied against conical impactor through numerical simulations using ABAQUS. The curvature ratio (h/r) of the target was varied as 0, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75 and 1.15 and the curvature ratio was calculated as the ratio between apex height (h) and radius (r) of the target. The apex height of the target (h) was varied as 0, 17.1, 34.2, 51.3 and 68.4 mm, whereas, the span (l) and radius (r) of the target are 119 and 59.5 mm, respectively. The material parameters for the Johnson–Cook model were employed to predict the material behaviour of target as well as projectile as available in literature [1,2,3]. The impact velocity of projectile was 605 and 180 m/s, considered against the chosen target configuration to study the influence of varying incidence velocity. The choice of 180 m/s incidence velocity is likely to be equivalent to the ballistic limit of 3.18 mm thick 2024 aluminium target, whereas, the 605 m/s incidence velocity was considered based on the assumption that hand guns were operated in the range of 500–820 m/s incidence velocity. It was observed that when the incidence velocity is 605 m/s, the resistance of target with varying curvature ratio is insignificant. However, the incidence velocity is 180 m/s, the resistance of the target was found to be increased significantly with increasing curvature ratio. Therefore, it is concluded that the incidence velocity is close to the limiting velocity, of 180 m/s, the resistance of the target with curvature ratio of 1.15 was found to be increased by 52% as compared to the target with curvature ratio of 0.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. M.A. Iqbal, G. Tiwari, P.K. Gupta, Euro. J. Mech. A/Solids 59, 37–57 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. G. Kay, FAA Rep. No. DOT/FAA/AR-03/57, Federal Aviation Administration, Washington, D.C. (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  3. M.A. Iqbal, K. Senthil, P. Sharma, N.K. Gupta, Int. J. Impact Eng. 96, 146–164 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. W. Goldsmith, S.A. Finnegam, Int. J. Impact Eng. 4, 83–105 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. M. Buyuk, S. Kan, M.J. Loikkanen, J. Aerospace Eng. 22, 287–295 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. D.R. Lesuer, Technical Report DOT/FAA/AR-00/25. Livermore: Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (2000), pp. 1–41

    Google Scholar 

  7. K. Senthil, M.A. Iqbal, B. Arindam, R. Mittal, N.K. Gupta, Thin-Walled Struct. 126, 94–105 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. G. Tiwari, M.A. Iqbal, P.K. Gupta, Int. J. Crashworth, 1–16 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  9. M.A. Iqbal, K. Senthil, V. Madhu, N.K. Gupta, Int. J. Impact Eng. 110, 26–38 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. G.R. Johnson, W.H. Cook, Eng. Fract. Mech. 21, 31–48 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. J.W. Hancock, A.C. Mackenzie, J. Mech. Phys. Solids 24, 147–169 (1976)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. K. Senthil, M.A. Iqbal, Theoret.Appl. Fract. Mech. 67–68, 53–64 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. ABAQUS/Explicit User’s Manual, Version 6.8 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  14. A. Hillerborg, M. Modeer, P.E. Petersson, Cem. Concr. Res. 6, 773–782 (1976)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. K. Senthil, B. Arindam, M.A. Iqbal, N.K. Gupta, Proc. Eng. 173, 363–368 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. K. Senthil, M.A. Iqbal, S. Rupali, Int. J. Prot. Struct. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1177/2041419618807493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. K. Senthil, S. Rupali, M.A. Iqbal, 8th International Conference on Structural Engineering and Construction Management, December 7–9, 2017, University of Peradeniya, Peradeniya, Kandy, Sri Lanka (2017)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. Senthil .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Senthil, K., Rupali, S., Iqbal, M.A., Thakur, A., Singh, A.P. (2020). Influence of Curvature Ratio on Perforation of 2024 Aluminium by Conical Impactor. In: Prakash, R., Suresh Kumar, R., Nagesha, A., Sasikala, G., Bhaduri, A. (eds) Structural Integrity Assessment. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8767-8_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8767-8_24

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-8766-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-8767-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics