Advertisement

Causal Analysis of the Effect on Performance of Start-Ups from External Supporting Activities

  • Hirotaka YanadaEmail author
  • Setsuya Kurahashi
Conference paper
Part of the Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies book series (SIST, volume 148)

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to investigate the relationships between the performance of start-ups and external support to them. We analyzed the questionnaire research on the basis of the answers which were obtained from 2,897 (1st research) people of start-ups. As a research method, we used two methods using a propensity score. This point is one of the novelties of this research. First, we tried a matching method, and we found that most external support alone did not have the causal effect of improving performance, but the other significant causal effects were found in part. Subsequently, we confirmed the effects again using a weighting method.

Keywords

Start-up company Propensity score matching External support 

References

  1. 1.
    Rosenbaum, P.R., Rubin, D.B.: The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrica 70, 41–55 (1983)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Guo, S.Y., Fraser, M.W.: Propensity Score Analysis: Statistical Methods and Applications. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA (2010)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hoshino, T., Okada, K.: Estimation of causal effects by covariate adjustment using propensity score and application in clinical medicine · epidemiology · pharmacology ·public health field, Health and medical science, vol. 55(3), pp. 230–243 (2006). (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Storey, D.J.: Understanding the Small Business Sector. Thomson Learning, London (1994)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lerner, J.: The Government as venture capitalist: the long-run effects of the SBIR Program. J. Bus. 72, 285–318 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kutsuna, K.: Management strategy of growth small and medium enterprises creating employment, Survey monthly report, Japan Finance Corporation, vol. 523, pp. 12–19 (2004). (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ejima, Y.: Growth factors for start-ups in Japan (1)(2). J. Osaka Univ. Econ. 61(4), 49–64 (2010). (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Key, H.T., Nguen, T.T.M., Ng, H.P.: The effects of entrepreneurial orientation and marketing information on the performance of SMEs. J. Bus. Ventur. 22, 592–611 (2007)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Madsen, E.L.: The significance of sustained entrepreneurial orientation on performance of firms-a longitudinal analysis. Entrep. Reg. Dev. 19(2), 185–204 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Okamuro, H., Kato, M.: Determinants of employment growth and composition change in start-up companies. Financ. Rev. 112, 8–25 (2013). (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Japan Finance Corporation Research Institute.: Results of the New Opening Panel Survey (2011). (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Stuart, E.A.: Matching methods for causal inference: a review and a look for ward. Stat. Sci. 25(1), 1–21 (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1214/09-STS313CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hoshino, T.: Statistical Science of Survey Observation Data—Causality Reasoning/Selection Bias/Data Fusion (2009). (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Austin, Peter C.: An introduction to propensity score methods for reducing the effects of confounding in observational study. Multivar. Behav. Res. 46(3) (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of TsukubaTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations