Advertisement

Academic as Public Intellectual

Chapter
  • 124 Downloads
Part of the Rethinking Higher Education book series (RHE)

Abstract

Some persons of a desponding spirit are in great concern about that vast number of academics using the university as a place to voice opinions, disrupt neoliberalism, and question the establishment under the guise of academic freedom, and we have been desired to employ our thoughts what course may be taken to ease higher education of so grievous an encumbrance. But we are not in the least pain upon that matter, because it is very well known that we can position these academics as service providers relieving them of academic freedom and putting them in their place by the neoliberal practices of efficiency, accountability, teaching evaluations, prescribed syllabi, university-wide templates, and class management systems. This way these academics have no time to think, and consequently pine away for want of intellectual nourishment to a degree that if at any time they are accidentally expected to ponder and engage, they have not the scholarly strength to perform it; and thus the university is happily delivered from the evils of the contemplative academic.

References

  1. AAUP. (2015). Teaching evaluations survey.Google Scholar
  2. Adkins, A., Spesia, T., & Snakenborg, J. (2015). Rebuttal to Dover et al. Teachers College Record.Google Scholar
  3. Agius, K., Aitken, J., Blaise, M., Boucher, K., Hamm, C., Iorio, J. M., … McCartin, J. (2015a). Who’s swallowing the Action Now: Classroom Ready Teachers report?: Discussing, understanding, and wondering. Teacher College Record, ID Number: 17971. Retrieved from February 18, 2015, from http://www.tcrecord.org.
  4. Agius, K., Aitken, J., Blaise, M., Boucher, K. Hamm, C., Iorio, J. M., … Nehma, N. (2015b). Critically imagining an early childhood ‘classroom ready’ teacher. Professional Educator.Google Scholar
  5. Aronowitz, S. (2000). The knowledge factory: Dismantling the corporate university and creating true higher learning. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  6. Axelrod, Y., Black, F., Cheruvu, R., Murphy, A.M., Pérez, M.S., Rabadi-Raol, A., Rollins, E., & Saavedra, C.M. (2018). Representation of people of color in critical early childhood spaces: Issues and possibilities. Teachers College Record.Google Scholar
  7. Biswas, A., & Kirchherr, J. (2015). Prof, no one is reading you. The Strait Times. Retrieved from https://www.straitstimes.com/opinion/prof-no-one-is-reading-you.
  8. Blaise, M., Hamm, C., & Iorio, J.M. (2016). Modest witness(ing): Paying attention to matters of concern in early childhood. Pedagogy, Culture, and Society.Google Scholar
  9. Boring, A., Ottoboni, K., & Stark, P. (2016). Student evaluations of teaching (mostly) do not measure teacher effectiveness. ScienceOpen research, 1–11,  https://doi.org/10.14293/s2199-1006.1.sor-edu.aetbzc.v1.
  10. Bromell, N. (2002). Summa Cum Avaritia: Plucking profit from the Groves of Academe. Harper’s Magazine, 71–76 (2002).Google Scholar
  11. Burns, J. (2016). Where do I fit in? Adrift in neoliberal educational anti-culture. Teachers College Record. Retrieved from http://www.tcrecord.org/Content.asp?ContentID=20275.
  12. Conley, M., & Garner, G. (2015). The edTPA and The (De)Skilling of America’s Teachers? Teachers College Record. Retrieved July 17, 2015, from http://www.tcrecord.org. ID Number: 18037, Date Accessed July 10, 2018, 6:07:47 AM.
  13. Cote, Day, & de Peuter. (2007). Utopian pedagogy: Creating radical alternatives in the neoliberal age. Review of Education, Pedagogy, and Cultural Studies, 29(4), 317–336.Google Scholar
  14. CReATE. (2015). Chicago school reform: Myths, realities, and new visions. Retrieved from http://www.createchicago.org/.
  15. Dahlberg, G., Moss, P., & Pence, A. (2007). Beyond quality in early childhood education and care: A postmodern perspective. London and New York: Routledge/Falmer.Google Scholar
  16. Dover, A., Schultz, B., Smith, K., & Duggan, T. (2015a). Embracing the controversy: edTPA, Corporate Influence, and the Cooptation of Teacher Education. Teachers College Record. Retrieved September 14, 2015, from http://www.tcrecord.org. ID Number: 18109, Date Accessed July 10, 2018, 6:01:58 AM.
  17. Dover, A., Schultz, B., Smith, K., & Duggan, T. (2015b). Who’s preparing our candidates? edTPA, Localized knowledge and the outsourcing of teacher evaluation. Teachers College Record, Retrieved March 30, 2015, from http://www.tcrecord.org. ID Number: 17914, Date Accessed July 10, 2018, 6:05:44 AM.
  18. Dryden-Peterson, S. (2016). Refugee education: The crossroads of globalization. Educational Researcher, 45(9), 473–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Edmundson, M. (1997, September). On the uses of a liberal education: Part 1—As light entertainment for bored college students. Harper’s Magazine, 39–49.Google Scholar
  20. Edwards, C., Gandini, L., & Forman, G. (Eds.). (1998). The hundred languages of children: The Reggio Emilia approach: Advanced reflections. Westport, CT: Ablex.Google Scholar
  21. Flaherty, C. (2016, June 10). Flawed evaluations. Inside Higher Education.Google Scholar
  22. Fraser, H., & Taylor, N. (2016). Neoliberalization, Universities and the Public Intellectual. New York: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Garlen, J., Kuh, L., & Coleman, B. (2017). Teaching for social justice in the early childhood classroom. Teachers College Record. Retrieved March 27, 2017, from http://www.tcrecord.org. ID Number: 21890, Date Accessed July 10, 2018, 6:16:40 AM.
  24. Giroux, H. (2013/2014). Public intellectuals against the neo-liberal university. In N. K. Denzin & M. Giardina (Eds.), Qualitative inquiry outside the academy (pp. 35–60). Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.Google Scholar
  25. Greene, M. (1978). Landscapes on learning. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  26. Greene, M. (1995). Releasing the imagination: Essays on education, the arts, and social change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  27. Greene, M. (2000). The ambiguities of freedom. English Education, 33, 8–14.Google Scholar
  28. Greene, M. (2005). Teaching in a moment of crisis: The spaces of imagination. The New Educator, 1, 77–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Greene, M. (2012). Inside the academy: Maxine Greene. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R8hp8GD8-p4.
  30. Hamm, C. (2015). Walking with place: Storying reconciliation pedagogies in early childhood education. Canadian Children, 40(2), 57–67. The Canadian Association for Young Children.Google Scholar
  31. Hamm, C., & Boucher, K. (2018). Engaging with place: Foregrounding aboriginal perspective in early childhood education. In N. Yelland & D. Bentley (Eds.), Found in translation: Connecting reconceptualist early childhood ideas with practice. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  32. Hamm, C., Nehma, N., McCartin, J., Lovell, B., Iorio, J.M., Boucher, K., … Agius, K. (2017). Engaging with ethical resistance and courageous activism: A response to where do I fit in? Adrift in neoliberal educational anti-culture. Teachers College Record. Retrieved January 9, 2017.Google Scholar
  33. Haraway, D. J. (2008). When species meet. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  34. Hill, (2016). The conference: An overview and assessment. Australian Universities Review, 58(2), 5–8.Google Scholar
  35. Holzer, H. (2015). Higher education and workforce policy: Creating more skilled workers (and jobs for them to fill). Economic studies at Brookings, Brookings Institution, Washington, Retrieved July 9, 2018, from <http://www.brookings.edu/research/papers/2015/04/higher-ed-workforce-policy-skilled-workers-holzer>.
  36. Iorio, J. M., Hamm, C., Parnell, W., & Quintero, E. (2017). Place, matters of concern, and pedagogy: Making impactful connections with our planet. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 32(2), 121–135.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10901027.2017.1306600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Iorio, J. M., Coustley, A., & Grayland, (2018). Practicing pedagogical documentation: Teachers making more-than-human relationships and sense of place visible. In N. Yelland & D. Bentley (Eds.), Found in translation: Connecting reconceptualist early childhood ideas with practice. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  38. Jakobi, M. (2016). A stab in the dark: Anonymous student evaluations of Aboriginal Teacher Educators. Teachers College Record. Retrieved September 21, 2016, from http://www.tcrecord.org. ID Number: 21653.
  39. Jordan, A., & Hawley, T. (2016). By the Elite, For the Vulnerable: The edTPA, Academic Oppression, and the Battle to Define Good Teaching. Teachers College Record. Google Scholar
  40. King, K. (2004). Historiography as reenactment: Metaphors and literalizations of TV documentaries. Criticism, 46(3), 459–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Latour, B. (2004). How to talk about the body? The normative dimension of science studies. Body & society, 10(2--3), 205--229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Lester, S., & Costley, (2010). Work-based learning at higher education level: Value, practice and critique. Studies in Higher Education, 35(5), 561–575.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070903216635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Levy, B., Solomon, B., & Collet-Gildard, L. (2016). Fostering political interest among youth during the 2012 presidential election: Instructional opportunities and challenges in a swing state. Educational Researcher, 45(9), 483–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. MacNell, L., Driscoll, A., & Hunt, A. N. (2015). What’s in a name: Exposing gender bias in student ratings of teaching. Innovative Higher Education, 40(4), 291–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Moss, P. (2016). Why can’t we get beyond quality. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood Education, 17(1), 8–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Newson, J. A. (2004). Disrupting the ‘student as consumer’ model: The new emancipatory project. International Relations, 18(2), 227–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. O’Grady, K. & Roos, N. (2016). It’s time for a global movement that pushes academic research beyond journal paywalls so it makes a difference in the world. Policy Options. Retrieved from http://policyoptions.irpp.org/magazines/august-2016/linking-academic-research-with-the-public-and-policy-makers/.
  49. Parnell, W. (2011). Revealing the experience of children and teachers even in their absence: Documenting in the early childhood studio. Journal of Early Childhood Research, 9(3), 291–309. Retrieved from  https://doi.org/10.1177/1476718x10397903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Peters, L., Reinke, S., & Castner, D. (2017). Critically engaging in discourses on quality improvement: Political and pedagogical futures in early childhood education. Teachers College Record. Retrieved from June 27, 2017, from http://www.tcrecord.org. ID Number: 22063, Date Accessed July 10, 2018, 6:12:56 AM.
  51. Phillips, S. (2016). Don’t read the comments! Agenda, 24, 17.Google Scholar
  52. Pinar, W. (2012). What is curriculum theory? New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  53. Pink, S. (2008, June). An urban tour: The sensory sociality of ethnographic place-making. Ethnography, 9, 175–196.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1466138108089467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Rose, D. B. (2004). Reports from a wild country: Ethics for decolonisation. Sydney, Australia: University of New South Wales Press.Google Scholar
  55. Quintero, E. P. (2009). Refugee and immigrant family voices: Experience and education. The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Quintero, E. P. (2011). Quality early care and education: Collaborating for children of agricultural workers, Bridges. Sacramento, CA: California Head Start—State Collaboration Office.Google Scholar
  57. Quintero, E. P. (2017). Carrying our Roots/llevar a nuestras raíces. Special Issue: Rethinking global north onto-epistemologies in childhood studies for the Global Studies of Childhood (GSC).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Quintero, E. P., & Rummel, M. K. (2014). Storying, a path to our future: Artful thinking, learning, teaching, and research. New York: Peter Lang, Series on Critical Perspectives in Qualitative Research.Google Scholar
  59. Rinaldi, C. (2006). In dialogue with Reggio Emilia: Listening, researching and learning. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  60. Said, E. (1996). Representations of the intellectual: The 1993 Reith lectures. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
  61. Saunders, D. (2011). Neoliberal ideology and public higher education in the United States. Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies, 8(1), 41–77.Google Scholar
  62. Schmidt, B. (2015). Gendered language in teacher reviews. http://benschmidt.org/.
  63. Slaughter, S., & Rhoades, G. (2004). Academic capitalism and the new economy: Markets, state, and higher education. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  64. Solomon, S., Plattner, G.-K., Knutti, R., & Friedlingstein, P. (2009). Irreversible climate change due to carbon dioxide emissions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106, 1704–1709.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0812721106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Soslau, E., Kotch-Jester, S., Jortin, A. (2015). The dangerous message teacher candidates infer: “If the edTPA Does Not Assess It, I Don’t Have to Do It”. Teachers College Record. Retrieved December 11, 2015, from http://www.tcrecord.org. ID Number: 18835, Date Accessed July 10, 2018, 5:58:05 AM.
  66. Stark, P. (2014). An evaluation of course evaluations. ScienceOpen Researcher, 1–26.  https://doi.org/10.14293/s2199-1006.1.sor-edu.aofrqa.v1.
  67. Taylor, A., & Guigini, M. (2012). Common worlds: Reconceptualising inclusion in early childhood communities. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 13(2), 2012.Google Scholar
  68. Taylor, A., & Pacini-Ketchabaw, V. (2015). Learning with children, ants, and worms in the anthropocene: Towards a common world pedagogy of multispecies vulnerability. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 23(4), 507–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Teacher Education Ministerial Advisory Group (TEMAG). (2014). Action now: Classroom ready teachers. Canberra, Australia: Australian Government Department of Education & Training. Retrieved from http://docs.education.gov.au/system/files/doc/other/action_now_classroom_ready_teachers_accessible.pdf.
  70. Tuck, E., McKenzie, M., & McCoy, M. (2014). Land education: Indigenous, post-colonial, and decolonizing perspectives on place and environmental education research. Environmental Education Research, 20(1), 1–23.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2013.877708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Victoria State Government Department of Education and Training. (2016, August). Working together to shape teacher education in Victoria: Discussion paper. Melbourne, AU. Author. Retrieved from http://www.education.vic.gov.au/Documents/workingtogether.pdf.
  72. Watts, V. (2013). “Indigenous place-thought and agency amongst humans and non humans (First Woman and Sky Woman go on a European world tour!)” decolonization: Indigeneity. Education & Society, 2(1), 20–34.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Melbourne Graduate School of EducationThe University of MelbourneMelbourneAustralia
  2. 2.College of EducationThe University of Texas at El PasoEl PasoUSA

Personalised recommendations