Abstract
Plant compensatory growth is mainly observed in their morphological changes, such as plant height, leaf area, recovery rate, and biomass. In natural ecosystems, the compensatory growth performance of plants in tolerating disasters or surviving disasters is reflected in yield and fitness. Sheepgrass is an important perennial forage grass of the Poaceae family, and it is widely distributed on Eastern Eurasian steppe. The optimum time to mow for the first time is when the vegetative branches of sheepgrass have just entered the jointing stage and the reproductive shoots have entered the booting stage from the jointing stage in sheepgrass grassland. Of the two ecotypes of sheepgrass, gray-green type is relatively more tolerant to mowing. Moreover, the severe mowing has great impact on sheepgrass at same mowing stage. Thus, severe mowing is not suitable for sheepgrass, while less severe mowing has relative little impact. The response of sheepgrass to mowing is very particular, and this character is of great value for sheepgrass application.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Alan KK (1993) Gas exchange dynamics in C3 and C4 grasses consequences of differences in stomatal conductance. Ecology 74:113–123
Alward RD, Joern A (1993) Plasticity and over compensation in grass responses to herbivory. Oecologia 95:358–364
Bai KY, Zhao ML, Wei ZJ et al (1996) The effect of castration on the storage of carbon hydrates in concentrated grassland in the desert steppe. Acta Pratacul Sin 4(2):127–132
Bakker JP, Olff H (1995) Nutrient dynamics during restoration of fen meadows by haymaking without fertilizer application. In: Wheeler BD, Shaw SC, Fojt WJ, Robertson RA (eds) Restoration of temperate wetlands. Wiley, Chichester, pp 14–166
Bao YJ, Li ZH, Zhong YK et al (2004) Effects of different frequency castration on energy fixation and distribution of Leymus chinensis steppe community in Inner Mongolia. Acta Pratacul Sin 13(5):46–52
Bao YJ, Li ZH, Zhong YK et al (2005) Effects of mowing frequency on the energy standing crops of major populations in a Leymus chinensis steppe of Inner Mongolia. Chin Bull Bot 22(2):153–162
Brathen KA, Odasz-Albrigtsen AM (2000) Tolerance of the arctic graminoid Luzula arcuata ssp. confusa to simulated grazing in two nitrogen environments. Can J Bot 78:1108–1113
Davies A (1988) The regrowth of grass swards. In: Jones MB, Lazenby A (eds) The grass crop. Chapman and Hall Ltd, London, pp 85–117
Doescher PS, Svkjcar TJ, Jaindl RG (1997) Gas exchange of Idaho fescue in response to defoliation and grazing history. J Range Manag 50:285–289
Du ZC, Yang ZG (1989) Effects of mowing on photosynthetic characteristics of Leymus chinensis. J Plant Ecol Geogr Bot 13(4):318–324
Ellison L (1960) The influence of grazing on plant succession. Bot Rev 26:1–78
Farguhar GD, Sharkey TD (1982) Stomatal conductance and photosynthesis. Annu Rev Plant Physiol 33:317–345
Fenner M, Palmer L (1998) Grassland management to promote diversity: creation of a patchy sward by mowing and fertilizer regimes. Field Stud 9:313–324
Graaf AJV, Stahl J, Bakker JP (2005) Compensatory growth of Festuca rubra after grazing: can migratory herbivores increase their own harvest during staging? Funct Ecol 19:961–969
Han GD, Li B, Wei ZJ et al (1999) Study on cattle compensation for box compensator in prairie grass grazing system. Acta Agrestia Sin 7(1):1–7
He F, Li XL, Bai JR et al (2005) Effects of environmental factors and cutting methods on the growth rate of two cold season pastures in winter. Chin J Grassl 27(5):38–41
Hik DS, Jeffries RL (1990) Increases in the net above ground primary productivity of a salt-marsh forage grass. Ecology 78:180–195
Hilbert DW, Swift DM, Dehing JK et al (1981) Relative growth rates and the grazing optimization hypothesis. Oecologia 51:14–48
Holechek JI (1994) Livestock grazing impacts on public lands: a viewpoint. Wildl Manag 58(1):28–30
Hun CJ, Han JG, Hong BZ (2000) Effects of cutting stage and stubble height on grass yield and quality of new wheatgrass. Acta Agrestia Sin 8(4):319–327
Li YH (1988) Differentiation and convergence of Leymus chinensis grassland and Stipa grandis steppe under the influence of grazing in Xilin River Basin, Inner Mongolia. Acta Phytoecologica Geobotanica Sin 3(12):189–196
Liu GS, Li XF et al (2011) Study on germplasm resources of Leymus chinensis. Science Press, Beijing, p 35
Ma HL, Wan T, Sun QG (1983) Observation on heading characteristics and panicle differentiation process of Leymus chinensis. Inn Mong Grassl 1:17–24
Niels PR, Anten MM-R et al (2003) Defoliation and growth in an understory palm: quantifying the contributions of compensatory responses. Ecology 84(11):2905–2918
Noy-Meir I, Gutman M, Kaplan Y (1989) Responses of Mediterranean grassland plants to grazing and protection. J Ecol 77:290–310
Polley HW, Johnson HB, Mayeux HS (1994) Increasing CO2 comparative responses of the C4 grass Schizachyrium and grass land invader Prosopis. Ecology 75:976–988
Rong YP, Han JG, Wang P et al (2000) Effects of cutting intensity on grass yield and carbohydrate and nitrogen compounds in new wheatgrass. Chin J Grassl 2:28–34
Tainton NM (1981) Veld and pasture management in South Africa. Interprint (Pty) Ltd, Durban, pp 263–238
Trlica MJ (1993) Rittenhouse I.R.Grazing and plant performance. Ecol Appl 3(1):21–23
Trumble JT (1993) Plant compensation for arthropod herbivory. Annu Rev Entomol 38:93–119
Van Staalduinen MA, Anten NPR (2005) Differences in the compensatory growth of two co-occurring grass species in relation to water availability. Oecologia 146:190–199
Wang W, Miao JX, Chang SB et al (2003) Effects of mowing on population growth and yield and interspecific competition characteristics of mixed sowing grassland. Pratacultural Sci 20(9):20–23
Wang GL, Li XL, He F et al (2007) The effect of mowing intensity on the quantitative characteristics of vegetation in Leymus chinensis grassland. Chin J Grassl J 29(3):10–16
Xia JX, Fan FC, Wang P (1994) Research progress on the effects of mowing on the regeneration and productivity of grass pasture. Chin J Grassl 2(1):45–55
Yang YF, Zheng HY, Li JD (1998) Comparative study on age structure of tiller plants of Leymus chinensis population under different ecological conditions. Ecol J l8:302–308
Yuan BZ, Wang J, Zhao SL (1998) Mechanism of plant compensation. Acta Ecol Sin 17(5):45–49
Zhong YK, Bao QH (1999) Effects of different cutting intensity on natural cutting grassland. Chin J Grassl 5:15–18
Zhou C, Yang YF (2003) Water responses of two populations of Leymus chinensis in Songnen plain to saline alkali stress. Acta Pratacul Sin 12(1):65–68
Zhu YC (2004) Grass ecology. Forestry Science and Technology Press, Ji lin, pp 156–157
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Science Press and Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Zhang, Q., Liu, G., Chen, Z. (2019). Compensatory Growth Pattern of Sheepgrass (Leymus chinensis). In: Liu, G., Li, X., Zhang, Q. (eds) Sheepgrass (Leymus chinensis): An Environmentally Friendly Native Grass for Animals. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8633-6_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8633-6_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-8632-9
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-8633-6
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)