Skip to main content

Sensory Ways to Indigenous Multimodal Literacies: Hands and Feet Tell the Story

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Literacy Education and Indigenous Australians

Part of the book series: Language Policy ((LAPO,volume 19))

Abstract

This chapter reports original research that asks the question: What are the ways of knowing, being, and communicating that are valued and practiced in Indigenous communities? Literacy curricula, internationally and nationally, typically do not take into account the multi-sensorial dimensions of non-Western forms of representation that go beyond narrow conceptions of print. For example, literacies are often conceived as drawing on print, visual, spatial, gestural, and audio modes, but the role of haptics and locomotion has typically received little attention. This chapter highlights examples of the multi-sensoriality of Indigenous literacies observed in participatory community research with an Indigenous school. It extends recent theories of sensory studies in the history and cultural anthropology of the senses, applying these principles to literacy education. Sensory literacies is a theoretical perspective that gives priority to the sensorial dimensions of the body and its role in communication in literacy practice, because without a sensing body, we cannot know about or communicate with the world. The data demonstrates how the forgotten role of the hands and feet in dominant theories of communication is central to Indigenous identity and literacies. Written by a white academic with an Indigenous researcher, the chapter problematises the privileging of narrow, logocentric, and Western forms of literacy and its implications for rethinking the role of the whole body in literacy and the literacy curriculum for Indigenous students.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The term Indigenous in this research refers to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples of Australia. It is acknowledged that there are many First Nations People worldwide, each with their own culture.

  2. 2.

    All student names are pseudonyms.

References

  • Arola, K. L., & Wysoki, A. (2012). Composing media, composing embodiment. Logan: Utah State University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority [ACARA]. (2016). National assessment program: Literacy and numeracy (NAPLAN). Syndey: Australian Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority [ACARA]. (2017). Australian curriculum: Version 8.3. Canberra: Australian Government. Retrieved December 13, 2017, from: http://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/?dnsi=1

  • Castagno, A. E., & Brayboy, B. M. J. (2008). Culturally responsive schooling for indigenous youth: A review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 78(4), 941–993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins-Gearing, B., & Osland, D. (2010). Who will save us from the rabbits? Rewriting the past allegorically. The Looking Glass: New Perspectives on Children’s Literature, 14(2). Retrieved December 13, 2017, from: http://www.lib.latrobe.edu.au/ojs/index.php/tlg/article/view/227/225

  • Eco, U. (1976). A theory of semiotics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Farnell, B. (2012). Dynamic embodiment for social theory. London: Taylor and Francis.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ford, M. (2013). Achievement gaps in Australia: What NAPLAN reveals about education inequality in Australia. Race Ethnicity and Education, 16(1), 80–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giaccardi, E. (2012). Heritage and social media: Understanding heritage in a participatory culture. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Howes, D. (1991). The varieties of sensory experience: A sourcebook in the anthropology of the senses. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howes, D. (2014). Anthropology and multimodality: The conjugation of the senses. In C. Jewitt (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of multimodal analysis (2nd ed., pp. 225–236). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howes, D., & Classen, C. (2014). Ways of sensing: Understanding the senses in society. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingold, T. (2000). The perpection of the environment: Essays in livelihood, dwelling and skill. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingold, T., & Vergunst, L. (2008). Ways of walking: Ethnography and practice on foot. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jewitt, C. (2006). Technology, literacy and learning: A multimodal approach. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kress, G. (2000). Design and transformation: New theories of meaning. In B. Cope & M. Kalantzis (Eds.), Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures (pp. 153–161). South Yarra: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kress, G., & Bezemer, J. (2008). Writing in multimodal texts: A social semiotic account of designs for learning. Written Communication, 25(2), 166–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2006). Reading images: The grammar of visual design (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Leeds-Hurwitz, W. (1987). The social history of the natural history of an interview: A multidisciplinary investigation of social communication. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 20, 1–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, K. L. (2003). Ways of knowing, being, and doing: A theoretical framework and methods for indigenous and Indigenist research: Voicing dissent new talents 21st century, next generation Australian studies. Journal of Australian Studies, 76, 203–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, K. (2008). Please knock before you enter: Aboriginal regulation of outsiders and implications for researchers. Flaxton: PostPressed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, K. A. (2010). Filming in progress: New spaces for multimodal designing. Linguistics and Education, 21(1), 14–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mills, K. A. (2011). The multiliteracies classroom. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, K. A. (2016a). Literacy theories for the digital age: Social, critical, multimodal, spatial, material, and sensory lenses. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, K. A. (2016b). Rethinking Indigenous ways to literacy assessment: Hands that speak, feet that tell the story. Paper presented at the Research and Innovation in Classroom Assessment Conference, Brisbane, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, K. A., & Dreamson, N. (2015). Race, the senses, and the materials of writing practices. In J. Turbill, C. Brock, & G. Barton (Eds.), Teaching writing in today’s classrooms: Looking back to look forward (pp. 298–312). Norwood: Australian Literacy Educators’ Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, K. A., & Unsworth, L. (2017). Multimodal literacy. In G. Noblit (Ed.), Oxford research encyclopedia of education. Oxford: Oxford Univeristy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, K. A., & Unsworth, L. (2018). The multimodal construction of race: A review of critical race theory research. Language and Education, 32(4), 331–332. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2018.1434787.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mills, K. A., Comber, B., & Kelly, P. (2013). Sensing place: Embodiment, sensoriality, kinesis, and children behind the camera. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 12(2), 11–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, K. A., Davis-Warra, J., Sewell, M., & Anderson, M. (2016). Indigenous ways with literacies: Transgenerational, multimodal, placed and collective. Language and Education, 30(1), 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monroe, M. H. (2011). Australia: The land where time began: A biography of the Australian continent. Retrieved December 13, 2017, from: http://austhrutime.com/geology.htm

  • Morphy, H. (1991). Ancestral connections: Art and an aboriginal system of knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nespor, J. (1997). Tangled up in school: Politics, space, bodies, and signs in the educational process. London: Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Halloran, K. L. (2009). Historical changes in the semiotic landscape: From calculation to computation. In C. Jewitt (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of multimodal analysis (pp. 98–113). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oodgeroo, N. (1990). My people. Sydney: Angus and Robertson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pandya, V. (1993). Above the forest: Andamanese ethnoanemology, cosmology, and the power of ritual. Delhi: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paterson, M. (2007). The senses of touch: Haptics, affects and technologies. Oxford: Berg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pietikäinen, S., & Pitkänen-Huhta, A. (2013). Multimodal literacy practices in the indigenous sámi classroom: Children navigating in a complex multilingual setting. Journal of Language & Literacy Education, 12(4), 230–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pink, S. (2009). Doing sensory ethnography. London: SAGE.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Porteous, D. (1990). Landscapes of the mind: Worlds of sense and metaphor. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Raworth, K., Sweetman, C., Narayan, S., Rowlands, J., & Hopkins, A. (2012). Conducting semi-structured interviews. Oxford: Oxfam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romero, A., Arce, S., & Cammarota, J. (2009). A barrio pedagogy: Identity, intellectualism, activism, and academic achievement through the evolution of critically compassionate intellectualism. Race Ethnicity and Education, 12(2), 217–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarra, C. (2003). Cherbourg state school: Strong and smart. What works program: Improving outcomes for Indigenous students. Retrieved December 13, 2017, from: http://www.whatworks.edu.au/dbAction.do?cmd=displaySitePage1&subcmd=select&id=111

  • Scollon, R., & Scollon, S. W. (2003). Discourses in place: Language in the material world. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, D. (2014). Interpreting qualitative data (5th ed.). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanton, D., Bayon, V., Neale, H., Ahmed, G., Gahli, A., Benford, S., Cobb, S., Ingrim, R., O’Malley, C., Wilson, J., & Pridmore, T. (2001). Classroom collaboration in the design of tangible interfaces for storytelling. CHI Letters, 3(1), 482–489.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, P. (2006). The olifantsvlei fresh stories project: Multimodality, creativity, and fixing in the semiotic chain. In C. Jewitt & G. Kress (Eds.), Multimodal literacy (pp. 123–138). New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoecker, R. (2005). Research methods for community change: A project-based approach. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stoller, P. (1989). The taste of ethnographic things: The sense in ethnography. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuhiwai Smith, L. (2006). Choosing the margins: The role of research in indigenous struggles for social justice. In N. K. Denzin & M. D. Giardina (Eds.), Qualitative inquiry and the conservative challenge (pp. 151–174). Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Kleut, G. (2011). The whiteness of literacy practice in Ontario. Race Ethnicity and Education, 14(5), 699–726.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, M., & Simpson, A. (2014). Exploring literacies through touch pad technologies: The dynamic materiality of modal interactions. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 37(2), 98–106.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kathy A. Mills .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Mills, K.A., Dooley, J. (2019). Sensory Ways to Indigenous Multimodal Literacies: Hands and Feet Tell the Story. In: Rennie, J., Harper, H. (eds) Literacy Education and Indigenous Australians. Language Policy, vol 19. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8629-9_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8629-9_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-8628-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-8629-9

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics