Abstract
This chapter reports original research that asks the question: What are the ways of knowing, being, and communicating that are valued and practiced in Indigenous communities? Literacy curricula, internationally and nationally, typically do not take into account the multi-sensorial dimensions of non-Western forms of representation that go beyond narrow conceptions of print. For example, literacies are often conceived as drawing on print, visual, spatial, gestural, and audio modes, but the role of haptics and locomotion has typically received little attention. This chapter highlights examples of the multi-sensoriality of Indigenous literacies observed in participatory community research with an Indigenous school. It extends recent theories of sensory studies in the history and cultural anthropology of the senses, applying these principles to literacy education. Sensory literacies is a theoretical perspective that gives priority to the sensorial dimensions of the body and its role in communication in literacy practice, because without a sensing body, we cannot know about or communicate with the world. The data demonstrates how the forgotten role of the hands and feet in dominant theories of communication is central to Indigenous identity and literacies. Written by a white academic with an Indigenous researcher, the chapter problematises the privileging of narrow, logocentric, and Western forms of literacy and its implications for rethinking the role of the whole body in literacy and the literacy curriculum for Indigenous students.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The term Indigenous in this research refers to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples of Australia. It is acknowledged that there are many First Nations People worldwide, each with their own culture.
- 2.
All student names are pseudonyms.
References
Arola, K. L., & Wysoki, A. (2012). Composing media, composing embodiment. Logan: Utah State University Press.
Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority [ACARA]. (2016). National assessment program: Literacy and numeracy (NAPLAN). Syndey: Australian Government.
Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority [ACARA]. (2017). Australian curriculum: Version 8.3. Canberra: Australian Government. Retrieved December 13, 2017, from: http://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/?dnsi=1
Castagno, A. E., & Brayboy, B. M. J. (2008). Culturally responsive schooling for indigenous youth: A review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 78(4), 941–993.
Collins-Gearing, B., & Osland, D. (2010). Who will save us from the rabbits? Rewriting the past allegorically. The Looking Glass: New Perspectives on Children’s Literature, 14(2). Retrieved December 13, 2017, from: http://www.lib.latrobe.edu.au/ojs/index.php/tlg/article/view/227/225
Eco, U. (1976). A theory of semiotics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Farnell, B. (2012). Dynamic embodiment for social theory. London: Taylor and Francis.
Ford, M. (2013). Achievement gaps in Australia: What NAPLAN reveals about education inequality in Australia. Race Ethnicity and Education, 16(1), 80–102.
Giaccardi, E. (2012). Heritage and social media: Understanding heritage in a participatory culture. London: Routledge.
Howes, D. (1991). The varieties of sensory experience: A sourcebook in the anthropology of the senses. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Howes, D. (2014). Anthropology and multimodality: The conjugation of the senses. In C. Jewitt (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of multimodal analysis (2nd ed., pp. 225–236). London: Routledge.
Howes, D., & Classen, C. (2014). Ways of sensing: Understanding the senses in society. London: Routledge.
Ingold, T. (2000). The perpection of the environment: Essays in livelihood, dwelling and skill. London: Routledge.
Ingold, T., & Vergunst, L. (2008). Ways of walking: Ethnography and practice on foot. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Jewitt, C. (2006). Technology, literacy and learning: A multimodal approach. Abingdon: Routledge.
Kress, G. (2000). Design and transformation: New theories of meaning. In B. Cope & M. Kalantzis (Eds.), Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures (pp. 153–161). South Yarra: Macmillan.
Kress, G., & Bezemer, J. (2008). Writing in multimodal texts: A social semiotic account of designs for learning. Written Communication, 25(2), 166–195.
Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2006). Reading images: The grammar of visual design (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
Leeds-Hurwitz, W. (1987). The social history of the natural history of an interview: A multidisciplinary investigation of social communication. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 20, 1–51.
Martin, K. L. (2003). Ways of knowing, being, and doing: A theoretical framework and methods for indigenous and Indigenist research: Voicing dissent new talents 21st century, next generation Australian studies. Journal of Australian Studies, 76, 203–214.
Martin, K. (2008). Please knock before you enter: Aboriginal regulation of outsiders and implications for researchers. Flaxton: PostPressed.
Mills, K. A. (2010). Filming in progress: New spaces for multimodal designing. Linguistics and Education, 21(1), 14–28.
Mills, K. A. (2011). The multiliteracies classroom. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Mills, K. A. (2016a). Literacy theories for the digital age: Social, critical, multimodal, spatial, material, and sensory lenses. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Mills, K. A. (2016b). Rethinking Indigenous ways to literacy assessment: Hands that speak, feet that tell the story. Paper presented at the Research and Innovation in Classroom Assessment Conference, Brisbane, Australia.
Mills, K. A., & Dreamson, N. (2015). Race, the senses, and the materials of writing practices. In J. Turbill, C. Brock, & G. Barton (Eds.), Teaching writing in today’s classrooms: Looking back to look forward (pp. 298–312). Norwood: Australian Literacy Educators’ Association.
Mills, K. A., & Unsworth, L. (2017). Multimodal literacy. In G. Noblit (Ed.), Oxford research encyclopedia of education. Oxford: Oxford Univeristy Press.
Mills, K. A., & Unsworth, L. (2018). The multimodal construction of race: A review of critical race theory research. Language and Education, 32(4), 331–332. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2018.1434787.
Mills, K. A., Comber, B., & Kelly, P. (2013). Sensing place: Embodiment, sensoriality, kinesis, and children behind the camera. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 12(2), 11–27.
Mills, K. A., Davis-Warra, J., Sewell, M., & Anderson, M. (2016). Indigenous ways with literacies: Transgenerational, multimodal, placed and collective. Language and Education, 30(1), 1–21.
Monroe, M. H. (2011). Australia: The land where time began: A biography of the Australian continent. Retrieved December 13, 2017, from: http://austhrutime.com/geology.htm
Morphy, H. (1991). Ancestral connections: Art and an aboriginal system of knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Nespor, J. (1997). Tangled up in school: Politics, space, bodies, and signs in the educational process. London: Falmer.
O’Halloran, K. L. (2009). Historical changes in the semiotic landscape: From calculation to computation. In C. Jewitt (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of multimodal analysis (pp. 98–113). London: Routledge.
Oodgeroo, N. (1990). My people. Sydney: Angus and Robertson.
Pandya, V. (1993). Above the forest: Andamanese ethnoanemology, cosmology, and the power of ritual. Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Paterson, M. (2007). The senses of touch: Haptics, affects and technologies. Oxford: Berg.
Pietikäinen, S., & Pitkänen-Huhta, A. (2013). Multimodal literacy practices in the indigenous sámi classroom: Children navigating in a complex multilingual setting. Journal of Language & Literacy Education, 12(4), 230–247.
Pink, S. (2009). Doing sensory ethnography. London: SAGE.
Porteous, D. (1990). Landscapes of the mind: Worlds of sense and metaphor. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Raworth, K., Sweetman, C., Narayan, S., Rowlands, J., & Hopkins, A. (2012). Conducting semi-structured interviews. Oxford: Oxfam.
Romero, A., Arce, S., & Cammarota, J. (2009). A barrio pedagogy: Identity, intellectualism, activism, and academic achievement through the evolution of critically compassionate intellectualism. Race Ethnicity and Education, 12(2), 217–233.
Sarra, C. (2003). Cherbourg state school: Strong and smart. What works program: Improving outcomes for Indigenous students. Retrieved December 13, 2017, from: http://www.whatworks.edu.au/dbAction.do?cmd=displaySitePage1&subcmd=select&id=111
Scollon, R., & Scollon, S. W. (2003). Discourses in place: Language in the material world. London: Routledge.
Silverman, D. (2014). Interpreting qualitative data (5th ed.). London: Sage.
Stanton, D., Bayon, V., Neale, H., Ahmed, G., Gahli, A., Benford, S., Cobb, S., Ingrim, R., O’Malley, C., Wilson, J., & Pridmore, T. (2001). Classroom collaboration in the design of tangible interfaces for storytelling. CHI Letters, 3(1), 482–489.
Stein, P. (2006). The olifantsvlei fresh stories project: Multimodality, creativity, and fixing in the semiotic chain. In C. Jewitt & G. Kress (Eds.), Multimodal literacy (pp. 123–138). New York: Peter Lang.
Stoecker, R. (2005). Research methods for community change: A project-based approach. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
Stoller, P. (1989). The taste of ethnographic things: The sense in ethnography. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Tuhiwai Smith, L. (2006). Choosing the margins: The role of research in indigenous struggles for social justice. In N. K. Denzin & M. D. Giardina (Eds.), Qualitative inquiry and the conservative challenge (pp. 151–174). Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press.
Van de Kleut, G. (2011). The whiteness of literacy practice in Ontario. Race Ethnicity and Education, 14(5), 699–726.
Walsh, M., & Simpson, A. (2014). Exploring literacies through touch pad technologies: The dynamic materiality of modal interactions. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 37(2), 98–106.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mills, K.A., Dooley, J. (2019). Sensory Ways to Indigenous Multimodal Literacies: Hands and Feet Tell the Story. In: Rennie, J., Harper, H. (eds) Literacy Education and Indigenous Australians. Language Policy, vol 19. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8629-9_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8629-9_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-8628-2
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-8629-9
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)