Skip to main content

‘Just Teach Our Kids to Read’: Efficacy of Intensive Reading Interventions for Both Younger and Older Low-Progress Readers in Schools Serving Mainly Remote Indigenous Communities

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Literacy Education and Indigenous Australians

Part of the book series: Language Policy ((LAPO,volume 19))

Abstract

Annually, the results released from the National Assessment Program Literacy and Numeracy testing Australia-wide confirm the huge gaps in literacy performance between students from Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australian backgrounds, particularly for those students living in remote communities. Recent research has shown promising results, indicating that one of the major changes that is likely to show positive effects on Indigenous students’ literacy levels is the provision of scientific, evidence-based, best-practice reading instruction.

We would like to thank the teachers and students who worked with us in Cape York, our MultiLit instructors and research teams and Cape York Partnership.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority. (2016). NAPLAN achievement in Reading, persuasive writing, language conventions and numeracy: National Report for 2016. Sydney: Author. Retrieved from https://www.nap.edu.au/results-and-reports/national-reports.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckingham, J. (2003). Class size and teacher quality. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 2, 71–86. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024403823803.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckingham, J., Beaman, R., & Wheldall, K. (2014). Why poor children are more likely to become poor readers: The early years. Educational Review, 66, 428–446. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2013.795129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conifer, D., Leslie, T., Tilley, C., & Liddy, M. (2017). Closing the gap: Australia is failing on indigenous disadvantage goals. Retrieved from http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-02-14/closing-the-gap-report-card-failing/8268450

  • Department of Education, Science and Training. (2005). Teaching reading: Report and recommendations. Canberra: Department of Education, Science and Training.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, R., Engelmann, S., & Bauer, M. M. (1999). Spelling mastery. Columbus: SRA McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, D. M. (2007). Peabody picture vocabulary test (4th ed.). Minneapolis: NCS Pearson Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, L. A. (2005). Balancing approaches: Revisiting the educational psychology research on teaching students with learning difficulties. Australian Education Review (No. 48). Camberwell: Australian Council for Educational Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, L., Wheldall, K., & Beaman, R. (2007). The research locus and conceptual basis for MULTILIT: Why we do what we do. Australian Journal of Learning Disabilities, 12, 61–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilmore, A., Croft, C., & Reid, N. (1981). Burt word reading test – New Zealand revision. Wellington: New Zealand Council for Educational Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Good to Great Schools Australia. (2013). Effective instruction – The keystone to school reform. Cairns: Author. Retrieved from https://goodtogreatschools.org.au/effective-instruction-keystone-school-reform/.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gough, P. B., & Tunmer, W. E. (1986). Decoding, reading and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7, 6–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/074193258600700104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, B., & Risley, T. (1995). Meaningful differences in the everyday experience of young American children. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, R., McGeown, S., & Watson, J. (2012). Long term effects of synthetic versus analytic phonics teaching on the reading and spelling ability of 10 year old boys and girls. Reading and Writing, 26, 1365–1384. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-011-9323-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lesaux, N., & Siegel, L. (2003). The development of reading in children who speak English as a second language. Developmental Psychology, 39, 1005–1019. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.39.6.1005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macquarie University Special Education Centre. (1998). The MultiLit reading tutor program (revised). Sydney: Macquarie University Special Education Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, F., & Pratt, C. (2001). The Martin and Pratt nonword reading test. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merrett, F., & Wheldall, K. (1990). Positive teaching in the primary school. London: Paul Chapman.

    Google Scholar 

  • MultiLit. (2007). The MultiLit reading tutor program (revised). Sydney: MultiLit Pty Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • MultiLit. (2011). MiniLit early literacy intervention program. Sydney: MultiLit Pty Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • MultiLit. (2012). PreLit: Early literacy preparation program. Sydney: MultiLit Pty Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • MultiLit. (2017). InitiaLit foundation: Whole class initial instruction in literacy. Sydney: MultiLit Pty Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakata, M. (2003). Some thoughts on literacy issues in indigenous contexts. The Australian Journal of Indigenous Education, 31, 7–15. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1326011100003641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD). (2000). Report of the national reading panel: Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction (NIH Publication No. 00-4769). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • National reports. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.nap.edu.au/results-and-reports/national-reports

  • Neale, M. (1999). Neale analysis of reading ability (3rd ed.). Melbourne: Australian council for educational research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neilson, R. (2003a). The astronaut invented spelling test. Jamberoo: Language, Speech and Literacy Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neilson, R. (2003b). Sutherland phonological awareness test (Rev. ed.). Jamberoo: Language, Speech and Literacy Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, N. (2009). Radical hope: Education and equality in Australia. Quarterly Essay, 35, 1–105. Retrieved from https://www.quarterlyessay.com.au/essay/2009/09/radical-hope.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, N. (2016, November). Direct instruction works: Evidence and experience of direct and explicit teaching. In Centre for Independent Studies (CIS). Direct instruction event. Public lecture conducted from Sydney. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oBBQbixVK74

  • Pogorzelski, S., & Wheldall, K. (2005). The importance of phonological processing skills for older low-progress readers. Educational Psychology in Practice, 21, 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, J. (2006). Independent review of the teaching of early reading: Final report. Retrieved from http://www.standards.dfes.gov.uk/rosereview

  • Stanovich, K. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquistion of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360–407. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.21.4.1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wegener, S., Wang, H., de Lissa, P., Robidoux, S., Nation, K., & Castles, A. (2017). Children reading spoken words: Interactions between vocabulary and orthographic expectancy. Developmental Science, 21, e12577. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westwood, P. (2005). Spelling: Approaches to teaching and assessment (2nd ed.). Camberwell: Australian Council for Educational Research Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheldall, K. (1991). Managing troublesome classroom behaviour: A positive teaching perspective. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 38, 99–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/0156655910380202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheldall, K. (1994). Why do contemporary special educators favour a non-categorical approach to teaching? Special Education Perspectives, 3, 45–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheldall, K. (2009). Effective instruction for socially disadvantaged low-progress readers: The Schoolwise program. Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties, 14, 151–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/19404150903264294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheldall, K., & Beaman, R. (2000). An evaluation of MultiLit: ‘Making up lost time in literacy’. Canberra: Commonwealth Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheldall, K., & Beaman, R. (2011). Effective instruction for older low-progress readers: Meeting the needs of indigenous students. In C. Wyatt-Smith, J. Elkins, & S. Gunn (Eds.), Multiple perspectives on difficulties in learning literacy and numeracy. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheldall, K., & Carter, M. (1996). Reconstructing behaviour analysis in education: A revised behavioural interactionist perspective for special education. Educational Psychology, 16, 121–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144341960160203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheldall, K., & Madelaine, A. (2013). The Wheldall assessment of reading passages (WARP) manual. Sydney: MultiLit Pty Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheldall, K., & Merrett, F. (1984). Positive teaching: The behavioural approach. London: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheldall, K., & Wheldall, R. (2014). The MultiLit story: Effective instruction for low-progress readers. Perspectives on Language and Literacy, 40(3), 32–39. Retrieved from https://dyslexiaida.org/perspectives/.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheldall, K., Beaman, R., & Langstaff, E. (2010). Mind the gap’: Effective literacy instruction for indigenous low-progress readers. Australasian Journal of Special Education, 34, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1375/ajse.34.1.1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheldall, K., Beaman, R., Madelaine, A., & McMurtry, S. (2012). Evaluations of the efficacy of MultiLit and MiniLit programs for aboriginal students at the various exodus tutorial centre sites over a three year period, 2009–2011. Unpublished research report submitted to the Exodus Foundation. Sydney: MultiLit Research Unit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheldall, K., Reynolds, M., & Madelaine, A. (2015). The Wheldall assessment of reading lists. Sydney: MultiLit Pty Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheldall, K., Snow, P., & Graham, L. (2017a). Explainer: What does the term ‘synthetic phonics’ really mean? Learning Difficulties Australia Bulletin, 49(1), 6–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheldall, K., Snow, P., & Graham, L. (2017b). Explainer: Phonics is not a method of reading, it is a method of learning how to read. Nomanis, 4, 18–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheldall, K., Stephenson, J., & Carter, M. (2017c, October). What is direct instruction? Nomanis Notes, Issue 2.https://docs.wixstatic.com/ugd/81f204_9c9551a55dfb410b993fbdf29532e912.pdf

  • Wolf, M., Ullman-Shade, C., & Gottwald, S. (2016). Lessons from the reading brain for reading development and dyslexia. Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties, 21, 143–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/19404158.2016.1337364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kevin Wheldall .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Wheldall, K., Wheldall, R., Madelaine, A., Reynolds, M., Arakelian, S., Kohnen, S. (2019). ‘Just Teach Our Kids to Read’: Efficacy of Intensive Reading Interventions for Both Younger and Older Low-Progress Readers in Schools Serving Mainly Remote Indigenous Communities. In: Rennie, J., Harper, H. (eds) Literacy Education and Indigenous Australians. Language Policy, vol 19. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8629-9_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8629-9_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-8628-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-8629-9

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics