Abstract
Issues related to elder abuse, including research, prevention, and treatment are addressed in the USA by several federal agencies, at the state level, and in over 3000 counties across the 50 states. Numerous nonprofit and professional organizations work to provide information and services designed to prevent elder abuse and to assist the victims. Although each organization plays an important role, minimal levels of funding restrict what can be accomplished. There is limited coordination across agencies, and accordingly there are gaps and duplication of efforts. In 2011, the US Government Accountability Office issued a report entitled: “Stronger Federal Leadership Could Enhance National Response to Elder Abuse”. Most states in the USA have mandatory reporting laws, which require such entities as banks or physicians to report instances of abuse to an official agency or to the police. Federal agencies involved in elder abuse issues include the Administration on Aging, which funds the National Center on Elder Abuse and sponsors other programs and seminars, and the National Institute of Justice which is interested in the extent to which elder abuse represents criminal activity and funds several research projects. The Center for Disease Control publishes a fact sheet and reports on the topic. The Long-Term Care Ombudsman Program under the Department of Health and Human Services responds to the issues of alleged abuse in nursing homes and inspects nursing homes on a regular basis. Among private nonprofit agencies, the National Committee for the Prevention of Elder Abuse (NCPEA) unites researchers, practitioners, educators, and advocates to work toward preventing elder abuse. Virtually, every county in the USA has an adult protective services agency, which takes reports of elder abuse and investigates them. Many of these county level agencies belong to a national organization, the National Adult Protective Services Association. This chapter describes the activities of these various organizational entities, both federal and nonfederal, and discusses the extent to which the GAO report has been influential in guiding current activities in the field.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Acierno, Ron, Melba A. Hernandez, Ananda B. Amstadter, Heidi S. Resnick, Kenneth Steve, Wendy Muzzy, and Dean G. Kilpatrick. 2010. Prevalence and correlates of emotional, physical, sexual, and financial abuse and potential neglect in the United States: The national elder mistreatment study. American Journal of Public Health 100 (2): 292–297.
Administration for Community Living. 2015, October 8. ACL news: ACL announces new federal grants to bolster state adult protective services. Accessed 6 May 2016.
Administration on Aging. No date. Prevention of elder abuse, neglect and exploitation (Title VII-A3). https://aoa.acl.gov/Elder_Rights/index. Accessed 15 May 2016.
Castle, Nicholas, and Scott Beach. 2013. Elder abuse in assisted living. Journal of Applied Gerontology 32: 248–267.
Elder Justice Coordinating Council. 2015. Elder justice coordinating council 2012–2014 report to Congress. Accessed 2 May 2016.
Este, Stephen. 2007. The challenges of accountability in the human services: Performance management in the adult protective services program of Texas. In Applied research projects. Texas State University paper 250.
GAO Report to the Chairman, Special Committee on Aging, U.S. Senate. 2011. Elder justice: Stronger federal leadership could enhance national response to elder abuse. GAO-11-208: 3/2/2011.
Government Accountability Office. 2013, July. Elder justice: More federal coordination and public awareness needed. GAO-13-498.
Hall, Jeffrey, Debra L. Karch, and Alex Crosby (Compilers). 2016. Elder abuse surveillance: Uniform definitions and recommended core data elements. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Harvard Health Letter. 2006, July 1.
Hemp, L.F. 2017. Analysis of elder abuse and neglect definitions under state law. https://www.ncbi.nim.nih.gov/books. Accessed 2 May 2016.
Lachs, M.S., and K. Pillemer. 2004, October 2–8. Elder abuse. Lancet 364 (9441): 1263–1272.
Lachs, Mark S., Christianna Williams, Shelley O’Brien, Leslie Hurst, and Ralph Horwitz. 1997. Risk factors for reported elder abuse and neglect: A nine-year observational cohort study. Gerontologist 37 (4): 469–474.
Laumann, E.O., S.A. Leitsch, and L.J. Waite. 2008. Elder mistreatment in the United States: Prevalence estimates from a nationally representative study. Journals of Gerontology B 63 (4): S248–S254.
Lifespan of Greater Rochester, Inc., Weill Cornell Medical Center, and New York City Department for the Aging. 2011, May. Under the radar: New York State elder abuse prevalence study, final report.
Marsh, J.C. 2003. The social work response to violence. Social Work 48 (4): 437–438.
McNamee, Catherine C., and Mary B. Murphy. No date. Elder abuse in the United States. NIJ Journal (255). www.nij.gov. Accessed 2 May 2016.
National Academies Committee on National Statistics. 2010, June 22. Meeting report: Meeting on research issues in elder mistreatment and abuse and financial fraud.
National Adult Protective Services Organization. No date. Help in your area/learn more. http://www.napsa-now.org. Accessed 14 Feb 2017.
National Institute on Aging. 2014. NIA budget update. https://www.nia.nih.gov. Accessed 2 May 2016.
National Institute of Justice, Office of Justice Programs. No date. Evaluating the elder abuse forensic center model. NIJ home page>topics>crimeandpunishment>elderabuse. Accessed 2 May 2016.
National Research Council. 2003. Elder mistreatment: Abuse neglect and exploitation in an aging America. In Panel to review risk and prevalence of elder abuse and neglect, ed. Richard J. Bonnie and Robert B. Wallace. Committee on National Statistics and Committee on Law and Justice, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press.
Nichol, Michael B., Kathleen H. Wilber, Joanne Wu, and Zachary D. Gassoumis. 2015, January. Evaluating the cost effectiveness of the elder abuse forensic center model. NIJ: 248556.
Pillemer, K.A., and D. Finkelhor. 1988. The prevalence of elder abuse: A random sample survey. Gerontologist 28 (1): 51–57.
Podnieks, Elizabeth, and Cynthia Thomas. 2018. Chapter 8: Public health, human rights and global perspectives on elder mistreatment. In Elder mistreatment and the public’s health, ed. Pamela Teaster and Jeffry Hall. New York: Springer.
Pub. L. No.111-148, tit. VI, subtit. §§6701-6703, 124 Stat. 119, 782-804 (2010) (codified at 42 U.S.C. §§1397j-1397 m-5).
Sedlak, Andrea J. 1991. National incidence and prevalence of child abuse and neglect (Revised report). Rockville, MD: Westat.
Steigel, L., and E. Klem. 2007. Types of abuse: Provisions and citations in adult protective services laws, by state. American Bar Association Commission on Law and Aging.
Thomas, Cynthia. 2000. The first national study of elder abuse and neglect: Contrast with results from other studies. Journal of Elder Abuse and Neglect 12 (1): 1–14.
Thomas, Cynthia, Toshio Tatara, et al. 1999. National elder abuse incidence study. National Center for Elder Abuse.
Wiglesworth, Aileen, Laura Mosqueda, Kerry Burnight, Ted Younglove, and Daniel Jeske. 2006. Findings from an elder abuse forensic center. The Gerontologist 46 (2): 277–283.
Yuan, Y., S. Leelaram, S. Dahbour, M. Greene, A. Acker, and E. Swartz. 2015, 9/25. Development of a national adult protective services data system: NAMRS pilot final report, vol. 1. Pilot overview and future recommendations.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Thomas, C. (2020). Coordinating Elder Abuse Prevention and Treatment Across Organizations in the USA. In: Shankardass, M. (eds) International Handbook of Elder Abuse and Mistreatment. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8610-7_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8610-7_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-8609-1
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-8610-7
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)