Skip to main content

Emerging Trends in Socket Reconstruction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Orbit and Oculoplastics

Part of the book series: Current Practices in Ophthalmology ((CUPROP))

  • 370 Accesses

Abstract

Loss of an eye is a devastating event in an individual’s life. It is of utmost importance to rehabilitate these patients with a proper fitting artificial prosthetic eye. The field of socket surgery has evolved over the last decade with better surgical techniques now available for these patients. The required procedure depends on the grade of socket contracture, and the aim of this chapter is to elucidate in brief the various techniques available for the same.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bhattacharjee K, Bhattacharjee H, Kuri GK, Das JK, Dey D. Comparative analysis of use of porous orbital implant with mucus membrane graft and dermis fat graft as a primary procedure in reconstruction of severely contracted socket. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2014;62:145–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Gougelmann HP. The evolution of the ocular motility implant. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 1976;10:689–711.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Krishna G. Contracted sockets—I (aetiology and types). Indian J Ophthalmol. 1980;28(3):117–20.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gundlach KKH, Gutoff RF, Hingst VHM, et al. Expansion of the socket and orbit for congenital clinical anophthalmia. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;116:1214–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Dunaway DJ, David DJ. Intraorbital tissue expansion in the management of congenital anophthalmos. Br J Plast Surg. 1996;49:529–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Sinclair D, Dangerfiled P. Nervous system. In: Sinclair D, Dangerfield P, editors. Human growth after birth. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1998. p. 87.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Weise KG, Vogel M, Guthoff R, Gundlach K. Treatment of congenital anophthalmos with self-inflating polymer expanders: a new method. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 1999;27:72–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Jordan DR, Klapper SR. Evaluation and management of the anophthalmic socket and socket reconstruction. In: Smith and Nesi’s ophthalmic plastic and reconstructive surgery. 3rd ed. Berlin: Springer; 2012. p. 1131–73.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Tse DT. Inventor; University of Miami (Miami, FL) assignee. Integrated rigid fixation orbital expander. US patent 6,582,465 B2 June 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Tse DT, Pinchuk L, Davis S. Evaluation of an integrated orbital tissue expander in an anophthalmic feline model. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007;143(2):317–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Tse DT, Abdulhafez M, Orozco MA, Tse JD, Azab AO, Pinchuk. Evaluation of an integrated orbital tissue expander in congenital anophthalmos: report of preliminary clinical experience. Am J Ophthalmol. 2011;15(3):470–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Tucker SM, Sapp N, Collin R. Orbital expansion of congenitally anophthalmic socket. Br J Ophthalmol. 1995;79:667–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Chen D, Heher K. Management of the anophthalmic socket in pediatric patients. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2004;15:449–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Leatherbarrow B. Oculoplastic surgery. 2nd ed. London: Informa; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kaltreider SA. The ideal ocular prosthesis: analysis of prosthetic volume. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;16:388–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kaltreider SA, Lucarelli MJ. A simple algorithm for selection of implant size for enucleation and evisceration. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;18:336–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Yoon JS, Lew H, Kim SJ, Lee SY. Exposure rate of hydroxyapatite orbital implants a 15-year experience of 802 cases. Ophthalmology. 2008;115(3):566–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Custer PL, Trinkaus KM. Volumetric determination of enucleation implant size. Am J Ophthalmol. 1999;128:489–94.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kumar S, Sugandhi P, Arora A, Pandey PK. Amniotic membrane transplantation versus mucous membrane grafting in anophthalmic contracted socket. Orbit. 2006;25:195–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Bosnaik, et al. Temporalis muscle transfer: a vascular bed for autogenous dermis fat orbital implantation. Ophthalmology. 1985;92:292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Li D, Jie Y, Liu H, Liu J, Zhu Z, Mao C. Reconstruction of anophthalmic orbits and contracted eye sockets with microvascular radial forearm free flaps. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;24(2):94–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Koshima I, Narushima M, Mihara M, et al. Short pedicle thoracodorsal artery perforator (TAP) adiposal flap for three dimensional reconstruction of contracted orbital cavity. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2008;61:13–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Lopez-Arcas JM, Martin M, Gomez E, et al. The Guyuron retroauricular island flap for eyelid and eye socket reconstruction in children. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;38:744–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Rycroft BW. An operation for treatment of severe contraction of the eye socket. Br J Ophthalmol. 1962;46:21–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosures

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bhattacharjee, K., Tongbram, A. (2019). Emerging Trends in Socket Reconstruction. In: Gupta, A., Tahiliani, P. (eds) Orbit and Oculoplastics . Current Practices in Ophthalmology. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8538-4_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8538-4_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-8537-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-8538-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics