Abstract
The Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant accident caused enormous damage in terms of not only the mental status of affected people, but also the cohesiveness of entire communities in Fukushima Prefecture. Regarding individual mental health, many psychiatric issues became apparent after the accident, including, but not limited to, posttraumatic stress disorder, depression, and alcohol or another type of substance abuse. Widespread rumors and damaged reputations caused anxiety among residents and evacuees, eliciting various disparities such as risk perception factors related to compensation or the effects of radiation exposure. As a result, a decrease in community resilience was observed. Additionally, evacuees were frequently exposed to public stigmas resulting from the negative stories regarding compensation issues or the possible genetic effects of radiation exposure. To address these multidimensional mental health problems, several new and unique care facilities were established after the disaster with the aim of providing active interventions for and improving the current well-being of affected people, including evacuees. While a certain level of effectiveness in the provision of outreach services has been seen, issues such as burnout and exhaustion among health care staff working for different care resources have also been observed. In contrast to natural disasters, nuclear disasters tend to have long-term psychosocial consequences on affected people. Therefore, support care resources that could play important roles, especially in the post-disaster phase in affected areas, should be supported by national and local governments on a long-term basis.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Yabe H, Suzuki Y, Mashiko H, Nakayama Y, Hisata M, Niwa S. Psychological distress after the Great East Japan Earthquake and Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant accident: results of a mental health and lifestyle survey through the Fukushima health management survey in FY2011 and FY2012. Fukushima J Med Sci. 2014;60:57–67.
Yoshizawa N. Fukushima reconstruction: current status and radiation health risks. 2017. https://www.mri.co.jp/opinion/column/trend/trend_20171226.html. Accessed 16 Aug 2018.
Tanigawa K, Lochard J, Abdel-Wahab M, Crick MJ. Roles and activities of international organizations after the Fukushima accident. Asia Pac J Public Health. 2017;29:90S–8S.
Kimura HA. Radiation brain moms and citizen science. The gender politics of food contamination after Fukushima. Durham: Duke University Press; 2016.
Sato A, Lyamzina Y. Diversity of concerns in recovery after a nuclear accident: a perspective from Fukushima. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15(2):350E. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15020350.
Fukushima Prefectural Government Steps for revitalization in Fukushima. 2017. http://www.pref.fukushima.lg.jp/uploaded/attachment/233344.pdf. Accessed 16 Aug 2018.
Yasumura S, Hosoya M, Yamashita S, Kamiya K, Abe M, Akashi M. Study protocol for the Fukushima health management survey. J Epidemiol. 2012;22:375–83.
Iwasa H, Suzuki Y, Shiga T, Maeda M, Yabe H, Yasumura S. Psychometric evaluation of the Japanese version of the posttraumatic stress disorder checklist in community dwellers following the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant incident: the Fukushima health management survey. SAGE Open. 2016;6(2):1–11.
Stellman JM, Smith RP, Katz CL, et al. Enduring mental health morbidity and social function impairment in world trade center rescue, recovery, and cleanup workers: the psychological dimension of an environmental health disaster. Environ Health Perspect. 2008;116:1248–53.
Mental Health and Lifestyle Survey for the Fukushima Health Management Survey 2018. http://fmu-global.jp/download/results-of-mental-health-and-lifestyle-survey-for-fy-2016-summary-of-support/?wpdmdl=4420. 2018. Accessed 16 Aug 2018.
Oe M, Fujii S, Maeda M, Nagai M, Harigane M, Miura I, et al. Three-year trend survey of psychological distress, posttraumatic stress, and problem drinking among residents in the evacuation zone after the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant accident: the Fukushima health management survey. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2016;70:245–52.
Oe M, Maeda M, Nagai M, Yasumura S, Yabe H, Suzuki Y, et al. Predictors of severe psychological distress trajectory after nuclear disaster: evidence from the Fukushima health management survey. BMJ Open. 2016;6:e013400. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013400.
Kawakami N. National survey of mental health measured by K6 and factors affecting mental health status in Research on Applied Use of Statistics and Information. Health Labour Sciences Research Grant (in Japanese). 2007.
Maeda M, Ueda Y, Nagai M, Fujii S, Oe M. Diagnostic interview study of the prevalence of depression among public employees engaged in long-term relief work in Fukushima. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2016;70:413–20.
Japanese Cabinet Office. Statistical data regarding suicide (in Japanese). 2017. http://www8.cao.go.jp/jisatsutaisaku/toukei/pdf/saishin_shinsai.pdf. Accessed 16 Aug 2018.
Ohto H, Maeda M, Yabe H, Yasumura S, Bromet EE. Suicide rates in the aftermath of the 2011 earthquake in Japan. Lancet. 2015;38:1727.
Kõlves K, Kõlves KE, De Leo D. Natural disasters and suicidal behaviours: a systematic literature review. J Affect Disord. 2013;146:1–14.
Orui M, Suzuki Y, Maeda M, Yasumura S. Suicide rates in evacuation areas after the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster: a 5-year follow-up study in Fukushima Prefecture. Crisis. 2018;5:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1027/0227-5910/a000509. [Epub ahead of print].
Beaudoin CE. Hurricane Katrina: addictive behavior trends and predictors. Public Health Rep. 2011;126(3):400–9.
Cerdá M, Tracy M, Galea S. A prospective population based study of changes in alcohol use and binge drinking after a mass traumatic event. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2011;115(1-2):1–8.
Kingston J. In: Nissan Institute, editor. Natural disaster and nuclear crisis in Japan: response and recovery after Japan’s 3/11, Routledge Japanese studies series. London: Routledge; 2012. ISBN-13: 978-0415698566.
Hirakawa H, Shirabe M. Rhetorical marginalization of science and democracy. In: Fujigaki Y, editor. Lessons from Fukushima: Japanese case studies on science, technology and society. New York: Springer; 2015. p. 69–71.
Sekiya N. What is fuhyohigai? Fukushima J Med Sci. 2011;57:93–9.
Vyncke B, Perko T, Van Gorp B. Information sources as explanatory variables for the Belgian health related risk perception of the Fukushima nuclear accident. Risk Anal. 2017;37(3):570–82.
Covello V, Sandman P. Risk communication: evolution and revolution. In: Wolbarst A, editor. Solutions to an environment in peril. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press; 2001. p. 164–78.
Lazarev V. Psychological-and-emotional problems of Chernobyl: role of mass media in the development of post Chernobyl mental disorders in population: critical-and-analytical review. In: Information science and science of science: proceedings of the 3rd international (5th Tambov) conference. Tambov; 1999. pp. 54–57.
Tomkiv Y, Perko T, Oughton DH, et al. How did media present the radiation risks after the Fukushima accident: a content analysis of newspapers in Europe? J Radiol Prot. 2016;36(2):S64–81.
The Japan Times. 2017. https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2017/06/01/national/social-issues/yokohama-mayor-apologizes-boy-bullied-fukushimanuclear-evacuee/#.XQmg1Yj7Rdg. Accessed 19 June 2019.
Corrigan PW, Watson AC, Barr L. The self-stigma of mental illness: implication for self-esteem and self-efficacy. J Soc Clin Psychol. 2006;25:875–84.
Corrigan PW, Rao D. On the self-stigma of mental illness: stages, disclosure, and strategies for change. Can J Psychiatr. 2012;57(8):464–9.
Maeda M, Oe M. The Great East Japan Earthquake: tsunami and nuclear disaster. In: Cherry KE, editor. Traumatic stress and long-term recovery coping with disasters and other negative life events. New York: Springer; 2015. p. 71–90.
Kashiwazaki Y, Maeda M, Yagi A, Fujii S, Takahashi N, Yabe H, et al. Effectiveness of telephone-based intervention for people living in Fukushima disaster area/Fukushima health management survey. Seishinigaku. 2016;58:433–42 (in Japanese).
Maeda M, Ueda Y, Hiruta G. What is the role of Fukushima Center for Disaster Mental Health? Jpn J Trauma Stress. 2014;12:5–12 (in Japanese).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Maeda, M., Lyamzina, Y., Ito, A. (2019). The Psychosocial Consequences of the Fukushima Disaster: What Are We Suffering From?. In: Steinhauser, G., Koizumi, A., Shozugawa, K. (eds) Nuclear Emergencies. Current Topics in Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8327-4_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8327-4_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-8326-7
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-8327-4
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)