Skip to main content

Detection of Factors Influencing Market Liquidity Using an Agent-Based Simulation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

Recently, investors have become more interested in market liquidity, which is regarded as a measure of a booming financial market. When market liquidity is high, market participants are able to smoothly buy and sell their intended amount at a price close to the market mid-price. When discussing market liquidity in empirical studies, researchers have defined liquidity indicators that are consistent with their research objectives. However, it has not been clarified which market factors affect these indicators. In the present paper, we investigated which market factors affect major liquidity indicators, including Volume, Tightness, Resiliency, and Depth, using an artificial market, which is a type of agent-based simulation system. As a result, market liquidity based on Volume is completely opposite to market liquidity based on Tightness, Resiliency, or Depth. Moreover, we confirmed the price decline rate from the fundamental price and the price convergence periods to the fundamental price as a measure of the convergence speed, which is the original meaning of Resiliency, from the price level, which has been brought about by random price changes. Therefore, the trades of fundamentalists have the effect of shortening the convergence period, i.e., causing market liquidity to increase.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For example, if the difference between the highest and lowest prices of the trading day is smaller, then the P/T ratio tends to become lower (Kurosaki et al. 2015).

  2. 2.

    For example, the P/T ratio may be small, although the price does not return from the price level that has been brought about by random price changes if the price fluctuates randomly far from the original price level.

References

  • Amihud Y (2002) Illiquidity and stock returns: cross-section and time-series effects. J Financ Mark 31–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Arthur W, Holland J, Lebaron B, Palmer R, Tayler P (1997) Asset pricing under endogenous expectations in an artificial stock market. The economy as an evolving complex system II. Addison-Wesley, pp 15–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen SH, Chang CL, Du YR (2012) Agent-based economic models and econometrics. Knowl Eng Review 27(2):187–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiarella C, Iori G, Perellò J (2009) The impact of heterogeneous trading rules on the limit order book and order flows. J Econ Dyn Control 33(3):525–537

    Google Scholar 

  • Chung KH, Kim KA, Kitsabunnarat P (2005) Liquidity and quote clustering in a market with multiple tick sizes. J Financ Res 28(2):177–195. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6803.2005.00120.x, https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1475-6803.2005.00120.x

  • Cont R (2001) Empirical properties of asset returns: stylized facts and statistical issues. Quant Financ 1(2):223–236

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurosaki T, Kumano Y, Okabe K, Nagano T (2015) Liquidity in JGB markets: an evaluation from transaction data. Bank of Japan Working Paper Series 15-E-2, Bank of Japan. https://ideas.repec.org/p/boj/bojwps/wp15e02.html

  • Kyle AS (1985) Continuous auctions and insider trading. Econometrica 53:1315–1336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lux T, Marchesi M (1999) Scaling and criticality in a stochastic multiagent model of a financial market. Nature 397:498–500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mizuta T, Izumi K, Yagi I, Yoshimura S (2014) Regulations’ effectiveness for market turbulence by large erroneous orders using multi agent simulation. In: 2014 IEEE conference on computational intelligence on for financial engineering and economics (CIFEr), pp 138–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Mizuta T, Izumi K, Yagi I, Yoshimura S (2014) Investigation of price variation limits, short selling regulation, and uptick rules and their optimal design by artificial market simulations. Electron Commun Jpn 98(7):13–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muranaga J (1999) Dynamics of market liquidity of Japanese stocks: an analysis of tick-by-tick data of the Tokyo Stock Exchange. In: Bank for International Settlements (ed) Market liquidity: research findings and selected policy implications, vol 11. Bank for International Settlements, pp 1–25. https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bis:biscgc:11-13

  • Nakada T, Takadama K (2013) Analysis on the number of XCS agents in agent-based computational finance. In: IEEE conference on computational intelligence on for financial engineering and economics (CIFEr), pp 8–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Nishizaki K, Tsuchikawa A, Yagi T (2013) Indicators related to liquidity in JGB markets. Bank of Japan Review Series 13-E-3, Bank of Japan. https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:boj:bojrev:13-e-3

  • Bank for International Settlements (1999) Recommendations for the design of liquid markets. Bank for International Settlements. https://www.bis.org/publ/cgfs13.htm

  • Sewell M (2006) Characterization of financial time series. http://finance.martinsewell.com/stylized-facts/

  • Yagi I, Nozaki A, Mizuta T (2017) Investigation of the rule for investment diversification at the time of a market crash using an artificial market simulation. Evol Inst Econ Rev 14(2):451–565. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs40844-017-0070-9

  • Yamamoto R, Hirata H (2013) Strategy switching in the Japanese stock market. J Econ Dyn Control 37(19):2010–2022. http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:dyncon:v:37:y:2013:i:10:p:2010-2022

Download references

Disclaimer

Note that the opinions expressed herein are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of SPARX Asset Management Co., Ltd.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Isao Yagi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Yagi, I., Masuda, Y., Mizuta, T. (2019). Detection of Factors Influencing Market Liquidity Using an Agent-Based Simulation. In: Chakrabarti, A., Pichl, L., Kaizoji, T. (eds) Network Theory and Agent-Based Modeling in Economics and Finance. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8319-9_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics