Skip to main content

An Agent-Based Model of BCVA and Systemic Risk

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Network Theory and Agent-Based Modeling in Economics and Finance
  • 862 Accesses

Abstract

An agent-based model is used to determine whether the stability of a financial system can be improved by incorporating BCVA into the pricing of OTC derivatives contracts. The results illustrate that the adjustments of financial institutions’ credit cannot only improve the stability of financial counterparties in credit events but also reduce systemic risk of the entire network. The equity cushion provided by BCVA shields financial intuitions against unanticipated losses. This reduces the frequency and scale of systemic events and the spread of losses. The scale of the benefit is dependent upon the leverage of institutions and is significantly affected by connectivity and the premiums of derivatives contracts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Acemoglu D, Ozdaglar A, Tahbaz-Salehi A (2015) Systemic risk and stability in financial networks. Am Econ Rev 105(2):564–608

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ali R, Vause N (2016) Systemic risk in derivatives markets: a pilot study using CDS data. Financ Stab Paper 38:1–21

    Google Scholar 

  • BISb (2015) Statistical release: OTC derivatives statistics at end-June 2015. Discussion paper, Bank for International Settlements

    Google Scholar 

  • Bliss RR, Kaufman GG (2004) Derivatives and systemic risk: netting, stay, and closeout, pp 1–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Blume L (2013) Network formation in the presence of contagious risk. In: 12th ACM conference on electronic commerce, pp 1–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Blume L, Easley D, Kleinberg J, Kleinberg R, Tardos V (2011) Which networks are least susceptible to cascading failure? In: IEEE 52nd annual symposium on foundations of computer science, pp 303–402

    Google Scholar 

  • Borovkova S, Mouttalibi HLE (2013) Systemic risk and centralized clearing of OTC derivatives: a network approach, Working paper, pp 1–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Brigo D, Buescu C, Morini M (2011) Impact of the first to default time on bilateral CVA, pp 1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Cont R, Minca A (2014) Credit default swaps and systemic risk, pp 1–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Crepey S (2014) XVA: about CVA, DVA, FVA and other market adjustments, pp 1–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg L, Noe TH (2001) Systemic risk in financial systems. Manag Sci 47:236–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green A (2016) XVA: credit, funding and capital valuation adjustments. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/book/10.1002/9781119161233

  • Gregory J (2010) Counterparty credit risk: the new challenge for global financial markets, 3rd edn. Wiley

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull J (2010) OTC derivatives and central clearing: can all transactions be cleared? Financ Stab Rev Deriv Financ Innov Stab 14:71–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiff J, Elliott J, Kazarian E, Scarlata J, Spackman C (2009) Credit derivatives: systemic risks and policy options, IMF working paper, Working paper 09/254, pp 1–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladley D (2013) Contagion and risk-sharing on the inter-bank market, Discussion papers in economics, Department of Economics, University of Leicester, 11/10, pp 1–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Pallavicini A, Perini D, Brigo D (2011) Funding valuation adjustment: a consistent framework including CVA, DVA, collateral, netting rules and re-hypothecation, pp 1–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Russo D (2010) OTC derivatives: financial stability challenges and responses from authorities. Financ Stab Rev Deriv Financ Innov Stab (14), 101–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh M (2010) Collateral, netting and systemic risk in the OTC derivatives market, IMF working paper, pp 1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Wellink N (2010) Mitigating systemic risk in OTC derivatives markets. Financ Stab Rev Deriv Financ Innov Stab (14), 131–135

    Google Scholar 

  • Yavorsky A (2010) OTC derivatives market structure and the credit profiles of wholesale investment banks. Financ Stab Rev Deriv Financ Innov Stab (14), 143–151

    Google Scholar 

  • Zigrand J-P (2010) What do network theory and endogenous risk theory have to say about the effects of central counterparties on systemic stability? Financ Stab Rev Deriv Financ Innov Stab (14), 153–160

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. T. M. Tran .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ladley, D., Tran, C.T.M. (2019). An Agent-Based Model of BCVA and Systemic Risk. In: Chakrabarti, A., Pichl, L., Kaizoji, T. (eds) Network Theory and Agent-Based Modeling in Economics and Finance. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8319-9_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8319-9_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-8318-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-8319-9

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics