Abstract
The effectiveness of the research results’ implementation is one of the main indicators that must be taken into account in the allocation of budget funds for research. The requirement of efficiency of spending budget funds allocated for research works leads to the necessity for continuous improvement of the methodological apparatus of decision support on the allocation of funds, including considering the efficiency of implementation of previously obtained research results of each certain research institution. With the development of information technology, it is important to improve the quality of the use of budgetary funds through information support for decision making on the organization of research in the Health Ministry of Russia, based on the assessment of the potential of the research institution, reflecting their ability to achieve the stated results in the execution of state contracts. The technique of integrated assessment of the effectiveness of research results in scientific institutions of the Health Ministry of Russia is obtained in the framework of state assignments or state contracts on the basis of a set of scientometric and statistical indicators, as well as expert evaluation. The requirements to the methodology and indicators, and the requirements to the approaches and methods of expert evaluation are consistently given.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Sully, B.G., Julious, S.A., Nicholl, J.: A reinvestigation of recruitment to randomized, controlled, multicenter trials: a review of trials funded by two UK funding agencies. Trials 14, 166 (2013)
Arnold, E., Brown, N., Eriksson, A., Jansson, T., Muscio, A., Nählinder, J., et al.: The Role of Industrial Research Institutes in the National Innovation System. VINNOVA, Stockholm (2007)
Warlow, C.: A new NHS research strategy. Lancet 367(9504), 12–13 (2006)
Anderson, M.L., Califf, R.M., Sugarman, J., Participants in the NIH Health Care Systems Research Collaboratory Cluster Randomized Trial Workshop: Ethical and regulatory issues of pragmatic cluster randomized trials in contemporary health systems. Clin. Trials 12(3), 276–286 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1177/1740774515571140
Frewer, L.J., Coles, D., van der Lans, I.A., Schroeder, D., Champion, K., Apperley, J.F.: Impact of the European clinical trials directive on prospective academic clinical trials associated with BMT. Bone Marrow Transplant. 46(3), 443–7 (2011)
Neaton, J.D., Babiker, A., Bohnhorst, M., Darbyshire, J., Denning, E., Frishman, A., et al.: Regulatory impediments jeopardizing the conduct of clinical trials in Europe funded by the National Institutes of Health. Clin. Trials 7(6), 705–18 (2010)
Sveiby, K.-E.: What is knowledge management? (2001). https://www.sveiby.com/Articles?page_articles=2. Last accessed 31 Jan 2019
VanLare, J.M., Conway, P.H., Sox, H.C.: Five next steps for a new national program for comparative-effectiveness research. N. Engl. J. Med. 362(11), 970–973 (2010)
Mushlin, A.I., Ghomrawi, H.M.: Comparative effectiveness research: a cornerstone of healthcare reform? Trans. Am. Clin. Climatol. Assoc. 121, 141–154; discussion 154–155 (2010)
Smyth, R.L.: A risk adapted approach to the governance of clinical trials. BMJ 343, d6756 (2010)
Platt, R., Wilson, M., Chan, K.A., Benner, J.S., Marchibroda, J., McClellan, M.: The new sentinel network—improving the evidence of medical-product safety. N. Engl. J. Med. 361(7), 645–7 (2009)
Higher Education Funding Council for England 2017 Research Excellence Framework [updated 2017 March 17]: Assessment criteria and level definitions [updated 2014 Dec 12]. https://www.ref.ac.uk/2014/panels/assessmentcriteriaandleveldefinitions/. Last accessed 31 Jan 2019
Lee, D., Kim, S., Cha, S.H.: Evaluating the effectiveness of research centers and institutes in universities: disciplines and life cycle stages. KEDI J. Educ. Policy 11(1), 119 (2014)
Selby, J.V., Lipstein, S.H.: PCORI at 3 years—progress, lessons, and plans. N. Engl. J. Med. 370(7), 592–595 (2014)
Academy of Medical Sciences [Internet]: A new pathway for the regulation and governance of health research (2011). http://www.acmedsci.ac.uk/policy/policy-projects/. Last accessed 29 Jan 2019
Ranking of research institutions SIR world report 2010 health sciences. SCImago J. Country Rank. http://www.scimagojr.com. Last accessed 31 Jan 2019
Altbach, P.G., Reisberg, L., Yudkevich, M., Androushchak, G., Pacheco, I.F. (eds.): Paying the Professoriate: A Global Comparison of Compensation and Contracts. Routledge, New York (2012)
Califf, R.M.: The patient-centered outcomes research network: a national infrastructure for comparative effectiveness research. N. C. Med. J. 75(3), 204–210 (1014)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Lebedev, G., Krylov, O., Lelyakov, A., Mironov, Y., Tkachenko, V., Zykov, S. (2020). Integral Assessment of Efficiency of Scientific Research in Scientific Institutions of Russian Ministry of Health. In: Czarnowski, I., Howlett, R., Jain, L. (eds) Intelligent Decision Technologies 2019. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol 142. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8311-3_25
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8311-3_25
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-8310-6
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-8311-3
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)