Optimization of Process Parameters in Pulsed Electrochemical Honing Process Using Evolutionary Algorithms

  • Sunny DiyaleyEmail author
  • Shankar Chakraborty
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 949)


This paper aims in the optimization of process parameters for straight bevel gear finishing by pulsed electrochemical honing (PECH) process using four evolutionary algorithms. The controllable parameters selected for optimal setting in PECH are the applied voltage, pulse-on time and pulse-off time, whereas finishing time, interelectrode gap and the rotary speed of workpiece gear are set as constant parameters. Theoretical model of material removal rate and surface roughness in PECH process developed by the past researchers are considered for a comparative analysis of the optimization problem by using four different algorithms, i.e. firefly algorithm, particle swarm optimization algorithm, differential evolution algorithm and teaching-learning-based algorithm, for arriving at the most global optimal settings of PECH process parameters. Teaching-learning-based algorithm attains the best optimal setting value within the range of different input process parameters for both single- and multi-objective optimization problems.


Optimization Pulsed electrochemical honing Material removal rate Surface roughness Evolutionary algorithms 


  1. 1.
    Misra, J.P., Jain, N.K., Jain, P.K.: Investigations on precision finishing of helical gears by electrochemical honing process. In: Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, vol. 224(12), pp. 1817–1830 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pathak, S., Jain, N.K.: Modeling and experimental validation of volumetric material removal rate and surface roughness depth of straight bevel gears in pulsed-ECH process. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 124, 132–144 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Shaikh, J.H., Jain, N.K.: Modeling of material removal rate and surface roughness in finishing of bevel gears by electrochemical honing process. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 214(2), 200–209 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Yang, X.S.: Firefly algorithm, Nature-Inspired Metaheuristic Algorithms. 20, 79–90 (2008)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kennedy, J., Eberhart, R.: Particle swarm optimization. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks, pp. 1942–1948. Perth, Australia (1995)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Storn, R., Price, K.: Differential evolution—a simple and efficient heuristic for global optimization over continuous spaces. J. Global Optim. 11, 341–359 (1997)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rao, R.V., Savsani, V.J., Vakharia, D.P.: Teaching learning-based optimization: a novel method for constrained mechanical design optimization problems. Comput. Aided Des. 43(3), 303–315 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringSikkim Manipal Institute of TechnologyMajitarIndia
  2. 2.Department of Production EngineeringJadavpur UniversityKolkataIndia

Personalised recommendations