Performance Assessment of Inter-Digital Capacitive Structure-Finite Element Approach

  • Sheeja P. GeorgeEmail author
  • Johney Isaac
  • Jacob Philip
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 949)


Incorporation of modern sensors and software functionalities has transformed traditional measuring instruments into smart ones. Even though capacitors are passive components, they find extensive applications as sensors to measure parameters such as pressure, acceleration, proximity, electric/magnetic fields and material properties. Capacitor-based systems also find wide applications in touch-screen systems. In all these systems, the measured capacitance is the input to an automated system. Response of the system to variations in the input capacitance needs to be understood and analyzed for the design of any system for optimum performance. Currently inter-digital capacitive sensors with different configurations are under development for various applications. Finite element methods provide an approximate solution to modeling problems by numerical tools. The computed values can be compared with measured ones for validation. Modeling helps to vary the parameters like area of the electrode, gap between the electrodes and the dielectric constant and to investigate the effect of each on the effective capacitance value of a multi-element inter-digital capacitor configuration. Such a configuration has been modeled and analyzed using the finite element analysis tool ANSYS 15.0. The results of the analysis will be presented and discussed.


Inter-digital capacitive sensor Finite element method ANSYS 



The first author would like to acknowledge Mr. Akash Rajan, Research Scholar, College of Engineering, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India, for his valuable help.


  1. 1.
    Zhu, L., et al.: Adjustable bandwidth filter design based on inter-digital capacitors. IEEE Microwave Wirel Compon Lett 18(1) (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Tesla, N.: Electric condenser, U.S. Patent 464 667 (1891)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mamishev, A.V., et al.: Interdigital Sensors and Transducers. In: Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 92, pp. 808–845 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Igreja, R., Dias, C.J.: Analytical evaluation of the interdigital electrodes capacitance for a multi-layered structure. Sens Actuators A 112, 291–301 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Igreja, R., Dias, C.J.: Dielectric response of interdigital chemocapacitors: the role of the sensitive layer thickness. Sens Actuators B 115, 69–78 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mamishev, A.V., Takahashi, A.R., Du, Y., Lesieutre, B.C., Zahn, M.: Assessment of Performance of Fringing Electric Field Sensor Arrays. In: Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Electrical Insulation and Dielectric Phenomena, pp. 918–921 (2002)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lim, Y.C., et al.: A Micromechanical Biosensor with Interdigitated Capacitor Readout. In: IEEE/ICME international Conference on Complex Medical Engineering (2011)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    ANSYS Mechanical APDL Theory Reference Release 15.0Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mohd Syaifudin, A.R., et al.: Measurements and performance evaluation of novel inter-digital sensors for different chemicals related to food poisoning. IEEE Sens. J. 11(11), 2957–2965 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of ElectronicsCollege of EngineeringChengannurIndia
  2. 2.Department of InstrumentationCUSATKochiIndia
  3. 3.Amaljyothi College of EngineeringKanjirappally, KottayamIndia

Personalised recommendations