Advertisement

Comparative Analysis of Fruit Categorization Using Different Classifiers

  • Chirag C. PatelEmail author
  • Vimal K. Chaudhari
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 949)

Abstract

The aim of the paper is to measure the performance of fruit images on different mentioned classifiers based on color, zone, area, centroid, size, equvidiameter, perimeter and roundness features. Features are extracted automatically from the provided images and passed to classifiers such as multi-class SVM, KNN, Naive Bayes, random forest and neural network to train the models, classify test images and measure the performance of the classifiers on different data mining tools. The experimental results show that multi-class SVM obtained 87.5 and 91.67% accuracy which is the highest accuracy rather than other mentioned classifiers. KNN has 58.3, 62.5 and 45.83%, Naive Bayes has 62.5 and 58.3%, random forest has 70.8, 75 and 83.33%, and neural network has 66.7 and 75% accuracy based on different data mining tools. Confusion matrix and ROC analysis also show that multi-class SVM has an efficient performance on the proposed features than other mentioned classifiers.

Keywords

Fruit classification Image classification Image recognition SVM KNN Random forest Naive Bayes Neural network 

References

  1. 1.
    Tang, X., Liu, K., Cui, J., Wen, F., Wang, X.: Intentsearch: capturing user intention for one-click internet image search. IEEE Trans. Pattern Analysis Mach. Intell. 34(7) (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kwak, J.W., Cho, N.I.: Relevance feedback in content-based image retrieval system by selective region growing in the feature space. Signal Process Image Commun. 18, 787–799 (2003)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gode, C.S., Ganar, A.N.: Image retrieval by using colour, texture and shape features. Int. J. Adv. Res. Electr. Electron. Instrumentation Eng. 3(4) (2014)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Smeulders, A.W., Worring, M., Santini, S., Gupta, A., Jain, R.: Content-based image retrieval at the end of the early years. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 22(12) (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bolle, R.M., Connell, J.H., Haas, N., Mohan, R., Taubin, G.: Veggievision: a produce recognition system: applications of Computer Vision, WACV96’. In: Proceedings 3rd IEEE Workshop on IEEE, 1996Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Arivazhagan, S., Shebiah, R.N., Nidhyanandhan, S.S., Ganesan, L.: Fruit recognition using color and texture features. J. Emerg. Trends Comput. Info. Sci. 1(2) (2010)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dubey, S.R., Jalal, A.S.: Fruit and vegetable recognition by fusing colour and texture features of the image using machine learning. Int. J. Appl. Pattern Recognition, 2(2) (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zhang, Y., Wu, L.: Classification of fruits using computer vision and a multiclass support vector machine. Sensors 12(9) (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kshirsagar, M., Arora, P.: Classification techniques for computer vision based fruit quality inspection: a review. Int. J. Recent Adv. Eng. Technol. 2(3) (2014)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Vogl, M., Kim, J.Y., Kim, S.D.: A fruit recognition method via image conversion optimized through evolution strategy. In: 2014 IEEE 17th International Conference on Computational Science and Engineering, 2014Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zawbaa, H.M., Hazman, M., Abbass, M., Hassanien, A.E.: Automatic fruit classification using random forest algorithm. In: 2014 14th International Conference on Hybrid Intelligent Systems, IEEE, 2014Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Seng, W.C.,Mirisaee, S.H.: A new method for fruits recognition system. In 2009 International Conference on Electrical Engineering and Informatics, 2009Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hsu, C.W., Lin, C.J.: A comparison of methods for multiclass support vector machines. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 13(2) (2002)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Shukla, D., Desai, A.: Recognition of fruits using hybrid features and machine learning. In: 2016 International Conference on Computing, Analytics and Security Trends (CAST),IEEE, 2016Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lowd, D., Domingos, P.: Naive Bayes models for probability estimation. In Proceedings of the 22nd international conference on Machine learning, ACM, 2005Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Breiman, L.: Random Forests. Kluwar Academic Publishers (2001)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zhang, G.P.: Neural networks for classification: a survey. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part C (Appl. Rev.) 30(4) (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.UCCC & SPBCBA & SDHG College of BCA & I.T, UdhnaSuratIndia
  2. 2.Department of Computer ScienceVeer Narmard South Gujarat UniversitySuratIndia

Personalised recommendations