Advertisement

Application of Fuzzy Integrated JAYA Algorithm for the Optimization of Surface Roughness of DMLS Made Specimen: Comparison with GA

  • Hiren GajeraEmail author
  • Veera Darji
  • Komal Dave
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 949)

Abstract

In today’s competitive era, the quality of the die or mold plays a significant role in tooling industries. The surface roughness of the die or mold drastically affects the final product and requires many post-processing processes which consume considerable time and money. These problems need to be minimized by controlling process parameters of direct metal laser sintering (DMLS). In order to establish the relationship between the surface roughness of DMLS made parts and process parameters, i.e., laser power, hatch spacing, scan speed, and layer thickness, Box–Behnken design (BBD) of response surface methodology (RSM) was used. This study demonstrates the application of optimization by a combination of nonlinear regression modeling in terms of a fuzzy inference system with the JAYA algorithm to select an optimal parameter set. The result obtained from the JAYA has been compared with the genetic algorithm (GA). A very good agreement has been found between JAYA and GA.

Keywords

DMLS RSM JAYA GA CL50WS Surface roughness 

References

  1. 1.
    Lee, J.H., Jang, J.H., Joo, B.D., Yim, H.S., Moon, Y.H.: Application of direct laser metal tooling for AISI H13 tool steel. Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China (English Ed), 19(SUPPL. 1), 2–5 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Yasa, E., Deckers, J., Kruth, J.-P., Rombouts, M., Luyten, J.: Charpy impact testing of metallic selective laser melting parts. Virtual Phys. Prototyp. (2010)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Benedetti, M., et al.: The effect of post-sintering treatments on the fatigue and biological behavior of Ti-6Al-4V ELI parts made by selective laser melting. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 71(January), 295–306 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Leon, A., Aghion, E.: Effect of surface roughness on corrosion fatigue performance of AlSi10Mg alloy produced by selective laser melting (SLM). Mater. Charact. 131(2016), 188–194 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Girardin, E., et al.: Biomedical Co–Cr–Mo components produced by direct metal laser sintering. Mater. Today Proc. 3(3), 889–897 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mengucci, P., et al.: Effects of build orientation and element partitioning on microstructure and mechanical properties of biomedical Ti-6Al-4V alloy produced by laser sintering. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 71(February), 1–9 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pal, S., Tiyyagura, H.R., Drstvenšek, I., Kumar, C.S.: The effect of post-processing and machining process parameters on properties of stainless steel PH1 product produced by direct metal laser sintering. Procedia Eng. 149(June), 359–365 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Casalino, G., Campanelli, S.L., Contuzzi, N., Ludovico, A.D.: Experimental investigation and statistical optimisation of the selective laser melting process of a maraging steel. Opt. Laser Technol. 65, 151–158 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    AlMangour, B., Yang, J.M.: Improving the surface quality and mechanical properties by shot-peening of 17–4 stainless steel fabricated by additive manufacturing. Mater. Des (2016)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yasa, E., Poyraz, O., Solakoglu, E.U., Akbulut, G., Oren, S.: A study on the stair stepping effect in direct metal laser sintering of a nickel-based superalloy. Procedia CIRP 45, 175–178 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yasa, E., Deckers, J., Kruth, J.-P., Rombouts, M., Luyten, J.: Charpy impact testing of metallic selective laser melting parts. Virtual Phys. Prototyp. 5(2), 89–98 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Khajeh, M.: Application of Box-Behnken design in the optimization of a magnetic nanoparticle procedure for zinc determination in analytical samples by inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry. J. Hazard. Mater (2009)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kirboga, S., Öner, M.: Application of experimental design for the precipitation of calcium carbonate in the presence of biopolymer. Powder Technol. (2013)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tekindal, M.A., Bayrak, H., Ozkaya, B., Genc, Y.: Box-behnken experimental design in factorial experiments: the importance of bread for nutrition and health. Turkish J. F. Crop (2012)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Abhishek, K., Datta, S., Mahapatra, S.S.: Multi-objective optimization in drilling of CFRP (polyester) composites: application of a fuzzy embedded harmony search (HS) algorithm. Meas. J. Int. Meas. Confed. 77, 222–239 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Singh, A., Datta, S., Mahapatra, S.S., Singha, T., Majumdar, G.: Optimization of bead geometry of submerged arc weld using fuzzy based desirability function approach. J. Intell. Manuf. 24(1), 35–44 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Venkata Rao, R.: Jaya: A simple and new optimization algorithm for solving constrained and unconstrained optimization problems. Int. J. Ind. Eng. Comput. 7(1) 19–34 (2016)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rao, R.V., More, K.C., Taler, J., Ocłoń, P.: Dimensional optimization of a micro-channel heat sink using Jaya algorithm. Appl. Therm. Eng. 103, 572–582 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.C U Shah UniversitySurendranagarIndia
  2. 2.L D College of EngineeringAhmedabadIndia

Personalised recommendations