Abstract
Morphological parameters have been recurrently used to assess the hydrological response of a watershed. Due to a strong mutual correlation between the run-off characteristics and the terrain of a watershed, the method is significantly popular, especially in an un-gauged catchment. In the present study, the hydrologic response of a Himalayan watershed and its sub-watersheds is discussed using various morphological parameters, and accordingly, the sub-watershed prioritization has been done. Morphological parameters have been extracted from digital elevation model (SRTM-DEM) in conjunction with Survey of India toposheets (1:50000 scale). Arc Hydro tools have been used for the preparation of watershed and sub-watershed boundaries, to calculate flow directions, flow accumulation and for stream ordering. Morphometric parameters categorized under linear, aerial and relief aspects are calculated for the entire catchment and also for its eight sub-watersheds separately. The drainage pattern is mostly sub-dendritic to dendritic in nature. The studied catchment has been categorized as an eighth order drainage catchment with a drainage density of 3.15 km/km2. The progressive increase in stream length ratio is a depiction of the attained geomorphic maturity of the basin. Considerable conformity between the sub-watersheds and their major catchment characteristics has been established. However, two sub-watersheds have been observed to behave in a different manner. In order to prioritize the catchment, a compound index was calculated by considering the individual rank assigned to all eight sub-watersheds based on 11 morphological parameters. The study reveals that SW6 sub-watershed has the highest priority and SW2 watershed has the least priority. Such maps have immense significance for field engineers for prioritizing the watershed management activities within the watershed especially in un-gauged condition.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Agarwal CS (1998) Study of drainage pattern through aerial data in Naugarh area of Varanasi district, U.P. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 26:169–175
Chopra R, Raman DD, Sharma PK (2005) Morphometric analysis of sub-watersheds in Gurdaspur district, Punjab using remote sensing and GIS techniques. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 33(4):531–539
Clarke JI (1996) Morphometry from maps. Essays in geomorphology. Elsevier Publication Co., New York, pp 235–274
Dar RA, Chandra R, Romshoo SA (2013) Morphotectonic and lithostratigraphic analysis of intermontane Karewa basin of Kashmir Himalayas, India. J Mt Sci 10(1):731–741
Evans IS (1972) General geomorphometry, derivatives of altitude, and descriptive statistics. In: Chorley RJ (ed) Spatial analysis in geomorphology. Harper and Row, New York, pp 17–90
Faniran A (1968) The index of drainage intensity—a provisional new drainage factor. Aust J Sci 31:328–330
Gayen S, Bhunia GS, Shi PK (2013) Morphometric analysis of Kangshabati-Darkeswar interfluves area in West Bengal, India using ASTER DEM and GIS techniques. Geol Geosci 2(4):1–10
Gardiner V (1975) Drainage basin morphometry, British geomorphological group. Tech Bull 14:48
Gravelius H (1914) Grundrifi der gesamten Gewcisserkunde. Band I: Flufikunde (Compendium of hydrology, vol I. Rivers, in German). Goschen, Berlin
Horton RE (1932) Drainage basin characteristics. Am Geophys Union Trans 13:348–352
Horton RE (1945) Erosional development of streams and their drainage basins; hydrophysical approach to quantitative morphology. Bull Geol Soc Am 56:275–370
John Wilson JS, Chandrasekar N, Magesh NS (2012) Morphometrical analysis of major sub watersheds in Aiyar & Karai Pottanar Basin, Central Tamil Nadu, India using remote sensing & GIS techniques. Bonfring Int J Ind Eng Manag Sci 2(special issue1):8–15
Magesh NS, Chandrasekar N, Kaliraj S (2012) A GIS based automated extraction tool for the analysis of basin morphometry. Bonfring Int J Ind Eng Manag Sci 2(1):32–35
Merritts D, Vincent KR (1989) Geomorphic response of coastal streams to low, intermediate, and high rates of uplift, Mendocino junction region, northern California. Geol Soc Am Bull 101:1373–1388
Muller JE (1968) An introduction to the hydraulic and topographic sinuosity indexes. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 58:371–385
Nag SK, Chakraborty S (2003) Influence of rock types and structures in the development of drainage network in hard rock area. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 31(1):25–35
Nautiyal MD (1994) Morphometric analysis of a drainage basin, district Dehradun, Uttar Pradesh. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 22(4):251–261
Obi Reddy GE, Maji AK, Gajbhiye KS (2002) GIS for morphometric analysis of drainage basins. GIS lndia 4(11):9–14
Ozdemir H, Bird D (2009) Evaluation of morphometric parameters of drainage networks derived from topographic maps and DEM in point floods. Environ Geol 56:1405–1415
Reddy GPO, Maji AK, Gajbhiye KS, (2004) Drainage morphometry and its influence on landform characteristics in a basaltic terrain, Central India—a remote sensing and GIS approach. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinformation 6(1):1–16
Schumm SA (1956) Evolution of drainage systems and slopes in bad lands at Perth Amboy, New Jersey. Geol Soc Am Bull 67:597–646
Sethupathi AS, Lakshmi Narasimhan C, Vasanthamohan V, Mohan SP (2011) Prioritization of mini watersheds based on morphometric analysis using remote sensing and GIS in a drought prone Bargur Mathur sub-watersheds, Ponnaiyar River basin, India. Int J GeomatGeosci 2(2):403–414
Shreve RW (1969) Stream lengths and basin areas in topologically random channel networks. J Geol 77:397–414
Singh KN (1980) Quantitative analysis of landforms and settlement distribution in southern uplands of eastern Uttar Pradesh (India). Vimal Prakashan, Varanasi
Singh S (1992) Quantitative geomorphology of the drainage basin. In: Chouhan TS, Joshi KN (eds) Readings on remote sensing applications. Scientific Publishers, Jodhpur
Smith GH (1939) The morphometry of Ohio: the average slope of the land (abstract). Ann Assoc Am Geogr 29:94
Strahler AN (1952) Dynamic basis of geomorphology. Geol Soc Am Bull 63:923–938
Strahler AN (1957) Quantitative analysis of watershed geomorphology. Trans Am Geophys Union 38:913–920
Strahler AN (1964) Quantitative geomorphology of drainage basins and channel networks. In: Chow VT (ed) Handbook of applied hydrology. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 439–476
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to the Director, National Institute of Hydrology, Roorkee, India, for providing all the necessary facilities required for this study. The work has been done under the aegis of Purpose Driven Study (PDS) of Western Himalayan Regional Centre, Jammu under the National Hydrology Project (NHP). The authors are also grateful to the Nodal Officer (NHP) for his constant support.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Khurana, D., Rawat, S.S., Raina, G., Sharma, R., Jose, P.G. (2020). GIS-Based Morphometric Analysis and Prioritization of Upper Ravi Catchment, Himachal Pradesh, India. In: AlKhaddar, R., Singh, R., Dutta, S., Kumari, M. (eds) Advances in Water Resources Engineering and Management. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering , vol 39. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8181-2_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8181-2_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-8180-5
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-8181-2
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)