Abstract
This paper examines how expert Twitter users showed alignment and disalignment with various people who constituted their readership at the time of the Fukushima Nuclear Crisis in 2011 in Japan, also known as 3/11. The scientific uncertainty involved in estimating the possible impact of the accident gave rise to a heightened sense of anxiety and mistrust of official information by the Japanese public. As such, specialist tweeters from various disciplines and professions became the core for discourse communities on Twitter characterised by shared concerns and values, among them physicists and freelance journalists. The interest herein lies in investigating the characteristics of these communities from a linguistic perspective, exploring what aspects in the language contributed to community formation around these two types of specialists. In my previous study, I compared the two groups in terms of kinds of knowledge and values they reciprocated to their readership on Twitter. In this study, I compare how these professionals negotiated their relationship with their readers, focusing on the aspect of ‘voice holders’, or the Sayer aspect of different kinds of ideas or opinions that constituted the society at the time of the crisis. In the process of this analysis, the function of resources from the honorification system, a lexicogrammatical system in Japanese also known under the label of referent honorifics, is re-defined from the perspective of engagement. An analysis of the tweets around the Fukushima Nuclear Crisis reveals the characteristics of the two communities formed around the two types of tweeters at the time of nuclear crisis in terms of their potential membership, one inclusive and the other exclusive.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Tann (2013) proposes the concept of identity icon to refer to a commonsense theory of social person as collectives. According to his theorisation, national identity is comprised of triangular notions of Gemeinschaft, or expression of sense of community as in ‘the Japanese’, Doxa, or shared values such as ‘compassionate empathy’, and ‘Oracle’, or celebrated things and people from history such as ‘Nitobe’ and ‘Bushido’. His study is based on analysis of identity discourses, in which identity construction is the focal topic of the texts, which cannot be applied in understanding how communities are construed via disaster communication.
- 2.
Twilog (http://twilog.org/) is an online service that allows Twitter users to automatically store tweet logs and present them in a blog format in a public Internet domain. The site allows access to the data beyond the limitation of Twitter’s display limitation of 3200 tweets. It also allows users to choose whether or not to store official retweets.
- 3.
Acronym for Nuclear Power Plant.
- 4.
Acronym for Citizens’ Nuclear Information Center.
- 5.
Name of an online live broadcasting site.
- 6.
The Geiger counter is an instrument used for detecting and measuring ionizing radiation used widely in applications such as radiation dosimetry, radiological protection, experimental physics and the nuclear industry. (Wikipedia n.d.)
- 7.
Proper names, originally mentioned in this tweet and the other tweets presented in the data, are anonymised by the author.
- 8.
References
Acar A, Muraki Y (2011) Twitter for crisis communication: lessons learned from Japan’s tsunami disaster. Int J Web Based Commun 7(3):392–402. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijwbc.2011.041206
Bakhtin MM (1934/1981) The dialogic imagination: four essays. University of Texas Press, Austin
Bednarek M (2006) Epistemological positioning and evidentiality in English news discourse: a text-driven approach. Text Talk 26(6):635–660. https://doi.org/10.1515/text.2006.027
Bednarek M (2016) Voices and values in the news: news media talk, news values and attribution. Discourse Context Media 11:27–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2015.11.004
Bernstein B (1990) Code, modalities, and the process of cultural reproduction: a model Class. In: Codes and control 4: the structuring of pedagogic discourse. Roudledge, London, pp 13–62
Cloran, C (1989) Learning through language: the social construction of gender. In JR Martin & R Hasan (Eds.), Language development: learning language, learning culture (pp. 111–151). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation
Firth JR (1957) Personality and language in society Papers in Linguistics 1934–1951. Oxford University Press, London, pp 177–189
Halliday MAK (1968) The users and uses of language. In: J Fishman A (ed) Readings in the sociology of language. Mouton, The Hague, pp 139–169
Halliday MAK, Matthiessen CMIM (2014) Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar, 4th edn. Roudtledge, London
Hao J, Humphrey S (2012) The role of ‘coupling’ in biological experimental reports. Linguist Hum Sci 5(2):169–194
Hasan R (1986/2005) The ontogenesis of ideology: an interpretation of mother child talk. In: Collective works of Ruqaiya Hasan: language, society and consciousness. Equinox, Bristol, CT, USA, pp 256–274
Hasan R (2002) Ways of meaning, ways of learning: code as an explanatory concept. Br J Sociol Educ 23(4):537–548. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142569022000038396
Hood S (2011) Writing discipline: comparing inscriptions of knowledge and knowers in academic writing. In: Christie F, Maton K (eds) Disciplinarity: systemic functional and sociological perspectives. Continuum, London, pp 106–128
Hood S (2012) Voice and stance as APPRAISAL: persuading and positioning in research writing across intellectual fields. In: Hyland K, Sancho Guinda C (eds) Stance and voice in written academic genres. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, pp 51–68
Hyland K (2005) Stance and engagement: a model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Stud 7(2):173–192
Inako A (2015) Affiliating in crisis: a linguistic perspective on community formation on Twitter after the nuclear accident in Japan in 2011. (Doctor of Philosophy), University of Technology, Sydney, Sydney
Inako A (2019) Different bonds around plutonium: physicists’ and freelance journalists’ tweets at the time of the 3/11 nuclear crisis. Discourse Context Media 29:100281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2018.11.003
Knight NK (2010) Wrinkling complexity: concepts of identity and affiliation in humour. In: Bednarek M, Martin JR (eds) New discourse on language: functional perspectives on multimodality, identity and affiliation. Continuum, London, pp 35–58
Martin JR (2004) Positive discourse analysis: solidarity and change. Revista Canaria De Estudios Ingleses 49:179–200
Martin JR (2008) Tenderness: realisation and instantiation in a Botswanan town. In: Nørgaard N (ed) Systemic functional linguistics in use. Odense working papers in language and communication, vol. 29, pp 30–62
Martin JR (2009) Realisation, instantiation and individuation: some thoughts on identity in youth justice conferencing. Documentacao de Estudos em Linguistica Teorica e Aplicada 25(Especial):549–583
Martin JR, Rose D (2007) Working with discourse: meaning beyond the clause, 2nd edn. Continuum, London
Martin JR, White PRR (2005) The language of evaluation: appraisal in English. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke
Martin JR, Zappavigna M, Dwyer P, Cléirigh C (2013) Users in uses of language: embodied identity in youth justice conferencing. Text Talk 33(4–5):467–496
Montgomery M (2007) The discourse of broadcast: a linguistic approach. Routledge, London
Sano M (2008) The rhetoric of editorials: a Japanese case study. In: Thomson EA, White PRR (eds) Communicating conflict: multilingual case studies of the news media. Continuum, London, pp 97–118
Takiura M (2005) Nihon no keigoron: poraitoness riron kara no saikentou [honorifics theories in Japan: reconsideration of honorifics from politeness viewpoint]. Taishukan, Tokyo
Tann K (2013) The language of identity discourse: introducing a systemic functional framework for iconography. Linguis Hum Sci 8(3):361–391. https://doi.org/10.1558/lhs.v8i3.361
Teruya K (2007) Systemic functional grammar of Japanese, vol 1. Continuum, London
Thompson G (1996) Voices in the text: discourse perspectives on language reports. Appl Linguis 17(4):501–530. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/17.4.501
Thomson E, White PRR (eds) (2008) Communicating conflict: multilingual case studies of the news media. Continuum, London
Thomson R, Ito N, Suda H, Lin F, Liu Y, Hayasaka R, … Wang Z (2012) Trusting tweets: the Fukushima disaster and information source credibility on twitter. Paper presented at the 9th international ISCRAM conference, Vancouver
Voloshinov VN (1930/1973) Marxism and the philosophy of language (trans: Mateika L, Titunik IR). Seminar Press, New York
White PRR (2006) Evaluative semantics and ideological positioning in journalistic discourse: a new framework for analysis. In: Lassen I, Strunck J, Bestergaard T (eds) Mediating ideology in text and image: ten critical studies. John Benjamins, Philadelphia, pp 37–67
White PRR, Sano M (2006) Dialogistic positions and anticipated audiences: a framework for stylistic comparisons. In: Aijmer K, Simon-Vandengergen AM (eds) Pragmatic markers in constrast: studies in pragamatics. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 189–214
Williams G (2005) Semantic Variation. In: Matthiessen C, Webster J (eds) Continuing discourse on language: a functional perspective. Equinox, London, pp 457–480
Wikimedia (n.d.) Geiger counter. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geiger_counter
Wikipedia (n.d.) Fukushima 50. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fukushima_50
Zappavigna M (2011) Ambient affiliation: a linguistic perspective on twitter. New Media Soc 13(5):788–806. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810385097
Zappavigna M (2012) Discourse of twitter and social media: how we use language to create affiliation on the web. Continuum, London
Zappavigna M (2014) CoffeeTweets: bonding around bean on twitter. In: Seargeant P, Tagg C (eds) The Langauge of social media: identity and community on the internet. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, pp 139–160
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Inako, A. (2019). Recognising Voices: The ‘Voice-Holder’ Aspect of engagement in Experts’ Tweets on the Fukushima Nuclear Crisis. In: Banks, D., Di Martino, E. (eds) Specialized Discourses and Their Readerships. The M.A.K. Halliday Library Functional Linguistics Series. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8157-7_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8157-7_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-8156-0
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-8157-7
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)