Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Aviation System Risks and Safety pp 119–147Cite as

Algorithms and Methods for ATS Safety Monitoring and Assurance Using Methods for Calculating Risks in the RRS Doctrine

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Springer Aerospace Technology ((SAT))

Abstract

The concept of flight safety assurance is adopted on the basis of the definition of the term “Safety” according to ISO-8402, Annex 19, and the corresponding mathematical risk models (“hazard measure”, “amount of hazard”, “hazard”, but not “probability…”).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Kuklev EA (2005) Estimation of catastrophe risks in highly reliable systems. In: Materials of the 13th International conference “Problems of complex system safety management. RAS ICS. Moscow: 55 p (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kuklev EA (2005) Decision making in systems based on management of possible risks of undesirable consequences. In: Materials of the 13th International conference “Problems of complex system safety management”. RAS ICS. Moscow, 87 p (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Standard for the assessment of major aviation risks (2012) Version 4 (Threats). (Raw material industries). Flight Safety Foundation. Melbourne (Australia) (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gipich GN, Evdokimov VG, Kuklev EA (2010) Methodical provisions of the classifier “SMS terms and definitions” in the field of flight safety management. Collection of papers of the NTC “Rostekhregulirovanie. no. 2. Moscow (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gipich GN, Evdokimov VG (2011) The concept in the field of standardization of principles and procedures for the development of a national version of the system and manual for safety management in the production of aircraft in the UAC at the state level in the Russian Federation. Report (printed) in the “UAC Bulletin” no. 2 1. Moscow, pp 65–70 (in press) (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gipich GN, Evdokimov VG (2009) Principles of a unified approach to assessing complex system safety based on indicators of risks. Collection of papers. RAS CC “System Safety”, no. 2, Moscow, pp 112–120 (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  7. SMM (2009) Doc. 9859-A/N460. ICAO

    Google Scholar 

  8. SMS & B-RSA (2008) Boeing, 2012

    Google Scholar 

  9. Amer MY (2012) 10 Things you should know about safety management systems (SMS). SM ICG, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  10. Evdokimov VG, Grushchanskiy VA, Kavtaradze EA (2008) On the system safety of information support for the development of complex social systems. Fundamental problems of system Safety: Collection of papers. RAS Dorodnitsyn CC, Moscow: University Book, pp 67–77. 14 (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Annex 19: C-WP/13935 ANC report (2013), based on AN-WP/ 8680 (Find) Review of the Air Navigation Commission, Montreal, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  12. SMM (Safety Management Manual) (2012) Doc 9859_AN474—Doc FAA

    Google Scholar 

  13. Probabilistic Risk Assessment Procedures for NASA Managers and Practitioners—Office of Safety and Mission Assurance NASA. Washington, DC 20546, August 2002. (Version 2/2)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kuklev EA, Evdokimov VG (2001) Predicting the safety level for aviation systems based on risk models. J TR, 2(45): 51–53 (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Evdokimov VG, Gipich GN (2006) Some issues in the methodology of assessment and prediction of air transport risks. In: The 5th International conference “aviation and astronautic science 2006”, abstracts, Moscow, pp 75–76 (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Novozhilov AB, Neymark MS, Cesarskiy LG (2003) Flight safety (Concept and technology). Mechanical engineering. Moscow, 140 p (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Risk management—Vocabulary. ISO Guide 73: 2009 (E/F). BSI 2009

    Google Scholar 

  18. GOST 23743-88 (1984) Aircraft. Nomenclature of the Flight Safety, Reliability, Testability and Maintainability Indices (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Aronov IZ et al (2009) Reliability and safety of technical systems. Moscow (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Savchuk VP (1989) Bayesian methods of static evaluation of reliability of technical facilities. Nauka, Moscow (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Evdokimov VG (2012) Integrated safety management system for aviation activities based on ICAO standards and recommended practices. J TR. 2(45): 54–57 (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ryabinin IA (1997) Reliability, survivability and safety of ship electric power systems. –Kuznetsov Naval Academy, St. Petersburg (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Orlovskiy SA (1981) Problems of decision making with fuzzy source information. “Science” FM, Moscow (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Rybin VV (2007) Fundamentals of the fuzzy sets theory and fuzzy logic. Study guide. STU Moscow State Aviation Institute. Moscow, 95 p (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Evdokimov VG (2010) Modern approaches to safety management based on the risk theory. International Aviation and Space Magazine “AviaSouz”. NQ 5/6 (33) October–December (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  26. CATS (Casual Aviation Technical Systems) (2012) Simulation of cause-effect relations in aviation systems on the basis of risk assessment. Research of the Air Accident Investigation Commission (Netherlands). ICAO (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Shvyryaev YV (1992) Probabilistic analysis of nuclear power plant safety—method. Kurchatov IAE, Moscow (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Putin VV Russian nuclear power plants are reliable (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Kirienko AN. At the Rosatomnadzor NTC meeting on the prospects for the development and implementation of nuclear power projects in the Russian Federation (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Ostretsov IN (2011) Nuclear energy now and in the future”, according to the site materials—newspaper “Zavtra” no. 12 (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  31. http://www.gosnadzor.ru—CFTP “Atomenergomash” (in Russian)

  32. Kovalevich OM (2005) Safety of nuclear power plants. MEI, Moscow (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Relex Faut Tree Module (FMEA)—473. Relex.0709. St. Petersburg, 2011 (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Evdokimov VG, Komarova YV, Kuklev EA, Chinyuchin YM (2013) Quantitative estimation of the possibility of occurrence of accidents in aviation complexes. Scientific bulletin of the MSTU CA. no. 187(1). Moscow. pp 53–56 (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Evdokimov VG. Methodical bases of safety assessment and risk management in aviation systems. International Aviation and Space Magazine “AviaSoyuz”. NQ 2 (35) April–May 2011 (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Technical description of ACARS for A-380 aircraft. Express information, Moscow: 2010 (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Kirpichev IG (2011) On the prospects and problems in developing the infrastructure for the maintenance of An-140, A-148 aircraft. Aircraft construction. Aviation Industry, no. 2. Moscow, 55 p (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Gipich GN, Evdokimov VG, Chinyuchin YM (2013) Basic provisions of the concept of building a safety management system for aviation activities. Scientific bulletin of the MSTU CA. no. 187(1). Moscow. pp 31–36 (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Accident Prevention Manual (1984) Doc. 9422-AN/923. International Civil Aviation Organization

    Google Scholar 

  40. Korolev VYu, Bening VE, Shorgin SY (2011) Mathematical foundations of the theory of risk. Fizmatlit, Moscow (in Russian)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  41. Barzilovich EY, Kashtanov VA, Kovalenko IN (1971) On minimax criteria in reliability problems. ASUSSR Bulletin. Ser. “Technical Cybernetics, no. 3. Moscow, pp 87–98 (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Smurov MY, Kuklev EA, Evdokimov VG, Gipich GN (2012) Safety of civil aircraft flights taking into account the risks of negative events. J Trans Russ Fed 1(38):54–58 (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Kotik M.A., Emelyanov A.M. The nature of human operator errors (on examples of vehicle management). Moscow: Transport, 1993 (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Kozlov VV (2008) Safety management. OJSC “Aeroflot”. Moscow (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Bykov AA, Demin VF, Shevelyov YV (1989) Development of the basics of risk analysis and safety management. Collection of scientific papers of the Kurchatov Institute of Atomic Energy. Moscow: Publ. House IAE (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Livanov VD, Novozhilov GV, Neymark MS (2013) Flight safety management system. IL SMS. “AviaSoyuz”, no. 1, pp. 14–21 (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Saint-Petersburg, Russia

    Kuklev E.A.

  2. Moscow, Russia

    Shapkin V.S.

  3. Moscow, Russia

    Filippov V.L.

  4. Saint-Petersburg, Russia

    Shatrakov Y.G.

Authors
  1. Kuklev E.A.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shapkin V.S.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Filippov V.L.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Shatrakov Y.G.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kuklev E.A. .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kuklev E.A., Shapkin V.S., Filippov V.L., Shatrakov Y.G. (2019). Algorithms and Methods for ATS Safety Monitoring and Assurance Using Methods for Calculating Risks in the RRS Doctrine. In: Aviation System Risks and Safety. Springer Aerospace Technology. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8122-5_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8122-5_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-8121-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-8122-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation