Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

New Doctrine “Reliability, Risk, Safety” for System Safety (Flight Safety) Assessment on The Basis of the Fuzzy Sets Approach

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Aviation System Risks and Safety

Part of the book series: Springer Aerospace Technology ((SAT))

  • 876 Accesses

Abstract

The new doctrine “Reliability, Risks, Safety” (RRS) is a system of views and provisions that makes it possible to create a “bridge” for linking the classical reliability theory and the system safety theory in order to solve system safety issues based on the methodology of calculating risks in the “rare events” problem (according to ICAO) using the Fuzzy Sets approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Probabilistic Risk Assessment Procedures for NASA Managers and Practitioners, Office of Safety and Mission Assurance NASA. Washington, DC 20546, August. 2002 (Version 2/2).

    Google Scholar 

  2. McCarthy J (1999) U.S. Naval Research Laboratory; Schwartz N., AT & T. Modeling risk with the flight operations risk assessment system (FORAS). ICAO Conference in Rio de Janeiro, Brasil

    Google Scholar 

  3. Documents of the 37th ICAO Assembly (Oct 2011, Montreal).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Severtsev NA (ed) (2008) Kuklev E.A. “Fundamentals of the system safety theory”, RAS Dorodnitsin CC, Moscow, pp 175–180 (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Issues of the system safety and stability theory. / Issue 7. Ed. by Severtsev N.A. / Moscow: RAS Dorodnitsin CC, 2005. (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Accident Prevention Manual. Doc. 9422-AN/923 (1984) International Civil Aviation Organization

    Google Scholar 

  7. Risk management—Principles and guidelines. Standards (Australia)—AS/NSZ ISO 31000 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Smurov MY, Kuklev EA, Evdokimov VG, Gipich GN (2012) Safety of civil aircraft flights taking into account the risks of negative events. J Transp Russ Fed 1(38):54–58 (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Malinetskiy GG, Kulba VV, Kosyachenko SA, Shnirman MG et al (2000) Risk management. Risk. Sustainable development. Synergetics. Moscow: Nauka, 431p. Series “Cybernetics”, RAS (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Aronov IZ et al (2009) Reliability and safety of technical systems, Moscow (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fujita M (2009) Frequency of rare event occurrences (ICAO collision risk model for Separation minima). RVSM. ICAO, Doc. 2458. EIWAC, Tokio

    Google Scholar 

  12. Henley EJ, Kumamoto H (1984) Reliability engineering and risk assessment. Mechanical Engineering, Moscow (translated from English: VS Syromyatnikov (ed)). (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kuklev EA (1999) Predicting the occurrence of aviation accidents on the basis of chains of random events: collection of materials of the International Symposium MAKS-99 (CIA). (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Aronov IZ (1998) Modern problems of safety of technical systems and risk analysis. Standards and quality, no 3. (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Volodin VV (ed) 1993( Reliability in technology. Scientific-technical, economic and legal aspects of reliability. Blagonravov Mechanical Engineering Research Institute, ISTC “Reliability of Machines” RAS, Moscow, pp 119–123. (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Orlov AI, Pugach OV (2011) Approaches to the general theory of risk. RFBR Grant-2010. Bauman MSTU. Moscow. (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Orlovskiy SA (1981) Problems of decision making with fuzzy source information. “Science” FM, Moscow. (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Rybin VV (2007) Fundamentals of the fuzzy sets theory and fuzzy logic. Study guide. STU Moscow State Aviation Institute, Moscow, 95 p. (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  19. British Standart (1992) Quality management and quality-assurance. Vocabulary. VS EN ISO-8402

    Google Scholar 

  20. Amer MY (2012) 10 Things you should know about safety management systems (SMS). SM ICG, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  21. Arnold VI (1995) Catastrophe theory. “Science” FM, Moscow. (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ryabinin IA (1997) Reliability, survivability and safety of ship electric power systems. Kuznetsov Naval Academy, St. Petersburg. (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Waitmann M (2011) UN: Japanese nuclear power plants are not ready for a tsunami. www.metronews.ru, 02 June 11. (in Russian)

  24. Annex 19: C-WP/13935—ANC Report (March 2013), based on AN-WP/8680 (Find) Review of the Air Navigation Commission, Montreal, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  25. Livanov VD, Novozhilov GV, Neymark MS (2013) Flight safety management system. IL SMS. “AviaSoyuz”, No 1, pp 14–21. (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Novozhilov AB, Neymark MS, Cesarskiy LG (2003) Flight safety (Concept and technology). Mechanical engineering, Moscow, 140 p. (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  27. SMS & B-RSA (2008): “Boeing”, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  28. SMM (Safety Management Manual): Doc 9859_AN474—Doc FAA (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Kuklev EA (2005) Estimation of catastrophe risks in highly reliable systems. Materials of the 13th international conference “Problems of complex system safety management”. RAS ICS, Moscow, 55 p. (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  30. CATS (Casual Aviation Technical Systems) (2012) Simulation of cause-effect relations in aviation systems on the basis of risk assessment. Research of the Air Accident Investigation Commission (Netherlands), ICAO (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Bykov AA, Demin VF, Shevelyov YV (1989) Development of the basics of risk analysis and safety management. Collection of scientific papers of the Kurchatov Institute of Atomic Energy. Publ. House IAE, Moscow. (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Smurov MY, Kuklev EA, Evdokimov VG, Gipich GN (2012) Development of tools for assessing the risks of occurrence of risks of AUI in the AASS of the airport system. J Transp Russ Fed 2(39). (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Barzilovich EY, Kashtanov VA, Kovalenko IN (1971) On minimax criteria in reliability problems. ASUSSR Bull. Ser “Technical Cybernetics” 3:87–98. (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Gipich GN (2005) The concept and models of predicting and mitigating risks in ensuring the airworthiness of civil aircraft. Moscow State University, TEIS, Moscow. (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Itskovich AA (2010) Formation of requirements for ATS unit diagnostic systems based on the results of logic-probabilistic modeling. MSTU CA Scientific Bulletin, series PA LA, No 8, 18 p. (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Kuklev EA (2005) Decision making in systems based on management of possible risks of undesirable consequences. Materials of the 13th international conference “Problems of complex system safety management”. RAS ICS, Moscow, 87 p. (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Kirpichev IG (2011) On the prospects and problems in developing the infrastructure for the maintenance of An-140, A-148 aircraft. Aircraft construction. “Aviation Industry”, no 2, Moscow, 55 p. (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Kabanov SA (1997) System management on predictive models. St. Petersburg University. St. Petersburg. (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Korolev VY, Bening VE, Shorgin SY (2011) Mathematical foundations of the theory of risk. Fizmatlit, Moscow. (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Dalinger YM, Isaev SA, Kuklev EA (2012) Risk management in the safety management system for RVSM. J Transp Russ Fed 6(43), 55 p. (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Evdokimov VG, Martynov VV (2007) To the issue of system safety. Proceedings of the RAS ISA. Dyn Heterogenous Syst 29(1):116–120. (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Bolotin VV (1998) The theory of reliability of machines, Mechanical engineering. Encyclopedia. Ed. board: K.V. Frolov (chair) et al. Reliability of machines, vol IV.-3. Mechanical Engineering, Moscow. (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Accidents and catastrophes. Prevention and mitigation of consequences. Study Guide. In 3 books. In: Kochetkov KE, Kotlyarevsky VA, Zabegayev AV. Publishing House ASV, Moscow. (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Documents of the ICAO High-level Conference (SMM). March 2010, Montreal.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Shor YB, Kuzmin FI (1968) Tables for reliability analysis and control. SOV Radio, Moscow. (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Prokhorov PZ, Rozanov YA (1987) Probability theory (basic concepts, limit theorems, random processes). “Science”—FM, Moscow. (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  47. Mushik E, Muller P (1990) Methods of making technical decisions: Translated from German. Moscow: Mir. (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  48. Gipich G, Evdokimov V, Kuklev E, Mirzayanov F (2013) Tools: identification of hazard & assessment of risk. Report at the ICAO meeting “Face to Face”. “Boeing” Corporation, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  49. Abramov BA, Gipich GN, Evdokimov VG, Chinyuchin YM (2013) Determination of the compliance service providers’ safety management system to air transport standards. Sci Bull MSTU CA. 187(1):36–41. (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  50. Putin VV Russian nuclear power plants are reliable. (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  51. GOST 23743-88. Aircraft. Nomenclature of the flight safety, reliability, testability and maintainability indices. (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  52. General rules for risk assessment and management (resource management at life cycle stages, risk and reliability analysis management—URRAN). JSC Russian Railways standard STO RR 1.02.034-2010. Moscow (2010). (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  53. Procedure for determining the acceptable level of risk (URRAN). JSC Russian Railways standard STO RR 1.02.035-2010. Moscow (2010). (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  54. Sakach RV, Zubkov BV, Davidenko MF et al (1989) (edited by Sakach RV) Flight safety. Textbook. Transport. Moscow, 239 p. (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  55. Zubkov BV, Prozorov SE (2013) Flight safety. Textbook. Ministry of Education AMA. Ulyanovsk. (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  56. Evdokimov VG Integrated safety management system for aviation activities based on ICAO standards and recommended practices. J TR 2(45):54–57. (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Saint-Petersburg, Russia

    Kuklev E.A.

  2. Moscow, Russia

    Shapkin V.S.

  3. Moscow, Russia

    Filippov V.L.

  4. Saint-Petersburg, Russia

    Shatrakov Y.G.

Authors
  1. Kuklev E.A.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shapkin V.S.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Filippov V.L.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Shatrakov Y.G.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kuklev E.A. .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kuklev E.A., Shapkin V.S., Filippov V.L., Shatrakov Y.G. (2019). New Doctrine “Reliability, Risk, Safety” for System Safety (Flight Safety) Assessment on The Basis of the Fuzzy Sets Approach. In: Aviation System Risks and Safety. Springer Aerospace Technology. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8122-5_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8122-5_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-8121-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-8122-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation