Skip to main content

Land, Property Rights and Management Issues in Tribal Areas of Jharkhand: An Overview

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Shifting Perspectives in Tribal Studies

Abstract

The paper examines the shift in tribal perception of land as a free good to its commoditisation and associated problems in the absence or poor management of land records. Within this framework, it makes a contrast between customary and statutory provisions and practices under land record management. It argues that modern laws are biased and also responsible for replacing ‘customary practices to favour the modern state machinery to acquire tribal land, displace tribal people and dispossess them from their livelihood’. Therefore, the paper suggests that tribal land management in the era of globalisation should address to the issues of protection and preservation of tribal customary rights on land on the face of threats from modern laws.

Just like in heaven, everybody wants a piece of land

—John Steinbeck

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See Morris Marsh (1988) and Lewis (1972) for an understanding of the concept ‘tribe’.

  2. 2.

    André Béteille’s observation in this regard is worth mentioning. He observes the existence of a tribe fitting any theoretical definition is at best an anthropological imagination (see Béteille 1981). In a same vein, Morton Fried suggests that what anthropologists study today is ‘tribe as a secondary sociopolitical phenomenon, brought about by the intercession of more complex ordered societies, states in particular. The ‘pristine tribe,’ on the other hand, is a creation of myth and legend, pertaining either to the golden age of the noble savage or romantic barbarism’ (Fried 1975: 114).

  3. 3.

    The Scheduled areas of Jharkhand have been specified in the Scheduled Areas (States of Chhatisgarh, Jharkhand and Madhya Pradesh) Order, 2003 (Constitution order, 192), have been rescinded vide the Scheduled Areas State of Jharkhand. The Scheduled Areas include Ranchi, Lohardaga, Gumla, Simdega, Latehar, East Singhbhum, West Singhbhum, Sarikela Kharsawan, Sahebganj, Dumka, Pakur, Jamtara, Palamu (Rabda & Bakoria Panchayats of Satbarwa Block) and Godda (Sunderpahari and Boarijor blocks). Source: http://www.jharkhand.gov.in/documents/10179/2712021/Presidential%20Order%20for%20the%20Scheduled%20Areas%20of%20Jharkhand.

  4. 4.

    The LARR Act of 2013—The Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act of 2013 is a most comprehensive Act provides fair opportunity to the land owner under land acquisition. Details can be accessed from http://indiacode.nic.in/acts-in-pdf/302013.pdf.

  5. 5.

    ‘Accumulation by dispossession is a notable contribution of David Harvey who has derived the basis from the Marx’s analysis of ‘primitive capital accumulation’ (Rao and Behera 2017: 26).

  6. 6.

    Draft National Land Utilization Policy developed in 2013 as a framework for land use planning and management is an attempt to develop an effective National Land Use Policy which has provisions for protection, conservation and effective use of land for growth and sustainable development. It has addressed concerns for indigenous communities including tribes and their cultural and social values apart from economy and livelihood.

References

  • Appu, P.S. 1996. Land Reforms in India. New Delhi: Vikash Publishing House Pvt. Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Areeparampil, M. 1996. Displacement due to Mining in Jharkhand. Economic and Political Weekly 31 (24): 1524–1528.

    Google Scholar 

  • Behera, H.C. 2009. Constraint in Land Record Computerization. Economic and Political Weekly 44 (25): 21–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Behera, H.C. 2014. Land alienation, Dispossession and Disempowerment: A Reappraisal of Constitutional Safeguards and Tribal Rights. In Dissent, Discrimination and Dispossession: Tribal Movements in Contemporary India, ed. K.K. Misra and N.K. Das, 321–337. New Delhi: IGRMS and Manohar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Behera, H.C., and A. Singh. 2014. Land Reforms and Record Management in Tribal Areas: Pertaining Issues and Prospects. In Resources, Tribes and Development, ed. M.C. Behera and J. Basar, 173–187. New Delhi: Rawat Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, C. 1990. Reforming Property Rights in Land and Tenancy. The World Bank Research Observer 5 (2): 143–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Béteille, André. 1981. The Definition of Tribe. In Tribe, Caste and Religion in India, ed. Romesh Thapar, 7–14. Delhi: Macmillan Co. of India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bottomore, T.B. 1971. Sociology. Bombay: Blackie & Son.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byamugisha, Frank and Wael Zakout. 2000. World Bank Support for land related projects in developing countries experiences and implications for international cooperation. Paper Prepared for the UN Regional Cartographic Conference for Asia and the Pacific (UNRCC-AP), with a Conference Theme on Sustainable Development, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, April 11–14, 2000, pp. 1–10. Available at http://www.sbsm.gov.cn/pcgiap/kl/frankbyamugisha.pdf.

  • Campbell, D.J., H. Gichohi, A. Mwangi, and I. Chege. 2000. Land Use Conflict in Kajaido District, Kenya. Journal of Land Use Policy 17: 337–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cernea, M.M. 1988. Involuntary Resettlement in Development Projects: Policy Guidelines in World Bank financed Projects. Washington, DC: World Bank Publications.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • De, Subrat. 1998. Status Paper on Availbale Data Base. The Administrator 13 (1): 1–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Soto, H. 2000. The Mystery of Capital. London: Black Swan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deininger, K. 2003. Land Policies for Growth and Poverty Reduction. Washington, DC: World Bank & Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deininger, K., and R. Castagnini. 2006. Incidence and Impact of Land Conflict in Uganda. Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organisation 60 (3): 321–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DoLR, Draft NLUP. 2013. Department of Land Resources Draft National Land Utilisation Policy, 2013. Available at https://smartnet.niua.org/sites/default/files/resources/draft_national_land_utilisation_policy_july_2013.pdf.

  • Ekka, A. 2011. Status of Adivasi/Indigenous Peoples Land Series-4. Delhi: Aakar Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekka, Alex and Muhammed Asif. 2000. Development-Induced-Displacement and Rehabilitation in Jharkhand, 1951 to 1995: A Database on its Extent and Nature. In A Research Project Supported by OXFAM India Trust. New Delhi: Indian Social Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandes, W. 2014. Tribal Customary and Formal Law Interface in Northeast India: Implications for Land Relations. In Resources, Tribes and Development, ed. M.C. Behera and J. Basar, 159–172. New Delhi: Rawat Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fried, Morton H. 1975. The Notion of Tribe. Menlo Park, CA: Cummings Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galiani, S., and E. Schargrodsky. 2011. Land Property Rights and Resource Allocation. Journal of Law and Economics 54 (4): S329–S345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • George, A.S. 2005. Laws Related to Mining in Jharkhand. Economic and Political Weekly 40 (41): 4455–4458.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, M., and C. Udry. 2008. The Profits of Power: Land Rights and Agricultural Investment in Ghana. Journal of Political Economy 116: 981–1082.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GoO (Government of Odisha). 2016. Status of the Implementation of the Forest Righst Act 2006 in the state of Odisha individual and community claims as on 31-08-2016. http://www.stscodisha.gov.in/pdf/FRA_MPRs_31_08_2016.pdf.

  • Guha, R. 1983. Forestry in British and Post British India: An Historical Analysis. Economic and Political Weekly 18 (44): 5–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, David. 2003. The New Imperialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • IDMC. 2010. Internal Displacement Global Overview of Trends and Developments in 2010. Internal Displacement Monitoring Centre (IDMC). Châtelaine (Geneva), Switzerland: Norwegian Refugee Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • JAJ. n.d. Hand book on land law, Land law: C.N.T. Act 1908, S.P.T. Act 1949, B.L.R. Act, 1950, Wilkinson Rules Land Acquisition Act. Ranchi: Judicial Academy of Jharkhand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kagwanji, P. 2009. Ethnicity, Land and Conflict in Africa: The Cases of Kenya, Uganda, Tanzania and Rwanda. Working Paper Series. Nairobi: Africa Policy Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, I.M. 1972. Tribal Society. In International Encyclopaedia of Social Sciences, vol. 16, 2nd ed, ed. David L. Sills, 146–151. New York: The Macmillan Company and The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathur, H.M. 2013. Displacement and Resettlement in India: The Human Cost of Development. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • MoRD. 2004. Report of the Expert Group on Prevention of Alienation of Tribal Land and Its Restoration. New Delhi: Ministry of Rural Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, D., and P. Marsh. 1988. Tribes. London: Pyramid Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • RAI (Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland). 1951. Notes and Queries in Anthropology, 6th ed. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, N. 2003. Life and Livelihood in Santhal Parganas; Does the Right to a Livelihood Really Exist? Economic and Political Weekly 38 (39): 4081–4084.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, P.Venkata, and Hari Charan Behera. 2017. Agrarian Questions under Neoliberal Economic Policies in India: A Review and Analysis of Dispossession and Depeasantisation. The Oriental Anthopologist 17 (1): 17–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saxena, N.C., S. Parasuraman, Kant Promode, and A. Baviskar. 2010. Report of the Four Member Committee for Investigation into the Proposal Submitted by the Orissa Mining Company for Bauxite Mining in Niyamgiri. New Delhi: MoEF, Government of India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sengupta, N. 1989. Peasant Movements in Chotanagpur. In Peasant and Peasant Protests, ed. M.N. Karna, 47–59. New Delhi: Intellectual Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharan, R. 2005. Alienation and Restoration of Tribal Land in Jharkhand: Current Issues and Possible Strategies. Economic and Political Weekly 40 (41): 4443–4446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinha, B.K. 2012. Land Security of the Tribals and Panchayat Extension to Scheduled Areas Act 1996 (PESA)—A Study of Problems and Prospects. Unpublished Ph.D Thesis. New Delhi: Dr. K.R.Narayan Centre for Dalit and Minorities Studies, Jamilia Millia Islamia University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sundar, N. 2005. Laws, Policies and Practices in Jharkhand. Economic and Political Weekly 40 (41): 4459–4462.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorner, D. 1956. Agrarian Prospect in India. Delhi: Delhi University Press (Five lectures delivered in 1955 on land reform).

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorner, D., and A. Thorner. 1962. Land and Labour in India. Bombay: Asia Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toulmin, Camilla. 2006. Securing Land and Property Rights in Sub-Saharan Africa: The Role of Local Institutions. In Securing Land and Property Rights in Africa: Improving the Investment Climate, Global Competitiveness Report, 2005–06, 27–54. Switzerland: World Economic Forum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Upadhya, Carol. 2005. Community Rights in Land in Jharkhand. Economic and Political Weekly 40 (41): 4435–4438.

    Google Scholar 

  • USAID. n.d. USAID Country Profile: Property Rights and Resource Governance. http://www.usaidlandtenure.net/sites/default/files/country-profiles/full-reports/USAID_Land_Tenure_India_Profile.pdf. Accessed on 27 Nov 2015.

  • Van Asperen, P. 2014. Evaluation of Innovative Land Tools in Sub-Saharan Africa: Three Cases from a Peri-Urban Context. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: IOS Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vasan, S. 2005. In the Name of Law: Legality, Illegality and Practice in Jharkhand Forests. Economic and Political Weekly 40 (41): 4447–4450.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vidyarthi, L.P. 1972. An Appraisal of the Leadership Pattern Among the Tribes of Bihar. In The Tribal Situation in India, ed. K.S. Singh, 438–456. Simla: IIAS.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I thank Shri Ashish Aman Sinha for field assistance and other useful support in preparing this article. Thanks are due to Professor M. C. Behera for his valuable inputs to the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hari Charan Behera .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Behera, H.C. (2019). Land, Property Rights and Management Issues in Tribal Areas of Jharkhand: An Overview. In: Behera, M. (eds) Shifting Perspectives in Tribal Studies. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8090-7_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8090-7_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-8089-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-8090-7

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics