Skip to main content

Rethinking Perspectives in Tribal Studies: Anthropology and Beyond

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Shifting Perspectives in Tribal Studies
  • 269 Accesses

Abstract

The title of the present volume, namely Shifting Perspectives in Tribal StudiesFrom an Anthropological Approach to Interdisciplinarity and Consilience, suggests shifting approaches in scientific study of tribes which practically began in the discipline of anthropology. Admittedly, anthropology approached the tribal studies in scientific spirit right from the beginning of the discipline.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Expansion of knowledge is not one-directional; it is a complex issue and has both external and internal dynamics. Even internal dynamics are often influenced by external forces. Expanded frontiers of disciplines and subsequent engagement with the study of tribes have added to the knowledge system in terms of new perspectives like interdisciplinary approach, gender perspective, etc.; interpretations of old phenomena using new concepts like participatory democracy or governance in the study of traditional political institutions and their functioning; and exploration of new subject areas like tribal literature, tribal law, etc. Besides, due to exposure to external forces, internal dynamics present new challenges and possibilities like the issues of poverty, deprivation, identity assertion, political participation, and so on.

  2. 2.

    Compare it with Clifford’s (1986: 4) remark that ‘man’ has disintegrated as telos for a whole discipline (quoted in Srivastava 1999: 551, fn. 15).

  3. 3.

    Linguistic anthropology, for instance, has an intimate connection with linguistics, in the same way as is the proximity of ethnomusicology to the science of music’ (Srivastava 1999: 546).

  4. 4.

    The confusion also is evident in the twin status of anthropology in universities (Srivastava 2012: 16).

  5. 5.

    For example, these communities are known as ‘Aborigines’ in Australia, as ‘Maori’ in New Zealand, as ‘First Nations’ in Canada, as ‘Indigenous’ in the USA.

  6. 6.

    See the works of Prabhash and Ibrahim (2017), where they have examined shifting voting preferences from Left Democratic Front to National Democratic Alliance in Kerala due to unfolding social reality based on Hindutva ideology. Chaturvedi’s (2003) essay informs how the word Hindutva was coined by Vinayak Damodar Savarkar in his book Who is a Hindu?, published in 1923, and on its basis Hindutva politics, i.e. Hindu nationalism in India evolved (also see Jain 1994). Nanda (2006) makes a contrast between the notions of political nationalism and cultural nationalism and argues that the former symbolises the establishment of a sovereign nation state at the macro level, and the latter, by and large, underlines the protection of distinct cultural nation/nationality in a given provincial political space within the common sovereign state.

  7. 7.

    The static relations refer to a balanced alliance with ritualistic significance. However, the element of mutual care in the alliance makes it dynamic which is reflected in seeking Raja’s support when mining activities in the area threatened to the Paudi Bhuyan’s life ways.

  8. 8.

    Oral tradition (see Lummis 1987; Cohn 1968; Thompson 1988 and Vansina 1965) and memory studies (see Bosch 2016; Keightley and Pickering 2013; Halbwachs 1980) approaches facilitate emergence of subfields of disciplines or borderline interdisciplinarity.

  9. 9.

    cf. Barak (2003: 26, quoted in de Hann 2008: 32) adopts a definition of violence as ‘any action or structural arrangement that results in physical or nonphysical harm to one or more persons’ following Iadicola and Shupe (1998: 26).

References

  • Agrawal, Binod C. 2011. Ever Expanding Hirizons Of Holistic Experimental Human Knowledge: Reflections in Retrospection and Future. The Eastern Anthropologist 64 (4): 431–441.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aguilar, Jessika. 2015. Folklore and the Construction Of National Identity in Nineteenth Century Russian Literature, Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, Submitted to the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, New York: Columbia University. Available at https://academiccommons.columbia.edu/catalog/ac:191534.

  • Alemu, Abreham. 2012. Narrating Local Identity Among the Southwestern Oromo of Ethiopia: Case of the Jimma and Gera. African Study Monographs 33 (1): 17–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appadurai, Arjun. 1995. The Production of Locality. In Counterworks: Managing the Diversity of Knowledge, ed. Richard Fardon, 204–223. London: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Atte, O. 1992. Indigenous Local Knowledge as a Key to Local Level Development: Possibilities, Constraints, and Planning Issues. Ames: Iowa State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Athreya A. 2016. Cultural Nationalism in India. Anthropology 4 (2), Open Access Journal. https://doi.org/10.4172/2332-0915.1000165.

  • Barak, G. 2003. Violence and Nonviolence. Pathways to Understanding. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrow, E.G.C. 1992. Building on local knowledge: The challenge of agroforestry for pastoral areas. Agroforestry Today 3 (4): 4–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bascom, William R. 1953. Folklore and Anthropology. The Journal of American Folklore 66 (262): 283–290. Available at http://www.jstor.org/stable/536722.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhabha, Homi K. 2017. The Location of Culture. Special Indian Edition, reprint. London/New York: Routledge. First Published in 1994, Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya, D.K. 2011. Anthropology at Cross Roads: Reflections on Rejuvenation of Traditional Areas. The Eastern Anthropologist 64 (4): 321–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumer, Harbert. 1969. Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method. Berkley and Los Angeles CA: California University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boas, Franz. 1948. Race, Language and Culture. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosch, Tanja E. 2016. Memory Studies, A Brief Concept Paper. In Media, Conflict and Democratisation MeCoDEM), pp. 1–9; Available at www.mecodem.eu.

  • Chaturvedi, Vinayak. 2003. Vinayak & Me: “Hindutva” and the Politics of Naming. Social History 28 (2): 155–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chulach, Teresa. 2016. Working in a Third Space: A Closer Look at the Hybridity, Identity and Agency of Nurse Practitioners. Nursing Inquiry 23 (1): 52–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clifford, James. 1986. Introduction: Partial Truths. In Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography, 1–26, eds. James Clifford and George Marcus Delhi: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohn Bernard S. 1968. Ethnohistory. In International Encyclopaedia of Social Sciences, vol. 5 and 6, ed. David L. Sills, 440–441. New York: The Macmillan Company & The Free Press. Reprint Edition 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalton, G. 1961. Economic Theory and Primitive Society. American Anthropologist 63 (1): 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das, Veena. 1987. The Anthropology of Violence and the Speech of Victims. Anthropology Today 3 (4): 11–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, Sangeeta. 1999. Reordering a World: The Tana Bhagat Movement, 1914–1919. Studies in History 15 (1): 1–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Haan, Willem. 2008. Violence as an Essentially Contested Concept. In Violence in Europe, ed. S. Body-Gendrot and P. Spierenburg, 27–40. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doak, Kevin M. 2001. Building National Identity through Ethnicity: Ethnology in Wartime Japan and After. The Journal of Japanese Studies 27 (1): 1–39. https://doi.org/10.2307/3591935.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eriksen, T.H. and F.S. Nielsen. 2008. A History of Anthropology. Jaipur: Rawat; First Published in 2001, London: Pluto Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farmer, P. 2009. On Suffering and Structural Violence: A View from Below. Race/Ethnicity: Multidisciplinary Global Contexts 3 (1): 11–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galtung, J. 1969. Violence, Peace, and Peace Research. Journal of Peace Research 6 (3): 167–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guha, Ranjit. 1987. Introduction. In An Anthropologist among the Historians and Other Essays, Ed. Bernard S.Cohn vii–xxvi. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halbwachs, M. 1980. The Collective Memory. ed. Trans. Francis J. Ditter Jr and Vida Yazdi Ditterl. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herskovits, M.J. 1952. Economic Anthropology. New York: A. Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Honko, Lauri. 1995. Traditions in the Construction of Cultural Identity and Strategies of Ethnic Survival. European Review. 3 (2): 131–146. Published online: 01 July 2009. Available at https://doi.org/10.1017/S1062798700001435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iadicola, P., and A. Shupe. 1998. Violence, Inequality, and Human Freedom. New York: General Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingold, Tim 1994. General Introduciton. In Companion Encyclopaedia of Anthropology, ed. Tim Ingold, xiii–xxii. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingold, Tim 1998. From Complementarity to Obviation: On Dissolving the Boundaries Between Social and Biological Anthropology, Archaeology and Psychology. Zeitschrift für Ethnologie, Bd. 123, H. 1, pp. 21–52. Available at http://www.jstor.org/stable/25842543.

  • Iversen, Gudmund. 1991. Contextual Analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jaffrelot, Christophe (ed.). 2007. Hindu Nationalism: A Reader. Ranikhet: Permanent Black Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jain, Girilal. 1994. The Hindu Phenomenon. New Delhi: UBS Publishers' Distributors.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jayaprasad, K. 1991. RSS and Hindu Nationalism: Inroads in a Leftist Stronghold. Delhi: Deep & Deep.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jell-Bahlsen, Sabine and Georg Jell 2016. The Gold Curse of Papua New Guinea. In Interventions, Familiarity and Continuity: Dynamics in Tribal Communities, ed. M.C. Behera, 108–107. New Delhi: Commonwealth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karlsson, Bengt G. 2018. The Social Life of Categories: Affirmative Action and Trajectories of the Indigenous. In Revisiting Tribal Studies: A Glimpse after Hundred Years, ed. M.C. Behera, 70–80. Jaipur: Rawat.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keightley, E., and M. Pickering (eds.). 2013. Research Methods for Memory Studies. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kluckhohn, Clyde. 1944. Mirror of Man. New York: Fawcett.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Clair, E.E. Jr. 1968. Economic Theory and Economic Anthropology. In Economic Anthropology, Readings in Theory and Analysis, eds. E.E. Le Clair, Jr. and H.K. Schneider, 187–207. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leach, Edmund. 1986. Violence. London Review of Books 8 (18): 13–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lummis, Trevor. 1987. Listening to History: The Authenticity of Oral Evidence. London: Hutchinson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, James 2011. Mythological History, Identity Formation, and the Many Faces of Alexander the Great. Classics Honors Projects, Paper 11. Available at http://digitalcommons.macalester.edu/classics_honors/11.

  • McFate, Montgomery 2005. Anthropology and Counterinsurgency: The Strange Story of their Curious Relationship. Military Review 85 (2): 24–38. www.au.af.mil/au/awc/awcgate/milreview/mcfate.pdf.

  • Mctavish, Donald G., and Ellen B. Pirro. 1990. Contextual Content Analysis. Quality and Quantity 24 (3): 245–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mjøset, Lars 2009. The Contextualist Approach to Social Science Methodology. In The SAGE Handbook of Case-Based Methods, eds. D.Byrne and Charles C. Ragin, 39–68. London/Thousand Oaks/New Delhi: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, J., P. Geraghty, and L. Crowl (eds.). 1994. Science of Pacific Islands Peoples. Suva, Fiji: University of the South Pacific Institute of Pacific Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, Joane. 1994. Constructing Ethnicity: Creating and Recreating Ethnic Identity and Culture. Social Problems, Special Issue on Immigration, Race, and Ethnicity in America 41 (1): 152–176. https://doi.org/10.2307/3096847.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nanda, Subrat K. 2006. Cultural Nationalism in a Multi-National Context: The Case of India. Sociological Bulletin 55 (1): 24–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Needham, R. 1970. The Future of Social Anthropology: Disintegration of Metamorphosis?. In Anniversary Contributions to Anthropology: Twelve Essays eds. P.E. de Josselin de Jong, J.van Baal, G. W. Locher and J. W. Schrool, 34–47. Leiden: E.J. Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, Laura J. 2004. Performing Russia: Folk Revival and Russian Identity. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Padel, Felix, and Samarendra Das. 2010. Out of this Earth: East India Adivasis and the Aluminium Cartel. Hyderabad: Orient BlackSwan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prabhash, J., and K.M. Sajad Ibrahim. 2017. Changing Voting Behaviour in Kerala Elections. Economic and Political Weekly 52 (5): 64–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rainbow, Paul. 1977. Reflections as Fieldwork in Morocco. Berkeley: California University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riches, David. 1986. The Anthropology of Violence. Oxford: Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.2307/3033216.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rylko-Bauer, B., L. Whiteford, and P. Farmer. 2009. Global Health in Times of Violence. Santa Fe: School for Advanced Research Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Said, Edward W. 1978. Orientalism. New York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saikia, J.P. and Anannya Gogoi. 2018. Identity crisis and Ethnic Assertion among the Thengal Kacharis of Assam. In Revisiting Tribal Studies: A Glimpse after Hundred Years, ed. M.C. Behera, 109–120. Jaipur: Rawat.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheper-Hughes, N., and P. Bourgois. 2004. Violence in War and Peace: A Reader. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, B., and I. Schroder. 2003. Anthropology of Violence and Conflict. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sillitoe, Paul. 1998. The Development of Indigenous Knowledge: A New Applied Anthropology. Current Anthropology 39 (2): 223–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slingerland, Ted, and Mark Collard. 2012. Introduction. In Creating Consilience: Integrating the Sciences and the Humanities, ed. Ted Slingerland and Mark Collard, 1–38. Oxfrod: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, C.P. 1959/1993. The two cultures. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava, V.K. (ed.). 2004/2005. Introduction. In Methodology and Fieldwork, ed. V.K. Srivastava, 1–50. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava, V.K. (ed.). 1999. The Future of Anthropology. Economic and Political Weekly XXXIV (9): 545–552.

    Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava, V.K. (ed.). 2012. Anthropology Today. Journal of the Asiatic Society LIV (1):11–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, Paul. 1988. The Voice of the Past: Oral History, 3rd ed. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vansina, Jan. 1965: Oral Tradition: A Study in Historical Methodology. Translated by H. M. Wright. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, D.Michael. 1998. Response to Paul Sillitoe, 1998. The Development of Indigenous Knowledge: A New Applied Anthropology. Current Anthropology 39 (2): 244–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehouse, Harvey. 2011. Whence and Whiter Social Anthropology. Annales de la Fondation Fyssen Hors Serie–30e Anniversaire: 19–29. Available at www.harveywhitehouse.com/s/CV_Whitehouse_March2018v-v2.pdf.

  • Wilson, E.O. 1998. Consilience: The Unity of Knowledge. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, Eric 1980. They Divide and Subdivide and Call It Anthropology. New York Times, November 30, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maguni Charan Behera .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Behera, M.C. (2019). Rethinking Perspectives in Tribal Studies: Anthropology and Beyond. In: Behera, M. (eds) Shifting Perspectives in Tribal Studies. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8090-7_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8090-7_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-8089-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-8090-7

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics