Abstract
Socio-ecological production landscapes (SEPLs) face numerous projected and unprecedented pressures amid changing social, economic, and environmental conditions. The use of diverse knowledge systems, including the transmission and sharing of traditional knowledge, to achieve mutually beneficial human-environment relationships, fosters the sustainable use of natural resources, promotes biodiversity conservation, and determines new methods to efficiently manage SEPLs, which can increase the adaptive capacity of local communities. To illustrate how the timely and regular transmission of traditional knowledge can promote the sustainable management of ecosystems and their services in complex SEPLs, this chapter presents the status and trend of the transmission and sharing of knowledge on non-timber forest products in two rural study sites in Japan. It also examines the factors, including motivations and incentives, that shape knowledge systems in these locales. The case study on apiculture in Nagano shows that beekeepers’ ecological knowledge should be transformed from tacit to explicit and shared beyond the family unit for the benefit of future generations, while the case study on Shiitake mushroom production in Ishikawa reveals that farmers’ traditional production knowledge and experience should be combined with modern production techniques to meet new quality standards. By understanding these elements and processes, relevant policies and activities could be developed and implemented, especially since new agents are frequently needed to increase the resilience of SEPLs.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsChange history
17 November 2019
The online version of this chapter was inadvertently published with incorrect author affiliations. The correct affiliation is provided below and this was also updated in the chapter.
Notes
- 1.
The collection, use, and commercialization (1) of the target plants have been declining, along with interest in embedded TK, practices, land, and resources, due to globalization, rapid economic development since 1950, local impacts of international trade on agriculture, more lucrative income sources, aging, and migration (Cetinkaya et al. 2012; Cetinkaya 2009).
References
Barreau A, Ibarra JT, Wyndham FS, Rojas A, Kozak RA (2016) How can we teach our children if we cannot access the forest? Generational change in Mapuche knowledge of wild edible plants in Andean temperate ecosystems of Chile. J Ethnobiol 36(2):412–432
Bogale S (2009) Indigenous knowledge and its relevance for sustainable beekeeping development: a case study in the highlands of Southeast Ethiopia. Livest Res Rural Dev 21(11):184
Bull G, Pledger S, Splittgerber M, Stephen J, Pribowo A, Baker K, Singh D, Pootlass D, Macleod N (2014) Culturally driven forest management, utilization and values: a Nuxalk first nations case study. For Chron 90(5):620–627
Byosiere P, Luethge DJ, Vas A, Salmador MP (2010) Diffusion of organisational innovation: knowledge transfer through social networks. Int J Technol Manag 49(4):401–420
Camacho LD, Gevaña DT, Carandang AP, Camacho SC (2016) Indigenous knowledge and practices for the sustainable management of Ifugao forests in Cordillera, Philippines. Int J Biodivers Sci Ecosyst Serv Manag 12:5–13
Carrasco LR, Nghiem TPL, Sunderland T, Koh LP (2014) Economic valuation of ecosystem services fails to capture biodiversity value of tropical forests. Biol Conserv 178:163–170
Castonguay AC, Burkhard B, Müller F, Horgan FG, Settele J (2016) Resilience and adaptability of rice terrace social-ecological systems: a case study of a local community’s perception in Banaue, Philippines. Ecol Soc 21(2):15
Cetinkaya G (2009) Challenges for the maintenance of traditional knowledge in the Satoyama and Satoumi ecosystems, Noto Peninsula, Japan. Hum Ecol Rev 16(1):27–40
Cetinkaya G, Nakamura K, Kambu A, Daisuke A, Daisuke U (2012) Traditional knowledge and landscape management: evaluation and measurement of traditional knowledge on edible wild plants and mushrooms in the Satoyama ecosystems in the Noto Peninsula, Japan. J Environ Plan Manag 55(2):141–160
Charnley S, Fischer AP, Jones ET (2007) Integrating traditional and local ecological knowledge into forest biodiversity conservation in the Pacific Northwest. For Ecol Manag 246(1):14–28
Chirenje LI, Giliba RA, Musamba EB (2013) Local communities’ participation in decision-making processes through planning and budgeting in African countries. Chin J Popul Resour Environ 11(1):10–16
Chun J (2014) A legal approach to induce the traditional knowledge of forest resources. Forest Policy Econ 38:40–45
Cocks M, López C, Dold T (2011) Cultural importance of non-timber forest products: opportunities they pose for bio-cultural diversity in dynamic societies. In: Non-timber forest products in the global context. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp 107–128
Cottier T, Panizzon M (2004) Legal perspectives on traditional knowledge: the case for intellectual property protection. J Int Econ 7(2):371–399
Curci J (2010) The protection of biodiversity and traditional knowledge in international law of intellectual property. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Della A, Paraskeva-Hadjichambi D, Hadjichambis AC (2006) An ethnobotanical survey of wild edible plants of Paphos and Larnaca countryside of Cyprus. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed 2:34–42
Diver S (2017) Negotiating indigenous knowledge at the science-policy interface: insights from the Xaxli’p community forest. Environ Sci Pol 73:1–11
Dubey P (2007) Sociocultural factors and enabling policies for non-timber forest products-based microenterprise development. J Entrep 16(2):197–206
Finetti C (2011) Traditional knowledge and the patent system: two worlds apart? World Patent Inf 33(1):58–56
Garibay-Orijel R, Córdova J, Cifuentes J, Valenzuela R, Estrada-Torres A, Kong A (2009) Integrating wild mushrooms use into a model of sustainable management for indigenous community forests. For Ecol Manag 258(2):122–131
He J, Dong M, Stark M (2014) Small mushrooms for big business? Gaps in the sustainable management of non-timber forest products in Southwest China. Sustainability 6(10):6847–6861
Huang J, Huang Z, Jia X, Hu R, Xiang C (2015) Long-term reduction of nitrogen fertilizer use through knowledge training in rice production in China. Agric Syst 135:105–111
Illukpitiya P, Yanagida JF (2010) Farming vs forests: trade-off between agriculture and the extraction of non-timber forest products. Ecol Econ 69(10):1952–1963
Jensen A (2009) Valuation of non-timber forest products and value chains. Forest Policy Econ 11(1):34–41
Jones ET, Lynch KA (2007) Nontimber forest products and biodiversity management in the Pacific Northwest. For Ecol Manag 246(1):29–37
Kajima S, Tanaka Y, Uchiyama Y (2017) Japanese sake and tea as place-based products: a comparison of regional certifications of globally important agricultural heritage systems, geopark, biosphere reserves, and geographical indication at product level certification. J Ethn Foods 4(2):80–87
Kilchling P, Hansmann R, Seeland K (2009) Demand for non-timber forest products: surveys of urban consumers and sellers in Switzerland. Forest Policy Econ 11(4):294–300
Kohsaka R, Tomiyoshi M, Saito O, Hashimoto S, Mohammend L (2015) Interactions of knowledge systems in shiitake mushroom production: a case study on the Noto Peninsula, Japan. J For Res 20:453–463
Kohsaka R, Park MS, Uchiyama Y (2017) Beekeeping and honey production in Japan and South Korea: past and present. J Ethn Foods 4(2):72–79
Leistner M (2004) Traditional knowledge. In: Von Lewinski S (ed) Indigenous heritage and intellectual property: genetic resources, traditional knowledge and folklore, by S. Von Lewinski and A. Von Hahn. Kluwer Law International, The Hague, pp 52–144
Maffi L, Woodley E (2010) Biocultural diversity conservation: a global sourcebook. Routledge, New York
Mantyka-Pringle CS, Jardine TD, Bradford L, Bharadwaj L, Kythreotis AP, Fresque-Baxter J, Kelly E et al (2017) Bridging science and traditional knowledge to assess cumulative impacts of stressors on ecosystem health. Environ Int 102:125–137
Marques MJ, Schwilch G, Lauterburg N, Crittenden S, Tesfai M, Stolte J, Zdruli P et al (2016) Multifaceted impacts of sustainable land management in drylands: a review. Sustainability 8(2):177
Martini NF, Nelson KC, Dahmus ME (2014) Exploring homeowner diffusion of yard care knowledge as one step toward improving urban ecosystems. Environ Manag 54(5):1223–1236
Matsuo T (2010) Regional changes of mushroom production areas in Japan. Study Glob Environ 12:53–66
McKay D (2003) Cultivating new local futures: remittance economies and land-use patterns in Ifugao, Philippines. J Southeast Asian Stud 34(2):285–306
Nagamitsu T, Yasuda M, Saito-Morooka F, Inoue MN, Nishiyama M, Goka K, Sugiura S, Maeto K, Okabe K, Taki H (2016) Genetic structure and potential environmental determinants of local genetic diversity in Japanese honeybees (Apis cerana japonica). PLoS One 11(11):e0167233
Ouédraogo I, Nacoulma BMI, Hahn K, Thiombiano A (2014) Assessing ecosystem services based on indigenous knowledge in South-eastern Burkina Faso (West Africa). Int J Biodivers Sci Ecosyst Serv Manag 10:313–321
Park MS, Youn Y (2012) Traditional knowledge of Korean native beekeeping and sustainable forest management. Forest Policy Econ 15:37–45
Parrotta J, Youn Y, Camacho LD (2016) Traditional knowledge for sustainable forest management and provision of ecosystem services. Int J Biodivers Sci Ecosyst Serv Manag 12(1–2):1–4
Polanyi M (1966) The tacit dimension. Routledge, London
Potts SG, Imperatriz-Fonseca VL, Ngo HT (2016) The assessment report of the intergovernmental science-policy platform on biodiversity and ecosystem services on pollinators, pollination and food production. Secretariat of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services, Bonn
Reyes-Garcia V, Aceituno-Mata L, Calvet-Mir L, Garnatje T, Gómez-Baggethun E, Lastra JJ, Ontillera R et al (2014) Resilience of traditional knowledge systems: the case of agricultural knowledge in home gardens of the Iberian Peninsula. Glob Environ Chang 24:223–231
Rist L, Shanley P, Sunderland T, Sheil D, Ndoye O, Liswanti N, Tieguhong J (2012) The impacts of selective logging on non-timber forest products of livelihood importance. For Ecol Manag 268:57–69
Ros-Tonen MAF (2000) The role of non-timber forest products in sustainable tropical forest management. Holz Roh Werkst 58:196–201
Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity (2011) REDD-plus and biodiversity. CBD Technical Series No. 59. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, Montreal
Talaat WIAW (2013) Protection of the associated traditional knowledge on genetic resources: beyond the Nagoya protocol. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 91:673–678
Ticktin T (2004) The ecological implications of harvesting non-timber forest products. J Appl Ecol 41:11–21
Van Overwalle G (2005) Protecting and sharing biodiversity and traditional knowledge: holder and user tools. Ecol Econ 53(4):585–607
Verma SK (2004) Protecting traditional knowledge. J World Intellect Prop 7:765–805
Von Lewinski S (2008) Introduction. In: Von Lewinski S (ed) Indigenous heritage and intellectual property: genetic resources, traditional knowledge and folklore, by S. Von Lewinski. Kluwer Law International, The Hague, pp 1–5
World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) (2001) Intellectual Property Needs and Expectations of Traditional Knowledge Holders. WIPO Report on Fact-finding Missions on Intellectual Property and Traditional Knowledge. WIPO, Geneva
Zeidemann V, Kainer KA, Staudhammer CL (2014) Heterogeneity in NTFP quality, access and management shape benefit distribution in an Amazonian extractive reserve. Environ Conserv 41(3):242–252
Acknowledgment
This work was supported by the JSPS KAKENHI Grant Numbers JP26360062; JP16KK0053; JP17K02105; JP17H01682; and JP17H04627; Environment Research and Technology Development Fund [S-15-2(3) Predicting and Assessing Natural Capital and Ecosystem Services (PANCES)] of the Ministry of the Environment, Japan; Research Institute for Humanity and Nature [No. 14200126]; Asahi Group Foundation [A17B-031]; Kurita Water and Environment Foundation [17K010]; Toyota Foundation [D17-N-0107]; Hokkaido-Tohoku Regional Economic Research Institute and the Foundation for Environmental Conservation Measures, Keidanren.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kohsaka, R., Tashiro, A., Rogel, M., Uchiyama, Y. (2020). Sustaining Diverse Knowledge Systems in SEPLs: Sharing Tacit Knowledge of Apiculture and Mushroom Production with Future Generations. In: Saito, O. (eds) Sharing Ecosystem Services. Science for Sustainable Societies. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8067-9_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8067-9_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-8066-2
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-8067-9
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)