Abstract
The term “wadakamari” in this paper means to switch one’s own viewpoint one after another without seeing it as perfect. We design and carry out “wadakamari gaming” which promotes players have wadakamari in consensus building process and make proposals for a better consensus building way. In this research, we focus on the concept of contingency as a factor that causes wadakamari. The contingencies concerning both the dilemma structure of the consensus building problem and differences of viewpoints between people seem to promote subjects have wadakamari. Therefore, in this research, we design wadakamari gaming in which players deal with a dilemma problem with compact city as the theme and aim for consensus building. We evaluated players’ behavior by preparing six indicators concerning wadakamari. As a result, it became clear that the players tend to have wadakamari by confronting the emphasized dilemma structure or facing differences between the players’ viewpoints. In addition, consistency was confirmed between the wadakamari indicators.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Adachi S (2001) Koukyoujigyou wo meguru taiwa no mekanizumu (Mechanism of dialogue over public works). In: Funabashi H (ed) Kagai/higai to kaiketsukatei (Harm, damage and solution process). Yuuhikaku, Tokyo, pp 1–43
Arai K (1998) Gaming simulation towa nanika (What is gaming simulation?). In: Arai K, Deguchi H, Kaneda T, Kato F, Nakamura M (eds) Gaming Simulation. Nikkagiren, Tokyo
Duke RD (1974) Gaming: the future’s language. Halsted Press, New York
Ohnuma S (2011) Shakaiteki dilemma wo meguru goui keisei (Social dilemma for consensus building). In: Hirose Y (ed) Kasou sekai game kara syakai shinrigaku wo manabu (Learning social phycology through simulated world game). Nakanishiya Shuppan, Kyoto
Barreteau O (2003) The joint use of role-playing games and models regarding negotiation process: characterization of associations. J Artif Soc Soc Simul 6(2). http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/6/2/3.html
Kitani S, Hasebe T (2014) The influence of formal mindsets on decision maker attitudes when confronted with difficult problems: a view of gaming simulation “lost in space” using inner measurement. In: The shift from teaching to learning: individual, collective and organizational learning through gaming simulation. W. Bertelsmann Verlag, Bielefeld, pp 212–223
Doi T (2007) Amae no kozo (The anatomy of dependence). Kobundo, Tokyo
Morita S (1978) Nihon no mura (Japanese village). Asahi Shinbunsya, Tokyo
Tsujishita T (1998) Seimei to fukuzatsukei (Life and complex system). In: Yamaguchi M, Takahashi Y (eds) Suugaku, fukuzatsukei no kagaku to gendaishisou (Mathematics, science of complex systems and modern thought). Seidosya, Tokyo, pp 75–225
Nishikawa A (2011) Tamashii to karada, nou (Soul and body, brain). Kodansya Sensho Métier, Tokyo
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Oyamada, S., Ishikawa, R., Kumagai, S., Kitani, S. (2019). Wadakamari Gaming Which Promotes Players’ Viewpoint Switching in Consensus Building. In: Hamada, R., et al. Neo-Simulation and Gaming Toward Active Learning. Translational Systems Sciences, vol 18. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8039-6_35
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8039-6_35
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-8038-9
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-8039-6
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)