Advertisement

A Study on Strength Properties and Cost Analysis of Industrial Byproduct-Based Ternary Blended Geopolymer Concrete

  • Kuunreddy Srinivas ReddyEmail author
  • S. Bala Murugan
Conference paper
  • 166 Downloads
Part of the Lecture Notes on Multidisciplinary Industrial Engineering book series (LNMUINEN)

Abstract

Flyash, ground granulated blast-furnace slag (GGBFS) and Alccofine are industrial byproduct materials and require large area of land for the safe disposal. These byproducts which are rich in alumina and silica can be value added, by using as binder in geopolymer concrete. The industrial byproducts are activated by NaOH- or KOH-based alkaline solution. Effective utilization of industrial byproducts in the construction industry will reduce the impact on the environment, which is caused due to ordinary portland cement (OPC). Previous studies on geopolymer concrete are at high molarity of NaOH and curing adopted is hot air oven curing for the effective polymerization of binder material and the alkaline activator solution (AAS). The present study is aimed to understand the effect of Alccofine as a ternary binder in geopolymer concrete at low molarities of NaOH-based alkaline solution under ambient temperature curing. Flyash, GGBFS, and Alccofine are the binder materials considered in geopolymer concrete by complete replacement of OPC. The ratio of Na2SiO3 to NaOH is fixed at 2.5 for all the geopolymer concrete mixes. Msand is used as fine aggregate by replacing with river sand in geopolymer concrete. The study also focused on comparing the compressive strength, split tensile strength, flexural strength, and cost analysis of ternary blended geopolymer concrete with conventional concrete of M30 grade. It is observed from the results that the geopolymer concrete has attained better strength properties than OPC concrete at the lesser cost and the impact on environment is reduced.

Keywords

Flyash GGBFS Alccofine Msand Alkaline solution Geopolymer concrete 

References

  1. 1.
    Pangdaeng, S., Phoo-ngernkham, T., Sata, V., Chindaprasirt, P.: Influence of curing conditions on properties of high calcium fly ash geopolymer containing Portland cement as additive. Mater Design 53, 269–274 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2013.07.018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pavithra, P., Srinivasula Reddy, M., Pasla Dinakar, B., HanumanthaRao, B.K., Satpathy, A.N.M.: A mix design procedure for geopolymer concrete with fly ash. J. Clean. Prod. 133, 117–125 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.05.041CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kong, D.L.Y., Sanjayan, J.G.: Damage behavior of geopolymer composites exposed to elevated temperature. Cement Concr. Compos. 30, 986–991 (2008).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2008.08.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Thaarrini, J., Dhivya, S.: Comparative study on the production cost of geopolymer and conventional concretes. Int. J. Civil Eng. Res. 7(2), 117–124 (2016)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Embong, R., Kusbiantoro, A., Shafiq, N., Nuruddin, M.F.: Strength and microstructural properties of fly ash based geopolymer concrete containing high-calcium and water-absorptive aggregate. J. Cleaner Prod. 112, 1–7 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.06.058CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Davidovits, J.: Chemistry of geopolymeric systems terminology. In: Proceedings of Geopolymer 99 Conference, Saint-Quentin, France, pp. 9–40 (1999)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Palomo, A., Grutzek, M.W., Blanco, M.T.: Alkali-activated flyash: a cement for the future. Cem. Concr. Res. 29, 1323–1329 (1999).  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-8846(98),00243-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fernandez-Jimenez, A., Palomo, J., Puertasalkali, F.: Activated slag mortars: mechanical strength behavior. Cem. Concr. Res. 29, 1313–1321 (1999).  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-8846(99)00154-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Somna, K., Jaturapitakkul, C., Kajitvichyanukul, P., Chindaprasirt, P.: NaOH activated ground flyash geopolymer cured at ambient temperature. Fuel. 90(6), 2118–2124 (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2011.01.018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    SrinivasReddy, K., Srinivasan, K.: IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 263 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/263/3/032023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Indian Standard Pulverized Fuel Ash—Specification. BIS, IS 3812 (Part 1) 2003 Bureau of Indian Standards: New Delhi, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Padmalal, D., Maya, K.: River sand mining and mining methods. In: Sand Mining. Environmental Science and Engineering. Springer, Dordrecht (2014)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Specifications for coarse and fine aggregates from natural sources for concrete, IS 383 (1970) reaffirmed 2002, Bureau of Indian Standards: New Delhi, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Patankar, S.V., Jamkar, S.S., Ghugal, Y.M.: Effect of sodium hydroxide on flow and strength of fly ash based geopolymer mortar. J. Struct. Eng. 39(1), 7–12 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/938789CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Anuradha, R., Sreevidya, V., Venkatasubramani, R., Rangan, B.V.: Modified guidelines for geopolymer concrete mix design using Indian standard. Asian J. Civil Eng. (Building and Housing), 13(3), 353–364 (2012)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Patankar, S.V., Jamkar, S.S., Ghugal, Y.M.: Effect of solution-to-fly ash ratio on flow and compressive strength of geopolymer concrete. In: Proceedings of 8th Biennial Conference on Structural Engineering Convention (SEC–2012) at S.V.N.I.T., Surat, pp. 161–166 (2012)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jamkar, S.S., Ghugal, Y.M., Patankar, S.V.: Effect of fineness of fly ash on flow and compressive strength of geopolymer concrete. Indian Concrete J. 87(4), 57–61 (2013)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Patankar, S.V., Ghugal, Y.M., Jamkar, S.S.: Mix design of fly ash based geopolymer concrete. In: Advances in Structural Engineering, pp. 1619–1633 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2187-6_123Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lloyd, N.A., Rangan, B.V.: Geopolymer concrete with fly ash. In: Second International Conference on Sustainable Construction Materials and Technologies, Ancona, Italy (2010)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Methods of tests for compressive strength of concrete, IS 516: 1959 (reaffirmed 2004), Bureau of Indian Standards: New Delhi, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ahmed, A.J., Dhaduk, D., Abhishek, R., Sunil, J., Pritesh, R.: Experimental study on the enhancement in concrete due to the ultra-fine particles. Global Res. Develop. J. Eng. 138–141 (2016)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Chindaprasit, P.: Influence of fly ash fineness on strength, drying shrinkage and sulfate resistance of blended cement mortar. Cement Concrte Res. 34, 1087–1092 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Singhal, D., Junaid, M.T., Jindal, B.B., Mehta, A.: Mechanical and microstructural properties of fly ash based geopolymer concrete incorporating Alccofine at ambient curing. Constr. Building Mater. 180, 298–307 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.05.286CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Structural and Geotechnical Engineering, School of Civil EngineeringVellore Institute of TechnologyVelloreIndia

Personalised recommendations