Skip to main content

What Is a Hybrid Regime?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Politics of South Asia ((POSAS))

Abstract

After decades of proliferation of democracy around the world as a part of the ‘Third Wave’, by the early 2000s, the democratization process stalled in many countries and a new form of governance emerged in some countries either by choice or by default. This new form, while having some democratic institutions, is essentially authoritarian in its nature. It became evident to researchers that these regimes are not in transition. They are neither subtypes of autocracy nor of democracy, but instead are a regime type of their own. They are called hybrid regimes. This chapter traces the emergence of the concept of hybrid regime, explores its defining features, and examines the spread of such regimes around the world.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Alvarez, Mike, Jose Antonio Cheibub, Fernando Limogni, and Adam Przeworski. 1996. “Classifying Political Regimes.” Studies in Comparative International Development 31 (2): 3–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armony, Ariel C., and Hector E. Schamis. 2005. “Babel in Democratization Studies.” Journal of Democracy 16 (4): 113–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boix, Carles, and Milan W. Svolik. 2013. “The foundations of limited authoritarian government: Institutions, commitment, and power-sharing in dictatorships.” The Journal of Politics 72 (2): 300–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bollen, Kenneth, and Pamela Paxton. 2000. “Subjective Measures of Liberal Democracy.” Comparative Political Studies 33 (1): 58–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brownlee, Jason. 2009. “Portents of Pluralism: How Hybrid Regimes Affects Democratic Transitions.” American Journal of Political Science 53 (3): 515–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bunce, Valerie, and Sharon Wolchik. 2008. “Mixed Regimes in Postcommunist Eurasia: Tipping Democratic and Tipping Authoritarian.” Workshop on “Democratization in European Former Soviet Republics: Limits, Obstacles and Perspectives.” Florence: Workshop on “Democratization in European Former Soviet Republics: Limits, Obstacles and Perspectives.” June 13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carothers, Thomas. 2002. “The End of the Transition Paradigm.” Journal of Democracy 13 (1): 5–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, Robert A., Ian Shapiro, and José Antonio Cheibub. 2003. The Democracy Sourcebook. Boston: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, Robert. 1971. Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. New Haven and London: Tale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, Larry Jay. 2011. “Democracy’s Third Wave Today.” Current History 110 (739): 299–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, Larry Jay. 2002. “Thinking about Hybrid Regimes.” Journal of Democracy 13 (2): 21–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, Larry Jay, Juan José Linz, and Seymour Martin Lipset. 1989. Democracy in Developing Countries. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doorenspleet, Renskee. 2000. “Reassessing the Three Waves of Democratizaton.” World Politics 52 (3): 384–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EIU, Economist Intelligence Unit. 2016. Democracy Index 2015: Democracy in an age of anxiety. Accessed December 17, 2018. https://www.yabiladi.com/img/content/EIU-Democracy-Index-2015.pdf.

  • Epstein, David, Robert Bates, Jack Goldstone, Ida Kristensen, and Shayrn O’Halloran. 2006. “Democratic Transitions.” American Journal of Political Science 50 (3): 551–569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finer, Samuel E. 1970. Comparative Government. London: Allen Lane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishman, Robert M. 1990. “Rethinking State and Regime: Southern Europe’s Transition to Democracy.” World Politics 42 (3): 422–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freedom House. 2013. Freedom In The World 2013: Democratic Breakthrough In The Balance. Washington, DC: Freedom House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gandhi, Jennifer. 2008. Political institutions under dictatorship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntington, Samuel P. 1991. The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karl, Terry Lynn. 1995. “The Hybrid Regimes for Central America.” Journal of Democracy 6 (3): 72–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kilinc, Faith Resul. 2017. What we see in Venezuela is the faith of hybrid regimes. August 27. Accessed December 10, 2018. http://foreignpolicynews.org/2017/08/28/see-venezuela-faith-hybrid-regimes/.

  • Levitsky, Steven, and Lucan A. Way. 2002. “Elections without Democracy: The Rise of Competitive Authoritarianism.” Journal of Democracy 13 (2): 51–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linz, Juan. 1975. “Totalitarian and Authoritarian Regimes.” In Handbook of Political Science, edited by Fred Greenstein and Nelson Polsby, 184–85. Boston: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lust-Okar, Ellen. 2004. “Divided they rule: The management and manipulation of political opposition.” Comparative Politics 36 (2): 159–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mainwaring, Scott, Daniel Brinks, and Anibal Perez-Linan. 2001. “Classifying Political Regimes in Latin America 1945–1999.” Studies in Comparative International Development 36 (1): 37–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merkel, W. 2004. “Embedded and defective democracies.” Special issue on consolidated or defective democracy? Problems of regime change. Democratization 11 (5): 33–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mufti, Mariam. 2018. “What Do We Know about Hybrid Regimes after Two Decades.” Politics and Governance 6 (2): 112–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nathan, Andrew J. 2003. “Authoritarian Resilience.” Journal of Democracy 14 (1): 6–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Donnel, Guillermo, and Phillippe Schmitter. 1986. Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Tentative Conclusions about Uncertain Democracies. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ottaway, Marina. 2003a. Democracy Challenged: The Rise of Semi-Authoritarianism. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ottaway, Marina. 2003b. “Promoting Democracy after Conflict: The Difficult Choices.” International Studies Perspectives 4 (3): 314–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, Graeme B. 2010. The Politics of Protest in Hybrid Regimes: Managing Dissent in Post-Communist Russia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sartori, Giovanni. 1987. The Theory of Democracy Revisited. London: Chatham House Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schedler, Andreas. 2006. Electoral Authoritarianism – The Dynamics of Unfree Competition. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schedler, Andreas. 2002. “The Menu of Manipulation.” Journal of Democracy 13 (2): 36–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zakaria, Fareed. 1997. “The Rise of Illiberal Democracy.” Foreign Affairs 76 (6): 22–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ali Riaz .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Riaz, A. (2019). What Is a Hybrid Regime?. In: Voting in a Hybrid Regime. Politics of South Asia. Palgrave Pivot, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7956-7_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics