What Is a Hybrid Regime?

  • Ali RiazEmail author
Part of the Politics of South Asia book series (POSAS)


After decades of proliferation of democracy around the world as a part of the ‘Third Wave’, by the early 2000s, the democratization process stalled in many countries and a new form of governance emerged in some countries either by choice or by default. This new form, while having some democratic institutions, is essentially authoritarian in its nature. It became evident to researchers that these regimes are not in transition. They are neither subtypes of autocracy nor of democracy, but instead are a regime type of their own. They are called hybrid regimes. This chapter traces the emergence of the concept of hybrid regime, explores its defining features, and examines the spread of such regimes around the world.


Democratization Transition paradigm Third wave Hybrid regime 


  1. Alvarez, Mike, Jose Antonio Cheibub, Fernando Limogni, and Adam Przeworski. 1996. “Classifying Political Regimes.” Studies in Comparative International Development 31 (2): 3–36.Google Scholar
  2. Armony, Ariel C., and Hector E. Schamis. 2005. “Babel in Democratization Studies.” Journal of Democracy 16 (4): 113–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boix, Carles, and Milan W. Svolik. 2013. “The foundations of limited authoritarian government: Institutions, commitment, and power-sharing in dictatorships.” The Journal of Politics 72 (2): 300–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bollen, Kenneth, and Pamela Paxton. 2000. “Subjective Measures of Liberal Democracy.” Comparative Political Studies 33 (1): 58–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brownlee, Jason. 2009. “Portents of Pluralism: How Hybrid Regimes Affects Democratic Transitions.” American Journal of Political Science 53 (3): 515–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bunce, Valerie, and Sharon Wolchik. 2008. “Mixed Regimes in Postcommunist Eurasia: Tipping Democratic and Tipping Authoritarian.” Workshop on “Democratization in European Former Soviet Republics: Limits, Obstacles and Perspectives.” Florence: Workshop on “Democratization in European Former Soviet Republics: Limits, Obstacles and Perspectives.” June 13.Google Scholar
  7. Carothers, Thomas. 2002. “The End of the Transition Paradigm.” Journal of Democracy 13 (1): 5–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dahl, Robert A., Ian Shapiro, and José Antonio Cheibub. 2003. The Democracy Sourcebook. Boston: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  9. Dahl, Robert. 1971. Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. New Haven and London: Tale University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Diamond, Larry Jay. 2011. “Democracy’s Third Wave Today.” Current History 110 (739): 299–307.Google Scholar
  11. Diamond, Larry Jay. 2002. “Thinking about Hybrid Regimes.” Journal of Democracy 13 (2): 21–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Diamond, Larry Jay, Juan José Linz, and Seymour Martin Lipset. 1989. Democracy in Developing Countries. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
  13. Doorenspleet, Renskee. 2000. “Reassessing the Three Waves of Democratizaton.” World Politics 52 (3): 384–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. EIU, Economist Intelligence Unit. 2016. Democracy Index 2015: Democracy in an age of anxiety. Accessed December 17, 2018.
  15. Epstein, David, Robert Bates, Jack Goldstone, Ida Kristensen, and Shayrn O’Halloran. 2006. “Democratic Transitions.” American Journal of Political Science 50 (3): 551–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Finer, Samuel E. 1970. Comparative Government. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
  17. Fishman, Robert M. 1990. “Rethinking State and Regime: Southern Europe’s Transition to Democracy.” World Politics 42 (3): 422–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Freedom House. 2013. Freedom In The World 2013: Democratic Breakthrough In The Balance. Washington, DC: Freedom House.Google Scholar
  19. Gandhi, Jennifer. 2008. Political institutions under dictatorship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Huntington, Samuel P. 1991. The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
  21. Karl, Terry Lynn. 1995. “The Hybrid Regimes for Central America.” Journal of Democracy 6 (3): 72–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kilinc, Faith Resul. 2017. What we see in Venezuela is the faith of hybrid regimes. August 27. Accessed December 10, 2018.
  23. Levitsky, Steven, and Lucan A. Way. 2002. “Elections without Democracy: The Rise of Competitive Authoritarianism.” Journal of Democracy 13 (2): 51–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Linz, Juan. 1975. “Totalitarian and Authoritarian Regimes.” In Handbook of Political Science, edited by Fred Greenstein and Nelson Polsby, 184–85. Boston: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  25. Lust-Okar, Ellen. 2004. “Divided they rule: The management and manipulation of political opposition.” Comparative Politics 36 (2): 159–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mainwaring, Scott, Daniel Brinks, and Anibal Perez-Linan. 2001. “Classifying Political Regimes in Latin America 1945–1999.” Studies in Comparative International Development 36 (1): 37–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Merkel, W. 2004. “Embedded and defective democracies.” Special issue on consolidated or defective democracy? Problems of regime change. Democratization 11 (5): 33–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mufti, Mariam. 2018. “What Do We Know about Hybrid Regimes after Two Decades.” Politics and Governance 6 (2): 112–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Nathan, Andrew J. 2003. “Authoritarian Resilience.” Journal of Democracy 14 (1): 6–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. O’Donnel, Guillermo, and Phillippe Schmitter. 1986. Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Tentative Conclusions about Uncertain Democracies. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Ottaway, Marina. 2003a. Democracy Challenged: The Rise of Semi-Authoritarianism. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.Google Scholar
  32. Ottaway, Marina. 2003b. “Promoting Democracy after Conflict: The Difficult Choices.” International Studies Perspectives 4 (3): 314–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Robertson, Graeme B. 2010. The Politics of Protest in Hybrid Regimes: Managing Dissent in Post-Communist Russia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Sartori, Giovanni. 1987. The Theory of Democracy Revisited. London: Chatham House Publications.Google Scholar
  35. Schedler, Andreas. 2006. Electoral Authoritarianism – The Dynamics of Unfree Competition. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
  36. Schedler, Andreas. 2002. “The Menu of Manipulation.” Journal of Democracy 13 (2): 36–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Zakaria, Fareed. 1997. “The Rise of Illiberal Democracy.” Foreign Affairs 76 (6): 22–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Politics and GovernmentIllinois State UniversityNormalUSA

Personalised recommendations