Skip to main content

Emerging States and the Shifting Balance of Global Power

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Entering the Global Arena

Part of the book series: Mega Event Planning ((MEGAEP))

Abstract

The economic achievements of the BRICS countries—Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa—have shifted economic power away from the West and led to the development of a more decentred international economy and alternative models of international economic development. As this chapter highlights, the rise of new economic centres of power and the shifting balance of power have raised concerns about a possible endgame to the current international order. This chapter explores these concerns and analyses the extent to which they are based on assumptions around BRICS’ unity and the sustainability of their continued economic success.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In terms of nuclear capabilities and military resources, Russia is the outstanding power among the BRICS. Moscow commands around 7000 nuclear warheads compared to China’s 270 and India’s 130 (www.armscontriol.org/factsheets/nuclearweaponswhohaswhat). Military spending in Russia is also high at 4.24 per cent of GDP in 2017, more than double that of China’s 2 per cent of GDP in the same year. Interestingly, and relevant since our study includes Qatar, military spending in Qatar has risen by 282 per cent since 2012 and the country is the third largest weapons importer. Qatar is heavily dependent upon the West for its weapons systems. It also hosts American and Turkish military bases (SPIRI.com). This suggests that Qatar’s emerging power serves the interest of the major powers rather than challenging it.

References

  • Balmaceda, M. M. (2013). The Politics of Energy Dependency: Ukraine, Belarus and Lithuania Between Domestic Oligarchs and Russian Pressure. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biersack, J., & O’Lear, S. (2014). The Geopolitics of Russia’s Annexation of Crimea: Narratives, Identity, Silences, and Energy. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 55(3), 247–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brautigam, D. (2009). The Dragon’s Gift: The Real Story of China in Africa. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brazilian Ministry of External Relations. (n.d.). Retrieved February 15, 2019, from http://brics.itamaraty.gov.br/component/search/?searchword=CRA&searchphrase=all&Itemid=134.

  • Bremmer, I. (2017, September 1). The Mixed Fortunes of the BRICS Countries, in 5 Facts. Time. Retrieved January 24, 2019, from http://time.com/4923837/brics-summit-xiamen-mixed-fortunes.

  • Breslin, S. (2013). China and the Global Political Economy (New Paperback ed.). London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breslin, S. (2017). Still Rising or Risen (or Both)? Why and How China Matters. The Pacific Review, 30(6), 870–884.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carmody, P. (2013). The Rise of the BRICS in Africa: The Geopolitics of South-South Relations. London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chin, G. T. (2014). The BRICS Led Development Bank: Purpose and Politics Beyond the G20. Global Policy, 5(3), 366–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, A. (2017). BRICS: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, A., & Farooq, A. B. (2015). Testing the Club Dynamics of the BRICS: The New Development Bank from Conception to Establishment. International Organisations Research Journal, 10(2), 32–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornelissen, S. (2010). The Geopolitics of Global Aspiration: Sports Mega Events and Emerging Powers. The International Journal of the History of Sport, 27(16–18), 3008–3025.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crocker, C. (2015). The Strategic Dilemma of a World Adrift. Survival, 57(1), 7–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • da Silva, P. (2018). Brazil, the BRICS, and the Changing Landscape of Global Economic Governance. In The Oxford Handbook of the Brazilian Economy. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190499983.013.31.

  • Duncombe, C., & Dunne, T. (2018). After Liberal World Order. International Affairs, 94(1), 25–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Efstathopoulos, C. (2015). Middle Powers in World Trade Diplomacy: India, South Africa and the Doha Development Agenda. London: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Flemes, D. (2011). India-Brazil-South Africa (IBSA) in the New Global Order: Interests, Strategies and Values of the Emerging Coalition. International Studies, 46(4), 401–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gowan, R. (2017, June 6). Can the International System Survive Trump’s Assault on Multilateralism? World Politics Review. Retrieved January 12, 2019, from https://www.worldpoliticsreview.com/articles/22371/can-the-international-system-survive-trump-s-assault-on-multilateralism.

  • Güven, A. B. (2017). Defending Supremacy: How the IMF and the World Bank Navigate the Challenge of Rising Powers. International Affairs, 93(5), 1149–1166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heldt, E. C., & Mahrenbach, L. C. (2018). Rising Powers in Global Economic Governance: Mapping the Flexibility-Empowerment Nexus. Global Policy. Retrieved February 10, 2019, from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/1758-5899.12643.

  • Hopewell, K. (2014). Difficult Paths to Power: The Rise of Brazil, India and China at the WTO. Review of International Political Economy, 22(2), 311–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopewell, K. (2016). Breaking the WTO: How Neoliberal Powers Disrupted the Neoliberalism Project. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurrell, A., & Narlikar, S. (2006). A New Politics of Confrontation? Brazil and India in Multilateral Trade Negotiations. Global Society, 20(4), 415–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ikenberry, G. J. (2018). The End of the Liberal International Order? International Affairs, 94(1), 7–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ismail, F., & Vickers, B. (2013). Reflections on the New Democratic South Africa’s Role in the Multilateral Trading System. In J. Scott & R. Wilkinson (Eds.), Trade, Poverty, Development: Getting Beyond the WTO’s Doha Deadlock. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahler, M. (2013). Rising Powers and Global Governance: Negotiating Change in a Resilient Status Quo. International Affairs, 89(3), 711–729.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keck, Z. (2014, March). Why Did BRICS Back Russia on Crimea? The Diplomat. Retrieved February 3, 2019, from https://thediplomat.com/2014/03/why-did-brics-back-russia-on-crimea.

  • Khanna, P. (2014). New BRICS Bank a Building Block of Alternative World Order. New Perspectives Quarterly, 31(4), 46–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khong, Y. F. (2019). Power as Prestige in World Politics. International Affairs, 95(1), 119–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kupchan, C. (2012). No One’s World: The West, The Rising Rest, and the Coming Global Turn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, D. (2012). Global Trade Governance and the Challenges of African Activism in the Doha Development Agenda Negotiations. Global Society, 26(1), 83–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, D., & Smith, N. (2010). Small State Discourses in the International Political Economy. Third World Quarterly, 31(7), 1091–1105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, D., & Wilkinson, R. (Eds.). (2007). The WTO After Hong Kong: Progress in, and Prospects for, the Doha Development Agenda. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lesage, D., & Van de Graaf, T. (Eds.). (2015). Rising Powers and Multilateral Institutions. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • McManus, D. (2014, July 29). Is Global Chaos the New Normal? Los Angeles Times. Retrieved February 8, 2019, from http://www.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/la-oe-mcmanus-column-foreign-policy-chaos-20140730-column.

  • Narlikar, A. (2004). International Trade and Developing Countries: Bargaining Coalitions in the GATT and WTO. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Narlikar, A. (2010). New Powers: How to Become One and How to Manage Them. London: Hurst & Co. (Publishers) Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narlikar, A. (2013). Negotiating the Rise of New Powers. International Affairs, 89(3), 561–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nye, J. (2017). Will the Liberal Order Survive? The History of an Idea. Foreign Affairs, 96(1), 10–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pant, H. V. (2013). The BRICS Fallacy. The Washington Quarterly, 36(3), 91–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Power, M., Mohan, G., & Tan-Mullins, M. (2012). China’s Resource Diplomacy in Africa: Powering Development? London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Qasem, I., van Dongen, T., & de Rider, M. (2011). The Beijing Consensus: An Alternative Approach to Development. World Foresight Forum Issue Brief No. 2, The Hague, The Netherlands. Retrieved February 15, 2019, from https://hcss.nl/sites/default/files/files/reports/WFF02_Issue_Brief_The_Beijing_Consensus02.pdf.

  • Roberts, C., Armijo, L. E., & Katada, S. N. (2017). The BRICS and Collective Financial Statecraft. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rothkopf, D. (2014, July 21). A Time of Unprecedented Instability? Foreign Policy. Retrieved February 8, 2019, from http://foreignpolicy.com/2014/07/21/a-time-of-unprecedented-instability.

  • Scott, J., & Wilkinson, R. (2013). China Threat: Evidence from the WTO. Journal of World Trade, 47(4), 761–782.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shambaugh, D. L. (2013). China Goes Global: The Partial Power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinbock, D. (2018, August 2). BRICS on Right Track to the Future. Daily Telegraph. Retrieved January 24, 2019, from https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/world/china-watch/business/brics-summit-2018.

  • Stephen, M. D. (2014). Rising Powers, Global Capitalism and Liberal Global Governance: A Historical Materialist Perspective of the BRICS Challenge. European Journal of International Relations, 20(4), 912–938.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephen, M. D. (2017). Emerging Powers and Emerging Trends in Global Governance. Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism, 23, 483–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, I. (2009). ‘The South Will Rise Again’? New Alliances and Global Governance: The India-Brazil-South Africa Dialogue Forum. Politikon, 36(1), 45–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, I. (2014). Africa Rising?: BRICS-Diversifying Dependency. Woodbridge, Suffolk: Boydell and Brewer Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tett, G. (2010, January 15). The Story of the BRICS. Financial Times. Retrieved January 21, 2019, from https://www.ft.com/content/112ca932-00ab-11df-ae8d-00144feabdc0.

  • Winters, A., & Yusuf, S. (Eds.). (2007). Dancing with Giants: China, India, and the Global Economy. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zürn, M., & Stephen, M. D. (2010). The View of Old and New Powers on the Legitimacy of International Institutions. Politics, 30(1), 91–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jonathan Grix .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Grix, J., Brannagan, P.M., Lee, D. (2019). Emerging States and the Shifting Balance of Global Power. In: Entering the Global Arena. Mega Event Planning. Palgrave Pivot, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7952-9_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7952-9_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Pivot, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-7951-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-7952-9

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics