Advertisement

Event Tree Analysis of Offshore Hydrocarbon Release Events

  • Guowei MaEmail author
  • Yimiao Huang
  • Jingde Li
Chapter
  • 231 Downloads

Abstract

This chapter presents event-tree-based risk analysis of hydrocarbon release accidents, which is the potential source for the VCE formation. A fuzzy-theory-based confidence level method for reducing uncertainties is explained and a barrier and operational risk analysis (BORA-Release) method is introduced as the basic model to illustrate the proposed methodology. One case study is provided as well to demonstrate implementation of this method.

References

  1. Aven, T., Sklet, S., & Vinnem, J. E. (2006). Barrier and operational risk analysis of hydrocarbon releases (BORA-Release): Part I. Method description. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 137(2), 681–691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bernardo, J. M., & Smith, A. F. (2009). Bayesian theory (Vol. 405). Wiley.Google Scholar
  3. Cho, H. N., Choi, H. H., & Kim, Y. B. (2002). A risk assessment methodology for incorporating uncertainties using fuzzy concepts. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 78(2), 173–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dong, Y., & Yu, D. (2005). Estimation of failure probability of oil and gas transmission pipelines by fuzzy fault tree analysis. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 18(2), 83–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Huang, D., Chen, T., & Wang, M. J. J. (2001). A fuzzy set approach for event tree analysis. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 118(1), 153–165.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Huang, Y., Ma, G., Li, J., & Hao, H. (2015). Confidence-based quantitative risk analysis for offshore accidental hydrocarbon release events. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 35, 117–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Jacobs, R., & Haber, S. (1994). Organisational processes and nuclear power plant safety. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 45, 75–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Liou, T. S., & Wang, M. J. J. (1992). Ranking fuzzy numbers with integral value. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 50(3), 247–255.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Liu, J., Yang, J. B., Wang, J., & Sii, H. S. (2003). Review of uncertainty reasoning approaches as guidance for maritime and offshore safety-based assessment. Journal of UK Safety and Reliability Society, 23(1), 63–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Markowski, A. S., Mannan, M. S., & Bigoszewska, A. (2009). Fuzzy logic for process safety analysis. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 22(6), 695–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. PSA. (2013). Trends in risk level in the petroleum activity, summary report 2012—Norwegian continental shelf. Stavanger: The Petroleum Safety Authority.Google Scholar
  12. Rajakarunakaran, S., Kumar, A. M., & Prabhu, V. A. (2015). Applications of fuzzy faulty tree analysis and expert elicitation for evaluation of risks in LPG refuelling station. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 33, 109–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Sa’idi, E., Anvaripour, B., Jaderi, F., & Nabhani, N. (2014). Fuzzy risk modelling of process operations in the oil and gas refineries. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 30, 63–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Seljelid, J., Haugen, S., Sklet, S., & Vinnem J. E. (2007). Operational risk analysis—Total analysis of physical and non-physical barriers. In BORA handbook, Rev 00, Norway.Google Scholar
  15. Sklet, S. (2006a). Hydrocarbon releases on oil and gas production platforms: Release scenarios and safety barriers. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 19(5), 481–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Sklet, S. (2006b). Safety barriers: Definition, classification, and performance. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 19(5), 494–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Sklet, S., Vinnem, J. E., & Aven, T. (2006). Barrier and operational risk analysis of hydrocarbon releases (BORA-Release): Part II: Results from a case study. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 137(2), 692–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Spouge J. (1999). A guide to quantitative risk assessment for offshore installations. United Kingdom: The Centre of Marine and Petroleum Technology (CMPT).Google Scholar
  19. Thomassen, O., & Sorum, M. (2002, March). Mapping and monitoring the technical safety level. In Society of petroleum engineers international conference on health, safety and environment in oil and gas exploration and production, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: March (pp. 20–22).Google Scholar
  20. Vinnem, J. E. (2014). Offshore risk assessment principles, modelling and applications of QRA studies. London: Springer.Google Scholar
  21. Vose, D. (1996). Quantitative risk analysis: A guide to monte carlo simulation modelling author: David Vose. USA: Wiley.Google Scholar
  22. Wang, Y. F., Xie, M., Habibullah, M. S., & Ng, K. M. (2011). Quantitative risk assessment through hybrid causal logic approach. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part O: Journal of Risk and Reliability, 225(3), 323–332.Google Scholar
  23. Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8(3), 338–353.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Civil and Transportation EngineeringHebei University of TechnologyTianjinChina
  2. 2.Department of Civil, Environmental and Mining Engineering, School of EngineeringUniversity of Western AustraliaPerthAustralia
  3. 3.Centre for Infrastructural Monitoring and ProtectionCurtin UniversityPerthAustralia

Personalised recommendations