Advertisement

CFD-Based Overpressure Prediction for Congested Multi-Modules—Safety Gap Effect

  • Guowei MaEmail author
  • Yimiao Huang
  • Jingde Li
Chapter
  • 231 Downloads

Abstract

This chapter presents a thorough investigation of the effect of the gas explosion on a cylindrical floating liquefied natural gas (FLNG) platform by using CFD simulation. The effect of safety gap on overpressure mitigation of gas explosion is evaluated. The data-dump technique is applied to ensure simulation accuracy. Two sets of different safety gaps are designed for the cylindrical FLNG platform. The overall results indicate that the safety gap is effective in reducing overpressure in two adjacent congestions.

References

  1. Alekseev, V. I., Kuznetsov, M. S., Yankin, Y. G., & Dorofeev, S. B. (2001). Experimental study of flame acceleration and the deflagration-to-detonation transition under conditions of transverse venting. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 14(6), 591–596.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0950-4230(01)00051-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bradley, D., Lawes, M., & Liu, K. X. (2008). Turbulent flame speeds in ducts and the deflagration/detonation transition. Combustion and Flame, 154(1–2), 96–108.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2008.03.011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chan, C., Moen, I. O., & Lee, J. H. S. (1983). Influence of confinement on flame acceleration due to repeated obstacles. Combustion and Flame, 49(1–3), 27–39.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-2180(83)90148-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. EMEG. (1997). Explosion Model Evaluation Group, specifications of test cases for gas explosions—Test case C1. Brussels, Belgium: EME project, DGXII.Google Scholar
  5. GexCon. (2011). FLACS v9.1 user’s manual. Norway: Doxygen.Google Scholar
  6. Gubba, S. R., Ibrahim, S. S., Malalasekera, W., & Masri, A. R. (2008). LES modeling of premixed deflagrating flames in a small-scale vented explosion chamber with a series of solid obstructions. Combustion Science and Technology, 180(10–11), 1936–1955.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00102200802261852.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hirdaris, S. E., Bai, W., Dessi, D., Ergin, A., Gu, X., Hermundstad, O. A., et al. (2014). Loads for use in the design of ships and offshore structures. Ocean Engineering, 78, 131–174.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2013.09.012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kindracki, J., Kobiera, A., Rarata, G., & Wolanski, P. (2007). Influence of ignition position and obstacles on explosion development in methane-air mixture in closed vessels. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 20(4–6), 551–561.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2007.05.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kvamsdal, H. M., Hetland, J., Haugen, G., Svendsen, H. F., Major, F., Karstad, V., et al. (2010). Maintaining a neutral water balance in a 450 MWe NGCC-CCS power system with post-combustion carbon dioxide capture aimed at offshore operation. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 4(4), 613–622.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2010.01.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Li, J. D., Abdel-jawad, M., & Ma, G. W. (2014). New correlation for vapor cloud explosion overpressure calculation at congested configurations. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 31, 16–25.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2014.05.013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Li, J. D., Ma, G. W., Abdel-jawad, M., & Hao, H. (2014). Evaluation of gas explosion overpressures at configurations with irregularly arranged obstacles. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, B4014003.Google Scholar
  12. Li, J., Ma, G., Hao, H., & Huang, Y. (2016). Gas explosion analysis of safety gap effect on the innovating FLNG vessel with a cylindrical platform. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 44, 263–274.Google Scholar
  13. Ma, G. W., Li, J. D., & Abdel-Jawad, M. (2014). Accuracy improvement in evaluation of gas explosion overpressures in congestions with safety gaps. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 32, 358–366.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2014.10.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Moen, I. O., Donato, M., Knystautas, R., & Lee, J. H. (1980). Flame acceleration due to turbulence produced by obstacles. Combustion and Flame, 39(1), 21–32.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-2180(80)90003-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Molkov, V., Makarov, D., & Puttock, J. (2006). The nature and large eddy simulation of coherent deflagrations in a vented enclosure-atmosphere system. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 19(2–3), 121–129.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2005.05.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Na’inna, A. M., Phylaktou, H. N., & Andrews, G. E. (2013). The acceleration of flames in tube explosions with two obstacles as a function of the obstacle separation distance. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 26(6), 1597–1603.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2013.08.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Pwaga, S. S. (2011). Sensitivity analysis of proposed LNG liquefaction processes for LNG FPSO (Master’s thesis, Institutt for energi-og prosessteknikk).Google Scholar
  18. Rudy, W., Porowski, R., & Teodorczyk, A. (2011). Propagation of hydrogen-air detonation in tube with obstacles. Journal of Power Technologies, 91, 122–129.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-2180(80)90003-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Shimamura, Y. (2002). FPSO/FSO: State of the art. Journal of Marine Science and Technology, 7(2), 59–70.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s007730200013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Suardin, J. A., McPhate, A. J., Sipkema, A., Childs, M., & Mannan, M. S. (2009). Fire and explosion assessment on oil and gas floating production storage offloading (FPSO): An effective screening and comparison tool. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 87(3), 147–160.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2008.12.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. van den Berg, A. C., & Mos, A. L. (2002). RIGOS—The critical separation distance. TNO Prins Maurits Laboratory Report No. PML 2002-C50.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0950-4230(02)00112-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. van den Berg, A. C., & Mos, A.L. (2005). Research to improve guidance on separation distance for the multi-energy method (RIGOS). TNO Prins Maurits Laboratory, Research Report 369.Google Scholar
  23. van den Berg, A. C., & Versloot, N. H. A. (2003). The multi-energy critical separation distance. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 16(2), 111–120.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0950-4230(02)00112-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Wang, F., Zhang, Y. K., Wang, Y., Xu, Z. Y., Zhang, Z. Y., Ni, T., et al. (2013). Floating non-traditional manufacture of floating drilling storage and offloading units-study on modeling and optimization method for the underwater rotating technology. Marine Structures, 31, 15–23.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marstruc.2012.12.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wen, X. P., Yu, M. G., Liu, Z. C., Li, G., Ji, W. T., & Xie, M. Z. (2013). Effects of cross-wise obstacle position on methane-air deflagration characteristics. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 26(6), 1335–1340.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2013.08.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Xu, X., Liu, J., & Cao, L. (2014). Optimization and analysis of mixed refrigerant composition for the PRICO natural gas liquefaction process. Cryogenics, 59, 60–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Xu, X., Liu, J., Jiang, C., & Cao, L. (2013). The correlation between mixed refrigerant composition and ambient conditions in the PRICO LNG process. Applied Energy, 102, 1127–1136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Zhao, W. H., Yang, J. M., Hu, Z. Q., & Wei, Y. F. (2011). Recent developments on the hydrodynamics of floating liquid natural gas (FLNG). Ocean Engineering, 38(14–15), 1555–1567.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2011.07.018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Civil and Transportation EngineeringHebei University of TechnologyTianjinChina
  2. 2.Department of Civil, Environmental and Mining Engineering, School of EngineeringUniversity of Western AustraliaPerthAustralia
  3. 3.Centre for Infrastructural Monitoring and ProtectionCurtin UniversityPerthAustralia

Personalised recommendations