Endoscopic Surgery for Adhesive Otitis Media

  • Kunio MizutariEmail author


Surgery for adhesive otitis media is generally known to be difficult; one reason is that a retracted tympanic membrane cannot be directly observed by microscopy. Moreover, elevation of a tympanic membrane which has adhered to the tympanic mucosa is difficult in a microscopic procedure. Recently, endoscopic ear surgery (EES) has been widely used for various middle ear diseases. The primary advantage of endoscopic procedures in ear surgeries is the wide field of view that allows visualization of lesions hidden behind bony structures. Thus, we have employed EES in the treatment of adhesive otitis media to take advantage of the improved visualization of a retracted or adhered tympanic membrane. EES allowed easy elevation of the adhered tympanic membrane from the facial recess, an area difficult to see directly by microscopy, with minimal removal of the bony edges. Complete elevation of the tympanic membrane from the ossicular chain, especially from the stapes, is also technically difficult by microscopic surgery. However, an endoscopic high-power view enables a clear and certain elevation procedure, which is helpful for preservation of the ossicular chain. Moreover, the clear, high-power endoscopic view enables the separation of the tympanic membrane adhesions from the tympanic mucosa, which is necessary to avoid re-adhesion.


Adhesive otitis media Tympanoplasty Endoscopic ear surgery (EES) Tympanic membrane Ossicular chain Cartilage tympanoplasty Retrotympanum Facial recess Sinus tympani 



Adhesive otitis media


Computed tomography


Endoscopic ear surgery


Magnetic resonance imaging


Otitis media with effusion


Transcanal endoscopic ear surgery



The author is deeply grateful to Dr. Katsuki Niwa, Dr. Takaomi Kurioka, and Dr. Saki Takihata for their assistance.


  1. 1.
    Tos M. Tympanoplasty in chronic adhesive otitis media. Acta Otolaryngol. 1972;73(1):53–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Larem A, Haidar H, Alsaadi A, et al. Tympanoplasty in adhesive otitis media: a descriptive study. Laryngoscope. 2016;126(12):2804–10. Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kojima H. Diagnosis and treatment of adhesive otitis media. Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho. 2011;114(7):632–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tos M, Stangerup SE, Larsen P. Dynamics of eardrum changes following secretory otitis. A prospective study. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1987;113(4):380–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sade J, Berco E. Atelectasis and secretory otitis media. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1976;85(2 Suppl):66–72. Scholar
  6. 6.
    Borgstein J, Gerritsma TV, Wieringa MH, et al. The Erasmus atelectasis classification: proposal of a new classification for atelectasis of the middle ear in children. Laryngoscope. 2007;117(7):1255–9. Scholar
  7. 7.
    Merchant SN, McKenna MJ, Rosowski JJ. Current status and future challenges of tympanoplasty. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 1998;255(5):221–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Watanabe T, Ito T, Furukawa T, et al. The efficacy of color mapped fusion images in the diagnosis and treatment of cholesteatoma using transcanal endoscopic ear surgery. Otol Neurotol. 2015;36(5):763–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Watanabe T, Ito T, Furukawa T, et al. The efficacy of color-mapped diffusion-weighted images combined with CT in the diagnosis and treatment of cholesteatoma using transcanal endoscopic ear surgery. Otol Neurotol. 2015;36(10):1663–8. Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kanoto M, Sugai Y, Hosoya T, et al. Detectability and anatomical correlation of middle ear cholesteatoma using fused thin slice non-echo planar imaging diffusion-weighted image and magnetic resonance cisternography (FTS-nEPID). Magn Reson Imaging. 2015;33(10):1253–7. Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sato K, Kawana M, Yamamoto Y, et al. Evaluation of mastoid air cell system by three-dimensional reconstruction using sagittal tomography of the temporal bone. Auris Nasus Larynx. 1997;24(1):47–51. Scholar
  12. 12.
    Miura M, Takahashi H, Honjo I, et al. Influence of the gas exchange function through the middle ear mucosa on the development of sniff-induced middle ear diseases. Laryngoscope. 1998;108(5):683–6. Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dommerby H, Tos M. Sensorineural hearing loss in chronic adhesive otitis. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1986;112(6):628–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Yaguchi Y, Murakami D, Yamato M, et al. Middle ear mucosal regeneration with three-dimensionally tissue-engineered autologous middle ear cell sheets in rabbit model. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2016;10(3):E188–94. Scholar
  15. 15.
    Yamamoto K, Yamato M, Morino T, et al. Middle ear mucosal regeneration by tissue-engineered cell sheet transplantation. NPJ Regen Med. 2017;2(1):1–11. Scholar
  16. 16.
    Marchioni D, Alicandri-Ciufelli M, Molteni G, et al. Ossicular chain preservation after exclusive endoscopic transcanal tympanoplasty: preliminary experience. Otol Neurotol. 2011;32(4):626–31. Scholar
  17. 17.
    Obholzer R, Ahmed J, Warburton F, et al. Hearing and ossicular chain preservation in cholesteatoma surgery. J Laryngol Otol. 2011;125(2):147–52. Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dornhoffer J. Cartilage tympanoplasty: indications, techniques, and outcomes in a 1,000-patient series. Laryngoscope. 2003;113(11):1844–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ichimura K, Ishikawa K, Nakamura K, et al. Cartilage palisade tympanoplasty for adhesive otitis media. Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho. 2009;112(6):474–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck SurgeryNational Defense Medical CollegeSaitamaJapan

Personalised recommendations