Skip to main content

Non-profit Foundation and Brand Alliances as a Reputation Management Tool

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Ethics, Social Responsibility and Sustainability in Marketing

Abstract

According to resource-based theory, reputation is an important intangible resource. As an intangible resource, it can provide a more sustainable source of competitive advantage in firms and can be used as a relationship management tool in public relations . With a recent history of scandal in firms face pressure to maximize the positive esteem in which they are held by the public. Companies make alliances with other firms or non-profits to promote mutual interests in products or services offered and in the public perception of their legitimacy. Accordingly, as part of their corporate social responsibility , many firms practice non-profit and brand alliances, in which organizations donate to a chosen cause with every consumer purchase. According to this, the study proposed a model of a non-profit and brand alliance based on relations to attitudes toward the brand, brand trust, and perceived quality of the brand variables. The results indicate that when brands alliance with a good reputation non-profit consumers tend to be more positive to brands according to their demographic characteristics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aaker, D. A., & Keller, K. L. (1990). Consumer evaluations of brand extensions. Journal of Marketing, 54(1), 27–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adkins, S. (1999). Cause-related marketing: Who cares wins. Boston, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, T. J., Landry, T. D., & Wood, C. M. (2010). Prosocial effects in youth from involvement in an experiential cause-related marketing event. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 18(1), 41–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, R., & Gabriel, H. (2003). Image and reputational characteristics of U.K. charitable organisations: An empirical study. Corporate Reputation Review, 6(3), 276–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, L. L. (2000). Cultivating service brand equity. Journal of the Academy of marketing Science, 28(1), 128–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, B. K., Bergh, D. D., & Ketchen, D. J. (2010). Reconsidering the reputation-performance relationship: A resource-based view. Journal of Management, 36(3), 588–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T. J., & Dacin, P. A. (1997). The company and the product: Corporate associations and consumer product responses. Journal of Marketing, 61(1), 68–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A. B., & Shabana, K. M. (2010). The business case for corporate social responsibility: A review of concepts, research and practice. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 85–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaudhuri, A., & Holbrook, M. B. (2001). The chain of effects from brand trust and brand affect to brand performance: The role of brand loyalty. Journal of Marketing, 65(2), 81–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dean, D. H. (2004). Consumer perception of corporate donations. Journal of Advertising, 32(4), 91–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deshpande, S., & Hitchon, J. C. (2002). Cause-related marketing ads in the light of negative news. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 79(4), 905–926.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, T., & Moriarty, S. (1998). A communication based marketing model for managing relationships. Journal of Marketing, 62, 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du, S., & Vieira, E. T. (2012). Striving for legitimacy through corporate social responsibility: Insights from oil companies. Journal of Business Ethics, 110(4), 413–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fombrun, C. J. (1996). Reputation: Realizing value from the corporate image. In N. E. Grund (Ed.). Book review-academy of managemet executive (Vol. 10(1), pp. 99–101). Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fombrun, C. J., & Shanley, M. (1990). What is in a name? Reputation building and corporate strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 33(2), 233–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fombrun, C. J., & Van Riel, C. (1997). The reputational landscape. Corporate Reputation Review, 1(1/2), 5–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foreh, M. R., & Grier, S. (2003). When is honesty the best policy? The effect of stated company intent on consumer skepticism. Journal Consumer Psychology, 13(3), 349–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • García, I., Gibaja, J. J., & Mujika, A. (2003). A study on the effect of cause-related marketing on the attitude towards the brand: The case of Pepsi in Spain. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 11(1), 111–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gautier, A., & Pache, A. C. (2015). Research on corporate philanthropy: A review and assesment. Journal of Business Ethics, 126, 343–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herbig, P., & Milewicz, J. (1993). the relationship of reputation and credibility to brand success. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 10(3), 18–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, S. (2013). Does corporate advertising work in a crisis? An examination of inoculation theory. Journal of Marketing Communications, 1(1), 293–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, R. M., & Lewicki, R. J. (2010). Repairing and enhancing trust: Approaches to reducing organizational trust deficits. The Academy of Management Annals, 4(1), 245–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotler, P., & Lee, N. (2005). Corporate social responsibility: Doing the most good for your company and your cause. Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lafferty, B. A. (1999). Selecting the right cause partners for the right reasons: The role of importance and fit in cause‐brand alliances. Psychology & Marketing, 26(4), 359–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landman, A., Ling, P. M., & Glantz, S. A. (2002). Tobacco industry youth smoking prevention programs: Protecting the industry and hurting tobacco control. American Journal of Public Health, 92, 917–930.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lassar, W. (1995). Measuring customer-based brand equity. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 12(4), 11–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, H., Park, T., Moon, H. K., Yang, Y., & Kim, C. (2008). Corporate philanthropy, attitude towards corporations, and purchase intentions: A South Korea study. Journal of Business Research, 62(10), 939–946.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyon, L., & Cameron, G. T. (2004). A relational approach examining the interplay of prior reputation and immediate response to a crisis. Journal of Public Relations Research, 16(3), 213–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie, S. B., & Scott B. (1986). The role of attitude toward the ad as a mediator of advertising effectiveness: A test of competing explanations. Journal of Marketing Research, 23(2), 130–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montavani., D., Lucas., M., & Angela., N. (2017). How motivations for csr and consumer-brand social distance influence consumers to adopt pro-social behavior. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 36, 156–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, R. M., & Hunt, S. D. (1994). The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing. Journal of Marketing, 58(3), 20–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nan, X., & Heo, K. (2007). Consumer responses to corporate social responsibility (CSR) initiatives: Examining the role of brand-cause fit in cause-related marketing. Journal of Advertising, 36(2), 63–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen, N., & Leblanc, G. (2001). Corporate image and corporate reputation in customers’ retention decisions in services. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 8(4), 227–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nowak, L. I. (2004). Cause marketing alliances: Corporate associations and consumer responses. Journal of Food Products Marketing, 10(2), 33–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2002). The competative Advantage of Corporate Philanthrophy. Harvard Business Review, 80(12), 56–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rains, D. (2003, April, 1–10). Corporate philanthropy versus sponsorship & cause related marketing. TCG Centerpiece.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhee, M., & Valdez, M. E. (2009). Contextual factors surrounding reputation damage with potential implications for reputation repair. Academy of Management Review, 34(1), 146–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rim, H., Yang, S., & Lee, J. (2016). Strategic partnerships with nonprofits in corporate social responsibility (CSR): The mediating role of perceived altruism and organizational identification. Journal of Business Research, 69(9), 3213–3219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, P. W., & Dowling, G. R. (2002). Corporate reputation and sustained superior financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 23(12), 1077–1093.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodgers, S. (2003). The effects of sponsor relevance on consumer reactions to internet sponsorships. Journal of Advertising, 32(4), 67–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sagawa, S., & Segal, E. (2000). Common interest, common good: Creating value through business and social sector partnerships. Harvard Business Review, 42(2), 105–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samu, S., & Wymer, W. (2014). Cause marketing communications: Consumer inference on attitudes towards brand and cause. European Journal of Marketing, 48(7,8), 1333–1353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, S., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2001). Does doing good always lead to doing better? Consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility. Journal of Marketing Research, 38(2), 225–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sirdeshmukh, D., Singh, J., & Sabol, B. (2002). Consumer trust, value, and loyalty in relational exchanges. Journal of Marketing, 66(1), 15–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skarmeas, D., & Leonidou, C. N. (2013). When consumers doubt, watch out! The role of CSR skepticism. Journal of Business Research, 66(10), 1831–1838.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, W. A. (1989). Lifestyles for survival: The role of social marketing in mass education. Academy for Educational Development, 5(1), 14–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spears, N., & Singh, S. N. (2004). Measuring attitude toward the brand and purchase intentions. Journal of Current İssues & Research İn Advertising, 26(2), 53–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strahilevitz, M. (2003). The effects of prior impressions of a firm’s ethics on the success of a cause-related marketing campaign: Do the good look better while the bad look worse? Journal of Non-Profit and Public Sector Marketing, 11, 77–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xie, Y., & Peng, S. (2009). How to repair customer trust after negative publicity: The roles of competence, integrity. Benevolence and Forgiveness. Psychology & Marketing, 26(7), 572–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Heyden, C., & Van der Rijt, R. (2004). Societal marketing and philanthropy in Dutch companies. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 12(1), 23–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varadarajan, P. R., & Menon, A. (1988). Cause-related marketing: A coalignment of marketing strategy and corporate philanthropy. Journal of Marketing, 52(3), 58–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webb, D. J., & Mohr, L. A. (1998). A typology of consumer responses to cause-related marketing: From skeptics to socially concerned. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 17(2), 226–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoo, B., & Donthu, N. (2001). Developing and validating a multidimensional consumer-based brand equity scale. Journal of Business Research, 52(1), 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Merve Yanar Gürce .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix

Appendix

Every year thousands of hectares of forest area disappear due to various reasons. Volkswagen cooperates with the TEMA Foundation in order to expand the coverage of forests, to be effective in combating erosion, to increase carbon capture, to draw society’s attention to deforestation and to ensure that children love forests and planting trees. In line with this cooperation, Volkswagen will contribute to a more sustainable world by providing financial support to the planting events that will be held by the TEMA Foundation in primary schools in the country.

*You have read an imaginary scenario.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kırcova, İ., Gürce, M.Y. (2019). Non-profit Foundation and Brand Alliances as a Reputation Management Tool. In: Altinbasak-Farina, I., Burnaz, S. (eds) Ethics, Social Responsibility and Sustainability in Marketing. Accounting, Finance, Sustainability, Governance & Fraud: Theory and Application. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7924-6_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics