Abstract
Palma’s papers (Development and Change 42:87–153, 2011, Development and Change 45:1416–1448, 2014) have shown that in most countries exist extreme inequalities in income distribution. This extreme inequality occurs because higher income population appropriates a significant part of income previously received by lower income groups without affecting middle-income group, which is relatively stable. This fact makes the gap between rich and poor wider than ever. In this chapter, we propose a measure that allows us to identify the impact that inequality in income distribution has on carbon footprint of households’ consumption. Through interdecile ratio 10/1–4 of the households’ footprint, it is assessed how social unsustainability (associated with the extreme inequality of income, which is transferred through the consumer spending) generates greater environmental unsustainability. We use a multi-regional input–output model to calculate the carbon footprint associated with households’ consumption according to different levels of income, from the highest income level to those who are below poverty line and at risk of social exclusion. An empirical application is carried out for the carbon footprint of Spanish households from 2006 to 2013. This period allows us to assess further the impact of the financial and economic crisis started in 2008. Finally, using a regression analysis, we evaluate how changes in domestic and imported household consumption and changes in consumption inequalities (measured through Gini index and Palma ratio) determine changes in household carbon footprint considering the different standard consumption units for the period 2006–2013. The databases used are the World Input–Output Database and Spanish Household Budget Survey.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Arce G, Zafrilla JE, López LA, Tobarra MÁ (2017) Carbon footprint of human settlements in Spain. In: Álvarez R, Zubelzu S, Martínez R (eds), Carbon footprint and the industrial lifecycle—from urban planning to recycling
Baek J, Gweisah G (2013) Does income inequality harm the environment? Empirical evidence from the United States. Energy Policy 62:1434–1437
Behrens P, Kiefte-de Jong JC, Bosker T, Rodrigues JFD, de Koning A, Tukker A (2017) Environmental impacts of dietary recommendations. Proc Natl Acad Sci 114(51):13412–13417. 10.1073/pnas.1711889114
Boyce JK (1994) Inequality as a cause of environmental degradation. Ecol Econ 11:169–178
Cazcarro I, Duarte R, Sánchez-Chóliz J (2012) Water flows in the spanish economy: agri-food sectors, trade and households diets in an input-output framework. Environ Sci Technol 46:6530–6538
Druckman A, Jackson T (2008) Measuring resource inequalities: the concepts and methodology for an area-based Gini coefficient. Ecol Econ 65:242–252
Duarte R, Mainar A, Sánchez-Chóliz J (2010) The impact of household consumption patterns on emissions in Spain. Energy Econ 32:176–185
Duarte R, Mainar A, Sánchez-Chóliz J (2012) Social groups and CO2 emissions in Spanish households. Energy Policy 44:441–450
Fleurbaey M, Kartha S, Bolwig S, Chee YL, Chen Y, Corbera E, Lecocq F, Lutz W, Muylaert MS, Norgaard RB, Okereke C, Sagar AD (2014) Sustainable development and equity. In: Climate change 2014: mitigation of climate change. contribution of working group III to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA
Gini C (1921) Measurement of inequality of incomes. Econ J 31:124–126
Hubacek K, Baiocchi G, Feng K, Patwardhan A (2017) Poverty eradication in a carbon constrained world. Nat Commun 8:912
Hubacek K, Feng K, Minx JC, Pfister S, Zhou N (2014) Teleconnecting consumption to environmental impacts at multiple spatial scales. J Ind Ecol 18:7–9
INE (2014a) Índice de Precios al Consumo. Retrieved from http://www.ine.es/
INE (2014b) Encuesta de Presupuestos Familiares. Retrieved from http://www.ine.es/
Johnson RC, Noguera G (2012) Accounting for intermediates: production sharing and trade in value added. J Int Econ 86:224–236
Jones CM, Kammen DM (2011) Quantifying carbon footprint reduction opportunities for U.S. households and communities. Environ Sci Technol 45:4088–4095
Kanemoto K, Lenzen M, Peters GP, Moran DD, Geschke A (2012) Frameworks for comparing emissions associated with production, consumption and international trade. Envion Sci Technol 46:172–179
Kerkhof AC, Benders RMJ, Moll HC (2009) Determinants of variation in household CO2 emissions between and within countries. Energy Policy 37:1509–1517
Kharas H (2010) The emerging middle class in developing countries. In: Global development outlook. OECD Development Centre
Lenzen M (2003) Environmentally important paths, linkages and key sectors in the Australian economy. Struct Change Econ Dyn 14:1–34
Lenzen M, Wier M, Cohen C, Hayami H, Pachauri S, Schaeffer R (2006) A comparative multivariate analysis of household energy requirements in Australia, Brazil, Denmark, India and Japan. Energy 31:181–207
López LA, Arce G, Morenate M, Monsalve F (2016) Assessing the inequality of spanish households through the carbon footprint: the 21st century great recession effect. J Ind Ecol 20:571–581
López LA, Arce G, Morenate M, Zafrilla JE (2017) How does income redistribution affect households’ material footprint? J Clean Prod 153:515–527
Palma JG (2011) Homogeneous middles versus heterogeneous tails, and the end of the ‘Inverted-U’: it’s all about the share of the rich. Dev Change 42:87–153
Palma JG (2014) Has the income share of the middle and upper-middle been stable around the ‘50/50 Rule’, or has it converged towards that level? the ‘Palma Ratio’ revisited. Dev Change 45:1416–1448
Ravallion M, Heil M, Jalan J (2000) Carbon emissions and income inequality. Oxford Econ Pap 52:651–669
Roca J, Serrano M (2007) Trade and atmospheric pollution in spain: an input-output approach. In: 2nd Spanish conference on input-output analysis, Zaragoza, Spain, 5–7 Sept 2007
Shigetomi Y, Nansai K, Kagawa S, Tohno S (2014) Changes in the carbon footprint of Japanese households in an aging society. Environ Sci Technol 48:6069–6080
Timmer MP, Dietzenbacher E, Los B, Stehrer R, de Vries GJ (2015) An illustrated user guide to the world input-output database: the case of global automotive production. Rev Int Econ 23:575–605
Tobarra MA, López LA, Cadarso MA, Gómez N, Cazcarro I (2018) Is seasonal households’ consumption good for the nexus carbon/water footprint? The Spanish fruits and vegetables case. Environ Sci Technol 52:12066–12077
Trefler D, Zhu SC (2010) The structure of factor content predictions. J Int Econ 82:195–207
Weber CL, Matthews HS (2008) Food-miles and the relative climate impacts of food choices in the United States. Environ Sci Technol 42:3508–3513
Wiedenhofer D, Guan D, Liu Z, Meng J, Zhang N, Wei Y-M (2017) Unequal household carbon footprints in China. Nat Clim Change 7:75
Yu Y, Feng K, Hubacek K (2013) Tele-connecting local consumption to global land use. Glob Environ Change 23:1178–1186
Zhang C, Zhao W (2014) Panel estimation for income inequality and CO2 emissions: a regional analysis in China. Appl Energy 136:382–392
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
López, L.A., Arce, G., Serrano, M. (2020). Extreme Inequality and Carbon Footprint of Spanish Households. In: Muthu, S. (eds) Carbon Footprints. Environmental Footprints and Eco-design of Products and Processes. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7916-1_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7916-1_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-7915-4
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-7916-1
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)