Abstract
As a barrier to the harsh environment, the skin is a key organ that protects the body from external pathogens. This protection is conferred by a diverse range of immune cells that work in concert to mount an immune response against invading pathogens. Over the last two decades, advancements in microscopic imaging systems have enabled intravital imaging to document the dynamic behavior of immune cells in cutaneous immune responses. This has provided insight into the roles that these immune cells play in the response, and this knowledge can be used in developing therapeutic strategies. In this chapter, we will review a variety of skin immune responses and their corresponding immune cell types that have been studied via the live imaging of mouse skin. In addition, we will cover the different tools that are utilized for the live imaging of skin immune responses.
You have full access to this open access chapter, Download conference paper PDF
1 Introduction
Amongst the various organs in the human body, the skin is particularly unique due to its diverse set of roles. From physical to immune protection, thermoregulation for homeostasis and sensory functions, the skin can do it all. This can, however, sometimes be a double-edged sword. Although skin immune cells can confer protection against invading pathogens, they can also become aberrant, leading to autoimmune diseases such as alopecia areata and vitiligo. Histology, flow cytometry and RNA sequencing have been useful tools in the analysis and understanding of immune cell function in the skin in normal and diseased states. These techniques are, however, unable to reveal the dynamics of immune cell migration and cellular interaction in these states in real-time. The technique most suitable for this is the in vivo imaging of the skin. In this chapter, we will cover some tools that are utilized for this, and examine key studies that have advanced our understanding of immune responses in the skin.
2 The Skin and Its Key Immune Cells
Histologically, the skin can be divided into two distinct sections, each with their own set of immune cells that function to keep the skin healthy. The upper layer, known as the epidermis, contains keratinocytes and Langerhans cells (LCs), whereas the dermis contains innate immune cells, including macrophages, neutrophils, mast cells, as well as cells for adaptive immune responses, such as dermal dendritic cells (DCs) and T cells (Fig. 26.1).
2.1 Dendritic Cells
DCs are specialized antigen-presenting cells (APCs) that are key to the development of immune responses. DCs are a heterogeneous population and, in steady-state skin, exist as LCs in the epidermis (Romani et al. 2010), and as dermal DCs in the dermis (Ginhoux et al. 2009). During inflammation, more DC subsets are recruited and can be found in the skin— these are the monocyte-derived DCs (Leon and Ardavin 2008) and plasmacytoid DCs (Nestle et al. 2009; Wollenberg et al. 2002). Emerging evidence in the field of LC biology highlights the similarities between LC and macrophage ontogeny, leading to the idea that LCs may be a specialized subset of tissue-resident macrophages with the capabilities of DCs (Doebel et al. 2017; Kaplan 2017).
2.2 Neutrophils
Neutrophils are short-lived, multi-nucleated leukocytes whose key role is to engulf pathogens. In a human adult, approximately 1011 neutrophils are produced in the bone marrow daily, though only 1–2% of these cells are present within the blood circulation (Borregaard 2010; Dancey et al. 1976). A small population of neutrophils has been reported to actively survey uninflamed dermis, a phenomenon that possibly allows for an immediate response to tissue damage (Li and Ng 2012; Ng et al. 2011). Upon initiation of cutaneous inflammation, neutrophils are rapidly recruited to the inflamed site (Phillipson and Kubes 2011). Upon entering the site of inflammation, neutrophils neutralize invading pathogens via phagocytosis and degranulation (Amulic et al. 2012).
2.3 Macrophages
Macrophages are important innate immune cells that are capable of a wide array of functions in response to the local microenvironment. Dermal macrophages are derived from blood-circulating monocytes that migrate into the skin (Geissmann et al. 2010; Jakubzick et al. 2013). In addition to phagocytosing invading pathogens, macrophages also play a role in the resolution of inflammation and subsequent wound repair (Lucas et al. 2010; Mirza et al. 2009). These differing abilities are observed with the different macrophage activation states, known as M1 and M2 macrophages or the classically activated macrophage and alternatively activated macrophage, respectively (Sica and Mantovani 2012). During wound repair, the initial pro-inflammatory phase involves M1 macrophages scavenging for, and killing, invading pathogens in the inflamed tissue. The subsequent phase of tissue regeneration involves M2 macrophages producing anti-inflammatory cytokines and growth factors to activate epithelial cells and fibroblasts.
2.4 Mast Cells
Deriving from hematopoietic stem cells, mast cells only differentiate to maturity upon entering peripheral tissues (Galli et al. 2005). Mast cells are long-lived immune cells that are particularly present in tissues exposed to the environment, enabling them to be first responders against environmental allergens and antigens (Galli and Tsai 2010). In the skin, mast cells localize around dermal blood vessels in an immotile state (Dudeck et al. 2011). With a spindle-like morphology in the steady state, inflammation results in mast cells taking on a more globular shape. During inflammation, mast cells secrete histamines to increase vascular permeability and promote neutrophil and effector T cell infiltration into the inflamed tissue (Biedermann et al. 2000).
2.5 T Cells
T cells are key players in the adaptive immune response, and can be classified into CD4- or CD8-expressing T cells, and natural killer (NK) T cells. CD4 T cells can be further subdivided into helper T cells (Th1, Th2, Th17) and regulatory T cells (Tregs). In a simplistic sense, helper T cells aid other immune cells in mounting an adaptable immune response to a wide variety of pathogens. Th1 cells protect against intracellular pathogens. Th2 cells promote the humoral immune response, stimulating B cells to produce antibodies. Th17 cells help with the recruitment of neutrophils. Tregs, as their name suggests, have a regulatory role and dampen inflammatory responses. CD8 T cells are also known as cytotoxic T cells for their ability to recognize and kill infected host cells.
Normal human skin contains approximately one million T cells per square centimeter of skin, which extrapolates to around 20 billion T cells, close to double the amount present in the blood (Clark et al. 2006). The majority of these T cells express the T cell receptor α and β chains (αβ T cells), and preferentially home to skin with CCR4 and cutaneous lymphocyte antigen (CLA). Most skin-homing T cells consist of CD4 memory T cells, and reside in the dermis. The epidermis, on the other hand, contains a minor population of tissue-resident CD8 memory T cells (Trm) (Carbone 2015). Resident Tregs in the skin preferentially localize around hair follicles (Chow et al. 2013; Gratz et al. 2013; Sanchez Rodriguez et al. 2014), and it has been reported that Treg-expressed Jag1 facilitates the hair follicular stem cell function for hair follicle regeneration (Ali et al. 2017).
The skin houses a special minor population of T cells that expresses the T cell receptor γ and δ chains (γδ T cells). In mice, γδ T cells exist in abundant numbers and are termed dendritic epidermal T cells (DETCs) (Witherden and Havran 2011). The human epidermis, however, does not have γδ T cells such as DETCs, but does have resident γδ T cells in the dermis (Ebert et al. 2006). Unlike the diverse T cell receptor repertoire of αβ T cells, γδ T cells express tissue-specific invariant T cell receptors and possess innate-like functions.
3 Tools for In Vivo Imaging
3.1 Microscopy
Previously, intravital imaging was limited to either the bright-field illumination of transparent tissues (Hickey et al. 1999), epifluorescence imaging of exposed dermal microvasculature (Hickey et al. 2002), or immune responses in the surface layer of the skin, the epidermis (Kissenpfennig et al. 2005). This was due to the poor penetrative ability of visible light. Technological advances led to the use of lasers, making way for a form of microscopy known as multiphoton (MP) microscopy. Also known as two-photon excitation microscopy, this is a process whereby a fluorescent molecule simultaneously absorbs two photons from rapid laser pulses. The benefit of this over conventional single-photon excitation is the deeper penetration into the tissue coupled with the reduced photodamage due to the lower energy transfer. This allows for a greater imaging depth as well as the maintenance of tissue health and viability over long imaging periods. These developments enabled the examination of a variety of fluorescently labelled leukocytes in various tissues in four dimensions (Devi et al. 2010; Gebhardt et al. 2011; Li et al. 2012; Mempel et al. 2006).
3.2 Animal Systems and Fluorescent-Cell Labelling Techniques
When using MP microscopy on the skin, structures such as hair shafts and elastic fibers, and collagen fibers, can be visualized due to their intrinsic autofluorescence or second harmonic generation, respectively. The visualization of collagen fibers in the skin distinguishes the epidermal and dermal layers in the skin. The conjugation of quantum dots to antibodies against lymphatic vessel endothelial hyaluronan receptor 1 (LYVE-1) can be used to visualize the peripheral lymphatic vessels (Sen et al. 2010). To observe the skin vasculature in the dermis, fluorescently labelled dextran can be used as it is retained within blood vessels for several hours (Egawa et al. 2013). The disadvantage to using fluorescently labelled dextran, however, is leakage due to vascular permeability as a result of inflammation. To circumvent this, a fluorescently labelled antibody against the endothelial cell surface marker CD31 (PECAM-1) can be used (Runnels et al. 2006). Runnels et al. demonstrated that a single administration of anti-CD31 antibody can stain the vasculature for 3–4 days after injection.
To visualize leukocytes endogenously, one can either fluorescently label leukocytes in vitro and adoptively transfer them into the animal, or undertake it in situ via intravenous injections of fluorescently labelled cell surface markers (Abeynaike et al. 2014; Deane et al. 2012). An alternative, which is currently the gold standard and essential to intravital imaging, is the use of transgenic animals that express fluorescent proteins in specific cells. In the field of immunology, there exists a variety of transgenic fluorescent reporter mice (Table 26.1), and their use has contributed significantly to the knowledge of immune responses in the skin (Chow et al. 2013; Egawa et al. 2011; Gebhardt et al. 2011; Goh et al. 2015; Li et al. 2012; Ng et al. 2008; Overstreet et al. 2013). In addition, unique fluorescent proteins, such as KikGR and Kaede have the ability to change their fluorescence via photoconversion by ultraviolet irradiation. These proteins allow researchers to trace cell migration endogenously between peripheral tissues and lymphoid organs (Nowotschin and Hadjantonakis 2009; Tomura et al. 2010).
4 In vivo Imaging of Skin Immune Responses
In the past decade, intravital MP microscopy has become a vital tool in understanding the behavior of leukocytes in the development and resolution of various skin immune responses.
4.1 Sterile Injury
Goh et al. recently employed intravital MP microscopy to investigate dermal DC migration in the skin. Their study was unique in that the transgenic mice they used had two fluorescent cell populations. These LysM-eGFP x CD11c-EYFP mice contained LysM+ neutrophils expressing enhanced green fluorescent protein (eGFP), and CD11c+ DCs expressing enhanced yellow fluorescent protein (EYFP). This allowed Goh et al. to investigate the dynamic responses of the two cell types during sterile injury of the skin (Goh et al. 2015). Their findings demonstrated that the onset of sterile injury to ear skin resulted in a transition in dermal DC motility from a random probing behavior to a highly directional one. This directional motility occurred towards the site of injury with an increase in cell velocity. This transition occurred over a span of 50 min, the outcome of which saw dermal DCs surrounding the periphery of the injury and a cessation in motility upon arrival. Conversely, neutrophils responded much quicker, arriving at the site of injury within 20 min and infiltrating to the core.
4.2 Contact Hypersensitivity
Contact hypersensitivity (CHS) is a commonly used mouse model of contact dermatitis, involving a type IV delayed-type hypersensitivity response. CHS is induced by small chemical compounds known as haptens that, upon binding to self-proteins, form immunogenic structures (Kaplan et al. 2012). CHS is a biphasic response, with the initial sensitization phase composed of these new immunogens activating innate immune cells, such as mast cells, macrophages, and keratinocytes. These innate cells secrete inflammatory mediators that activate resident DCs to capture the haptenated proteins. Following antigen uptake, skin DCs transiently increase their motility (Sawada et al. 2015; Sen et al. 2010) and migrate to the draining lymph nodes for presentation to, and activation of, T cells. Some skin DCs however remain, forming clusters after hapten introduction (Natsuaki et al. 2014). A subsequent exposure to the hapten initiates the second phase of CHS, which is the elicitation phase. Similar to the sensitization phase, innate immune cells are activated and skin DCs take up haptenated proteins. The presence of antigen-specific T cells in the skin generated during the sensitization phase, however, brings about a more robust inflammatory response in the skin.
Using MP microscopy, Natsuaki et al. highlighted the importance of dermal DC clusters for efficient T cell activation in the skin (Natsuaki et al. 2014). Their study showed that dermal DCs localize around perivascular macrophages that are situated on post-capillary venules. Following this, recruited T cells accumulate around these clusters, allowing for activation by proximal antigen-bearing dermal DCs. As these clusters only appear during inflammation, they have been termed “inducible skin-associated lymphoid tissues (iSALT)” (Ono and Kabashima 2015).
MP microscopy in conjunction with the CHS model has also been used to study T cell dynamics in cutaneous inflammation. Honda et al. demonstrated that effector T cells become sessile and form stable contacts with DCs within 10 min of antigen recognition (Honda et al. 2014). These effector T cells successively regain their motility within 6–8 h. Interestingly, Honda et al. discovered an inverse correlation between cytokine production and cell motility whereby these effector T cells only produce cytokines while immobile. Another study by Chow et al. investigated the dynamics of skin regulatory T cells (Tregs) during a CHS response via MP microscopy (Chow et al. 2013). They reported that, unlike the high motility of effector CD4+ T cells, most Tregs were sessile in steady state skin. During the elicitation phase of CHS, however, approximately 40% of Tregs increased their motility. It is possible that migratory Tregs are either increasing their area of regulatory influence via cytokine secretion (Vignali et al. 2008), or are in the process of migrating to draining lymph nodes (Tomura et al. 2010). Sessile Tregs on the other hand, could be interacting with DC-effector T cell clusters to exert their regulatory control (Onishi et al. 2008).
4.3 Infection
Using intravital MP microscopy, Ng et al. investigated the behavior of dermal DCs in ear skin in response to Leishmania major injection (Ng et al. 2008). Their study revealed that dermal DCs continuously surveyed the dermis in a highly motile, and G protein-coupled receptor-dependent manner under homeostatic conditions. Upon the introduction of L. major parasites to the dermis, local dermal DCs became immotile, initiating parasite uptake into cytosolic vacuoles. These changes in migration suggest that dermal DCs are constantly probing the microenvironment for foreign antigens, and may undergo arrest to process and present these antigens to cells.
Gebhardt et al. utilized MP microscopy to demonstrate the localization and distinct migratory behavior of herpes virus-specific CD4+ (gDT-II) and CD8+ (gBT-I) effector memory T (TEM) cells in mouse skin following resolution of a cutaneous herpes simplex virus (HSV) infection (Gebhardt et al. 2011). Their study describes a slow-moving population of CD8+ TEM cells during the memory phase (30 days post-infection) that were resident in the epidermis, and in close proximity to the site of HSV infection. On the other hand, CD4+ TEM cells were observed to be migrating extensively in a recirculating pattern that was limited to the dermis.
4.4 Cancer
Of clinical importance is the role of Tregs in tumor immunology. With the potential to restrict the hosts’ anti-tumor immune response, a copious amount of Tregs surrounding the tumor can be a negative prognostic indicator (Tanaka and Sakaguchi 2017). To understand the actions of Tregs in the tumor microenvironment, studies have been conducted using MP microscopy to observe Treg behavior in vivo.
Using a mouse model in which influenza HA-expressing tumors were implanted under the flank skin, Bauer et al. documented the interactions of CD8+ T cells and Tregs via MP microscopy (Bauer et al. 2014). By adoptively transferring HA-specific Tregs, tumor-infiltrating CD8+ T cells transitioned to a state resembling T cell exhaustion. Further analysis using MP microscopy revealed that Tregs in the tumor microenvironment were migratory, which was in stark contrast to the surrounding CD8+ T cells. Interestingly, the migratory behavior of the Tregs included moments of arrests to form unstable contacts with CD11c+ APCs. These interacting APCs had a marked reduction in their expression of costimulatory molecules CD80/86, and CD8+ T cell activation by these incapacitated APCs resulted in the expression of inhibitory receptors programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and T cell immunoglobulin- and mucin-domain-containing-3 (TIM-3) on CD8+ T cells. These findings emphasize the capability of MP microscopy in revealing the mechanism by which Tregs can promote tumor survival.
5 Concluding Remarks – Looking Ahead to the Future
Over the last two decades, intravital imaging has proved to be a useful tool in expanding our knowledge on cellular behavior in their native environment. Although techniques such as flow cytometry, immunohistochemistry and RNA sequencing are able to provide insight into cellular function, they are but snapshots. The way in which an immune cell changes shape, moves, and interacts with neighboring cells during various types of immune responses can only be visualized via intravital imaging. Together, these techniques complement each other to not only help us build upon our current understanding of skin immunology, but also potentially discover new facets of leukocyte behavior in the skin.
Currently, MP microscopy is heavily utilized in animal studies, but not in human studies. One key limitation is the thickness of human skin compared to mouse skin, which reduces the penetrative ability of the laser. MP microscopy has been used on humans to evaluate skin tumors, skin aging, and epidermal cells in skin diseases (Klemp et al. 2016; Koehler et al. 2011; Murata et al. 2013; Tsai et al. 2009). For further use on humans, advancements in MP microscopy are necessary. Until then, the development of better cell-labelling systems, novel transgenic mouse systems and optical microscopic systems will drive our continual discovery of skin immunology.
References
Abeynaike LD, Deane JA, Westhorpe CL, Chow Z, Alikhan MA, Kitching AR, Issekutz A, Hickey MJ (2014) Regulatory T cells dynamically regulate selectin ligand function during multiple challenge contact hypersensitivity. J Immunol 193:4934–4944
Ali N, Zirak B, Rodriguez RS, Pauli ML, Truong HA, Lai K, Ahn R, Corbin K, Lowe MM, Scharschmidt TC et al (2017) Regulatory T cells in skin facilitate epithelial stem cell differentiation. Cell 169:1119–1129 e1111
Amulic B, Cazalet C, Hayes GL, Metzler KD, Zychlinsky A (2012) Neutrophil function: from mechanisms to disease. Annu Rev Immunol 30:459–489
Bauer CA, Kim EY, Marangoni F, Carrizosa E, Claudio NM, Mempel TR (2014) Dynamic treg interactions with intratumoral APCs promote local CTL dysfunction. J Clin Invest 124:2425–2440
Biedermann T, Kneilling M, Mailhammer R, Maier K, Sander CA, Kollias G, Kunkel SL, Hultner L, Rocken M (2000) Mast cells control neutrophil recruitment during T cell-mediated delayed-type hypersensitivity reactions through tumor necrosis factor and macrophage inflammatory protein 2. J Exp Med 192:1441–1452
Borregaard N (2010) Neutrophils, from marrow to microbes. Immunity 33:657–670
Carbone FR (2015) Tissue-resident memory T cells and fixed immune surveillance in nonlymphoid organs. J Immunol 195:17–22
Chow Z, Mueller SN, Deane JA, Hickey MJ (2013) Dermal regulatory T cells display distinct migratory behavior that is modulated during adaptive and innate inflammation. J Immunol 191:3049–3056
Clark RA, Chong B, Mirchandani N, Brinster NK, Yamanaka K, Dowgiert RK, Kupper TS (2006) The vast majority of CLA+ T cells are resident in normal skin. J Immunol 176:4431–4439
Dancey JT, Deubelbeiss KA, Harker LA, Finch CA (1976) Neutrophil kinetics in man. J Clin Invest 58:705–715
Deane JA, Abeynaike LD, Norman MU, Wee JL, Kitching AR, Kubes P, Hickey MJ (2012) Endogenous regulatory T cells adhere in inflamed dermal vessels via ICAM-1: association with regulation of effector leukocyte adhesion. J Immunol 188:2179–2188
Devi S, Kuligowski MP, Kwan RY, Westein E, Jackson SP, Kitching AR, Hickey MJ (2010) Platelet recruitment to the inflamed glomerulus occurs via an alphaIIbbeta3/GPVI-dependent pathway. Am J Pathol 177:1131–1142
Doebel T, Voisin B, Nagao K (2017) Langerhans cells – the macrophage in dendritic cell clothing. Trends Immunol 38:817–828
Dudeck A, Dudeck J, Scholten J, Petzold A, Surianarayanan S, Kohler A, Peschke K, Vohringer D, Waskow C, Krieg T et al (2011) Mast cells are key promoters of contact allergy that mediate the adjuvant effects of haptens. Immunity 34:973–984
Ebert LM, Meuter S, Moser B (2006) Homing and function of human skin gammadelta T cells and NK cells: relevance for tumor surveillance. J Immunol 176:4331–4336
Egawa G, Honda T, Tanizaki H, Doi H, Miyachi Y, Kabashima K (2011) In vivo imaging of T-cell motility in the elicitation phase of contact hypersensitivity using two-photon microscopy. J Invest Dermatol 131:977–979
Egawa G, Nakamizo S, Natsuaki Y, Doi H, Miyachi Y, Kabashima K (2013) Intravital analysis of vascular permeability in mice using two-photon microscopy. Sci Rep 3:1932
Galli SJ, Tsai M (2010) Mast cells in allergy and infection: versatile effector and regulatory cells in innate and adaptive immunity. Eur J Immunol 40:1843–1851
Galli SJ, Kalesnikoff J, Grimbaldeston MA, Piliponsky AM, Williams CM, Tsai M (2005) Mast cells as “tunable” effector and immunoregulatory cells: recent advances. Annu Rev Immunol 23:749–786
Gebhardt T, Whitney PG, Zaid A, Mackay LK, Brooks AG, Heath WR, Carbone FR, Mueller SN (2011) Different patterns of peripheral migration by memory CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. Nature 477:216–219
Geissmann F, Manz MG, Jung S, Sieweke MH, Merad M, Ley K (2010) Development of monocytes, macrophages, and dendritic cells. Science 327:656–661
Ginhoux F, Liu K, Helft J, Bogunovic M, Greter M, Hashimoto D, Price J, Yin N, Bromberg J, Lira SA et al (2009) The origin and development of nonlymphoid tissue CD103+ DCs. J Exp Med 206:3115–3130
Goh CC, Li JL, Devi S, Bakocevic N, See P, Larbi A, Weninger W, Ginhoux F, Angeli V, Ng LG (2015) Real-time imaging of dendritic cell responses to sterile tissue injury. J Invest Dermatol 135:1181–1184
Gratz IK, Truong HA, Yang SH, Maurano MM, Lee K, Abbas AK, Rosenblum MD (2013) Cutting edge: memory regulatory t cells require IL-7 and not IL-2 for their maintenance in peripheral tissues. J Immunol 190:4483–4487
Hickey MJ, Kanwar S, McCafferty DM, Granger DN, Eppihimer MJ, Kubes P (1999) Varying roles of E-selectin and P-selectin in different microvascular beds in response to antigen. J Immunol 162:1137–1143
Hickey MJ, Bullard DC, Issekutz A, James WG (2002) Leukocyte-endothelial cell interactions are enhanced in dermal postcapillary venules of MRL/fas(lpr) (lupus-prone) mice: roles of P- and E-selectin. J Immunol 168:4728–4736
Honda T, Egen JG, Lammermann T, Kastenmuller W, Torabi-Parizi P, Germain RN (2014) Tuning of antigen sensitivity by T cell receptor-dependent negative feedback controls T cell effector function in inflamed tissues. Immunity 40:235–247
Jakubzick C, Gautier EL, Gibbings SL, Sojka DK, Schlitzer A, Johnson TE, Ivanov S, Duan Q, Bala S, Condon T et al (2013) Minimal differentiation of classical monocytes as they survey steady-state tissues and transport antigen to lymph nodes. Immunity 39:599–610
Kaplan DH (2017) Ontogeny and function of murine epidermal Langerhans cells. Nat Immunol 18:1068–1075
Kaplan DH, Igyarto BZ, Gaspari AA (2012) Early immune events in the induction of allergic contact dermatitis. Nat Rev Immunol 12:114–124
Kissenpfennig A, Henri S, Dubois B, Laplace-Builhe C, Perrin P, Romani N, Tripp CH, Douillard P, Leserman L, Kaiserlian D et al (2005) Dynamics and function of Langerhans cells in vivo: dermal dendritic cells colonize lymph node areas distinct from slower migrating Langerhans cells. Immunity 22:643–654
Klemp M, Meinke MC, Weinigel M, Rowert-Huber HJ, Konig K, Ulrich M, Lademann J, Darvin ME (2016) Comparison of morphologic criteria for actinic keratosis and squamous cell carcinoma using in vivo multiphoton tomography. Exp Dermatol 25:218–222
Koehler MJ, Zimmermann S, Springer S, Elsner P, Konig K, Kaatz M (2011) Keratinocyte morphology of human skin evaluated by in vivo multiphoton laser tomography. Skin Res Technol 17:479–486
Leon B, Ardavin C (2008) Monocyte-derived dendritic cells in innate and adaptive immunity. Immunol Cell Biol 86:320–324
Li JL, Ng LG (2012) Peeking into the secret life of neutrophils. Immunol Res 53:168–181
Li JL, Goh CC, Keeble JL, Qin JS, Roediger B, Jain R, Wang Y, Chew WK, Weninger W, Ng LG (2012) Intravital multiphoton imaging of immune responses in the mouse ear skin. Nat Protoc 7:221–234
Lucas T, Waisman A, Ranjan R, Roes J, Krieg T, Muller W, Roers A, Eming SA (2010) Differential roles of macrophages in diverse phases of skin repair. J Immunol 184:3964–3977
Manjunath N, Shankar P, Stockton B, Dubey PD, Lieberman J, von Andrian UH (1999) A transgenic mouse model to analyze CD8(+) effector T cell differentiation in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 96:13932–13937
Mempel TR, Pittet MJ, Khazaie K, Weninger W, Weissleder R, von Boehmer H, von Andrian UH (2006) Regulatory T cells reversibly suppress cytotoxic T cell function independent of effector differentiation. Immunity 25:129–141
Mirza R, DiPietro LA, Koh TJ (2009) Selective and specific macrophage ablation is detrimental to wound healing in mice. Am J Pathol 175:2454–2462
Murata T, Honda T, Miyachi Y, Kabashima K (2013) Morphological character of pseudoxanthoma elasticum observed by multiphoton microscopy. J Dermatol Sci 72:199–201
Natsuaki Y, Egawa G, Nakamizo S, Ono S, Hanakawa S, Okada T, Kusuba N, Otsuka A, Kitoh A, Honda T et al (2014) Perivascular leukocyte clusters are essential for efficient activation of effector T cells in the skin. Nat Immunol 15:1064–1069
Nestle FO, Di Meglio P, Qin JZ, Nickoloff BJ (2009) Skin immune sentinels in health and disease. Nat Rev Immunol 9:679–691
Ng LG, Hsu A, Mandell MA, Roediger B, Hoeller C, Mrass P, Iparraguirre A, Cavanagh LL, Triccas JA, Beverley SM et al (2008) Migratory dermal dendritic cells act as rapid sensors of protozoan parasites. PLoS Pathog 4:e1000222
Ng LG, Qin JS, Roediger B, Wang Y, Jain R, Cavanagh LL, Smith AL, Jones CA, de Veer M, Grimbaldeston MA et al (2011) Visualizing the neutrophil response to sterile tissue injury in mouse dermis reveals a three-phase cascade of events. J Invest Dermatol 131:2058–2068
Nowotschin S, Hadjantonakis AK (2009) Use of KikGR a photoconvertible green-to-red fluorescent protein for cell labeling and lineage analysis in ES cells and mouse embryos. BMC Dev Biol 9:49
Onishi Y, Fehervari Z, Yamaguchi T, Sakaguchi S (2008) Foxp3+ natural regulatory T cells preferentially form aggregates on dendritic cells in vitro and actively inhibit their maturation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105:10113–10118
Ono S, Kabashima K (2015) Proposal of inducible skin-associated lymphoid tissue (iSALT). Exp Dermatol 24:630–631
Overstreet MG, Gaylo A, Angermann BR, Hughson A, Hyun YM, Lambert K, Acharya M, Billroth-Maclurg AC, Rosenberg AF, Topham DJ et al (2013) Inflammation-induced interstitial migration of effector CD4(+) T cells is dependent on integrin alphaV. Nat Immunol 14:949–958
Phillipson M, Kubes P (2011) The neutrophil in vascular inflammation. Nat Med 17:1381–1390
Romani N, Clausen BE, Stoitzner P (2010) Langerhans cells and more: langerin-expressing dendritic cell subsets in the skin. Immunol Rev 234:120–141
Runnels JM, Zamiri P, Spencer JA, Veilleux I, Wei X, Bogdanov A, Lin CP (2006) Imaging molecular expression on vascular endothelial cells by in vivo immunofluorescence microscopy. Mol Imaging 5:31–40
Sanchez Rodriguez R, Pauli ML, Neuhaus IM, Yu SS, Arron ST, Harris HW, Yang SH, Anthony BA, Sverdrup FM, Krow-Lucal E et al (2014) Memory regulatory T cells reside in human skin. J Clin Invest 124:1027–1036
Sawada Y, Honda T, Hanakawa S, Nakamizo S, Murata T, Ueharaguchi-Tanada Y, Ono S, Amano W, Nakajima S, Egawa G et al (2015) Resolvin E1 inhibits dendritic cell migration in the skin and attenuates contact hypersensitivity responses. J Exp Med 212:1921–1930
Sen D, Forrest L, Kepler TB, Parker I, Cahalan MD (2010) Selective and site-specific mobilization of dermal dendritic cells and Langerhans cells by Th1- and Th2-polarizing adjuvants. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107:8334–8339
Sica A, Mantovani A (2012) Macrophage plasticity and polarization: in vivo veritas. J Clin Invest 122:787–795
Tanaka A, Sakaguchi S (2017) Regulatory T cells in cancer immunotherapy. Cell Res 27:109–118
Tomura M, Honda T, Tanizaki H, Otsuka A, Egawa G, Tokura Y, Waldmann H, Hori S, Cyster JG, Watanabe T et al (2010) Activated regulatory T cells are the major T cell type emigrating from the skin during a cutaneous immune response in mice. J Clin Invest 120:883–893
Tsai TH, Jee SH, Dong CY, Lin SJ (2009) Multiphoton microscopy in dermatological imaging. J Dermatol Sci 56:1–8
Vignali DA, Collison LW, Workman CJ (2008) How regulatory T cells work. Nat Rev Immunol 8:523–532
Witherden DA, Havran WL (2011) Molecular aspects of epithelial gammadelta T cell regulation. Trends Immunol 32:265–271
Wollenberg A, Wagner M, Gunther S, Towarowski A, Tuma E, Moderer M, Rothenfusser S, Wetzel S, Endres S, Hartmann G (2002) Plasmacytoid dendritic cells: a new cutaneous dendritic cell subset with distinct role in inflammatory skin diseases. J Invest Dermatol 119:1096–1102
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.
The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the chapter's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the chapter's Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s)
About this paper
Cite this paper
Chow, Z., Egawa, G., Kabashima, K. (2020). Live Imaging of the Skin Immune Responses. In: Toyama, Y., Miyawaki, A., Nakamura, M., Jinzaki, M. (eds) Make Life Visible. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7908-6_26
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7908-6_26
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-7907-9
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-7908-6
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)