Skip to main content

Democracy and Corruption in a Capitalist Economy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Keynesian Macroeconomics Beyond the IS-LM Model

Abstract

A capitalist society is characterized by extreme inequality and multiparty democracy. In a capitalist society, a small number of giant capitalists have in their command the major part of the country’s wealth and income. This chapter argues that the system of private funding of political parties enables the giant capitalists to form and run political parties to usurp state power. They need it to protect their enormous wealth from the masses. The political parties compete with one another for the favors of the giant capitalists and work feverishly to help them increase their command over the society’s income and wealth both legally and illegally. On the illegal side, political parties allow giant capitalists to evade taxes, invest their savings in foreign assets in tax havens, and defraud the banks, among others. We have shown in this chapter that these illegal favors or corrupt practices generate strong recessionary forces and slow down drastically the rate of growth of output and employment. In the wake of recessions and bank frauds, which lead to a sharp increase in the non-performing assets of banks and other financial institutes, the political parties pass laws or seek to pass laws such as Financial Regulation and Deposit Insurance Bill (FRDI Bill) in India that empowers the financial institutions to confiscate the savings of the people held with them to tide over the crisis. We have shown here that such a measure is likely to bring about a collapse of the financial institutions and the economy. Of the legal favors granted to the capitalists, we have considered two. Government and the central bank often specify lending norms of banks and other financial institutions in such a manner that they favor the giant capitalists at the expense of the small and medium producers. They also often confiscate land of the small and medium producers and give it away to the giant capitalists. To examine the implications of these legal favors, we have divided the economy into the organized sector and the unorganized sector. The former consists of large firms owned by the giant capitalists, while the latter consists of firms owned by small and medium producers. We have shown here that the legal favors mentioned here will in all probability lead to a cumulative expansion of the organized sector matched by a cumulative contraction of the unorganized sector. Both of these will bring about a sharp deterioration in the standard of living of the workers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aidt, T. S. (2003, November). Economic analysis of corruption: A survey. Economic Journal, 113(8), F-632–F-652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bardhan, P. K. (1997, September). Corruption and development: A review of the issues. Journal of Economic Literature, 35(3), 587–605.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, H. (2002, September). Breaking the mould: An institutional political economy alternative to the neo-liberal theory of the market and the state. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 26(5), 359–559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh, C., & Ghosh, A. (2016). Indian Economy: A macro-theoretic analysis. Delhi: PHI Learning Private Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, J. (2002, August). States, markets and corruption: A review of some recent literature. Review of International Political Economy, 9(3), 574–590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jain, A. K. (2001, February). Corruption: A review. Journal of Economic Surveys, 15(1), 71–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nye, J. S. (1967, June). Corruption and political development: A cost-benefit analysis. American Political Science Review, 61(2), 417–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oxfam India. (2018). India Inequality Report, Delhi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reserve Bank of India. (2018). Financial stability report, June 26, 2018. https://rbi.org.in/Scripts/PublicationReportDetails.aspx?UrlPage=&ID=906.

  • Shleifer, A., & Vishney, R. W. (1993, August). Corruption. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(3), 599–617.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, M. E. (2004, April). What does corruption mean in a democracy? American Journal of Political Science, 48(2), 328–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chandana Ghosh .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ghosh, C., Ghosh, A.N. (2019). Democracy and Corruption in a Capitalist Economy. In: Keynesian Macroeconomics Beyond the IS-LM Model. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7888-1_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics