Skip to main content

Intrinsic Quality Factors: Carcass Quality Grading Systems

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 522 Accesses

Abstract

The history of red meat production across the globe has focused on marshaling available resources to produce cattle, sheep, goats, camels, yak, or other ruminant animal without too much regard to the end user of the total process of red meat production. Therefore, a food purveyor was confronted with an array of wholesale raw products at the marketplace of which only some would be acceptable to his/her market. Thus, a discontinuity in the production chain occurred with animals being produced on one side and meat being served to consumers on the other side. So, classifications were developed to aid in sorting the array of products at the fulcrum of the process, the meat packer (where animals became meat). This chapter describes the classification systems employed in the world that have attempted to sort these raw wholesale products according to their value to the end user. This chapter also presents the research delineating the relative successes of the various systems used in the world. Red Meat Science and Production takes a different perspective of the production, delivery system than this historic method. That is, the orientation is to understand the consumer’s desires for red meat; translate those desires into red meat specifications; then understand control points in the production, delivery system sensitive to the character of these specifications; and then orchestrate the production, delivery system to consistently deliver the desired products to the targeted consumer. Although Red Meat Science and Production takes a different approach to the historical approach, it is necessary to understand the methods commonly used to characterize red meat in order to develop the new approach. Thus, this chapter provides a “springboard” for launching different approaches to red meat science and production.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Acheson, R.J., D.R. Woerner, and J.D. Tatum. 2014. Effects of USDA carcass maturity on sensory attributes of beef produced by greain finished steers and heifers classified as less than 30 months old using dentition. Journal of Animal Science 92: 1792–1799.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Almlie, V.L., L. VanWezemael, W. Verbeke, and O. Ueland. 2013. One technology does not fit all: Profiling consumers of tender and tenderized beef steaks. Meat Science 93: 361–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Argiles, J.M., J. Lopez-Soriano, V. Almendro, S. Busquets, and F.J. Lopez-Soriano. 2005. Cross-talk between skeletal muscle and adipose tissue: A link with obesity? Medicinal Research Reviews 25: 49–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Boleman, S.L., S.J. Boleman, W.W. Morgan, D.S. Hale, D.B. Griffin, J.W. Savel, R.P. Ames, M.T. Smith, J.D. Tatum, T.G. Field, G.C. Smith, B.A. Bardner, J.B. Morgan, S.L. Northcutt, H.G. Dolezal, D.R. Gill, and F.K. Ray. 1998. National Beef Quality Audit-1995: Survey of producer-related defects and carcass quality and quantity attributes. Journal of Animal Science 76: 96–103.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bouyssou, D., T. Marchant, M. Pirlot, P. Perny, A. Tsoukias, and P. Vincke. 2000. Evaluation and decision models a critical perspective, 274. Dordrecht: Kluwer’s Academic Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brandon, K., P. Allen, R. Polkinghorne, A. Gee, J. Lau, and M. Drennan. 2006. Testing the meat standards Australia (MSA) model on Irish beef. Proceedings of 52nd International Congress Meat, Science and Technology. 619–620.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, J.C., J.B. Belew, D.B. Griffin, B.L. Gwartney, D.S. Hale, W.R. Henning, D.D. Johnson, J.B. Morgan, F.C. Parrish Jr., J.O. Reagan, and J.W. Savell. 2000. National Beef Tenderness Survey –1998. Journal of Animal Science 78: 1852–1860.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bumpus, E.K., J.E. Sawyer, T.D.A. Forbes, B.G. Warrington, and J.W. Holloway. 2005. Influence of acetagenic versus propiogenic supplements on adipose tissue accretion in stocker steers grazing ryegrass pastures. Beef Cattle Research in Texas, Department of Animal Science, TAMU, ge Sta. TX 2005:31–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Busboom J.R., and J.J. Reeves. 2013. Japanese Meat Grading. Washington State University Pullman, WA. Available at http://www.nikuya.ca/products/JapaneseMeatGrading.pdf. Retrieved November 7, 2013.

  • Dikeman, M.E. 1987. Fat reduction in animals and the effects on palatability and consumer acceptance of meat products. In Proceedings of American Meat Science Association National Livestock Meat Board. 93–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dikeman, M.E., G.B. Reddy, V.H. Arthaud, H.J. Tuma, R.M. Koch, R.W. Mandigo, and J.B. Axe. 1986. Longissimus muscle quality, palatability, connective tissue, and histological characteristics of bulls and steers fed different energy levels and slaughtered at four ages. Journal of Animal Science 63: 92–101.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dubost, A., D. Micol, B. Picard, C. Lethias, D. Andueza, D. Bauchart, and A. Listrat. 2013b. Structural and biochemical characteristics of bovine intramuscular connective tissue and beef quality. Meat Science 95: 555–561.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Farmer, L.J., D.J. Devlin, N.F.S. Gault, A. Gee, A.W. Gordon, B.W. Moss, R. Polkinghorne, J. Thompson, E.L.C. Tolland, and I.J. Tollerton. 2009b. Prediction of eating quality using the Meat Standards Australia system for Northern Ireland. Proceedings of 55th International Congress Meat Science and Technology, PE7 34, Copenhagen, August 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farmer, L.J., D.J. Devlin, N.F.S. Gault, A.W. Gordon, B.W. Moss, E.L.C. Tolland, and I.J. Tollerton. 2010. Comparison of systems for assuring the eating quality of beef. Advance in Animal Science Belfast: Proceeding of British Society of Animal Science 231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, D.M., J. Thompson, and R. Polkinghorne. 1999. Meat standards Australia, a “PACCP” based beef grading scheme for consumers. (3) PACCP requirements which apply to carcass processing. Book of abstracts of the 45th International Congress Meat Science and Technology, Yokohama, Japan, 18–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Field, R., R. McCormick, V. Balasubramanian, D. Sanson, J. Wise, D. Hixon, M. Riley, and W. Russell. 1997. Tenderness variation among loin steaks from A and C maturity carcasses of heifers similar in chronological age. Journal of Animal Science 75: 693–699.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia, L.G., K.L. Nicholson, T.W. Hoffman, T.E. Lawrence, D.S. Hale, D.B. Griffin, J.W. Savell, D.L. Van Overbeke, J.B. Morgan, K.E. Belk, T.G. Field, J.A. Scanga, J.D. Tatum, and G.C. Smith. 2008a. National Beef Quality Audit–2005: Survey of targeted cattle and carcass characteristics related to quality, quantity, and value of fed steers and heifers. Journal of Animal Science 86: 3533–3543.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia, P.T., N.A. Pensel, A.M. Sancho, N.J. Latimori, A.M. Kloster, M.A. Amigone, and J.J. Casal. 2008b. Beef lipids in relation to animal breed and nutrition in Argentina. Meat Science 79: 500–508.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Garmyn, A.J., G.G. Hilton, R.G. Mateescu, J.B. Morgan, J.M. Reecy, R.G. Tait Jr., D.C. Beitz, Q. Duan, J.P. Schoonmaker, M.S. Mayes, M.E. Drewnoski, Q. Liu, and D.L. Van Overbeke. 2011a. Estimation of relationships between mineral concentration and fatty acid composition of longissimus muscle and beef palatability traits. Journal of Animal Science 89: 2849–2858.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Garmyn, A.J., S.M. Knobel, K.S. Spivey, L.F. Hightower, J.C. Brooks, B.J. Johnson, S.L. Parr, R.J. Rathmann, J.D. Starkey, D.A. Yates, J.M. Hodgen, J.P. Hutcheson, and M.F. Miller. 2011b. Warner-Bratzler and slice shear force measurements of 3 beef muscles in response to various aging periods after trenbolone acetate and estradiol implants and zilpaterol hydrochloride supplementation of finishing beef steers. Journal of Animal Science 89: 3783–3791.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, S.L., J.D. Tatum, J.A. Scanga, P.L. Chapman, G.C. Smith, and K.E. Belk. 2006. Effects of postmortem aging and USDA quality grade on Warner–Bratzler shear force values of seventeen individual beefmuscles. Journal of Animal Science 84: 3387–3396.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hale, D.S., K. Goodson, and J.W. Savell. 2010. Beef quality and yield grades. Department of Animal Science, Texas AgriLife Extension Service, College Station, TX 77843-2471. Updated February 10, 2010. www.meat.tamu.edu/beefgrading

  • Hausman, G.J., M.V. Dodson, K. Ajuwon, M. Azain, K.M. Barnes, L.L. Guan, Z. Jiang, S.P. Poulos, R.D. Sainz, S. Smith, M. Spurlock, J. Novakofski, M.E. Fernyhough, and W.G. Bergen. 2009. Board Invited Review: The biology and regulation of preadipocytes and adipocytes in meat animals. Journal of Animal Science 87: 1218–1246.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hocquette, J.F., I. Legrand, C. Jurie, D.W. Pethick, and D. Micol. 2011a. Perception in France of the Australian system for the prediction of beef quality (MSA) with perspectives for the European beef sector. Animal Production Science 51: 30–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hocquette, J.F., R. Botreau, B. Picard, A. Jacquet, D.W. Pethick, and N.D. Scollan. 2012a. Opportunities for predicting and manipulating beef quality. Meat Science 92: 197–209.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hocquette, J.F., A. Jacquet, G. Giraud, I. Legrand, P. Sans, P. Mainsant, and W. Verbeke. 2013. Quality of food products and consumer attitudes in France. In Consumer attitudes to food quality products. ed. M. Klopcic, A. Kuipers, and J. F. Hocquette. EAAP Publication, 133, 67–82, Wageningen, The Netherlands: Wageningen Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hocquette, J.F., L. Van Wezemael, S. Chriki, I. Legrand, W. Verbeke, L. Farmer, N.D. Scollan, R. Polkinghorne, R. Rødbotteni, P. Allen, and D.W. Pethick. 2014. Modelling of beef sensory quality for a better prediction of palatability. Meat Science 97: 316–322.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hood, R.L., and C.E. Allen. 1978. Lipogenesis in isolated intramuscular adipose tissue from four bovine muscles. Journal of Animal Science 46: 1626–1633.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Howard, J.T., S.D. Kachman, M.K. Nielsen, T.L. Mader, and M.L. Spangler. 2013. The effect of myostatin genotype on body temperature during extreme temperature events. Journal of Animal Science 91: 3051–3058.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Igo, J.L., D.L. Van Overbeke, D.R. Woerner, J.D. Tatum, D.L. Pendell, L.L. Vedral, G.G. Mafi, M.C. Moore, R.O. McKeith, G.D. Gray, D.B. Griffin, D.S. Hale, J.W. Savell, and K.E. Belk. 2013. Phase I of The National Beef Quality Audit-2011: Quantifying willingness-to-pay, best-worst scaling, and current status of quality characteristics in different beef industry marketing sectors. Journal of Animal Science 91: 1907–1919.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • INAO 2009. Notice technique définissant les critères minimaux à remplir pour l’obtention d’un label rouge en ‘Gros bovins de boucherie’. Available at. http://www.inao.gouv.fr/public/home.php?pageFromIndex=textesPages/ Label_rouge_(Guides_et_NT)410.php~mnu=410 (Verified November 2010).

  • Jeremiah, L.E., M.E.R. Dugan, J.L. Aalhus, et al. 2003c. Assessment of the relationship between chemical components and palatability of major beef muscles and muscle groups. Meat Science 65: 1013–1019.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Juarez, M., J.A. Basarab, V.S. Baron, M. Valera, I.L. Larsen, and J.L. Aalhus. 2012a. Quantifying the relative contribution of ante- and post-mortem factors to the variability in beef texture. Animals 6: 1878–1887.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Juarez, M., M.E.R. Dugan, N. Aldai, J.A. Basarab, V.S. Baron, T.A. McAllister, and J.L. Aalhus. 2012b. Beef quality attributes as affected by increasing the intramuscular levels of vitamin E and omega-3 fatty acids. Meat Science 90: 764–769.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Konarska, M., K. Kuchida, G. Tarr, and R.J. Polkinghorne. 2017. Relationships between marbling measures across principal muscles. Meat Science 123: 67–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kuchida, K., T. Kurihara, M. Suzuki, and S. Miyoshi. 1997. Development of an accurate method for measuring fat percentage on rib-eye area by computer image analysis. Animal Science and Technology 68: 853–859.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kuchida, K., K. Konishi, M. Suzuki, and S. Miyoshi. 1998. Prediction of the crude fat contents in rib-eye muscle of beef using the fat area ratio calculated by computer image analysis. Nihon Chikusan Gakkaiho. Journal of Animal Science 69: 655–658.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuchida, K., S. Kono, K. Konishi, L.D. Van Vleck, M. Suzuki, and S. Miyoshi. 2000. Prediction of crude fat content of longissimus muscle of beef using the ratio of fat area calculated from computer image analysis: Comparison of regression equations for prediction using different input devices at different stations. Journal of Animal Science 78: 799–803.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kuchida, K., M. Suzuki, and S. Miyoshi. 2001. Development of photographing equipment for the cross section of carcass and prediction of BMS number by using obtained image from that equipment. Nihon Chikusan Gakkaiho. Journal of Animal Science 72: 224–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuchida, K., T. Osawa, T. Hori, H. Kotaka, and S. Maruyama. 2006. Evaluation and genetics of carcass cross section of beef carcass by computer image analysis. Journal of Animal Genet.(Japanese) 34: 45–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, J., and P. Shatadal. 2001. Classification of tough and tender beef by image texture analysis. Meat Science 57: 341–346.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Li, J., J. Tan, F.A. Martz, and H. Heymann. 1999. Image texture features as indicators of beef tenderness. Meat Science 53: 17–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, K.C., H.R. Cross, and S.B. Smith. 1992. Esterification of fatty acids by bovine intramuscular and subcutaneous adipose tissues. Lipids 27: 111–116.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Long, N.M., C.B. Tousley, K.R. Underwood, S.I. Paisley, W.J. Means, B.W. Hess, M. Du, and S.P. Ford. 2012. Effects of early- to mid-gestational undernutrition with or without protein supplementation on offspring growth, carcass characteristics, and adipocyte size in beef cattle. Journal of Animal Science 90: 197–206.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • López-Campos, Ó., J.L. Aalhus, N. Prietoc, I. Larsen, M. Juárez, and J.A. Basarab. 2015. Chronological vs. physiological age indicators in beef cattle: Effects of the production system and growth promotants. Meat Science 99: 146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzen, C.L., D.S. Hale, D.B. Griffin, J.W. Savell, K.E. Belk, T.L. Frederick, et al. 1993. National Beef quality Audit: Survey of producer-related defects and carcass quality and quantity attributes. Journal of Animal Science 71: 1495–1502.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzen, C.L., T.R. Neely, R.K. Miller, J.D. Tatum, J.W. Wise, J.F. Taylor, M.J. Buyk, J.O. Reagan, and J.W. Savell. 1999. Beef Customer Satisfaction: Trained sensory panel ratings and Warner-Bratzler shear force values. Journal of Animal Science 81: 143–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzen, C.L., R.K. Miller, J.F. Taylor, T.R. Neely, J.D. Tatum, J.W. Wise, M.J. Buyck, J.O. Reagan, and J.W. Savell. 2003. Beef customer satisfaction: trained sensory panel ratings and Warner-Bratzler shear force values. Journal of Animal Science 81: 143–149.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • May, S.G., H.G. Dolezal, D.R. Gill, F.K. Ray, and D.S. Buchanan. 1992. Effects of days fed, carcass grade traits, and subcutaneous fat removal on post-mortem muscle characteristics and beef palatability. Journal of Animal Science 70: 444–453.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McKeith, R.O., G.D. Gray, D.S. Hale, C.R. Kerth, D.B. Griffin, J.W. Savell, C.R. Raines, K.E. Belk, D.R. Woerner, J.D. Tatum, J.L. Igo, D.L. VanOverbeke, G.G. Mafi, T.E. Lawrence, R.J. Delmore, L.M. Christensen, S.D. Shackelford, D.A. King, T.L. Wheeler, L.R. Meadows, and M.E. O’Connor. 2012. National Beef Quality Audit – 2011: Harvest-floor assessments of targeted characteristics that affect quality and value of cattle, carcasses, and byproducts. Journal of Animal Science 90: 5135–5142. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2012-5477.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, R.K., J.D. Tatum, H.R. Cross, R.A. Bowling, and R.P. Clayton. 1983. Effects of carcass maturity on collagen solubility and palatability of beef from grain-finished steers. Journal of Food Science 48: 484–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Modzelewska-Kapituła, M., E. Dąbrowska, B. Jankowska, A. Kwiatkowska, and M. Cierach. 2012. The effect of muscle, cooking method and final internal temperature on quality parameters of beef roast. Meat Science 91: 195–202.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moody, W.B., and R.G. Cassens. 1968. A quantitative and morphological study of bovine longissimus fat cells. Journal of Food Science 33: 47–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, C., P. Bass, M. Green, P. Chapman, M. Connor, L. Yates, .et al. 2010. Establishing an appropriate mode of comparison for measuring the performance of marbling score output from video image analysis beef carcass grading systems. Journal of Animal Science 88:2464–2475.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, M.C., G.D. Gray, D.S. Hale, C.R. Kerth, D.B. Griffin, J.W. Savell., .et. al. 2012. National Beef Quality Audit-2011. In-plant survey of targeted carcass characteristics related to quality, quantity, value, and marketing of fed steers and heifers. Journal of Animal Science 90:5143–5151.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, J.B., J.W. Savell, D.S. Hale, R.K. Miller, D.B. Griffin, H.R. Cross, et al. 1991. National Beef tenderness survey. Journal of Animal Science 69: 3274–3283.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Motoyama, M., K. Sasaki, and A. Watanabe. 2016. Wagyu and the factors contributing to its beef quality: A Japanese industry overview. Meat Science 120: 10–18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mottram, D.S. 1998. Flavour formation in meat and meat products: A review. Food Chemistry 62: 415–424.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Neely, T.R., C.L. Lorenzen, R.K. Miller, J.D. Tatum, J.W. Wise, J.F. Taylor, M.J. Buyck, J.O. Reagan, and J.W. Savell. 1998. Beef customer satisfaction: Role of cut, USDA quality grade, and city on in-home consumer ratings. Journal of Animal Science 76: 1027–1033.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1999. Beef Customer Satisfaction: Cooking method and degree of doneness effects on the top round steaks. Journal of Animal Science 77: 653–660.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, A.R., and B.K. Pedersen. 2007. The biological roles of exercise-induced cytokines: IL-6, IL-8, and IL-15. Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism 32: 833–839.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nishimura, T., A. Hattori, and K. Takahashi. 1999. Structural changes in intramuscular connective tissue during the fattening of Japanese black cattle: Effect of marbling on beef tenderization. Journal of Animal Science 77: 93–104.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Polkinghorne, R.J., and J.M. Thompson. 2010. Meat standards and grading: A world view. Meat Science 86: 227–235.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Polkinghorne, R., J. Thompson, R. Watson, A. Gee, and M. Porter. 2008a. Evolution of the Meat Standards Australia (MSA) beef grading system. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 48: 1351–1359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polkinghorne, R., R. Watson, J.M. Thompson, and D.W. Pethick. 2008b. Current usage and future development of the Meat Standards Australia (MSA) grading system. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 48: 1459–1464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polkinghorne, R., T. Nishimura, K.E. Neath, and R. Watson. 2011. Japanese consumer categorisation of beef into quality grades, based onMeat Standards Australiamethodology. Animal Science Journal 82: 325–333.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Raines, C.R., M.E. Dikeman, J.A. Unruh, M.C. Hunt, and R.C. Knock. 2008. Predicting cattle age from eye lens weight and nitrogen content, dentition, and United States Department of Agriculture maturity score. Journal of Animal Science 86: 3557–3567.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roy, B., ed. 1996. Multicriteria methodology for decision aiding, 316. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savell, J.W., H.R. Cross, and G.C. Smith. 1986. Percentage ether extractible fat and moisture content of beef longissimus muscle as related to USDA marbling score. Journal of Food Science 51: 838–840.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savell, J.W., C.L. Lorenzen, T.R. Neely, R.K. Miller, J.D. Tatum, J.W. Wise, J.F. Taylor, M.J. Buyck, and J.O. Reagan. 1999. Beef Customer Satisfaction: Cooking method and degree of doneness effects on the top sirloin steak. Journal of Animal Science 77: 645–652.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Semler, M.L., D.R. Woerner, K.E. Belk, K.J. Enns, and J.D. Tatum. 2016. Effects of USDA carcass maturity on sensory attributes of steaks produced by cattle representing two dental age classes. Jounal of Animal Science 94: 2207–2217.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, S.B., and J.D. Crouse. 1984. Relative contributions of acetate, lactate and glucose to lipogenesis in bovine intramuscular and subcutaneous adipose tissue. The Journal of Nutrition 114: 792–800.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, G.C., J.W. Savell, H.G. Dolezoll, T.G. Field, D.R. Gill, and D.B. Griffin. 1995. Improving the quality, consistency, competitiveness, and market share of beef: the final report of the second blueprint for total quality management in the fed-beef (slaughter steer/heifer) industry. National Beef Quality Audit-1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, S.B., K.C. Lin, J.J. Wilson, D.K. Lunt, and H.R. Cross. 1998b. Starvation depresses acylglycerol biosynthesis in bovine subcutaneous but not intramuscular adipose tissue homogenates. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology 120B: 165–174.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, S.B., D.K. Lunt, and M. Zembayashi. 2000b. Intramuscular fat deposition: the physiological process and the potential for its manipulation. Proceedingss of 2000 Plains Nutrition Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, G.C., J. Tatum, K. Belk, and J. Scanga. 2005a. Beef carcass quality and yield grading in the USA, Canada and Australia. II Jornada Tecnica de la Fundación ANETIF, Mexico City, 13–14 June 2005, 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R.D., K.L. Nicholson, J.D.W. Nicholson, K.B. Harris, R.K. Miller, D.B. Griffin, and J.W. Savell. 2008a. Dry versus wet aging of beef: Retail cutting yields and consumer palatability evaluations of steaks from US Choice and US Select short loins. Meat Science 79: 631–639.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, G.A., and C.R. Calkins. 2011. Ranking beef muscles from Warner–Bratzler shear force and trained sensory panel ratings from published literature. Journal of Food Quality 34: 195–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tatum, D. 2012. Beef Grading. Department of Animal Science, Colorado State University, Ft. Collins, Colorado. Available at www.beefresearch.org/CMDocs/BeefResearch/Beef%20Grading.pdf

  • Thompson, J. 2002. Managing meat tenderness. Meat Science 62: 295–308.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J.M., R. Polkinghorne, I.H. Hwang, A.M. Gee, S.H. Cho, B.Y. Park, and J.M. Lee. 2008. Beef quality grades as determined by Korean and Australian consumers. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 48: 1380–1386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J., R. Polkinghorne, A. Gee, D. Motiang, P. Strydom, M. Mashau, J. Ng’ambi, R. de Kock, and H. Burrow. 2010. Beef palatability in the Republic of South Africa: Implications for niche-marketing strategies. ACIAR Tech. Rpt. 72Canberra, Australia: Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tian, Y.Q., D.G. McCall, W. Dripps, Q. Yu, and P. Gong. 2005. Using computer vision technology to evaluate the meat tenderness of grazing beef. Food Australia 57: 322–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • USDA. 1996. Standards for grades of slaughter cattle and standards for grades of carcass beef. Agricultural Marketing Services, USDA. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Donkersgoed, J., G. Jewison, M. Mann, B. Cherry, B. Altwasser, R. Lower, K. Wiggins, R. Dejonge, B. Thorlakson, E. Moss, C. Mills, and H. Grogan. 1997. Canadian beef quality audit. The Canadian Veterinary Journal 38: 217–225.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Van Donkersgoed, J., G. Jewison, S. Bygrove, K. Gillis, D. Malchow, and G. McLeod. 2001. Canadian beef quality audit 1998–99. The Canadian Veterinary Journal 42: 121–126.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Verbeke, W., F.J.A. Perez-Cueto, M.D. de Barcellos, A. Krystallis, and K.G. Grunert. 2010a. European citizen and consumer attitudes and preferences regarding beef and pork. Meat Science 84: 284–292.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Verbeke, W., L. Van Wezemael, M.D. de Barcellos, J.O. Kugler, J.F. Hocquette, O. Ueland, and K.G. Grunert. 2010b. European beef consumers’ interest in a beef eating-quality guarantee. Insights from a qualitative study in four EU countries. Appetite 54: 289–296.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Voges, K.L., C.L. Mason, J.C. Brooks, R.J. Delmore, D.B. Griffin, D.S. Hale, W.R. Henning, D.D. Johnson, C.L. Lorenzen, R.J. Maddock, R.K. Miller, J.B. Morgan, B.E. Baird, B.L. Gwartney, and J.F. Savell. 2007. National beef tenderness survey-2006: Assessment of Warner-Bratzler shear and sensory panel ratings for beef from US retail and foodservice establishments. Meat Science 77: 357–364.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, R., R. Polkinghorne, and J. Thompson. 2008. Development of the Meat Standards Australia (MSA) prediction model for beef palatability. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 48: 1368–1379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webb, E.C., and H.A. O’Neill. 2008. The animal fat paradox and meat quality. Meat Science 80: 28–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, T.L., L.V. Cundiff, and R.M. Koch. 1994. Effect of marbling degree on beef palatability in Bos taurus and Bos indicus cattle. Journal of Animal Science 72: 3145–3151.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. and Science Press

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Holloway, J.W., Wu, J. (2019). Intrinsic Quality Factors: Carcass Quality Grading Systems. In: Red Meat Science and Production. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7860-7_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics