Skip to main content

QoL and Final Energy Consumption with Other Policy Targets

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Relationship Between Quality of Life and Energy Usage
  • 191 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter utilizes the results of previous chapter, to characterize three general energy policies in line with global energy strategy. Global energy strategy (GES) is a manner to find a balance between positive and negative impacts of energy on societies, especially their quality of life (QoL). This chapter proposes a framework to consider a decent GES regarding acceptable QoL. The core of the framework is a “Trade-off Analysis” in which the five variables including final energy consumption, QoL, poverty, health, and CO2 emissions are analyzed together. Three energy policies resulted from the “Trade-off Analysis” are eco-sufficiency, eco-efficiency, and energy poverty. The first two energy policies correspond with developed and developing countries respectively, while energy poverty policy has a close similarity with pre-developing countries. To implement these three energy policies in the form of global energy strategy, strong motivations are required especially in case of developed countries. Because the eco-sufficiency idea is to reduce energy consumption beyond of energy reduction of input per unit of output which is the idea of eco-efficiency. According to the results, mitigation of CO2 emissions and natural energy resource’s saving are two factors with a higher priority to encourage developed countries to reduce energy consumption. In case of developing countries, in addition to the two previous factors, the poverty and QoL are next priorities. For pre-developing countries the first priority to supply sufficient energy is poverty reduction, health and QoL improvement. In other words, mitigation of CO2 emissions and maintaining natural energy resource have the lowest priority for pre-developing countries, because according to the fitted sigmoid function, a little amount of energy supply among pre-developing countries will significantly increase their QoL. Generally, the results of this chapter imply that to conduct a suitable global energy strategy, the priority of influential factors should be considered. This chapter proposes five macro-factors (final energy consumption, QoL, poverty, health, and CO2 emissions) to decide about global energy strategy. By considering these five factors as well as population growth, three aforementioned energy policies are extracted correspond with three types of countries.                                                                                                        

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The IEA projection shows the global energy increases by one-third from 2010 to 2035, which the share of China and India totally is 50% of the growth.

  2. 2.

    Appendix 1 consists of terminology definition for some words applied in this chapter.

  3. 3.

    \(D_{i} = Distance\left( {T\,line,a\,pair\,of\,\left( {EC,QL} \right)} \right) = \frac{{\left| {a \times EC_{i} + b \times QL_{i} + c} \right|}}{{\sqrt {a^{2} + b^{2} } }}\quad i = 1, \ldots ,M\).

Bibliography

  1. E.A. Rosa, G.E. Machlis, K.M. Keating, Energy and society. Annu. Rev. Sociol. JSTOR 14, 149–172 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. A.L. Ferriss, A theory of social structure and the quality of life, Appl. Res. Qual. Life 117–123 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. GEA, Global Energy Assessments (International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, 2012)

    Google Scholar 

  4. E. Dlugokencky, P. Tans, Trends in Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide (NOAA/ESRL, 2017)

    Google Scholar 

  5. R. Nadimi, Quality of life modelling in terms of energy consumption, in International Association for Energy Economics (IAEE) (Singapore, 2017)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Z. Wang, W. He, B. Wang, Performance and reduction potential of energy and CO2 emissions among the APEC’s members with considering the return to scale. Energy (In Press, Accepted Manuscript, 2017)

    Google Scholar 

  7. R. Nadimi, K. Tokimatsu, K. Yoshikawa, Sustainable energy policy options in the presence of quality of life, poverty, and CO2 emission. Energy Procedia 142, 2959–2964 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Y. Wang, The analysis of the impacts of energy consumption on environment and public health in China. Energy 35, 4473–4479 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. K.R. Smith, H. Frumkin, K. Balakrishnan, C.D. Butler, Z.A. Chafe, I. Fairlie, P. Kinney, T. Kjellstrom, D.L. Mauzerall, T.E. McKone, A.J. McMichael, M. Schneider, Energy and human health. Annu. Rev. Public Health 34, 159–188 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. D. McCollum, L.G. Echeverri, K. Riahi, S. Parkinson, SDG 7 ensure access to affordable, reliable, sustainable and modern energy for all (International Council for Science, Paris, 2017)

    Google Scholar 

  11. P. Action, Poor People’s Energy Outlook 2010 (Rugby, UK, 2010)

    Google Scholar 

  12. J.E. Stiglitz, A. Sen, J.-P. Fitoussi, Commission on the measurement of economic performance and social progress (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  13. T. Burchardt, R. Hick, Inequality and the Capability Approach (Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, London, 2017)

    Google Scholar 

  14. IEA, Worldwide Engagement for Sustainable Energy Strategies (International Energy Agency, 2014)

    Google Scholar 

  15. C. Pasten, J.C. Santamarina, Energy and quality of life. Energy Policy 49, 468–476 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. U. Nations, Transforming our world: the 2030 agenda for sustainable development. sustainabledevelopment.un.org (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  17. R. Nadimi, K. Tokimatsu, Energy use analysis in the presence of quality of life, poverty, health. Energy 19, 657–663 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  18. R. Nadimi, K. Tokimatsu, Modeling of quality of life in terms of energy and electricity consumption. Appl. Energy 212, 1282–1294 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. S. Ross, A First Course in Probability, 8 edn. (Pearson Prentice Hall, 2010), pp. 58–114

    Google Scholar 

  20. B.C. Choi, Population attributable fraction: comparison of two mathematical procedures to estimate the annual attributable number of deaths. Choi Epidemiol. Perspect. Innov. 1–8 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  21. The World Health Report 2002 (WHO, 2002)

    Google Scholar 

  22. A. Coudouel, J.S. Hentschel, Q.T. Wodon, Poverty Measurement and Analysis (The World Bank, Washington D.C., 2002)

    Google Scholar 

  23. D.C. Montgomery, Design and analysis of experiments, 5 edn. (Wiley, 2001), p. 639

    Google Scholar 

  24. IEA, International Energy Agency (2016). [Online]. Available http://www.iea.org/statistics

  25. W. H. O. (WHO), Health statistics and information systems. WHO (2017). [Online]. Available http://www.who.int/healthinfo/global_burden_disease/en/

  26. World Bank Open Data (2016). [Online]

    Google Scholar 

  27. W. H. Organization, Global health risks: mortality and burden of disease attributable to selected major risks. WHO (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  28. A.D. Sagar, Alleviating energy poverty for the world’s poor. Energy Policy 33, 1367–1372 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. J. Zinck Thellufsen, H. Lund, Roles of local and national energy systems in the integration of renewable energy. Appl. Energy 183, 419–429 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. MHPS, Mitsubishi Hitachi Power Systems (2018). [Online]. Available https://www.mhps.com/products/igcc/

  31. R. Hoya, C. Fushimi, Thermal efficiency of advanced integrated coal gasification combined cycle power generation systems with low-temperature gasifier, gas cleaning and CO2 capturing units. Fuel Process. Technol. 164, 80–91 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. TEPCO, https://www4.tepco.co.jp/en/challenge/energy/thermal/power-g-e.html. Tokyo Electric Power Company (2017). [Online]. Available https://www4.tepco.co.jp/en/challenge/energy/thermal/power-g-e.html

  33. P.-M. Boulanger, Three strategies for sustainable consumption. S.A.P.I.EN.S 3(2) (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  34. I. Spectrum, Japan’s Isogo Power Plant burnishes clean coal’s credentials. J-Power (2018). [Online]. Available https://spectrum.ieee.org/green-tech/clean-coal/japans-isogo-power-plant-burnishes-clean-coals-credentials

  35. J. Edmonds, M. Wise, J. Dooley, S. Kim, S. Smith, P. Runci, L. Clarke, E. Malone, G. Stokes, Global Energy Technology Strategy Addressing Climate Change Phase 2 (Battelle Memorial Institute, 2007)

    Google Scholar 

  36. R. Schubert, J. Blasch, K. Hoffmann, Environmental protection, energy policy and poverty reduction—synergies of an integrated approach. IED Working Paper 1 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  37. M. Grubb, Communication energy efficiency and economic fallacies. Energy Policy 18, 783–785 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. B. Alcott, The sufficiency strategy: would rich-world frugality lower environmental impact? Ecol. Econ. 64, 770–786 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. J.D. Edgerton, L.W. Roberts, S.V. Below, Education and quality of life, in Handbook of Social Indicators and Quality of Life Research (Springer Netherlands, 2011), pp. 265–296

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Reza Nadimi .

Appendices

Appendix 1

Table 3.5 defines some of terminologies used in this chapter.

Table 3.5 Terminology definition

Appendix 2

Coefficients of the QoL indicator are given in Table 3.6, which are calculated through conducting factor analysis method.

Table 3.6 Factor analysis results (A) and the values of the sigmoid function parameters (B)

Appendix 3

See Table 3.7.

Table 3.7 Name of countries in terms of Refs. 1–3

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Nadimi, R. (2019). QoL and Final Energy Consumption with Other Policy Targets. In: Relationship Between Quality of Life and Energy Usage. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7840-9_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics