Abstract
Summary statistics on the labor share of income show that between-country variation is much greater than within-country variation: functional income distribution is determined by factors which change substantially across countries but are persistent over time. This article attempts to shed some light on the long-run and political economy determinants of the labor income share. We revisit and extend previous empirical research on democratic political institutions and the labor share using a dataset of 112 countries over the period 1970–2015. Our empirical analysis shows that democracy allows workers to appropriate a higher share of national income. The evidence is robust to different indices of democracy and different periods of time, and after performing instrumental variable estimation. These results are particularly relevant today, in light of the recent global decline in the labor income share and current crisis of democracy.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The OECD sample is composed of today’s OECD member countries.
- 2.
For example, the Polity IV score for Switzerland is equal to its maximum since 1848.
- 3.
For example, Switzerland’s score ranges from a value of 23.04 to a value of 43.4 in the period 1970–2015.
- 4.
Some of the variables presented in this table are discussed in Sect. 5.
- 5.
Bolivia, Chile, Ecuador, Georgia, the Kyrgyz Republic, Mexico, Peru, Senegal, the Republic of Korea, Sri Lanka, and Thailand.
- 6.
Similar relationships are found with year-by-year scatter plots.
- 7.
No data is available for the dichotomous variable for the period 2010–2014.
- 8.
Only the results for oil exporters and the natural logarithm of GDP per capita are presented in the table.
- 9.
Rodrik’s (1999) article mainly focuses on wages and not the share of labour. However, among the various estimations, the author includes a panel data regression of the impact of democracy on the labour share. His estimated coefficients range from 11 to 41.
- 10.
Results not presented here.
- 11.
Results not presented here.
- 12.
According to the authors, less than 25% of value added.
- 13.
Where both the dichotomous variable switches from 0 to 1 and the Polity IV index exhibits a discontinuous change.
- 14.
In addition to the above suggestions, Young and Lawson (2014) instrument democracy with a measure of a country’s checks and balances (Keefer and Stasavage 2002; Keefer and Stasavage 2003). With respect to this measure, we argue that it is not exogenous, as it is itself a manifestation of the presence of democracy. For example, the extent of institutionalised constraints on the exercise of executive power is one of the components of the Polity IV index. As such, it may be correlated with the error term.
- 15.
- 16.
Relevant post-estimation tests have been performed, but not presented here.
References
Acemoglu, D. (2008). Oligarchic versus democratic societies. Journal of the European Economic Association, 6(1), 1–44.
Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2006). Economic origins of dictatorship and democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2015). The rise and decline of general laws of capitalism. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 29(1), 3–28.
Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., & Robinson, J. A. (2001). The colonial origins of comparative development: An empirical investigation. The American Economic Review, 91(5), 1369–1401.
Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., Robinson, J. A., & Yared, P. (2008). Income and democracy. The American Economic Review, 98(3), 808–842.
Acemoglu, D., Ticchi, D., & Vindigni, A. (2010). A theory of military dictatorships. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 2(1), 1–42.
Alesina, A., Devleeschauwer, A., Easterly, W., Kurlat, S., & Wacziarg, R. (2003). Fractionalization. Journal of Economic Growth, 8(2), 155–194.
Alesina, A., Easterly, W., & Matuszeski, J. (2011). Artificial states. Journal of the European Economic Association, 9(2), 246–277.
Alvarez, M., Cheibub, J. A., Limongi, F., & Przeworski, A. (1996). Classifying political regimes. Studies in Comparative International Development, 31(2), 3–36.
Amendola, A., Easaw, J., & Savoia, A. (2013). Inequality in developing economies: the role of institutional development. Public Choice, 155(1), 43–60.
Atkinson, A. B. (2009). factor shares: The principal problem of political economy? Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 25(1), 3–16.
Autor, D., Dorn, D., Katz, L. F., Patterson, C., & Van Reenen, J. (2017). Concentrating on the fall of the labor share. American Economic Review: Papers and Proceedings, 107(5), 180–185.
Barro, R. J. (1996). Democracy and growth. Journal of Economic Growth, 1, 1–27.
Barro, R. J. (1999). Determinants of democracy. Journal of Political Economy, 107(S6), 158–183.
Bates, R. H. (2008). The logic of state failure: learning from late-century Africa. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 25(4), 297–314.
Benhabib, J., Corvalan, A., & Spiegel, M. M. (2013). Income and democracy: evidence from nonlinear estimations. Economics Letters, 118(3), 489–492.
Bentolila, S.& Saint-Paul, G. (2003). Explaining movements in the labor share. The B.E. Journal of Macroeconomics, 3(1), 1–33.
Bernanke, B. S., & Gürkaynak, R. S. (2001). Is growth exogenous? taking mankiw, romer, and weil seriously. NBER Macroeconomics Annual, 16, 11–57.
Boix, C. (2003). Democracy and redistribution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bollen, K. A. (1990). Political democracy: conceptual and measurement traps. Studies in Comparative International Development, 25(1), 7–24.
Bollen, K. A., & Jackman, R. W. (1985). Political democracy and the size distribution of income. American Sociological Review, 50(4), 438–457.
Bourguignon, F., Ferreira, F., & Walton, M. (2007). Equity, efficiency and inequality traps: a research agenda. Journal of Economic Inequality, 5(2), 253–256.
Cheibub, J. A., Gandhi, J., & Vreeland, J. R. (2010). Democracy and dictatorship revisited. Public Choice, 143(1–2), 67–101.
Chong, A., & Calderón, C. (2000). Institutional quality and income distribution. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 48(4), 761–786.
Chong, A., & Gradstein, M. (2007). Inequality and institutions. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 89(3), 454–465.
Coppedge, M., Alvarez, A., & Maldonado, C. (2008). Two persistent dimensions of democracy: contestation and inclusiveness. Journal of Politics, 70(3), 632–647.
Daudey, E., & García-Peñalosa, C. (2007). The personal and the factor distributions of income in a cross-section of countries. Journal of Development Studies, 43(5), 812–829.
Denoon, D. (1983). Settler capitalism: The dynamics of dependent development in the southern hemisphere. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Dulleck, U. & Frijters, P. (2004). Why the US and not Brazil? Old Elites and the development of a modern economy. In Vienna Economics Papers 0406: University of Vienna, Department of Economics.
Easterly, W. (2001). The middle class consensus and economic development. Journal of Economic Growth, 6(4), 317–335.
Easterly, W., & Levine, R. (1997). Africa’s growth tragedy: policies and ethnic divisions. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(4), 1203–1250.
Elkins, Z. (2000). Gradations of democracy? empirical tests of alternative conceptualizations. American Journal of Political Science, 44(2), 293–300.
Epstein, D. L., Bates, R., Goldstone, J., Kristensen, I., & O’Halloran, S. (2006). Democratic transitions. American Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 551–569.
Fearon, J. D., & Laitin, D. D. (2003). Ethnicity, insurgency and civil war. American Political Science Review, 97(1), 75–90.
Feenstra, R. C., Inklaar, R., & Timmer, M. P. (2015). The next generation of the penn world table. American Economic Review, 105(10), 3150–3182.
Fields, G. S., & Wan, H. (1989). Wage-setting institutions and economic growth. World Development, 17(9), 1471–1483.
Freedom House (2017). Freedom in the World, Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press. https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world/freedom-world-2018
Gallup, J. L., Sachs, J. D., & Mellinger, A. D. (1999). Geography and economic development. International Regional Science Review, 22(2), 179–232.
Gerring, J., Bond, P. J., Barndt, W. T., & Moreno, C. (2005). Democracy and economic growth: A historical perspective. World Politics, 57(3), 323–364.
Glyn, A. (2009). Functional Distribution and Inequality. In W. Salverda, B. Nolvan, & T. M. Smeeding (Eds.), The oxford handbook of economic inequality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gollin, D. (2002). Getting income shares right. The Journal of Political Economy, 110(2), 458–474.
Gradstein, M., & Milanovic, B. (2004). Does Liberté = Egalité? A Survey of the Empirical Links between Democracy and Inequality with some Evidence on the Transition Economies, Journal of Economic Surveys, 18(4), 515–537.
Guerriero, M. (2019). The labor share of income around the world: Evidence from a panel dataset. In G. Fields, & S. Paul (Eds.), Labor income share in Asia: Conceptual issues and the drivers (ADB Institute Series on Development Economics). Singapore: Springer.
Guscina, A. (2006). Effects of globalization on labor’s share in national income. In IMF Working Paper 06/294, Washington: International Monetary Fund.
Hall, R. E., & Jones, C. I. (1999). Why do some countries produce so much more output per worker than others? The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(1), 83–116.
Harrison, A. (2002). Has globalization eroded labor’s share?. In UC Berkeley and NBER: Some Cross-Country Evidence.
Harrison, A., McLaren, J., & McMillan, M. (2011). Recent perspectives on trade and inequality. Annual Review of Economics, 3, 261–289.
Helliwell, J. F. (1994). Empirical linkages between democracy and economic growth. In NBER Working Paper n. 4066: National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
IMF (2017). Understanding the downward trend in labor income shares (Chapter 3). In World Economic Outlook, April 2017: Gaining Momentum?, Washington: International Monetary Fund.
Izyumov, A., & Vahaly, J. (2015). Income shares revisited. The Review of Income and Wealth, 61(1), 179–188.
Jaggers, K., & Gurr, T. R. (1995). Tracking democracy’s third wave with polity III. Journal of Peace Research, 32(4), 469–482.
Karabarbounis, L., & Neiman, B. (2013). The global decline of the labor share. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 129(1), 61–103.
Keefer, P., & Stasavage, D. (2002). Checks and balances, private information, and the credibility of monetary commitments. International Organization, 56(4), 751–774.
Keefer, P., & Stasavage, D. (2003). The limits of delegation: veto players, central bank independence, and the credibility of monetary policy. American Political Science Review, 97(3), 407–423.
Kristal, T. (2010). Good times, bad times: postwar labor’s share of national income in capitalist democracies. American Sociological Review, 75(5), 729–763.
Krueger, A. B. (1999). Measuring labor’s share. The American Economic Review, 89(2), 45–51.
LaPorta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (2008). The economic consequences of legal origin. Journal Of Economic Literature, 46(2), 285–332.
LaPorta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (1999). The quality of government. Journal of Law Economics and Organization, 15(1), 222–279.
Li, H., Squire, L., & Zou, H.-F. (1998). Explaining international and intertemporal variations in income inequality. The Economic Journal, 108(446), 26–43.
Marshall, M. & Jaggers, K. (2016). Polity IV Project: Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800–2015, Center for Systemic Peace. http://www.systemicpeace.org/inscrdata.html
McArthur, J. W. & Sachs, J. D. (2001). Institutions and geography: comment on acemoglu, johnson, and robinson. In NBER Working Paper 8114, National Bureau of Economic Research.
Midlarski, M. I. (1999). The evolution of inequality: war, state survival, and democracy in comparative perspective. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Munck, G. L., & Verkuilen, J. (2002). Conceptualizing and measuring democracy: evaluating alternative indices. Comparative Political Studies, 35(1), 5–34.
Palley, T. I. (2005). Labour standards, democracy and wages: some cross-country evidence. Journal of International Development, 17(7), 883–898.
Posner, D. N. (2004). Measuring ethnic fractionalization in Africa. American Journal of Political Science, 48(4), 849–863.
Przeworski, A., Alvarez, M. E., Cheibub, J. A., & Limongi, F. (2000). Democracy and development: political institutions and well-being in the world, 1950–1990. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Przeworski, A., Newman, S., Park, S. K., Queralt, D., Rivero, G. & Shin, K. J. (2013). Political institutions and political events (PIPE) data set, Department of Politics, New York University, New York.
Rodrik, D. (1999). Democracies pay higher wages. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(3), 707–738.
Savoia, A., Easaw, J., & McKay, A. (2010). Inequality, democracy and institutions: a critical review of recent research. World Development, 38(2), 142–154.
Schmitter, P. C., & Karl, T. L. (1991). What democracy is… and is not. Journal of Democray, 2(3), 75–88.
Stockhammer, E. (2017). Determinants of the wage share: a panel analysis of advanced and developing economies. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 55(1), 3–33.
Summers, R., & Heston, A. (1988). A new set of international comparisons of real product and price levels estimates for 130 countries, 1950–1985. Review of Income and Wealth, 34(1), 1–25.
Tebaldi, E., & Mohan, R. (2010). Institutions and poverty. Journal of Development Studies, 46(6), 1047–1066.
Timmons, J. F. (2010). Does democracy reduce economic inequality? British Journal of Political Science, 40(4), 741–757.
Vanhanen, T. (2000). A new dataset for measuring democracy, 1810–1998. Journal of Peace Research, 37(2), 251–265.
Vanhanen, T. (2003). Democratization. a comparative analysis of 170 countries: Routledge.
Vanhanen, T. (2016). Measures of democracy 1810–2014, finnish social science data archive. http://www.fsd.uta.fi/en/data/catalogue/FSD1289/meF1289e.html
Wright, J. (2008). Do authoritarian institutions constrain? how legislatures affect economic growth and investment. American Journal of Political Science, 52(2), 322–343.
Young, A. T., & Lawson, R. A. (2014). Capitalism and labour shares: a cross-country panel study. European Journal of Political Economy, 33, 20–36.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Asian Development Bank Institute
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Guerriero, M. (2019). Democracy and the Labor Share of Income: A Cross-Country Analysis. In: Fields, G., Paul, S. (eds) Labor Income Share in Asia. ADB Institute Series on Development Economics. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7803-4_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7803-4_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-7802-7
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-7803-4
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)