Skip to main content

Impact of Grid Model on Tropospheric Wet Refractivity Tomography in Multiplicative Algebraic Reconstruction Techniques

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
China Satellite Navigation Conference (CSNC) 2019 Proceedings (CSNC 2019)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering ((LNEE,volume 562))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1497 Accesses

Abstract

The ground-based GNSS has become a member of global meteorological composite observing system with superiority on the derivation of the atmosphere water vapor compared to traditional observation methods. Grid models decide the spatial distribution of the slant path penetrating the grids and greatly affect the tomography results which is key for further operational water vapor tomography to select optimal grid model in ground-based GNSS. The paper gives the effect of three different grid models on the convergence properties and tomography result in the multiplicative technique to reconstruct the 4D wet refractivity field of troposphere based on simulation method for Shenzhen-Hongkong (SH) GNSS network with data from 15th to 22th August, 2009. The results show that for SH tomography region, the fundamental irregular grid model induces the worst tomography result, for the extended grid model and fundamental regular grid model which one is better depends on the distribution of satellites related to the ground network during the specular time, if there are more slant path signal with low elevation angle coming in, the extended grid model can achieve better results, otherwise the fundamental regular one can get tomography results with higher precision since there are more unknown voxels and no improvement for SWD structure for the extended grid model. In a word, for SH region, the fundamental regular grid model can get best tomography results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alber C, Ware RH, Rocken C et al (2000) Inverting GPS double differences to obtain single path phase delays. Geophys Res Lett 27:2661–2664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bender M, Dick G, Ge M et al (2011a) Development of a GNSS water vapour tomography system using algebraic reconstruction techniques. Adv Space Res 47(10):1704–1720

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bender M, Stosiusa R, Zusa F et al (2011b) GNSS water vapour tomography - Expected improvements by combining GPS, GLONASS and Galileo observations. Adv Space Res 47(5):886–897

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bevis M, Businger S, Herring TA et al (1992) GPS meteorology: remote sensing of atmospheric water vapor using the global positioning system. J Geophys Res 97:15787–15801

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eresmaa R, Jarvinen H (2006) An observation operator for ground based GPS slant delays. Tellus A 58(1):131–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jin S, Luo OF, Park P (2008) GPS observations of the ionospheric F2-layer behavior during the 20th November 2003 geomagnetic storm over South Korea. J Geod 82(12):883–892. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-008-0217-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Notarpietro R, Cucca M, Gabella M et al (2011) Tomographic reconstruction of wet and total refractivity fields from GNSS receiver networks. Adv Space Res 47:898–912

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rocken C, Ware R, Van Hove T et al (1993) Sensing atmospheric water vapor with the global positioning system. Geophys Res Lett 20:2631–2634

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rohm W, Bosy J (2011) The verification of GNSS tropospheric tomography model in a mountainous area. Adv Space Res 47(10):1721–1730

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stolle C, Schluter S, Heise M et al (2006) A GPS based three-dimensional ionospheric imaging tool: process and assessment. Adv Space Res 38(11):2313–2317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2006.05.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang W, Wang J (2011) Tropospheric water vapor tomography based on algebraic reconstruction techniche. J Comput Appl 31(11):3149–3156

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study is funded by a National Natural Science Funds (Grant no. 41674036), NUIST Pre-Research Fund (Grant no. 2014x039), and Key Research & Development Program of Jiangsu Province of China (Grant no. BE2016020).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fuyang Ke .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Wang, X., Ke, F., Song, L., Cao, Y. (2019). Impact of Grid Model on Tropospheric Wet Refractivity Tomography in Multiplicative Algebraic Reconstruction Techniques. In: Sun, J., Yang, C., Yang, Y. (eds) China Satellite Navigation Conference (CSNC) 2019 Proceedings. CSNC 2019. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 562. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7751-8_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7751-8_24

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-7750-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-7751-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics