Abstract
The ground-based GNSS has become a member of global meteorological composite observing system with superiority on the derivation of the atmosphere water vapor compared to traditional observation methods. Grid models decide the spatial distribution of the slant path penetrating the grids and greatly affect the tomography results which is key for further operational water vapor tomography to select optimal grid model in ground-based GNSS. The paper gives the effect of three different grid models on the convergence properties and tomography result in the multiplicative technique to reconstruct the 4D wet refractivity field of troposphere based on simulation method for Shenzhen-Hongkong (SH) GNSS network with data from 15th to 22th August, 2009. The results show that for SH tomography region, the fundamental irregular grid model induces the worst tomography result, for the extended grid model and fundamental regular grid model which one is better depends on the distribution of satellites related to the ground network during the specular time, if there are more slant path signal with low elevation angle coming in, the extended grid model can achieve better results, otherwise the fundamental regular one can get tomography results with higher precision since there are more unknown voxels and no improvement for SWD structure for the extended grid model. In a word, for SH region, the fundamental regular grid model can get best tomography results.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Alber C, Ware RH, Rocken C et al (2000) Inverting GPS double differences to obtain single path phase delays. Geophys Res Lett 27:2661–2664
Bender M, Dick G, Ge M et al (2011a) Development of a GNSS water vapour tomography system using algebraic reconstruction techniques. Adv Space Res 47(10):1704–1720
Bender M, Stosiusa R, Zusa F et al (2011b) GNSS water vapour tomography - Expected improvements by combining GPS, GLONASS and Galileo observations. Adv Space Res 47(5):886–897
Bevis M, Businger S, Herring TA et al (1992) GPS meteorology: remote sensing of atmospheric water vapor using the global positioning system. J Geophys Res 97:15787–15801
Eresmaa R, Jarvinen H (2006) An observation operator for ground based GPS slant delays. Tellus A 58(1):131–140
Jin S, Luo OF, Park P (2008) GPS observations of the ionospheric F2-layer behavior during the 20th November 2003 geomagnetic storm over South Korea. J Geod 82(12):883–892. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-008-0217-x
Notarpietro R, Cucca M, Gabella M et al (2011) Tomographic reconstruction of wet and total refractivity fields from GNSS receiver networks. Adv Space Res 47:898–912
Rocken C, Ware R, Van Hove T et al (1993) Sensing atmospheric water vapor with the global positioning system. Geophys Res Lett 20:2631–2634
Rohm W, Bosy J (2011) The verification of GNSS tropospheric tomography model in a mountainous area. Adv Space Res 47(10):1721–1730
Stolle C, Schluter S, Heise M et al (2006) A GPS based three-dimensional ionospheric imaging tool: process and assessment. Adv Space Res 38(11):2313–2317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2006.05.016
Wang W, Wang J (2011) Tropospheric water vapor tomography based on algebraic reconstruction techniche. J Comput Appl 31(11):3149–3156
Acknowledgements
This study is funded by a National Natural Science Funds (Grant no. 41674036), NUIST Pre-Research Fund (Grant no. 2014x039), and Key Research & Development Program of Jiangsu Province of China (Grant no. BE2016020).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Wang, X., Ke, F., Song, L., Cao, Y. (2019). Impact of Grid Model on Tropospheric Wet Refractivity Tomography in Multiplicative Algebraic Reconstruction Techniques. In: Sun, J., Yang, C., Yang, Y. (eds) China Satellite Navigation Conference (CSNC) 2019 Proceedings. CSNC 2019. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 562. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7751-8_24
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7751-8_24
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-7750-1
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-7751-8
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)