Skip to main content

How Do I Handle Academic Integrity Issues?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Surviving and Thriving in Postgraduate Research
  • 1718 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter, we review the research imperative called “academic integrity”. Academic integrity relates primarily to accuracy, honesty, safety, truthfulness and adherence to the highest standards in all aspects of research undertaken and reported. Academic integrity issues can arise not only with your research contextualisation, positioning, configuration and data gathering, but also in the writing up, dissemination, and use of your research results. Issues such as maintaining confidentiality and ethical treatment of participants, storage of data, the appropriate recording and reporting of research findings, as well as concerns specific to the publication process in regard to plagiarism and authorship credit are implicated. As well, academic integrity encompasses how you relate to key stakeholders, groups and organisations that you are associated with or are reliant upon.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Academy of Management Code of Ethics. (2006). Academy of Management. Retrieved March 7, 2018, from http://aom.org/About-AOM/AOM-Code-of-Ethics.aspx#preamble.

  • Altman, E., & Hernon, P. (1997). Research misconduct issues implications and strategies. Greenwich, CN: Ablex Publishing Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Code for the Responsible Conduct of Research. (2018). National Health and Medical Research Council. Retrieved October 22, 2018, from https://nhmrc.gov.au/about-us/publications/australian-code-responsible-conduct-research-2018.

  • Ben-Yehuda, N., & Oliver-Lumerman, A. (2017). Fraud and misconduct in research. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, B. R. (2006). Doing your dissertation in business and management: The reality of researching and writing. London: Sage Publications.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • COPE. (2018). How to handle authorship disputes: A guide for new researcher. Retrieved October 21, 2018, from https://publicationethics.org/resources/guidelines-new/how-handle-authorship-disputesa-guide-new-researchers.

  • Copyright (New Technologies) Amendment Act. (2008). World Intellectual Property Organization. Retrieved March 7, 2018, from http://www.wipo.int/edocs/lexdocs/laws/en/nz/nz123en.pdf.

  • Copyright IP Australia. (2017). Australian Government. Retrieved March 7, 2018, from https://www.ipaustralia.gov.au/about-us/about-this-site/copyright.

  • Cryer, P. (2006). The research student’s guide to success (3rd ed.). Berkshire, UK: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, S., Fischer, B., Grinnell, F., & Zigmond, M. (2015). Perspectives on research integrity. Washington, DC: ASM Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Emmerich, N. (2018). Virtue ethics in the conduct and governance of social science research. Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, M., Hole, R., Berg, L. D., Hutchinson, P., & Sookraj, D. (2009). Common insights, differing methodologies: Toward a fusion of indigenous methodologies, participatory action research, and white studies in an urban aboriginal research agenda. Qualitative Inquiry, 15(5), 893–910.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faria, R. (2018). Research misconduct as white collar crime. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillian.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, D. C. (2003). When is a new submission “new”? Journal of Management, 29(2), 139–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godecharle, S., Nemery, B., & Dierickx, K. (2013). Guidence on research integrity: No union in Europe. The Lancet, 381(9872), 1097–1098.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Homan, R. (1991). The ethics of social research. New York: Addison-Wesley Longman Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphrey, L. (2017). Tearoom trade: Impersonal sex in public places. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Institute of Professional Editors Limited. Retrieved March 7, 2018, from http://iped-editors.org/.

  • Iphofen, R. (2017). Finding common ground consenus in research ethics across the social sciences. Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Israel, M. (2015). Research ethics and integrity for social scientists (2nd ed.). London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jerjes, W., Hamoudi, R., & Hopper, C. (2018). The power of research best practices and principles in research integrity and publication ethics. Amsterdam: Kugler Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimmel, A. J. (2007). Ethical issues in behavioural research: Basic and applied perspectives (2nd ed.). Malden, MA: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knowledge Assets and Intellectual Property Policy. (2015). University of New England. Retrieved March 7, 2018, from https://policies.une.edu.au/view.current.php?id=00117.

  • Macfarlance, B. (2009). Researching with integity. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, S., & Green, N. (2007). Your PhD companion: A handy mix of practical tips, sound advice and helpful commentary to see you through your PhD (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: How to Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, B. (1999). Suppressing research data: Methods, context, accountability, and responses. Accountability in Research, 6(4), 333–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, T., & Carroll, J. (2008). Academic and research misconduct in the Phd: Issues for students and supervisors. Nurse Education Today, 28(2), 218–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NHMRC. (2018). Ethical conduct in research with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples and communities: Guidelines for researchers and stakeholders. Canberra: The National Health and Medical Research Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • NHMRC, ARC, & UA. (2018). National statement on ethical conduct in human research 2007 (updated 2018). The National Health and Medical Research Council, the Australian Research Council and Universities Australia. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholas-Casebolt, A. (2012). Research integrity and responsible conduct of research (building social work research capacity). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pacific Health Research Guidelines. (2014). The Health Research Council of New Zealand. Retrieved March 7, 2018, from https://gateway.hrc.govt.nz/funding/downloads/Pacific_health_research_guidelines.pdf.

  • Petre, M., & Rugg, G. (2010). The unwritten rules of PhD research. Open up study skills (2nd ed.). Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polonsky, J. M., & Waller, S. D. (2015). Designing and managing a research project: A business student’s guide (3rd ed.). Los Angeles: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seadle, M. (2017). Quantifying research integrity. San Raphael, CA: Morgan and Claypool Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shamoo, A., & Resnik, D. (2014). Responsible conduct of research (3rd ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sibinga, C. (2018). Ensuring research integrity and the ethical management of data. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sieber, J. E., & Tolich, M. B. (2013). Planning ethically responsible research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Simmerling, M., Schwegler, B., Sieber, J. E., & Lindgren, J. (2007). Introducing a new paradigm for ethical research in the social, behavioural and bio-medical sciences: Part 1. Northwestern University Law Review, 101(2), 837–859.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staw, B. M. (1975). Attribution of the “causes” of performance: A general alternative interpretation of cross-sectional research on organizations. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 13(3), 414–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steneck, N. (2007). ORI introduction to the responsible conduct of research (Rev. ed.). Washington, DC: Office of Research Integrity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, E. F. (1981). Research methods in organisational behavior. Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thody, A. (2006). Writing and presenting research. London: Sage Publications.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • The Tuskegee Timeline. (2017). Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Retrieved March 6, 2018, from https://www.cdc.gov/tuskegee/timeline.htm.

  • U.S. Public Health Service Syphilis Study at Tuskegee. (2015). Retrieved October 21, 2018, from https://www.cdc.gov/tuskegee/index.html.

  • Unitec Human Research Ethics Guidelines. (2014). Unitec Institute of Technology. Retrieved March 6, 2018, from http://www.unitec.ac.nz/epress/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/unitec-human-research-ethics-guidelines.pdf.

  • University of Pittsburgh Guidelines on Research Data Management. (2009). University of Pittsburgh. Retrieved March 7, 2018, from http://www.provost.pitt.edu/documents/RDM_Guidelines.pdf.

  • Van Der Weyden, M. B. (2006). Preventing and processing research misconduct: A new Australian code for responsible research. Medical Journal of Australia, 184(9), 430–431.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodfield, K. (2018). The ethics of online research. Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolston, C. (2002). When a mentor becomes a thief. Retrieved October 6, 2018, from https://www.sciencemag.org/careers/2002/05/when-mentor-becomes-thief.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ray Cooksey .

Appendix: Information to Include in a Participant Information Sheet

Appendix: Information to Include in a Participant Information Sheet

It is all too easy to manipulate a person’s informed and voluntary consent by exploiting their ignorance, fears and respect for experts or superiors. Applications for projects must therefore be accompanied by Participant Information Sheets that describe, in the participant’s language, the essential points which any reasonable person would wish to know before agreeing to participate in research, including:

  • The date the participant information sheet was produced.

  • The project title.

  • The names of the supervisor(s) for the project and the host institution for the research.

  • The name(s) of the researcher(s) who will actually make direct contact with the participants.

  • A statement of what the research is about and the purpose of the research.

  • An invitation to participate and a description of what they are being asked to do.

  • An explanation of how they were chosen to receive an invitation.

  • What the likely consequences are for them should they participate (describe what the discomforts, risks, and or time commitment could be).

  • What the benefits for them might be (indicate any likely benefits), including any incentive or reward to be provided for participating.

  • Indicate that they can receive feedback on the results (if desired, they can receive a summary of the results).

  • What will happen in this research (where, when and how frequently the data will be gathered from them).

  • Any special conditions of the research that might affect their participation (indicate whether there will be audio-taping or video-recording).

  • Indicate that there will be no disadvantages/penalties/adverse consequences related to not participating or to withdrawing from the research.

  • A statement of how privacy will be protected and how confidentiality or anonymity of information will be preserved (provide a schedule for the destruction of any personal identifying information, in the case of confidentiality).

  • What opportunity do they have to consider this invitation? (Give a time frame for them to consider).

  • How do they agree to participate in the research? (Need to complete the attached Consent Form).

  • Indicate that research ethics approval has been given (provide a copy of the University’s Research Ethics Approval Statement and/or approval number).

  • Who they can contact for further information or if they have concerns (provide a means, for example, a telephone number or email address by which participants are able to contact the researcher(s), the principal supervisor and or the secretary of the university’s Research Ethics Committee) (adapted from Participant Information Sheet Exemplar, Auckland University of Technology https://www.aut.ac.nz/research/researchethics/forms).

Note: There are some cases where it is not appropriate to provide a written information sheet, for example, when dealing with young children or adults who are illiterate, it would be more appropriate to provide them with a verbal explanation. A Dialogue Statement of the verbal information that will be communicated should be provided.

In order to be more engaging, an information sheet can be set up as a question and answer sheet by modifying the points above into questions, as if being asked by participants, and including responses from the researchers. It is also acceptable to present a consolidated information sheet and consent form, as long as the participants are provided with a copy of the document and have been given an opportunity to reflect on the document before indicating their consent.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Cooksey, R., McDonald, G. (2019). How Do I Handle Academic Integrity Issues?. In: Surviving and Thriving in Postgraduate Research. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7747-1_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7747-1_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-7746-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-7747-1

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics