Abstract
In this chapter, we show that in order to make your research feasible and realistically achievable, you need to make scoping and shaping choices, pertaining to the nature of the research activities that you will use to gather the evidence you need and configuring choices, pertaining to the patterns and connections between those research activities. Such choices move you toward the ‘pointy end’ of research where you assemble the evidence you need to address your research questions/hypotheses. Appropriately scoping, shaping and configuring research will typically require adaptations and trade-offs in response to impediments or constraints you experience or can foresee down the track in order to achieve project feasibility. We also argue that you may, in addition, need to build up some type of conceptual framework to help guide your scoping, shaping and configuring activities.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Alfawaz, A. (2015). Recruitment and selection practices for female administrative officers in Saudi public sector universities. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, UNE Business School, University of New England, Armidale, NSW
Anderson, B. F., Deane, D. H., Hammond, K. R., McClelland, G. H., & Shanteau, J. C. (1981). Concepts in judgement and decision making: Definitions, sources, interrelations, comments. New York: Praeger Publishers.
Azorín, J. M., & Cameron, R. (2010). The application of mixed methods in organisational research: A literature review. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 8(2), 95–105.
Braund, M. (2001). Understanding public perceptions of police in the ACT through observations of police-public turf interactions and surveys of the public. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Department of Marketing and Management, University of New England, Armidale, NSW.
Cavana, R. Y., Delahaye, B. L., & Sekaran, U. (2001). Applied business research: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Milton, QLD, Australia: Wiley.
Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
Cooksey, R. W. (2014). Illustrating statistical procedures: Finding meaning in quantitative data (2nd ed.). Prahran, VIC: Tilde University Press.
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Cryer, J. D., & Chan, K.-S. (2008). Time series analysis: With applications in R. New York: Springer.
Fieger, P. (2015). Efficiency and effectiveness in the Australian Technical and Further Education system. unpublished Ed.D. portfolio, UNE Business School, University of New England, NSW.
Fisher, C. (2007). Researching and writing a dissertation: A guidebook for business students (2nd ed.). Essex, UK: Pearson Education.
Flick, U. (2018). Triangulation. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (5th ed., pp. 444–461). Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
Glaser, B. (1992). The basics of grounded theory analysis. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
Glass, G. V., Willson, V. L., & Gottman, J. N. M. (2008). Design and analysis of time-series experiments. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
Gregson, W. (2016). Harnessing sources of innovation, useful knowledge and leadership within a complex public sector agency network: A reflective practice perspective. Unpublished Ph.D.I portfolio, UNE Business School, University of New England, Armidale, NSW.
Harrison, J. (2003). Information scope in small service firms: A comparison of universalistic, contingency and configurational theoretical approaches. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of New England, Armidale, NSW.
Henryks, J. (2009). Organic foods, choice and consumer context: An exploration of switching behavior. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, School of Business, Economics and Public Policy, University of New England, Armidale, NSW.
Jick, T. D. (1979). Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: Triangulation in action. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24(4), 602–611.
Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14–26.
Kaptchuk, T. J. (2001). The double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial: gold standard or golden calf? Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 54(6), 541–549.
Kincheloe, J. L. (2005). On to the next level: Continuing the conceptualization of the bricolage. Qualitative Inquiry, 11(3), 323–350.
Maxwell, J. A. (2005). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach (2nd ed.). London: Sage Publications.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (3rd ed.). Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
Morse, J. M., Stern, P. N., Corbin, J., Bowers, B., Charmaz, K., & Clarke, A. E. (2009). Developing grounded theory: The second generation. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
Muchiri, M. (2006). Transformational leader behaviours, social processes of leadership and substitutes for leadership and their relationships with employee commitment, organisational efficacy and citizenship behaviours. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, New England Business School, University of New England, Armidale, NSW.
Patton, M. Q. (2011). Developmental evaluation: Applying complexity concepts to enhance innovation and use. New York: The Guilford Press.
Ross, E. (1999). Academics’ perceptions of university culture and the factors that facilitate or inhibit commitment to it. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Department of Marketing and Management, University of New England, Armidale, NSW.
Sandall, J. (2006). Navigating pathways through complex systems of interacting problems: Strategic management of native vegetation policy. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, New England Business School, University of New England, Armidale, NSW.
Smyth, R., & Maxwell, T. W. (2008). The research matrix: An approach to supervision of higher degree research. Milperra, NSW: Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australia.
Spector, P. E. (2006). Method variance in organizational research truth or urban legend? Organizational Research Methods, 9(2), 221–232.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). The basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. London: Sage Publications.
Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (Eds.). (2010). Sage handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2011). Mixed methods research: Contemporary issues in an emerging field. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (pp. 285–299). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Wolodko, K. (2017). The emergence of group dynamics from contextualised social processes: A complexity-oriented grounded-theory approach. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, UNE Business School, University of New England, Armidale, NSW.
Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cooksey, R., McDonald, G. (2019). How Do I Scope, Shape and Configure My Research Project?. In: Surviving and Thriving in Postgraduate Research. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7747-1_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7747-1_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-7746-4
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-7747-1
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)