Skip to main content

How Do I Frame and Conceptualise My Research Problem and Questions?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Surviving and Thriving in Postgraduate Research
  • 1981 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter presents the concept of research frames (i.e., Action Research, Case Study, Evaluation, Survey, Cross-Cultural, Indigenous, Transdisciplinary, Developmental Evaluation, Explanatory, Exploratory, Descriptive, Feminist) as ways of providing more holistic pictures of how your research purposes can/will be translated into research strategies and tactics that will generate or apply knowledge and learning that will speak to and influence specific audiences. We show that research frames emerge from the dynamic and synergistic intersection of researcher positioning, research contexts, participants’ contexts and positioning and research sponsor/reader/user contexts, all embedded within the larger social, political and physical worlds. We then discuss strategies for identifying and clarifying researchable problems and for appropriately setting out your research questions and/or hypotheses in the context of your chosen research frame(s).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adapa, S. (2010). An investigation of the factors influencing the continued and frequent use of internet banking by Australian consumers. Unpublished PhD thesis, School of Economics, Business & Public Policy, University of New England, Armidale, NSW.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alghannam, Z. (2016). Importing western human resource systems and practices into a Saudi company: A case study analysis. Unpublished PhD thesis, UNE Business School, University of New England, Armidale, NSW.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allard-Poesi, F., & Marechal, C. (2001). Constructing the research problem. In R.-A. Thietart (Ed.), Doing management research: A comprehensive guide (pp. 31–50). London: Sage Publications.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Babbie, E. (2011). The basics of social research (5th ed.). Belmont: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bamberger, M., Rugh, J., & Mabry, L. (2012). RealWorld evaluation: Working under budget, time, data, and political constraints (2nd ed.). Los Angeles: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergmann, M., Jahn, T., Knobloch, T., Krohn, W., Pohl, C., & Schramm, E. (2012). Methods for transdisciplinary research: A primer for practice. Frankfurt: Campus Verlag. (translated from the original German edition by RC Faust).

    Google Scholar 

  • Browne, K., & Nash, C. J. (Eds.). (2010). Queer methods and methodologies: Intersecting queer theories and social science research. London: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, A., & Charmaz, K. (Eds.). (2007). The Sage handbook of grounded theory. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buzan, T. (2003). The mind map book (Rev ed.). London: BBC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buzan, T. (2018). Mind map mastery. London: Watkins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavana, R. Y., Delahaye, B. L., & Sekaran, U. (2001). Applied business research: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Milton, QLD, Australia: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chilisa, B. (2012). Indigenous research methodologies. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coghlan, D., & Brannick, T. (2014). Doing action research in your own organization (4th ed.). London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, T. D., Campbell, D. T., & Peracchio, L. (1990). Quasi-experimentation. In M. D. Dunnette & Hough, L. M. (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 491–576). Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooksey, R. W. (2011). Yours, mine or ours: What counts as innovation? Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 17(3), 283–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, P. (2006). Exploratory research. In V. Jupp (Ed.), The Sage dictionary of social research methods (pp. 110–111). London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Vaus, D. (2008). Comparative and cross-national designs. In P. Alasuutari, L. Bickman, & J. Brannen (Eds.), The Sage handbook of social research methods (pp. 249–264). London: Sage Publications.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, S. I., Christie, C. A., & Mark, M. M. (2009). What counts as credible evidence in applied research and evaluation practice?. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dul, J., & Hak, T. (2008). Case study methodology in business research. Oxford: Butterworth-Heineman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ember, C. R., & Ember, M. (2009). Cross-cultural research methods. Lanham: AltaMira Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fear, F. A., Rosaen, C. L., Bawden, R. J., & Foster-Fuishman, P. G. (2006). Coming to critical engagement: An autoethnographic exploration. Lanham: University Press of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fieger, P. (2015). Efficiency and effectiveness in the Australian Technical and Further Education system. unpublished EdD portfolio, UNE Business School, University of New England, NSW.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, C. (2007). Researching and writing a dissertation: A guidebook for business students (2nd ed.). Essex: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, F. J. (2014). Survey research methods (5th ed.). Los Angeles: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, D. E. (2014). Doing research in the real world (3rd ed.). Los Angeles: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, D. J., & Levin, M. (2007). Introduction to action research: Social research for social change (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gregson, W. (2016). Harnessing sources of innovation, useful knowledge and leadership within a complex public sector agency network: A reflective practice perspective. Unpublished PhD.I portfolio, UNE Business School, University of New England, Armidale, NSW.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harkness, J. A., Braun, M., Edwards, B., Johnson, T. P., Lyberg, L., Mohler, P. P., et al. (2010). Survey methods in multinational, multiregional, and multicultural contexts. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hesse-Biber, S. N. (Ed.). (2012). Handbook of feminist research: Theory and praxis. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hesse-Biber, S. N. (2014). Feminist research practice: A primer (2nd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kazdin, A. E. (2011). Single-case research designs: Methods for clinical and applied settings (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kehm, B. M. (2006). Doctoral education in Europe and North America: A comparative analysis. Wenner Gren International Series, 83, 67–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, R. (2002a). When to use creativity. In T. Greenfield (Ed.), Research methods for postgraduates (2nd ed., pp. 121–125). London: Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, R. (2002b). Synthesis and evaluation of creativity. In T. Greenfield (ed.), Research methods for postgraduates (2nd ed., pp. 126–136). London: Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, R. (2002c). Software and websites for creativity. In T. Greenfield (ed.), Research methods for postgraduates (2nd ed., pp. 137–140). London: Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kovach, M. (2009). Indigenous methodologies: Characteristics, conversations, and contexts. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krosnick, J. A. (1999). Survey research. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 537–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, V. A., & Lambert, C. E. (2012). Qualitative descriptive research: An acceptable design. Pacific Rim International Journal of Nursing Research, 16(4), 255–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lang, D. J., Wiek, A., Bergmann, M., Stauffacher, M., Martens, P., Moll, P., et al. (2012). Transdisciplinary research in sustainability science: Practice, principles, and challenges. Sustainability Science, 7(1), 25–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leavy, P. (2011). Essentials of transdisciplinary research: Using problem-centred methodologies. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Letherby, G. (2011). Feminist methodology. In M. Williams & W. P. Vogt (Eds.), The Sage handbook of innovation in social research methods (pp. 62–79). Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Liamputtong, P. (2010). Performing qualitative cross-cultural research. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, K., & Mirraboopa, M. (2003). Ways of knowing, being and doing: A theoretical framework and methods for indigenous and indigenist re-search. Journal of Australian Studies, 27(76), 203–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre, A. (2008). Participatory action research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mittal, V. (2011). Descriptive research. In J. Sheth & N. Malhotra (Eds.), Wiley international encyclopedia of marketing (Vol. 2). New York: Wiley. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/9781444316568.wiem02002/full.

  • Muchiri, M. (2006). Transformational leader behaviours, social processes of leadership and substitutes for leadership as predictors of employee commitment, efficacy, citizenship behaviours and performance outcomes. Unpublished PhD thesis, New England Business School, University of New England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, R. (2005). Doctoral differences: Professional doctorates and PhDs compared. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 27(2), 173–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholls, R. (2009). Research and indigenous participation: Critical reflexive methods. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 12(2), 117–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M. Q. (2011). Developmental evaluation: Applying complexity concepts to enhance innovation and use. New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M. Q. (2012). Essentials of utilization-focused evaluation. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M. Q., McKegg, K., & Wehipeihana, N. (Eds.). (2015). Developmental evaluation exemplars: Principles in practice. New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Punch, K. (2003). Survey research: The basics. London: Sage Publications.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Quinton, S., & Smallbone, T. (2006). Postgraduate research in business: A critical guide. London: Sage Publications.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Robson, M. (2011). The use and disclosure of intuition(s) by leaders in Australian organisations: A grounded theory. Unpublished PhD thesis, School of Economics, Business & Public Policy, University of New England, Armidale, NSW.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruel, E. E., Wagner, W. E., & Gillespie, B. J. (2015). The practice of survey research: Theory and applications. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, L. T. (2012). Decolonizing methods: Research and indigenous peoples (2nd ed.). London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smyth, R., & Maxwell, T. W. (2008). The research matrix: An approach to supervision of higher degree research. Milperra, NSW: Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stebbins, R. A. (2001). Exploratory research in the social sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sue, V. M., & Ritter, L. A. (2007). Conducting online surveys. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tharenou, P., Donohue, R., & Cooper, B. (2007). Management research methods. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tripodi, S., & Bender, K. (2010). Descriptive studies. In B. Thyer (Ed.), The handbook of social work research methods (2nd ed., pp. 120–130). Los Angeles: Sage Publications.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Walter, M., & Anderson, C. (2013). Indigenous statistics: A quantitative research methodology. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, P. (2009). Developing research questions: A guide for social scientists. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ray Cooksey .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Cooksey, R., McDonald, G. (2019). How Do I Frame and Conceptualise My Research Problem and Questions?. In: Surviving and Thriving in Postgraduate Research. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7747-1_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7747-1_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-7746-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-7747-1

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics